Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How it
impacts financial decisions regarding project management?
At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value
(NPV) case study solution. Black River Farms case study is a Harvard Business School
(HBR) case study written by David Currie, Kyle S. Meyer. The Black River Farms
(referred as “Cow Calf” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision
scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business
topics such as - Value proposition, .
The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the
proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is
greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.
NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment
In 2016, the owner of a cow-calf operation must decide what the appropriate weight
for cows in their herd is. For decades, the national trend has been for cow weights to
increase because they produce larger calves, but evidence indicates that cow weights
may have reached the point where the cost of maintaining a larger cow has become
greater than the return from producing a larger calf. Analyzing this issue introduces
marginal principles from economics. Formerly "Old Mule Farms," product no.
9B10B004. The authors David M. Currie and Kyle S. Meyer are affiliated with Rollins
College.
Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Black
River Farms Case Study
Discount
Cumulative Rate Discounted
Years Cash Flow Net Cash Flow Cash Flow @6% Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027495) -10027495 - -
Year 1 3472131 -6555364 3472131 0.9434 3275595
Year 2 3959131 -2596233 7431262 0.89 3523612
Year 3 3938306 1342073 11369568 0.8396 3306678
Year 4 3238222 4580295 14607790 0.7921 2564975
TOTAL 14607790 1267086
The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2643366
In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is
one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -
To overcome such scenarios managers at Cow Calf needs to not only know the
financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate
them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.
In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance
managers at Cow Calf, then the stock price of the Cow Calf should change by same
amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other
factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.
In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant
share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in
the project execution process.
Sensitivity Analysis
Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on
the NPV number. Finance managers at Cow Calf should conduct a sensitivity analysis
to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those
risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity
analysis helps in –
What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s
often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other
equipment.
What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and
retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.
David Currie, Kyle S. Meyer (2018), "Black River Farms Harvard Business Review
Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.