Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NEW RIGHT
Underclass
● The underclass is the segment of the population that occupies the
lowest possible position in a class hierarchy, below the working-class
● Charles Murray – an underclass is emerging in modern western
societies
● A group whose attitudes and values are different from tose of
mainstream society
● NR approach identified the emergence (development) of the
‘underclass’
● Underclass experience long term poverty and are unable to gain a living
AO3i
Gallie (1994)
Charlesworth (1999)
Young (2003)
AO3ii
● Gallie (1994)
● Charlesworth (1999)
● Young (2003)
● New Right thinkers see the family as the cornerstone of society. They
also see a ‘normal’ and ‘ideal’ family as the heterosexual nuclear family
unit. They see the family structure changes as a concern about the state
of the family
AO3iii
● Neale states that rising diversity leads to a less judgmental society as
we become more accepting of all sorts of family structures and
relationships and this reduces morality based judgements.
● Chester maintains that the dominant ideology which stresses the
nuclear family ideal leads to negative labelling of one parent families by
social agencies such as teachers, social workers, housing departments,
police and courts which may result in a self fulfilling prophecy. He
rejects the New Right assertion that inferior parenting is the cause of
problems with children.
● Young (2003)
AO1iv – Hirschi
● Hirschi looks at way the majority of people do not commit crime
● Social bonds of attachment
● Another key sociologist to be influenced by Emile Durkheim and the
concept of anomie is Travis Hirschi . Influenced by Functionalists but
comes under New Right.
● Instead of asking why people commit deviance he asks why most
people do not
● To answer this, he argues, we need to understand what forces maintain
conformity for most people in society.
● Rather than the factors that drive a minority into deviant behaviour.
AO3iv
● Sometimes social bonds can be used to explain deviance
● For example, attachment can actually lead people into crime because of
loyalty to their peer group or subculture
● The need to support a family in financial trouble can cause, say,
shoplifting while attachment to a subculture can encourage drug-taking
for example
● Like all functionalist theorists, Hirschi assumes a set of shared values in
society – other perspectives such as Marxism would disagree with this
view
● Limitations of statistics
● Contrasting theory
General evaluation
● Under-emphasises the causes of crime; it is reacting to the
phenomenon of crime and seeking to prevent it without a large enough
body of empirical evidence as to whether patterns of crime are related
to age, gender or ethnicity
● They do not provide any research into metrics of success or failure for
proactive policing and education as a system for imparting values
● They are not interested in corporate crime, white-collar crime, political
crime, or state crime
● They focus on young males and street crime, but are they really the
most dangerous and harmful to society? Or should corporate crime and
domestic crime be given more prevalence?
Outline the New Right view of crime and deviance in society. [10]
New Right sociologists developed the idea of an emerging ‘underclass’ which is the lowest
possible position in the hierarchy and is when an individual experiences prolonged poverty and
low standards of living. Charles Murray stated that the characteristics of the underclass were
illegitimate births, high crime rates and economic inactivity. Murray suggested that the welfare
state created dependency and that there were contradictory incentives in the welfare system
which could encourage single parenthood and discourage working for a living. Births outside
marriage are the leading indicator of an underclass as these illegitimate births lead to lone
parents families which are seen as undesirable. Murray stated that the welfare state has created
a 'dependency culture', which results in the weakening of the work ethic. The result is a social
sickness, which reduces the strength of society’s moral values and mechanisms of social control
which are essential for preventing criminal behaviour.
New Right sociologists also believe that crime and deviance is linked to the breakdown of
society. Marsland states that schools and religion have become less effective as agencies of
social control in contemporary society, as previously these agents were what maintained
authority. This ultimately led to a decline in morality and crime increased. A decline in religious
beliefs meant that people do not have the same morals, and as some religions forbid sex before
marriage, a decline in religious beliefs meant that there was a rise in illegitimate births. Durkheim
advocated that institutions such as the family make society and that without them, society
breaks down. School plays an effective role in secondary socialisation, and so a decline in
education use meant that youth seeked for other ways of gaining an income, and this was done
through various criminal activities. This also may lead to less people in employment, and so
increasing the reliance on the state, eventually forming an underclass. Marsland supports Murray
in his view that the Welfare State is responsible for the emergence of this underclass because
welfare dependency has undermined people’s sense of commitment and obligation to support
each other.