You are on page 1of 1

Read the excerpts below then do a comparative analysis.

The following readings discuss the findings on the remains of what was then considered the earliest known human
remains in the Philippines – Tabon Man.

Tabon Man – During the initial excavations of Tabon Man – The earliest human skull remains
Tabon Cave, June and July, 1962, the scattered fossil known in the Philippines are the fossilized fragments of a
bones of at least three individuals were excavated, skull and jawbone of three individuals who are
including a large fragment of frontal bon with the brows collectively called “Tabon Man” after the place where
and portions of the nasal bones. These fossil bones were they were found on the west coast of Palawan. Tabon
recovered towards the rear of the cave along the left Cave appears to be a kind of little Stone Age factory:
wall. Unfortunately, the area in which the human fossil both finished tools and waste cores and flakes have been
bones were discovered has been disturbed by Magapode found at four different levels in the main chamber.
birds. It was not possible in 1962 to establish the Charcoal left from cooking fires has been recovered from
association of these bones with a specific flake three of these assemblages and dated by C-14 to roughly
assemblage. Although they were provisionally related to 7,000 B.C., 20,000 B.C., and 28,000 B.C. with an earlier
either Flake Assemblage II or III, subsequent excavations level lying so far below these that it must represent
in the same area now strongly suggest that the fossil Upper Pleistocene dates like 45 or 50 thousand years
human bones were associated with Flake Assemblage III ago… Physical anthropologists who have examined the
for only the flakes of this assemblage have been found to Tabon skullcap are agreed that it belonged to modern
date in this area of the cave. The available data would man – that is, Homo sapiens as distinguished from those
suggest that Tabon Man may be dated from 22,000 to mid-Pleistocene species nowadays called Homo erectus.
24,000 years ago. But, only further excavations in the Two experts have given the further opinion that the
cave and chemical analysis of human and animal bones mandible is “Australian” in physical type, and that the
from disturbed and undisturbed levels in the cave will skullcap measurements are mostly nearly like those of
define the exact age of the human fossils. Ainus and Tasmanians. What this basically means is that
Tabon Man was “pre-Mongoloid,” Mongoloid being the
The fossil bones are those of Homo sapiens.
term anthropologists apply to the racial stock which
These will form a separate study by a specialist which
entered Southeast Asia during the Holocene and
will be included in the final site report for Tabon Cave. It
absorbed earlier peoples to produce the Modern Malay,
is important, however, because of a recent publication
Indonesian, Filipino, and Pacific peoples popularly –
(Scott, 1969), that a preliminary study of the fossil bones
and unscientifically – called, the “brown race.” Tabon
of Tabon Man shows that it is above average in skull
Man presumably belonged to one of those earlier
dimensions when compared to the modern Filipino.
peoples, but, if decently clothed in flesh, T-shirt, and blue
There is no evidence that Tabon Man was “…a less
jeans, might pass unnoticed in Quiapo today, whatever
brainy individual…” [Scott (1969) 36]. Moreover,
his facial features are concerned, nothing can be said
Scott’s study includes many misstatements about the
about the color of his skin or hair, or the shape of his
Tabon Caves, always the problem when writer’s work
nose or eyes – except one thing: Tabon Man was not a
from “conversations”.
Negrito.

Robert B. Fox. The Tabon Caves: Archeological


William Henry Scott. Prehispanic Source Materials for
Explorations and Excavations on Palawan Island,
the Study of Philippine History. (Revised Edition)
Philippines (Manila, 1970) p. 40
(Quezon City, 1984), pp.14-15.

You might also like