Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Theories of Acquisition
Theories of Acquisition
Theories of Acquisition
SLA Theories
Th •Conditioning •Creative
Creative constructivism
•“pivot” grammar
•Reinforcement
•Parallel Distribution
Primitive Stage
Naive Stage
Syntagmatic Paradigmatic
• Babbling is an example of the primitive stage of • The child learns how to say words before he learns their meaning
g g development.
language p The sounds pproduced serve and function. An example of this manifestation is “ball”. To the child
thi one wordd can mean a variety
this i t off things
thi g ((“where
h iis my bball
ll”, “gi
give
no real purpose except to produce the sound and me the ball”, etc.). As the child develops and gains understanding of
experiment with our new capability. As the baby new words, he begins to produce naïve sentences like “where ball”
and “where is the ball.” The child uses these structures without any
does not produce speech, there is also no verbal understanding of how to put a sentence together or why the words
thought, or internal monologue. This does not mean must go in that order. He only knows that when the words are said in
a certain way, others understand his meaning. Understanding of
the baby does not think, it only means that the word order comes about before the child learns the logic of how the
child has not yet internalized his speech. words fit in that order.
• Lenneberg
• Age of acquisition
hard versus soft
wiring of language
•Innate Predisposition
depends on age of learner •Stimuli: linguistic
responses
•Systematic, rule-governed
acquisition
• Age of acquisition •Conditioning •Creative
Creative constructivism
L1 L2
CUP Issues
L1 L2
Bicycle Model
Language Transition
•BICS
CALP CALP BICS
It’s
It’slanguage!
a aplain!
It’s word!
•CALP
BICS
Fossilization
Cross-linguistic Influence
• Relatively permanent incorporation of
• Prior experience with language incorrect linguistic forms in SLA.
plays a significant role in SLA. • Normal stage for many SLA learners.
• L1 influences L2 learning. • Can also come from Functional Ceiling
• L1 phonology
h l predicts
d llearner
performance in L2.
• Great difference does not
always cause great difficulty.
English Spanish
Form: Be
Have
he (D1)
he (D1)
Ser
Hacer/tener/estar/etc.
Functionalist Theory (Krashen)
Example: Is he a farmer? ¿Es un campesino?
Has he a cat? ¿Tiene un gato?
Krashen’s Model
Krashen’s Input Hypothesis
Is a set of five interrelated hypotheses:
• The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis
• The Monitor Hypothesis
• The Natural Order Hypothesis
• The Input Hypothesis
• The Affective Filter Hypothesis
Stage 1 Pre-production
Early Production
Speech emergence
Comprehensible Input
1. Use visual cues. 13. Provide guided practice.
2. Demonstrate.
14. Be friendly and enthusiastic.
3. Use simpler syntax. Informal Formal
15. Stress participatory learning.
4. Preview, view, review.
16. Use fewer pronouns.
5. Use hands-on activities.
Context Context
17. Build upon prior
6. Use shorter sentences. Embedded Reduced
experiences
experiences.
7. Maintain a warm affect.
60 Form al After 5
Entry/Exit Criteria For LEP
Anglo child English instruction years of
instruction
begins
exposure12 hours awake 55
25
LEP
21,900 ESL
20 Below 36%ile on EXIT
Anglo child English achievement test Monitor 2 years
exposure 14 hours each 15
16,425 ELL LAS 5 Score
WM 4-5
day x 365 x 5 years 10
5,495
5
Hispanic child English
exposure 9 hours each
B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
day x 365 x 5 years K 1
st
2
nd
3
rd
4
th
5
th
6
th
7
th
8
th
9
th
Climate of Context
Leaves of
Comprehension
Spotlights
& Production
Strategies
Fruits of
Teeacher Talk
Othher Students
Materials
Branches of
Affective Performance
Nonverbal
Texttbooks
Variables
What am I
going to
do??!
Germination
Strategies
Seeds of
Predisposition
Roots of
Competence
Activities
Key Learning