Professional Documents
Culture Documents
23k156 Fy18 Ecers-R
23k156 Fy18 Ecers-R
The ECERS-R is an observational tool used to assess early childhood learning environments. The ECERS-R incorporates a wide range
of quality indicators and has been used in major studies of early childhood programs throughout the United States, across cultures,
and internationally. This research has shown a consistent relationship between ECERS-R scores and a wide range of child
developmental outcomes, and, as a result, the DECE has used ECERS-R to understand pre-K quality since the 2010-2011 school year.
The ECERS-R looks for markers of quality across six subscales, which are further broken into 37 items. Information about the ECERS-R
tool and how it relates to the Quality Standards is shown in the chart below:
Page 1 of 21
P.S. 156 Waverly 2017-18 ECERS-R Results
The table below outlines your scores for each item on the scale. Further explanation of each item scored below a 5 is included on the pages
to follow. The graph shows scores for each subscale compared to the NYC average. When considering ECERS-R scores, it is important to
note that any individual requirement of the scale is far less important than the overall average score. The overall average score is related to
positive child development outcomes, not any single indicator or item.
Key
Bold Items that were scored 5 points and above reflect strengths according to the ECERS-R tool.
Normal text Items that score 4 points reflect developmentally appropriate practice according to the ECERS-R tool.
Items that score in this range reflect less than developmentally appropriate practices ranging from “inadequate” (1 point) to “minimal”
Italicized
(3 points).
23k156
23k156
NYC Avg
NYC Avg
23k156
23k156
7
NYC Avg
NYC Avg
NYC Avg
NYC Avg
6
23k156
5
NYC Avg
23k156
4
3
2
1
0
Space and Personal Care Language- Program
Overall Score Activities Interaction
Furnishings Routines Reasoning Structure
23k156 5.4 5.6 3.7 7.0 6.3 5.8 2.7
NYC Avg 4.2 3.9 2.7 5.2 4.6 5.2 3.9
Page 2 of 21
How the ECERS-R is scored
ECERS-R assessments are conducted by Pre-K
Each ECERS-R subscale is comprised of items that are
Program Evaluators, who undergo a standardized
individually scored on a scale between 1 and 7, with
training facilitated by the authors of the tool. In order
higher scores indicating higher quality. Subscale and
to become a certified assessor, evaluators must
average scores are calculated by averaging all of the
observe and score alongside the master scorers who
item scores.
rate and determine each evaluator’s reliability.
Each item has its own indicators that the assessor looks
for throughout the observation. When scoring, the
assessor starts with the lowest indicators of the How to read your ECERS report
item, and then progresses through the rubric until At the beginning of the report are recommendations
one of the indicators is not observed. The scale is from the observation that are intended to identify
designed so that a higher score cannot be given if the broader trends in the program that likely impacted
more basic indicators are not met. This means that if a scores for multiple items.
program meets the higher-level indicators on the
rubric but has not met the more basic indicators for a After that, each ECERS-R subscale has its own color-
given item, then credit will not be given for the higher- coded section in the report. When identifying areas
level provision. This is because the ECERS-R was for coaching support, the DECE typically uses items
designed according to the idea that children will not from three of these subscales as an area of focus:
fully benefit from the higher-level indicators unless the Language-Reasoning, Activities, and Interactions.
basic indicators of the item are also met.1 Although it is the overall average that relates to child
outcomes and all of the subscales look at things that
affect children’s experiences, these will appear first in
How the ECERS-R assessments are the report and evaluators look for an item scoring 5 or
conducted higher to identify as an item of strength. An
explanation of this item of strength appears after the
ECERS-R reliable evaluators observe a randomly introductory graph on each of the subscale
chosen classroom of children for at least three hours introduction page.
and use information from the entire observation to
score each item on the scale. During this time, the The end of the report has an appendix that includes an
evaluator observes the physical environment as well as expanded schedule outlining what the evaluator saw
the interactions all staff members have with students. on the day of the observation and a chart outlining
Although for most items the observed evidence is used how the schedule contributed to scores on time-
over staff reports about typical practices, for any related portions of the tool.
indicators that are not observed during an assessment,
a short interview is scheduled with the teacher in order
to gather this information. ECERS-R uses the length of
For questions regarding the scores
the program to calculate “substantial portion of the
day” (1/3 of the program day) requirements. Program within this report, please contact the
time refers to the amount of time that is funded by the DECE by emailing your questions to
DECE. That is either 6 hours and 20 minutes or 2 hours programassessment@schools.nyc.gov
and 30 minutes for most programs, with some
variation. Programming that occurs outside of Pre-K
1For more information about the ECERS-R scale and
for All hours is not accounted for in the ECERS-R
assessment. ECERS-R item requirements, please see the All About
the ECERS-R book, and the ECERS-R spiral bound
scale.
Page 3 of 21
Language – Reasoning
Children’s language, literacy, and reasoning skills are supported through meaningful interactions with staff and peers and
developmentally appropriate resources. Staff should select materials for children and plan lessons and learning centers based on
what will support each child’s language and reasoning development. By encouraging meaningful dialogue around children’s use of
the classroom materials throughout the day, teachers can intentionally develop children’s communication, reasoning and problem-
solving skills. Specifically, staff may model or scaffold language for reasoning, or use questioning techniques to encourage peer
discussion and complex concept development (PQS 8: Engaging Children in Meaningful Activity).
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
16. Encouraging children to 17. Using language to develop
15. Books and pictures 18. Informal use of language
communicate reasoning skills
23k156 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
NYC Average 4.4 6.3 4.6 5.6
Page 4 of 21
Items scoring below 5: Language – Reasoning
No items scored below 5. spaceForNoItemsBe
Page 5 of 21
Activities
Play is an important vehicle for developing a variety of skills outlined in the New York State Prekindergarten Foundation for the
Common Core (PKFCC) and is woven into many of the PQSs. Rather than detracting from academic learning, purposeful play
supports the abilities that underlie such learning. When children have a sufficient amount of time to play and can access learning
centers and the materials in them, they have some of the essential supports necessary for their play to continue developing in
complexity. As children actively and confidently explore and learn through play, they develop the background knowledge that is
essential for making connections and deepening understandings. Furthermore, children should be empowered and encouraged to
intentionally self-select from the variety of learning activities and the resources should be representative of the diversity of children in
the classroom and in New York City (PQS 8: Engaging Children in Meaningful Activity).
2.0
1.0
NA
0.0
27. Use of 28.
21. Music 24. 26. Math
19. Fine 23. Sand 25. Nature TV, video, Promoting
20. Art and 22. Blocks Dramatic and
Motor and Water and science and/or acceptance
movement Play numbers
computers of diversity
23k156 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 0.0 7.0
NYC Average 5.1 4.7 4.7 3.6 5.1 4.0 4.5 4.7 NA
3.3 5.8
Page 6 of 21
Items scoring below 5: Activities
Item 23: Sand/water Score: 4
ECERS-R Indicator of Quality: Provision for sand and water play (either
Indicator 5.1
outdoors or indoors).
Indicator Description
This indicator requires that staff make the equipment and materials needed for both sand and water play available to children at
least every other week. The two materials do not have to be provided at the same time or in the same place. For more information
about this indicator's requirements, please see the All About the ECERS-R book (pp. 233-234).
1 .
Observed Evidence
Children did not have access to both sand and water play at least every other week. During the interview, the teacher reported that
the children mostly use sand and the materials are switched "every few weeks." Therefore, credit could not be given.
Page 7 of 21
Interaction
It is important for children to feel emotionally and physically safe in their environment and comfortable to experiment and play. This
kind of support should be provided through positive staff-child interactions and vigilant supervision throughout the day. All staff can
and should model and promote respectful and compassionate interactions throughout the day, act as a source of comfort and
support for children, and support positive interactions between children. (PQS 9: Creating a Positive Classroom Culture).
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
30. General supervision
29. Supervision of gross 32. Staff-child 33. Interactions among
of children (other than 31. Discipline
motor activities interactions children
gross motor)
23k156 4.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
NYC Average 4.7 4.5 5.1 5.9 5.8
Page 8 of 21
Items scoring below 5: Interaction
Item 29: Supervision of gross motor activities Score: itemHeader
4
1 .
Observed Evidence
Staff did not act to prevent dangerous situations before accidents occurred. Children did active movements such as jumping,
hopping, balancing, leaping and freeze dancing on the rug in the Block Center. A large easel and rocking chair were left on the rug
and were not moved out of the space to create more room for children to move around. Staff repeatedly reminded the children to
stay on the rug and to give each other enough space but there were several instances when children bumped into each other.
Therefore, credit could not be given.
.
itemFooter
1 .
Observed Evidence
Staff did not provide careful supervision during toileting instances. Staff did not verbally check if children followed proper toileting
procedures. Also, in one instance a child came out of the bathroom and returned to play at 9:04 AM with their pants open and this
was not corrected by staff until after 9:08 AM. Therefore, credit could not be given.
Page 9 of 21
Space & Furnishings
It is important for children to have learning environments that are safe, engaging, and age appropriate. Physical resources should be
arranged and managed to meet the diverse needs of children, ranging from quiet and private time in the classroom to gross motor
activities with many peers. Clean, well-kept, and appropriately-sized furniture and spaces communicate to children that they are
valued community members, and facilitate children’s purposeful play, learning, and development (PQS 10: The Physical Learning
Environment).
3.0 2.7
2.3
2.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
2. Furniture for
3. Furnishings 4. Room 7. Space for
routine care, 5. Space for 6. Child-related 8. Gross motor
1. Indoor space for relaxation arrangement gross-motor
play and privacy display equipments
and comfort for play play
learning
23k156 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 5.0 2.0
NYC Average 3.4 3.6 4.4 4.2 4.9 5.6 2.3 2.7
1 .
Observed Evidence
The tables were not appropriately sized for at least 75% of the children. During breakfast, tables were appropriately sized for three
out of the eight children (38%). The tables were at mid- to upper-chest level on five of the seated children, an indication that elbows
cannot be rested on the table without raising the arms. Therefore, credit could not be given.
Page 10 of 21
Item 8: Gross motor equipment Score: 2 itemHeader
1 .
Observed Evidence
The time requirement was not met. On the day of the observation, due to inclement weather children did movement in the
classroom and did not use equipment. Also, based on the staff report, children do a large group activity with the dance special in the
afternoon and do not use gross motor equipment. Therefore, credit could not be given. Please see the special note at the bottom of
the schedule page of the appendix for more information.
Page 11 of 21
Personal Care Routines
1
Pre-K is an important time to teach and reinforce personal care habits that keep children safe and healthy, so that it is less likely that
they are absent due to injury or sickness. All staff can use daily events such as mealtimes or toileting to develop these skills and
provide meaningful learning experiences. By encouraging safe and healthy practices and responding appropriately to safety hazards,
staff help ensure that children are better prepared to come to school ready to learn. This holistic approach to education, including the
provision of healthy foods, is fundamentally important to the learning and development of children (PQS 4: Health, Safety & Well-
being).
1
7.0 7.0
6.0
6.0 5.6
5.0
4.0
4.0
3.0 2.7
2.0 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.2
2.0 1.7
1.0
1.0
0.0
9. Greeting/ 12. Tolieting/
10. Meals/snacks 11. Nap/rest 13. Health practices 14. Safety practices
departing diapering
23k156 4.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 7.0
NYC Average 5.6 2.1 2.7 2.1 2.2 1.7
1
Hand Cleaning
Hand cleaning procedures are considered in three ECERS-R items (items 10, 12, and 13). Too many instances of improper hand
cleaning procedures (as outlined in the ECERS-R) may have affected your scores for one or more these items (see table below). For
more information about specific procedures, please see the following resource
(http://schools.nyc.gov/Academics/EarlyChildhood/educators/HandCleaningProcedures).
Hand cleaning is an important tool for creating a safe and healthy environment and building safe and healthy habits. While this is
important, we encourage programs to focus quality improvement efforts around larger parts of those subscales that are more
directly related to the PQS and your overall program score, such as classroom schedules that allow for ample center time and ensure
regular access to a variety of materials. For example, materials and the time that children have to play are important factors in 15 of
37 items on the ECERS-R scale.
The table below outlines when and how the hand cleaning mistakes happened:
Item Credit Given (Y/N) and When incorrect Hand Cleaning Happened
Item 10: Meals No; After touching food while serving or eating.
Item 12:Toileting No; After toileting procedures.
Item 13: General Health Practices Yes credit given; no major hand cleaning issues for general health practices.
Hand Cleaning Mistakes
Children Hands not washed.
Staff
Please Note: Hand Sanitizer can be used unless hands are visibly dirty however it should not be in place of regular hand washing. Children must be
supervised while using it and the product must contain 60-95% alcohol.
Page 12 of 21
Items scoring below 5: Personal Care Routines
Item 9: Greeting/departing Score: i4temHeader
ECERS-R Indicator of Quality: Each child is greeted individually (Ex. Staff
Indicator 5.1 say "hello" and use child's name; use child's primary language spoken at
home to say "hello"). indicatorBox
Indicator Description
This indicator requires that staff greet every child warmly and in a personal way without delay upon arrival. For example, staff can say
the child's name, make eye contact, smile, give the child a hug or pat on the back, or ask a question about their family or their day.
For more information about this indicator's requirements, please see the All About the ECERS-R book (pp. 84-85).
1 .
Observed Evidence
Staff greeted the class as a group warmly upon arrival but did not greet every child in a personal way. At 8:00 AM, staff went into the
hallway to greet children and said "Good morning boys and girls." Families brought late arrivals into the classroom and they were
greeted individually. Therefore, credit could not be given.
.
itemFooter
1 .
Observed Evidence
Proper hand cleaning procedures were not followed during breakfast as indicated in the table found on the first page of the Personal
Care Routines section. Children ate baguettes and apples with their hands. Staff asked children to wash their hands after breakfast if
hands were "visibly soiled" and gave hand sanitizer to those children who showed that their hands were clean. However, hand
sanitizer is not an acceptable substitute for hand washing after eating finger foods. Therefore, credit could not be given.
.
itemFooter
Page 13 of 21
Item 11: Nap/rest Score: i2temHeader
ECERS-R Indicator of Quality: Sanitary provisions for nap/rest (Ex. Area
Indicator 3.2
not crowded, clean bedding). indicatorBox
Indicator Description
This indicator requires that all cots/mats be placed at least 18 inches apart during nap/rest time. This is to minimize the possible
spread of disease such as respiratory illness, lice, scabies, and ringworm, which are among the most common health problems in early
childhood education. This indicator also requires that all the cots/mats and children’s bedding be stored separately without touching
one another. For more information about this indicator's requirements, please see the All About the ECERS-R book (p. 106), NYC
DECE Additional Notes for this item and Caring for Our Children.
1 .
Observed Evidence
All mats were labeled and stored separately. Sheets were stored with mats and blankets were stored in the cubbies. Based on the
staff report, mats are placed at least 3 feet apart; however, children who do not have blankets sleep under the sheet and directly on
their mat. Therefore, credit could not be given.
.
itemFooter
1 .
Observed Evidence
A sink used for handwashing after toileting was not sanitized before being used for food-related or other handwashing routines.
During the interview, the teacher reported that the classroom sink has not functioned for approximately four months and the
bathroom sink was used for all handwashing purposes. The sink was disinfected once at 8:27 AM after breakfast but was not
disinfected again after handwashing after toileting at 9:17 AM. Therefore, credit could not be given.
1 .
Observed Evidence
Proper hand cleaning procedures were not followed after toileting as indicated in the hand cleaning table. Therefore, credit could not
be given.
.
Page 14 of 21
ECERS-R Indicator of Quality: Adequate supervision for age and abilities
Indicator 3.5
of children. indicatorBox
Indicator Description
This indicator requires that staff monitor toileting to protect children’s safety. Staff must also ensure that children usually complete
toileting procedures correctly, including use of toilet tissue and flushing. Credit cannot be given if preschoolers go into the bathroom,
close the door, and have the ability to lock it. Although staff do not have to have line-of-sight supervision, if children close the door or
stall, staff must verbally check on them. For more information about this indicator's requirements, please see the All About the
ECERS-R book (pp. 119-120) and the NYC DECE Additional Notes for this item.
1 .
Observed Evidence
Staff did not adequately supervise toileting. There were three instances of toileting. Staff did not verbally or visually check if children
followed proper toileting procedures. Also, in one instance a child came out of the bathroom and returned to play at 9:04 AM with
their pants open and this was not corrected by staff until after 9:08 AM. Therefore, credit could not be given.
Page 15 of 21
Program Structure
Children are active learners who thrive when staff plan and respond to children’s learning and development throughout the day. The
daily schedule should be predictable, yet flexible based on the ages and abilities of the children, offering choices of teacher and child
initiated activities. Play is an important vehicle for developing a variety of skills outlined in the PKFCC and is woven into many of the
PQSs. Rather than detracting from academic learning, purposeful play supports the abilities that underlie such learning. When
children have a sufficient amount of time to play and can access learning centers and the materials in them, they have some of the
essential supports necessary for their play to continue developing in complexity. A balance of center time, small group and whole
group learning opportunities empower children to develop and grow at their own rate and supports teachers to take advantage of
teachable moments. Implementing a schedule that allows for these experiences involves not only the lead teacher but also other
adults, such as the paraprofessional or assistant, other supporting teachers (e.g., cluster teachers, SEITs), cafeteria workers, and
school leadership. The entire pre-K team needs to be involved when it comes to making adjustments to the schedule to allow for
children to have an adequate amount of time to play and access materials indoors and outdoors (PQS 8: Engaging Children in
Meaningful Activity).
7.0
6.0 5.7
5.0 4.5
4.0
4.0 3.6
2.8
3.0
2.0 2.0
2.0
1.0
NA
0.0
37. Provisions for children with
34. Schedule 35. Free play 36. Group time
disabilities
23k156 2.0 2.0 4.0 NA
0.0
NYC Average 2.8 3.6 4.5 5.7
Observed Evidence
The time requirement was not met for outdoor play on a daily basis. During the interview, the teacher reported that on Wednesdays
the children have a dance special and only 30 minutes of outdoor play in the morning. Also, the class does not go outdoors if the
temperature is less than 32 degrees. Colder days like this should not prevent children from going outside. Therefore, credit could not
be given.
Page 16 of 21
.
1 .
Observed Evidence
A portion of free play does not occur outdoors on a daily basis. During the interview, the teacher reported that the class does not go
outdoors if the temperature is less than 32 degrees. Colder days like this should not prevent children from going outside. Therefore,
credit could not be given.
.
Indicator Description
This indicator requires that the length of whole group activities be limited to the time children can remain interested and involved. If
children appear bored or tuned out, have trouble remaining in the group, or require frequent correction by staff, it is unlikely that the
amount of whole group time is appropriate. For more information about this indicator's requirements, please see the All About the
ECERS-R book (p. 384).
1 .
Observed Evidence
Whole group gatherings were too long for the children in the class. During the storybook reading, several children did not focus on
the story. Although staff asked them to do movements related to the story, children played with clothing, looked up to the ceiling,
made faces, yawned and played by the cubby. Staff frequently redirected children calling them by name and said "Are you
listening?" "Please don't touch that." "You must be tired." Additionally, during the large group movement activity on the rug, two
children chose not to participate and did not do anything for the entire 19 minutes. One child stood by the block shelf and one child
sat by the table. Therefore, credit could not be given.
Page 17 of 21
Classroom Schedule on Day of Observation
Below is the schedule observed and reported on the day of the observation. Components marked as “Observed” were seen
and noted by the evaluator while they were in the classroom. Components marked as “Reported” were input based upon
feedback from the teacher interview and the posted classroom schedule.
Observed or
Component Time Notes
Reported
Families escorted children to the hallway by the classroom door. Staff
08:00 AM - members greeted children and escorted them into the classroom. Children
Arrival Observed
08:14 AM hung up their belongings, washed hands and sat for breakfast.
08:14 AM - Children greeted each other and said thank you for their food. Staff joined
Breakfast Observed
08:26 AM children at the tables as children ate breakfast.
As children finished, they threw away breakfast items, washed hands or
08:26 AM -
Transition Observed used hand sanitizer and gathered on the meeting rug to look at books.
08:33 AM
Staff asked children to put books away at 8:32 AM.
Staff led children in a good morning song. Class helpers led the class and
Circle/Whole 08:33 AM - reviewed the days of the week and counted the number of children present
Observed
Group 08:45 AM in English and Spanish. At 8:44 AM a staff member held up name cards and
children chose centers.
Children played in centers. All centers were accessible.
08:45 AM -
Centers/Choice Observed
10:21 AM
10:21 AM - Staff called cleanup. Children cleaned up and gathered on the rug.
Transition Observed
10:28 AM
Storybook 10:28 AM - A staff member read the story "Water Dance" and children did some
Observed
Reading 10:42 AM creative movements related to the story from 10:36 AM to 10:38 AM.
10:42 AM - Staff put the book away, asked children to stand up and stay on the rug as
Transition Observed
10:44 AM she put action squares on the floor.
Four children were selected to choose different actions for children to do
while on the rug. Each action was done for approximately 10-15 seconds
along with recorded music and each child did approximately six actions for
Gross Motor/ 10:44 AM - a total active time of six minutes. From 10:56 AM to 10:58 AM a staff
Observed
Recess 11:03 AM member led the children in stretching and pumping arms. At 11:00 AM, a
staff member put on "Animal Action" and then "Freeze Dance." At 11:03
AM the first child was called to go wash hands for lunch.
Page 18 of 21
Schedule Notes
Based on the weekly schedule, and staff report children have a large group dance special on Wednesdays. All other preps are
done as a push in.
Page 19 of 21
Time Related Items
Within the ECERS-R scale, 15 items require specific information about the amount of time materials or activities are available. The table
below contains specific information about when materials were available or activities took place at your site related to time
requirements. If an item met the time requirement for an indicator, but did not meet the materials requirement, specific information
about this is included earlier in the report. Please see that portion of the report for more information.
Item Amount of Time Minimal Requirement Higher Level Times Accessible
Observed Met? (materials Requirement Met?
accessible for at least (materials accessible for
47 minutes) at least 2 hours, 7
minutes)
Centers/Choice,
3. Furnishings for relaxation 2:06 Yes Yes
Centers/Choice
Centers/Choice,
5. Space for Privacy 2:06 Yes Yes
Centers/Choice
Storybook, Reading, Gross,
7. Gross Motor Space 0:58 Yes N/A Motor/, Recess,
Specials/Cluster
8. Gross Motor Equipment 0:00 No N/A
Transition, Centers/Choice,
15. Books and pictures 2:12 Yes Yes
Centers/Choice
Centers/Choice,
19. Fine Motor 2:06 Yes Yes
Centers/Choice
Centers/Choice,
20. Art 2:06 Yes Yes
Centers/Choice
Centers/Choice, Gross,
Motor/, Recess,
21. Music and Movement 2:57 Yes N/A
Specials/Cluster,
Centers/Choice
Centers/Choice,
22. Blocks 2:06 Yes Yes
Centers/Choice
Centers/Choice,
23. Sand/Water 2:06 Yes N/A
Centers/Choice
Centers/Choice,
24. Dramatic Play 2:06 Yes Yes
Centers/Choice
Centers/Choice,
25. Nature Science 2:06 Yes Yes
Centers/Choice
Centers/Choice,
26. Math/Number 2:06 Yes Yes
Centers/Choice
Centers/Choice, Storybook,
Reading, Gross, Motor/,
34. Schedule - Roll up 3:04 Yes Yes
Recess, Specials/Cluster,
Centers/Choice
Centers/Choice,
35. Free Play 2:06 Yes Yes
Centers/Choice
Page 20 of 21
The observations conducted and/or the reports prepared as part of the ECERS-R assessment, or any other assessment of the pre-
kindergarten program, shall be used only for purposes of assessing the quality of the pre-kindergarten program generally and
shall not be placed in any teacher’s official file or used in any action or employment-related decision involving an individual DOE
employee (including, but not limited to, any letter to file, rating or tenure determination), and shall not be introduced by the DOE
in any disciplinary proceeding, grievance or arbitration, case or action. Furthermore, the results of the ECERS-R evaluations will
not be used in any evaluation of any CSA member nor will the reports about ECERS-R evaluations identify specific CSA members
by name in any way.
Recommendations
Based upon the overall subscale scores received during the ECERS-R observation, please note the following recommendations.
P.S. 156 Waverly scored above the NYC average in the subscale of Space and Furnishings, Personal Care Routines, Language-
Reasoning, Activities, and Interaction. P.S. 156 Waverly scored below the NYC average in the subscale(s) of Program Structure.
Site leaders and principals are encouraged to consider specific indicators (individually numbered) under each item within the
Personal Care Routines subscale in conjunction with other data to determine how this can support program goals.
The recommendations below reflect broader trends seen during the observation that may have impacted scores across multiple
items and could be considered for programmatic changes:
· Pay more attention to children as they are toileting to ensure that sanitary procedures (e.g., hand washing) are carried out
and that children are developing good personal care and hygiene skills. In bathrooms with stalls, an adult should be present to
make sure children are safe, supervise hand washing, and make sure that the toilets are flushed. If the bathroom is located
outside of the classroom, make sure an adult is always present when children use the bathroom. Younger children need careful
supervision to make sure that they are using the bathroom correctly and safely.
· Consider reworking the schedule so that children can access gross motor equipment for at least 47 minutes during the Pre-K
for All day of 6 hours 20 minutes, regardless of whether it takes place indoors or outdoors. Appropriate equipment challenges
the children to develop large muscle coordination through active play, in a safe way. The equipment may be portable (balls,
hula hoops, and tricycles), and/or stationary (installed features such as slides or climbing units). If gross motor materials are
limited to a climber/slide unit, it should be large enough for children to have access without crowding or waiting. Build in time
for children to put on coats and transition to and from gross motor space, so they actually have at least 47 minutes to use
equipment.
· Offer both sand and water to children on a weekly basis. As with most play opportunities, learning is enhanced when there is
variety in what children experience. By experimenting with sand and water, children learn about measurement and natural
science. In addition, sand and water activities can be soothing and stress-reducing. Although staff should make each of these
materials available for children to use at some time, the two materials do not have to be provided at the same time or in the
same place. For example, sand can be provided one week, and water provided the following week. Or, one might be indoors
while the other is outdoors. When considering how much sand or water to put in the bin or table, there must be enough for
children to pour, fill, and empty containers and there should not be so many toys that children cannot pour, fill, and empty. If
the water or sand is stored in a closed space or bin, staff should bring these materials out and open them for children to freely
access and use. This way, it is evident to the children that they are available.
Page 21 of 21