Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Diversity
&
Managing in a
Global
M. Azkha Rinaldhy
Meila Rosanty R.
Environment
Managing Diversity
Diversity has traditionally been considered a
term used by human resources departments,
associated with fair hiring practices,
discrimination, and inequality.
➔ Workforce Diversity
People in an organization are different
form and not similar to one another.
Why Is Managing Workforce Diversity So Important?
Age, Gender
Sexual
Race, Ethnicity
Orientation
Disabilities,
Religion
Abilities
Apple making consistent progress.
● For the past five years, Apple continued to hire more women and
underrepresented minorities every year.
● Apple bring in new team members and support their growth and
highly encouraged that their workforce will become more
representative at all levels of the company.
Underrepresented groups include women and people who identify as Black, Hispanic, Native
American, or Native Hawaiian & Other Pacific Islander.
Apple making consistent progress.
● Apple is a multigenerational company with employees from 18 to 87
● Apple proud that so many of their people choose to remain at Apple for a long
time.
● 45% of leaders under 30 are women, and 17% are underrepresented minorities.
Why Apple needs more diversity?
Tim Cook has been clear that he sees diversity as vital to
the future of Apple.
➔ Abstract
1. More companies are getting to recognize that the best way to meet customer satisfaction, higher quality
products, and faster service challenges is through coordinated efforts of employees.
2. Managers have become more concerned with managing diversity in organizations.
3. Diversity offers both potential costs and benefits for the organization
➔ Purpose
How managers could manage more effectively diverse team whose members have different ages,
genders and nationalities or even belong to distinct ethnic or cultural groups
➔ Previous Research
1. Contradictory and mixed results (Azmat, Hartel& Fujimoto, 2013)
a. cognitive outcomes such as greater innovation, ideas and creativity that employees from distinct
social backgrounds could bring
b. adverse behavioral and affective outcomes such as less social cohesion, relational conflicts and
higher staff turnover due to employees’ perceived dissimilarity and adverse stereotypes about
dissimilar employees
2. Based on a previous study diversity was found to be reducing the organizations’ speed to respond and
act, which could lead to lower performance (Eisenhardt, 1989; Chen and MacMillan, 1992)
3. Social distance could be referred to as the degree of unwillingness to interact with other members in the
group (Chan and Goto, 2003).
➔ Methods
Qualitative data collection and analysis is used in this research through the collection of secondary data to
answer the research question
➔ Discussion and Findings
(Lunenburg, 2010).
Conclusion
❏ Effective managers can better manage diversity
through providing training programs for the team
members. (Formal approaches for understanding
diversity problems).
❏ Managers should help the team members to
accept, and understand these individual
differences.
❏ Managers should maximize the potential of the
group by finding ways to capitalize on diverse
skills, viewpoints and backgrounds (Zenger et al.,
1994).
Case Study II
Diversity and Inclusiveness
Diverse perspectives combined with an inclusive
culture:
● Drive better decision-making
● Stimulate innovation
● Increase organizational agility
● Strengthen resilience to disruption.
Inclusive organizations:
● Maximize the power of all differences
● Realize the full potential of all of their
employees.
● Minimizes blind spots
● Encourages truly innovative thinking.
➔ Abstract
1. Workforce diversity means similarities and differences among employees in terms of age, cultural
background, physical abilities and disabilities, race, religion, gender, and sexual orientation.
2. Employing diversified workforce is a necessity for every organization but to manage such diversified
workforce is also a big challenge for management
➔ Purpose
Analyses the workforce diversity and its impact on productivity of an organization
➔ Previous Research
1. Diversity stimulates innovation and productivity and creates a world class culture that can outperform the
competition.
2. In research-oriented and hi-tech industries, the broad base of talents generated by a gender-and
ethnicdiverse organization becomes a priceless advantage. “Creativity thrives on diversity” (Morgan, 1989).
3. Multicultural organizations are found to be better at problem solving, possess better ability to extract
expanded meanings, and are more likely to display multiple perspectives and interpretations in dealing
with complex issues.
4. Organizations employing a diverse workforce can supply a greater variety of solutions to problems in
service, sourcing, and allocation of resources.
5. Employees from diverse backgrounds bring individual talents and experiences in suggesting ideas that
are flexible in adapting to fluctuating markets and customer demands.
➔ Discussion and Findings
➔ Ethnocentric attitude
➔ Polycentric attitude
➔ Geocentric attitude
Adopting a Global
Perspective
Ethnocentric Attitude Polycentric Attitude Geocentric Attitude
The parochialistic belief that The view that the managers in A world-oriented view that
the best work approaches and the host country know the best focuses on using the best
practices are those of the work approaches and practices approaches and people from
home country. for running their business. around the globe.
Tip
“Global trade
systems ensure
that trade
1. Power Distance
2. Collectivism vs. Individualism
3. Uncertainty Avoidance
4. Femininity vs. Masculinity
5. Short-Term vs. Long-Term
Orientation
6. Restraint vs. Indulgence
Global Leadership and Organisational
Behaviour Effectiveness (GLOBE)
Previous Research:
Result :
Descriptive Analysis
1. Power distance was positively related to collectivism (r 0.32, p < 0.01), masculinity (r 0.28, p < 0.01) and long-term orientation (r 0.21, p < 0.01).
2. Collectivism was significantly correlated with risk aversion (r 0.40, p < 0.01), masculinity (r 0.28, p < 0.01) and long-term orientation (r 0.57, p < 0.01). R
3. Risk aversion was also positively related to masculinity (r 0.18, p < 0.01) and long-term orientation (r 0.52, p < 0.01).
4. Masculinity showed a significant correlation with long-term orientation (r 0.36, p < 0.01).
Result :
Hypothesis testing
1. The regression results indicate that power
distance was negatively related to both
dependent variables for organizational
attractiveness. Thus, we found support for
Hypothesis 1.
2. The results for collectivism showed no
significance with both dependent variables,
leading to the rejection of Hypothesis 2.
3. Risk aversion showed a significantly positive
relationship with the dependent variables for
organizational attractiveness. Support for
Hypothesis 3.
4. The results for masculinity showed no
significance with the dependent variables there
was no support for Hypothesis 4,
5. Long-term orientation indicated significant
The results indicated that only academic year and acquaintance were significantly
positive influences on the dependent variables,
related to intention to work, suggesting that Malaysian potential job-seekers in supporting Hypothesis 5.
higher academic years, who have acquaintances in Japan, may have a stronger
intention to work for Japanese companies.
➔ Conclusion