Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Description
Visual Exemplars are STS which seek to provide students with clear expectations regarding their
work. Exemplars should be provided upfront at the introduction of a project or assignment so
that students may match the performance standards to real examples.
Visual Exemplars are an important teaching strategy because they promote learning through:
Demonstrating different ways in which standards may be met
Demonstrating different levels of student achievement
Creating clear expectations between instructors and students
Creating opportunities for discussions on standards
Exemplars are best used in conjunction with an assessment document which outlines the
standards of the assignment.
*As a caution, it should be noted that extensive use of visual exemplars is likely to reduce the
opportunity for other candidates to produce an original body of work and therefore this
teaching strategy should not be used excessively*
Links
Visual Exemplars (STS) work well alongside Clear Lesson-Goal Setting (STS) by providing a start
of lesson visual goal for students to work towards. Visual Exemplars also work well with Student
Achievement Records (STS) by providing examples of performance standards for student self-
evaluation
Sample 1 provides students with the standards for performance at a high level:
Procedure is divided into two major parts, reflecting the goals of the lab
Steps involving the recording of data are clearly denoted
The sequence of steps is logical and clearly labelled
Visual aids are used in addition to written work
Teachers may wish to contrast the high level visual exemplar with a second exemplar which
would demonstrate performance at a much lower standard.
Suggested STS #2: Scaffolding
Description
Scaffolding lessons is truly vital to the principles of teaching. Scaffolding is a technique used to
break concepts or skills, into manageable chunks. Each chunk should provide a tool or
structure, to guide students throughout the learning process. Scaffolding can be utilized in a
short simple task, or it can be used over the duration the lesson or even the course.
Rationale
Scaffolding lessons is an instructional strategy that is closely related to the Zone of Proximal
Development, developed by Lev Vygotsky. A core concept to the theory is that children learn
new knowledge and skills when they have assistance. Take a look at the image below. For a
student to access new knowledge that is positioned higher than they can currently reach, the
teacher has to provide a framework to support the student in accessing the new knowledge.
This “framework” is termed scaffolding.
Scaffolding is a vital teaching strategy because it:
Breaks a large concept into manageable segments, in order to coherently guide students
to greater understanding
Models the teacher’s train of thought
Links
Scaffolding is very versatile. It can be used in conjunction with almost any teaching strategy.
Usually it is at the root of most teaching strategies.
Suggested STS #3: Think-Pair- Share (Partner Talk)
Description
Rationale
Links
Think-Pair-Share is also a very versatile teaching strategy. It can used with many different goals.
Think-Pair-Share can also be considered a Vocabulary Enhancement (STS) strategy or a
Scaffolding (STS) strategy or a Frequent Quick Understanding Checks strategy (STS)
Suggested STS #4: Vocabulary Enhancement
Description
Rationale
Links
Vocabulary Enhancement is a number of strategies incorporated into this one. It can be used
with several other strategies. It is necessary when understanding the content of a lesson, and
concepts of a unit. In order for success to be measured, the core vocabulary must be
understood
Suggested STS #5 Clear Lesson-Goal Setting
Description
Clear Lesson-Goal Setting is a start of lesson STS intended to provide direction for students.
Instructors are expected to communicate lesson goals to students prior to covering content for
the day.
Clear Lesson-Goal Setting is not specific to lesson structure. It may also be used to preview
student learning at the unit level through sharing unit plans with students, or at the course level
through sharing course overviews with students.
The phrase "students will be able to" may be replaced with other descriptors more appropriate
to a specific course, such as:
o students will be familiar with:
o students will have demonstrated:
Rationale
Student learning is facilitated by the opportunity to preview instructional goals. By using Clear
Lesson-Goal Setting, students are more likely to identify and focus on key learning objectives as
highlighted by the preview. Furthermore, students are more likely to identify gaps in their
learning by the end of the lesson due to clear expectations at the start of the lesson.
Clear Lesson-Goal Setting provides students with the ability to:
Identify key learning objectives at the lesson level
Recognize gaps and difficulties related to specific objectives
The instructor also benefits from Clear Lesson-Goal Setting by providing an upfront checklist to
remind them of the lesson goals.
Links
Clear Lesson-Goal Setting (STS) is works well with Student Achievement Records (STS) which
may constitute a long term summary of individual lesson goals.
Visual Exemplars (STS) work well in conjunction with Lesson Goals that are qualitative in nature.
The visual exemplars serve to flesh out the lesson goal and give the students clear expectations
on how to meet the goal.
Suggested STS #6: Frequent Quick Checks for Understanding
Description
Frequent Quick Checks for Understanding (STS), also known as, Quick Checks, are used to break
up a lesson into chunks, as well as, to provide formative assessment. Quick Checks can take
many forms, but would usually only take-away 5 minutes of a lesson, unless a teacher identifies
a need for further explanation. Most often, they are multiple choice or fill in the blanks
questions, however, they could also be review questions from the previous days content or exit
slips to summarize today’s content. Quick Checks are usually embedded in notes and/or PPT to
allow students time to work through the questions.
Rationale
Frequent Quick Checks for Understanding is a useful teaching strategy because it:
Provides time for students apply what they have learned through-out the lesson instead
of requiring students to retain the information until the end of class to complete a larger
“worksheet”.
Allows for frequent formative assessment to provide information to both the teacher
and the student
Can inform future lessons
Models potential question types of summative assessment
Links
Frequent Quick Checks for Understanding can also be used to aid in vocabulary acquisition
when the Quick Checks assesses the vocabulary, such as fill-in-the-blanks.
Suggested STS #7 Transitional Content
Description
Transitional Content is a broad STS which seeks to facilitate the transition of a student's native
background to a global perspective. This STS aims to either replace or compliment content
outside the student's background with content the student would be familiar with.
Rationale
Current curricula within the system place a significant emphasis on Canadian history, cultural
references, and prominent history and scientific figures which Chinese native students do not
share a background in. Complimenting or replacing these references with Chinese analogs will
grant Maple Leaf students a level playing field.
Links
Description
Reflective Journaling is a means for the student to synthesize their knowledge and to determine
the effectiveness of their learning process. Reflection is important for transformative learning
process whereby the student is able to look at and examine their beliefs and orientation of a
topic or idea, critically thinking and analyzing to bring about improved ways to redefine their
beliefs or conceptual learning.
Rationale
Links
Reflection Journals are a useful strategy for the teacher and the student, demonstrating the
inner thoughts and understandings of concepts and knowledge taught in class. This
strategy can be used with other strategies to demonstrate learning and progress, or as a
lesson in itself. The reflective process is a key developmental strategy that must be
demonstrated in the completion of their high school courses.
Suggested STS #9 Active Learning
Description
Active Learning represents a broad STS which seeks to promote student engagement by
breaking out of a traditional passive learning in favour of more active student participation.
The Active Learning STS seeks to make daily use of as many of the following as possible:
Creation of original content
Visual processes or results
Student movement
Student ownership
Collaborative work
When active learning is employed the focus should be on learning through participation and
collaboration between peers or between groups of peers.
Rationale
Links
The Active Learning (STS) may be used in conjunction with Consolidation Events (STS) and
Student Achievement Records (STS) in order to increase the effectiveness of peer-learning.
Achievement Records maintain a long term record of the student's learning progress for
later reference.
Suggested STS #10 Student Achievement Records
Description
Student Achievement Records are long term STS designed to provide comprehensive tracking of
student progress. Using whatever means a teacher may desire, students will be tasked with
keeping track of their learning achievements on a daily basis as a form of self-assessment.
A simple Student Achievement Record could take the form of a learning outcome based
checklist which would layout specific skills or accomplishments the student has demonstrated.
This checklist may be designed with a tiered approach like a rubric or with an all or nothing
mastery approach with a simple box to be checked. Students will keep a copy for themselves
and submit photocopies to teachers.
Rubric scores could be specific to each achievement indicator and full descriptions could
be found in supplementary documentation
Modify a procedure to Modifications have Modifications have Modifications have Modifications have
reduce experimental failed to bring brought experimental brought experimental brought experimental
error experimental results results a little closer results closer to results very close to
closer to accepted to accepted values accepted values accepted values
values
Student learning may be facilitated through the use of metacognitive practices. These practices
are designed as a record of acquired learning and as a preview of upcoming learning.
Student Achievement Records aim to provide students with the ability to identify:
Where they are coming from
Where they are at
Where they are going
Students armed with a full spectrum of learning self-awareness will be able to:
Preview and prepare for upcoming content
Identify key areas for improvement
Identify gaps in learning
Track their progress
The learning self-awareness promoted by this STS will increase the efficiency of instructor
tutorial time, peer-tutoring sessions, and student self-review.
Furthermore, with the ubiquitous nature of the cell phone camera, students may be
encouraged to keep a photographic record of any achievement which lends itself to visual
recording. Thus a learning portfolio may be created and linked to the Student Achievement
Record both as part of an accreditation process as well as for later reference when reviewing.
Links
Student Achievement Records (STS) may be used in conjunction with Active Learning (STS) to
provide for a more effective use of discussion time, activity time, or collaborative learning time:
In a peer-tutor dynamic, weaker students may enjoy a more accurate pairing with
stronger students based on specific Student Achievement Records rather than on
general percentage grades alone.
In a collaborative dynamic, different groups within the same class could work on
different tasks and outcomes based on common prior achievement.
Suggested STS #11 Consolidation Events
Description
Consolidation Events are end of lesson or end of unit STS which seek to summarize and
reinforce the achievements which have taken place during class time.
Consolidation Event STS should attempt to include these general characteristics where possible:
Student driven rather than teacher driven
Collaborative processes
Strong visual component
Active component
Inclusive design
This Consolidation Event would follow a lesson on magnetic induction of electric current.
Lesson Component (30 minutes)
Students would be provided with the materials necessary to construct a simple proof-of-
concept generator and an ammeter to verify successful construction.
Students would work in teams to design and build the generator. Following testing with the
ammeter students would be asked to record on the whiteboard their team name as well as the
current produced by their model.
Activity Component (20 minutes)
In closing, teams would share their model design with the rest of the class in a quick
presentation. A flip board provided at the front of the class could keep track of common
characteristics of successful design identified through class discussion.
Consolidation Component (20 minutes)
Sample 2: A Gallery-Walk Consolidation Event
Conservation of - Open end design - Concept Map - Team project Diverse roles:
momentum of concept map - Gallery Walk - Class discussion - Project manager
- Designers
- Artists
Students would be tasked with identifying key concepts from the lesson and organising the
concepts into a concept map which would show logical connections between the concepts.
Activity Component (25 minutes)
In closing, teams would post their concept map onto a medium such as a whiteboard or a
bulletin board. A gallery walk would then take place in which students would be encouraged to
walk about and examine the submissions from other teams. Time should be allotted to provide
opportunity for organic conversation between members of different teams. Student use of cell
phone cameras should be encouraged for record keeping purposes.
Consolidation Component (15 minutes)
A key aspect of Consolidation Events is that they are constructed by the students rather than by
the teacher. This provides a twofold benefit in that students are granted ownership of their
review material and additionally that teachers are granted the opportunity to identify
misconceptions within the class based on collaborative summary.
Links
Consolidation Events (STS) may be used in conjunction with Active Learning (STS) to provide for
a more effective means of student driven summary.
The creation of original and visual content by students lends itself well to activities that
compare and contrast multiple approaches to learning between groups of students.
The inclusive, collaborative, and student driven components of active learning promote
student ownership of summaries. An increase in ownership allows individual students to
customize their summaries and review of lesson content.
Suggested STS #12: Integration of Technology
Description:
Integration of Technology represents a broad STS which aims to increase the amount of
technology integrated into the daily learning experiences of students.
Rationale:
There is a vast amount of research that supports the integration of technology into 21 st Century
classrooms.
Links:
Depending on the specific application of Integration of Technology (STS), there are many
possible connections to the other System Wide Teaching Strategies (STS).
The addition of these three STS will create a learning environment in which sustained student
driven learning may emerge organically as a result of activities facilitated by the teacher rather
than driven by the teacher. The learning environment will facilitate visual and aural comparison
between the ideas and work of students, whose differences in approach will provide the
impetus for student driven discussion. This discussion in turn will drive further learning and
collaboration.
These three STS arose from observations and reflections made during the first residency of the
MAELM program offered by RRU. The program head's approach to instruction included a
significant focus on peer driven learning.
Spontaneous discussion observed during student driven activities included phrases such as:
I think that...
What do you think...
Why did you...
How did you...
Please explain to me...
Note that all discussion took place between students despite having an instructor available. This
was in part due to having the work and ideas generated by the students rather than the
instructor, thus most inquiries about the work were directed toward the students who created
it.