Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Multiconsult
Div. Industry, Oil and Gas
Nesttunbrekka 99, N-5221 Nesttun, Norway
gert.nielsen@multiconsult.no
Abstract
The use of comfort cooling and heat pumps in office buildings is rapidly increasing. Energy consumption in
these applications is often neglected. A good choice of refrigerant and plant design is more often than not
discarded in favour of short term investment considerations. This is not helped by an overall lack of compe-
tence in the HVAC societies with regard to the actual running and design of a refrigeration plant.
1. Introduction
Due to numerous poorly designed and operated comfort cooling plants installed all over Norway, we in
Multiconsult have devised a set of guidelines that have to be followed, when designing comfort cooling
systemes. The main issue is that “The natural choice is natural refrigerants”, which in most cases will be
ammonia.
Of course this does not happen overnight or without conflicts, especially with the engineers who believe
they know how to design a plant, but as it often turns out their competence in the field is below par.
Therefore we have been working continuously to raise the awareness of our colleagues of the inherent
benefits by using natural working fluids in heat pumps and comfort cooling. Industrial cooling is as such
today dominated by ammonia refrigeration systems.
2. Mythbusting
Myth Ammonia is explosive.
Fact This is so wrong that it is NONSENSE. Ammonia is flammable, not explosive. The LFL / UFL of am-
monia is 15%vol/29%vol. In order to achieve ignition, the ignition source has to have a temperature above
629°C. The energy developed in an ammonia fire is so low that the fire is not able to sustain itself. Fire can
ONLY occur in a confined space.
4. Low liquid heat capacity relative to heat of evaporation in order to minimize flashing
5. High vapour heat capacity in order to minimize compressor exit temperature.
6. High critical pressure
7. High critical temperature
8. Chemical stability at high temperatures
9. Good thermal conductivity both in liquid- and vapour phase
In the following we will compare two natural refrigerants, ammonia (R717) and propane (R290), one single
component artificial refrigerant, R134a, and two zeotropic blends, R407C and R410A.
Figure 2 shows the heat of evaporation in relation to evapora- Figure 2 shows the volumetric heat of evaporation in relation
tion temperature to evaporation temperature
As it is quite clear, the ammonia heat of evaporation is much higher than the other substances. On average
a factor 3 – 4 on propane and a factor 6 - 8 on the artificial substances. However, when we look at the heat
of evaporation in relation to the specific volume, we see why low specific volume, or high density, is desira-
ble, as it reduces the necessary volumetric flow to be handled by the compressor and the plant as such.
When we examine this closer, we find that in relation to the heat of evaporation, ammonia is the substance
Figure 4 shows liquid heat capacity relative to heat of evap- Figure 5 shows compressor capacity loss due to flashing.
oration Evaporation temperature 0°C
being less affected than the others. The remainder are quite similar over a normal field of operation.
This also explains why a high critical temperature and pressure is desirable, as it gives a larger field of rea-
sonable operation.
1
As R410A and R407C are having glide, we use the dewpoint as our working point.
KGH HVAC&R SOCIETY PAGE 3/10
44TH INTERNATIONAL HVAC&R CONGRESS AND EXHIBITION
BELGRADE 4TH – 6TH OF DECEMBER 2013
Use of ammonia in comfort cooling and heat pump applications. Advantages, draw-backs and black holes
Figure 8 shows the ideal and the real process COPs. Evaporation at 0°C, no superheating, no subcooling.
This has to do with the properties of the different refrigerants, especially the molar mass. The lighter the
substance, the smaller the internal losses due to the compression will be. To popularize it: “The less the
mass, the easier it is to get out of the way”.
Judging by Table 2, we would expect both R407C and R410A to perform better than R134a. Keeping mind
that both refrigerants are blends, we have to look into the substances that go into the blendS. R407C is a
blend of R32 (23%), R125 (25%) and R134a (52%), and R410A is made up of R32 (50%) and R125 (50%). The
molecular weight of these constituents range from 52 (R32) to 120 (R125), and in a refrigeration cycle, and
especially during compression, they don’t act as one substance, but as a blend, which means that the R125
part of the blend seriously affects the total result.
The conclusion this far, is that ammonia is thermodynamically the best refrigerant in the field of operation
for comfort cooling and heat pumps.
Figure 8 shows compressor exit temperatures relative to Figure 9 shows the isentropic COP with regard to evaporator
condensation temperature superheat
be beneficial in systems using the other refrigerant. As for the R4XX media, superheat is a necessity, in or-
der to ensure that all fractions of the blend are fully evaporated.
This makes the ammonia systems seem big and Figure 10 shows a classic ammonia design
bulky compared to direct expansions (DX) sys-
tems, where the refrigerant is superheated in the evaporator. This reduces the efficiency of the evaporator,
as the heat transfer in the superheat area is via gas and not liquid.
The flooded evaporator systems are virtually immune to leakages of refrigerant, whereas the performance
and efficiency of DX systems are very susceptible to leakages. In copper systems an annual leakage of app.
5% of the charge is normal.
These expansion valves are produced in two main designs, an electronic expansion valve, and a thermostat-
ic expansion valve. The thermostatic expansion valve has very poor ability to control a system at off design,
especially with varying condenser pressure. This leads to unnecessary high condenser pressures, often un-
necessary low evaporation temperatures at off-design.
The electronic expansion valve is able to control the entire system and gives a good and reliable control
over a large range of operating conditions.
For both valve types the control of the plant is a combination of control by valve and compressor. This can
often result in hunting, where the two components can’t find a balanced mode of operation.
Flooded evaporator systems don’t use expansion valves as it is normally understood. They apply float
valves that control liquid levels, either a high pressure float valve that will keep the condenser drained or
low pressure float valve that control the liquid level in the liquid separator. This means that the control of
the plant is solely at the compressor, thereby eliminating a source of error.
4.5 Oil
As Dr. Andy Pearson of Star Refrigeration often has said “The day we can eliminate oil in refrigeration sys-
tems, life will be a lot easier”. Alas, we are not there yet. So oil systems is a part of what we have to consid-
er. The first part of handling oil, is to have a good oil separator on the pressure line from the compressor,
minimizing oil carryover. The oil that is being carried over, we still have to handle.
Again we see a difference between the ammonia systems and the others. In non-ammonia systems usually
oil that is miscible with the refrigerant is used, and to ensure that the oil is carried from the evaporator to
the compressor the velocity of the refrigerant vapour has to be high enough to ensure that the oil is
dragged along. In ammonia systems the oil is normally not miscible with ammonia, so the oil will settle in
the liquid separator. As the oil is heavier than the liquid ammonia, it will run to the lowest point in the sep-
arator, from where it is returned to the suction line of the compressor, typically by the use of an ejector
using hot gas as diving fluid.
4.7 Compressors
Systems with non-ammonia compressors can use hermetic and semi hermetic compressors, as well as open
compressors, whereas the ammonia compressors usually will not be able to use anything but open com-
pressors. Semi hermetic and hermetic compressors use the incoming suction vapour to cool the compres-
sor motor, by leading the gas over the motor before reaching the suction gate of the compressor. As we
saw above, this would in affect the efficiency of the cycle negatively. An effect of this way of motor cooling
is that the volumetric efficiency of the compressor is compromised, because the vapour expands when
heated, so this extra heating before the suction gate, means that the mass flow through the compressor is
reduced, and thus the capacity.
COP cold
higher degree of flexibility.
5. Environment
Fluorinated gasses are very efficient greenhouse gasses, as Table 3 shows
Table 3 shows the Global Warming Potensial of the refrigerant treated here
This means that 1 kg of R410A has an impact on the greenhouse effect that matches 2 088 kg of CO2. In the
EU the present F-Gas proposal means that a refrigeration plant can not contain more than the equivalent to
5 000 kg of CO2 from 2020. This gives the following constraints
6. Economy
When suggesting that the best solution would be an ammonia plant, we are often faced with a remark go-
ing something like “Are you mad! That is much too expensive!”
1. The ammonia plant will have a service life that is broadly twice that of the other refrigerants.
2. If we are to reach a similar build quality on a R134a plant, it would cost approx. 180% of what the
ammonia plant would cost. A major foul-up some years ago taught us that.
3. When the actual offer is just 65% - 70% of the ammonia price, then some compromise on quality
has been made.
4. What do you mean “expensive”?
a. To buy?
b. To own?
Table 5 shows the annual costs of ownership for five different plants, having the same cooling capacity
As we see from Table 5, even though the investment in an ammonia plant is quite high compared to the
others (140% - 175%), the cost of ownerships is actually lower than any of the others. This is partly due to
the longer service life and partly to the better energy efficiency.
This will make budget work easier, as a larger proportion of the cost are banking costs and not free floating
energy cost.
When assessing this, we have to look into the risks involved, combined with the common human responses
Table 6 show the human response to ammonia. Adapted from the late Anders Lindborg, Ammonia Partnership
An example: A chiller with a cooling capacity of 1 000 kW, has a charge of 100 kg. Most of this, approx. 90%
is in liquid form in the liquid separator or evaporator. The evaporator has a temperature of 4°C, which is
the state in the liquid separator. All of a sudden, this liquid is on the floor, the temperature will drop to -
33% and ca. 15% of the liquid will flash of as vapour. The amount of vapour will therefore be 13,5 kg. This
will become app 20 m3 when flashed of. According to Norwegian rules the machinery room has to have a
minimum ventilation rate of 1 100 m3/h or 18 m3/minute. This means that within 2 – 3 minutes the ammo-
nia vapour has been removed from the room and vented out above the roof.
This seems an easy fix. But ammonia as a substance is toxic and not to be treated complacently. Treat it
with respect and not with fear.
Draw-backs
Black holes
So far I haven’t touched the black holes. In my mind the black holes when it comes to working with ammo-
nia as a refrigerant is not in the technology. There are no problems regarding ammonia systems that cannot
be circumvented by good engineering and careful maintenance.
The biggest problem is in our heads, in our fear of what we do not know.
I hope this has given you inspiration to work with ammonia in the future.