You are on page 1of 18

Reliability

Case Processing Summary


N %
Cases Valid 85 100.0
a
Excluded 0 .0
Total 85 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Cronbach's Standardized
a
Alpha Itemsa N of Items
-.002 -.002 2
a. The value is negative due to a negative average
covariance among items. This violates reliability
model assumptions. You may want to check item
codings.

Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
Facultatea 1.38 .771 85
Nevoie de programe de 1.56 1.063 85
formare

Inter-Item Correlation Matrix


Nevoie de
programe de
Facultatea formare
Facultatea 1.000 -.001
Nevoie de programe de -.001 1.000
formare

Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Scale Variance if Corrected Item- Squared Multiple Alpha if Item
Item Deleted Item Deleted Total Correlation Correlation Deleted
Facultatea 1.56 1.130 -.001 1.051E-6 .
Nevoie de programe de 1.38 .595 -.001 1.051E-6 .
formare

Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
2.94 1.723 1.313 2
Fleiss Multirater Kappa

Overall Agreementa
Asymptotic 95% Confidence
Asymptotic Interval
Kappa Standard Error z Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
Overall Agreement -.006 .008 -.838 .402 -.007 -.006
a. Sample data contains 85 effective subjects and 11 raters.
Factor Analysis

Correlation Matrix
Avantajel
Principalel e
Beneficiil e servicii participari
Introducere Activitati Castigul e oferite i la
Nevoie de teme Dezvoltare Formare derulate de unui curs cursurilor tinerilor cursuri
Facultate Mediu programe programe a unor noi profesional programe de de din mediul de
a l An genul de formare formare abilitati a continua de formare formare formare rural formare
Co Facultatea 1.000 -.017 .536 -.211 -.001 -.182 -.035 .066 .078 .054 -.023 .225 .137
rre Mediul -.017 1.000 -.068 .025 -.197 .008 .144 -.060 .029 -.066 -.154 .088 -.099
lati An .536 -.068 1.000 -.131 -.087 -.040 -.005 .005 .027 -.049 .036 .127 .168
on genul -.211 .025 -.131 1.000 -.241 -.022 .078 -.029 -.035 -.275 .004 -.126 -.048
Nevoie de -.001 -.197 -.087 -.241 1.000 -.173 .026 -.117 .070 .129 .027 -.101 -.121
programe
de formare
Introducere -.182 .008 -.040 -.022 -.173 1.000 -.022 .020 .139 -.044 .120 -.050 .051
teme
programe
formare
Dezvoltare -.035 .144 -.005 .078 .026 -.022 1.000 .126 .048 .022 -.050 -.001 .156
a unor noi
abilitati
Formare .066 -.060 .005 -.029 -.117 .020 .126 1.000 -.022 -.082 .326 .000 .169
profesional
a continua
Activitati .078 .029 .027 -.035 .070 .139 .048 -.022 1.000 .005 .223 -.088 .201
derulate de
programe
de formare
Castigul .054 -.066 -.049 -.275 .129 -.044 .022 -.082 .005 1.000 -.119 .133 -.010
unui curs
de formare
Beneficiile -.023 -.154 .036 .004 .027 .120 -.050 .326 .223 -.119 1.000 -.047 .121
cursurilor
de formare
Principalele .225 .088 .127 -.126 -.101 -.050 -.001 .000 -.088 .133 -.047 1.000 .171
servicii
oferite
tinerilor din
mediul rural
Avantajele .137 -.099 .168 -.048 -.121 .051 .156 .169 .201 -.010 .121 .171 1.000
participarii
la cursuri
de formare

KMO and Bartlett's Test


Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .491
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 108.446
df 78
Sig. .013

Communalities
Initial Extraction
Facultatea 1.000 .740
Mediul 1.000 .529
An 1.000 .710
genul 1.000 .585
Nevoie de programe de 1.000 .716
formare
Introducere teme programe 1.000 .674
formare
Dezvoltarea unor noi abilitati 1.000 .751
Formare profesionala 1.000 .701
continua
Activitati derulate de 1.000 .759
programe de formare
Castigul unui curs de 1.000 .611
formare
Beneficiile cursurilor de 1.000 .614
formare
Principalele servicii oferite 1.000 .554
tinerilor din mediul rural
Avantajele participarii la 1.000 .486
cursuri de formare
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Total Variance Explained
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 1.893 14.560 14.560 1.893 14.560 14.560
2 1.664 12.797 27.358 1.664 12.797 27.358
3 1.453 11.177 38.535 1.453 11.177 38.535
4 1.215 9.343 47.878 1.215 9.343 47.878
5 1.128 8.674 56.552 1.128 8.674 56.552
6 1.079 8.297 64.849 1.079 8.297 64.849
7 .928 7.140 71.989
8 .841 6.470 78.459
9 .735 5.653 84.112
10 .679 5.222 89.334
11 .540 4.156 93.491
12 .461 3.542 97.033
13 .386 2.967 100.000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Component Score Coefficient Matrix


Component
1 2 3 4 5 6
Facultatea .413 -.082 .106 -.184 -.009 .178
Mediul -.072 -.027 .384 .323 -.083 .173
An .372 .009 .139 -.266 -.113 .214
genul -.238 .200 .259 -.214 .136 .184
Nevoie de programe de .009 -.228 -.452 .027 .231 .250
formare
Introducere teme programe -.075 .236 -.046 .212 -.557 -.172
formare
Dezvoltarea unor noi abilitati .012 .105 .125 .445 .493 .270
Formare profesionala .106 .325 -.059 -.015 .394 -.373
continua
Activitati derulate de .093 .213 -.216 .264 -.282 .507
programe de formare
Castigul unui curs de .102 -.272 -.182 .387 -.027 -.258
formare
Beneficiile cursurilor de .075 .369 -.293 -.111 .020 -.119
formare
Principalele servicii oferite .236 -.094 .228 .189 -.036 -.379
tinerilor din mediul rural
Avantajele participarii la .246 .254 .025 .239 .067 .006
cursuri de formare
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Component Scores.

Component Score Covariance Matrix


Component 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 1.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
2 .000 1.000 .000 .000 .000 .000
3 .000 .000 1.000 .000 .000 .000
4 .000 .000 .000 1.000 .000 .000
5 .000 .000 .000 .000 1.000 .000
6 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1.000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Component Scores.

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
genul * Nevoie de programe 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
de formare
genul * Introducere teme 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
programe formare
genul * Dezvoltarea unor noi 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
abilitati
genul * Formare profesionala 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
continua
genul * Activitati derulate de 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
programe de formare
genul * Castigul unui curs de 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
formare
genul * Beneficiile cursurilor 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
de formare
genul * Principalele servicii 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
oferite tinerilor din mediul
rural
genul * Avantajele participarii 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
la cursuri de formare
genul * An 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
genul * Facultatea 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
Mediul * Nevoie de 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
programe de formare
Mediul * Introducere teme 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
programe formare
Mediul * Dezvoltarea unor 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
noi abilitati
Mediul * Formare 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
profesionala continua
Mediul * Activitati derulate de 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
programe de formare
Mediul * Castigul unui curs 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
de formare
Mediul * Beneficiile cursurilor 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
de formare
Mediul * Principalele servicii 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
oferite tinerilor din mediul
rural
Mediul * Avantajele 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
participarii la cursuri de
formare
Mediul * An 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%
Mediul * Facultatea 85 100.0% 0 0.0% 85 100.0%

genul * Nevoie de programe de formare

Crosstab
Count
Nevoie de programe de formare
1 2 3 4 6 Total
genul 1 15 8 1 2 2 28
2 39 17 0 0 1 57
Total 54 25 1 2 3 85

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 8.314 4 .081
Likelihood Ratio 8.766 4 .067
Linear-by-Linear Association 4.894 1 .027
N of Valid Cases 85
a. 6 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .33.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
a b
Value Standard Error Approximate T Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.241 .111 -2.266 .026c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.187 .112 -1.736 .086c
N of Valid Cases 85
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

genul * Introducere teme programe formare

Crosstab
Count
Introducere teme programe formare Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14
genul 1 5 3 5 0 3 0 2 0 4 1 1 0 4 28

2 6 5 6 8 6 6 3 3 6 0 4 1 3 57

Total 11 8 11 8 9 6 5 3 10 1 5 1 7 85

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 15.087 12 .237
Likelihood Ratio 20.626 12 .056
Linear-by-Linear Association .043 1 .837
N of Valid Cases 85
a. 20 cells (76.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .33.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
a b
Value Standard Error Approximate T Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.022 .116 -.205 .838c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .021 .117 .192 .849c
N of Valid Cases 85
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

genul * Dezvoltarea unor noi abilitati

Crosstab
Count
Dezvoltarea unor noi abilitati Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
genul 1 9 2 0 5 2 5 1 3 0 0 1 28

2 14 5 1 9 4 7 9 4 1 1 2 57

Total 23 7 1 14 6 12 10 7 1 1 3 85

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 5.090 10 .885
Likelihood Ratio 6.505 10 .771
Linear-by-Linear Association .513 1 .474
N of Valid Cases 85
a. 17 cells (77.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .33.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
a b
Value Standard Error Approximate T Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .078 .107 .714 .477c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .084 .108 .772 .442c
N of Valid Cases 85
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
Value Standard Errora Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.029 .108 -.262 .794c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.032 .107 -.289 .774c
N of Valid Cases 85
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.461 3 .691
Likelihood Ratio 1.531 3 .675
Linear-by-Linear Association .103 1 .748
N of Valid Cases 85
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is 1.98.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
a b
Value Standard Error Approximate T Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.035 .104 -.319 .751c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.046 .102 -.419 .676c
N of Valid Cases 85
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

genul * Castigul unui curs de formare

Crosstab
Count
Castigul unui curs de formare Total
1 2 3 4
genul 1 12 5 11 0 28
2 41 7 8 1 57
Total 53 12 19 1 85

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.806a 3 .032
Likelihood Ratio 8.875 3 .031
Linear-by-Linear Association 6.368 1 .012
N of Valid Cases 85
a. 3 cells (37.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .33.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
Value Standard Errora Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.275 .110 -2.609 .011c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.287 .108 -2.728 .008c
N of Valid Cases 85
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

genul * Beneficiile cursurilor de formare

Crosstab
Count
Beneficiile cursurilor de formare
1 2 3 4 5 Total
genul 1 3 14 3 8 0 28
2 6 24 16 10 1 57
Total 9 38 19 18 1 85

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 4.362 4 .359
Likelihood Ratio 4.961 4 .291
Linear-by-Linear Association .001 1 .973
N of Valid Cases 85
a. 3 cells (30.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .33.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
a b
Value Standard Error Approximate T Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .004 .111 .033 .974c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .016 .112 .148 .883c
N of Valid Cases 85
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

You might also like