Professional Documents
Culture Documents
For almost 10 years, ITS Team Sapuangin has been participating Shell-Eco Marathon
competition in Urban Concept class, Internal Combustion Energy category, and almost every year
won the first prize. Many pieces of research have been implemented to the vehicle to improve its
fuel efficiency. Aerodynamic drag is one of the resistances which increase depends on the velocity
of the car. Aerodynamic drag occurs due to the separation that produces the wake region at the
back of the vehicle. By increasing the fluid momentum through the vortex generator, the separation
point can be delayed resulting in a diminished wake region. Therefore, this research aims to
determine the effect of vortex generator placement and height on the separation point and wake
region so that it can reduce the aerodynamic drag of the Sapuangin XI EVO 2. This research is
based on numerical simulation using three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations with SIMPLE as
the algorithm solver. The placement and height variations that were used are (x/c) = 0.90; 0.92;
0.94, (h) = 0.3; 0.4; 0.5. Through numerical simulation, the optimal configuration was found to
be (x/c) = 0.92 and (h) = 0.3 reducing Cd value by 5.0534% and resulting fuel consumption of 418
km/l.
1. Introduction
ITS team has been participating in the Shell Eco-Marathon Asia since 2010. ITS Team
Sapuangin has built several urban concept class cars and prototypes fueled by diesel and gasoline.
Since 2017, ITS Team Sapuangin has been competing in the urban concept class and gasoline
category using Sapuangin XI EVO 2 car.
Several factors that influence fuel consumption in the energy-efficient Sapuangin XI EVO 2
car are rolling resistance, gravitational force, the mass of the car and driver, engine characteristics,
aerodynamic drag, and the driver's strategy in driving the car. From several factors that have been
described, the total resistance acting on the car is aerodynamic drag, rolling resistance, and
gravitational force.
The contribution of each resistance force can be determined by simple calculations. The
following is the Sapuangin XI EVO 2 car data.
Table 2. Sapuangin XI EVO 2 car data
Parameter Value
Vehicle and driver mass
150.4
(kg)
Rolling coefficient 0.00192
Transmission ratio 15
Wheel radius (m) 0.28
Frontal Area (m2) 1.038501
Table 3. Initial vehicle’s coefficient of drag data
Based on the data, the value of rolling resistance force is as follows.
𝐹𝑟 = 𝑚 × 𝑔 × 𝑓𝑟
𝐹𝑅 = 2.833𝑁
Aerodynamic drag changes with increasing speed. The value of drag force is shown in table 4.
Table 4. Initial vehicle’s aerodynamic drag data
V (km/h) FD (N)
5 0.157
10 0.553
15 1.189
20 2.038
25 3.064
30 4.364
35 5.799
40 7.081
The rolling and aerodynamic resistance are plotted in graphical form, a graph is obtained as in
Figure 1.
There are several pieces of research related to vortex generators installed on the upper surface
of an airfoil. Azmi et al [1] researched a passive vortex generator applied on NASA LS-0417. The
research was done numerically at Re = 1.41x105 with 16o of the angle of attack. Parameters that
are varied in this research were the height (h) and the placement (x/c) of the vortex generator with
counter-rotating rectangular vanes type. The results obtained from this research are the reduction
of coefficient of drag in the value of 1.2% to 8% and the increment of the coefficient of lift in the
value of 0.6% to 4.6%.
This study aims to determine the effect of adding a vortex generator to the Sapuangin XI EVO
2 car using a Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) simulation. In this study, the Sapuangin XI
EVO 2 car body design and the installed vortex generator were made with Solidwork 2017
software and the flow simulation on the car body before and after the addition of the vortex
generator was carried out with Ansys Fluent 18.1.
2. Methods
2.1 Simulation of Sapuangin XI EVO 2 without vortex generator
This step aims to evaluate the overall aerodynamic condition of the vehicle including
coefficient of drag value, flow characteristics around the vehicle, separation point, and the
boundary layer thickness. These pieces of information are needed to determine the vortex
generator’s geometry and its placement. This simulation is carried out at the vehicle’s cruising
speed, which is 0-40 km/h. The following figures show the vehicle’s geometry and its dimensional
specification.
Figure 2. Sapuangin XI EVO 2 model
Table 5. Sapuangin XI EVO 2 dimensional specification
Dimension Value
Length (mm) 2.6
Width (mm) 1.3
Height (mm) 1.1
Front Track Width (mm) 1
Rear Track Width (mm) 800
Wheel Base (mm) 1.5
Ground Clearance (mm) 200
1. Preprocessing
The computational domain was created which will be the geometrical representation and
boundary condition imposition. The domain’s geometry proportion depends on the geometry of
the vehicle including the length (L), width (W), and height (H). Each of these values is multiplied
by a certain coefficient. The computational domain later needs to be discretized through the
meshing process to solve the discretized equations of fluid flows.
The MATLAB Simulink block diagram used for the simulation is shown in figure 11. The
resulting output is the overall fuel economy in km/liter units.
Figure 12 shows the visualization of velocity contours on Sapuangin XI EVO 2 without vortex
generator at a speed range of 0-40 km/h in increments of 5 km/h. Velocity countor represents the
flow characteristic around the vehicle. The separation point followed by wake region at a speed of
25 km/h is also shown in figure 13 in blue contour. The figure shows where the separation occurs
at x = 3.84 then converted to x/c = 0.96 which will be the reference of the vortex generator
placement in order to find its optimal performance on reducing the wake region.
Figure 12. Velocity contour at a speed range of 0–40 km/h
Table 9 shows the coefficient of drag value after the installation of vortex generator on each
configuration. Based on the table, configuration D yields the best performance which reduced 5.05
% of the Cd. Figure 15 shows the visualization of velocity contours on Sapuangin XI EVO 2 with
vortex generator on configuration D at a speed of 25 km/h. Based on the figures, this configuration
has succeeded delaying the separation point to x = 3.931 or equal to x/c = 0.99 and reducing the
wake region at the back of the vehicle. Diminished wake region resulting a lower coefficient of
drag.
Table 9. Cd value on each VG configurations
Using the optimal configuration, the simulation is carried out at a speed range of 0-40 km/h to
obtain Cd value as shown in Table 10. The value of Cd is then calculated to obtain the Fd as shown
in table 11. The graph of aerodynamic drag comparison between before and after the installation
of vortex generator is shown in figure 16.
Figure 16. Graph of Cd before and after the installation of vortex generator
Fuel consumption can be estimated by making a simulation through Matlab with car data as
stated in the previous chapter. The following are the results of the Matlab simulation.
1. Original body
At a distance of 2530 meters or one lap, the fuel consumption is 6.453 ml, so the overall
fuel economy can be estimated at 392 km/l.
2. Body after installation of the Vortex Generator
After installing the vortex generator, there was an improvement in fuel consumption, there
are 6.041 ml so that the overall fuel economy became 418 km/l.
4. Conclusion
Based on this research, the following conclusions can be drawn on the effect of the installation
of vortex generator:
1. The installation of vortex generator on Sapuangin XI EVO 2 with optimal placement and
height obtained the optimal configuration, namely (x/c) = 0.92 and (h) = 0.3. This
configuration reduced the Cd by 5.0534%.
2. By using the optimal configuration, the value of Cd is obtained at the speed range of 0-40
km/h. Then the values inputted to the MATLAB Simulink simulation resulting in the fuel
consumption of the vehicle is 418 km/l.
5. References
[1] Azmi, U. and Herman, S. “Studi Eksperimen dan Numerik Pengaruh Penambahan Vortex
Generator pada Airfoil NASA LS-0417”, JURNAL TEKNIK ITS Vol. 4, No. 1. 2015.
[2] Godard, G. and Stanislas, M. “Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 1: Optimization
of passive vortex generators”, Aerospace Science and Technology 10, 181-191. 2006.
[3] John C. Lin. “Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer
separation”, Progress in Aerospace Sciences 38, 389-420. 2002.
[4] Shan, H. et al. “Numerical Study of Passive and Active Flow Separation Control Over a
NACA0012 Airfoil”, Mathematics Preprint Series 03. 2007.