Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cl2 + ℎ𝜈 → 2Cl
𝑘2
Cl + H2 → HCl + H
𝑘3 Steady state eqns:
H + Cl2 → HCl + Cl
𝑘4 d[Cl]/dt = 0 = 2Ia + ? ------------------ (1)
H + O2 → HO2 d[H]/dt = 0 = ? ------------------------- (2)
𝑘5
Cl + O2 → ClO2 From (2) calculate [Cl]. [Cl]=? ------------- (3)
𝑘6 Substituting (3) in (1), neglecting [O2]2, calculate [H].
Cl + X → ClX [H] = ? ---------------- (4)
Integrated form: Or
The absorbance, A, is defined by:
=A
Note: cell length is just
a parameter = 1cm (say)
Ozone layer in atmosphere
If the absorption of solar radiation in the first and third steps is steady, the concentration
of ozone rises to a steady level
-------- (i)
-------- (ii)
Adding eqs. (i) and (ii)
-------- (iii)
-------- (v)
Obtained by taking
d[O3]/dt=0 in Eq. (v)
UV radiation
HCFCs deplete less stratospheric ozone than equivalent amount of CFCs because:
ii. HCFCs contain C-H bond. H is attached by OH radical in the lower part of
atmosphere (Troposphere) and Cl is released (oxidised). Cl typically combines with
other chemicals to form compounds that dissolve in water and ice and are
removed by precipitation. So Cl doesn’t reach the stratosphere.
iii. Photolysis rates of HCFCs are slower than CFCs in stratosphere. So less Cl is
released from them in lower stratosphere than CFCs.
HCFCs still contain Cl, it has a potential for ozone depletion, hence 2nd generation
alternatives HFCs are introduced with zero ozone depletion potential.