Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE
BSc (Hons) Biotechnology
Plant Biotechnology AGRI 3066Y
Secondary metabolites
Figure 1 shows the secondary metabolism pathway which is inherited from primary
metabolites.
Objectives
To highlight the analytical methods used for extraction of secondary metabolites
from medicinal plant; Psiadia plant.
Investigating the qualitative and quantitative analysis antimicrobial crude extract
from psiadia plant displaying highest phytochemical composition and antioxidant
property
5. Leucoanthrocyanins
Extract the crude plant and extract all the pigments. Add magnesium turnings and
concentrated HCl to the filtrate.10minutes if coloration appears red this means that
leucoanthrocyanins is present. Or add concentrated HCL to the filtrate .Warm for 30
minutes. Red coloration shows presence of Flavonols.
3.0 RESULTS
Extract 0.2
Meth/DCM - +green + - -
+blue
DCM + +blue ++ - +
++green
Ethyl - ++blue ++ - -
Acetate
Water - ++blue ++ + -
Table 3: the results of the TLC Thin-layer chromatography conducted on the Psiadia
leaves.
Plate Results
1 Negative
3 Negative
Figure 1: The results of the TLC Thin-layer chromatography conducted on the Psiadia
leaves
0 0.000
10 0.020
20 0.039
30 0.051
40 0.064
50 0.070
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Concentration (µg/ml)
10000
Dilution factor = =20 Volume = 10ml Mass of extract = 1.2g
500
0.06
x= =42.8571, y = 0.0014x, Absorbance at 50µg/ml = 0.06
0.0014
c =42.8571 X 20=857.1429
C = (857.1429 X 10)/1.2
C = 7142.86 mg QE/g
Table 5: The results for the absorbance of the total flavonoid content for the other group
which used extract and quercetin.
510
0 0.00
10 0.017
20 0.039
30 0.048
40 0.055
50 0.060
Total Flavonoid content using extract
0.07
f(x) = 0 x
0.06 R² = 0.98
Absorbance at 510 nm
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Concentration (µg/ml)
510
0 0.00
10 0.381
20 0.885
30 1.146
40 1.721
50 2.266
Gallic acid standard curve
60
40
30
20
10
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Concentration of gallic acid at µg/ml
Table 7: The results for the absorbance at 685nm for the group which used diluted
extract and gallic acid.
685
X100 0.194
X1000 0.103
3.5 Antibacterial assay
The results were taken in terms of diameter of the zone of inhibition. Table 8 to table 12
and figures 8 and 9 shows the results and the means of the zone of inhibition.
Table 8: shows result for our group and we used hexane extract.
1 2 3
Extract 1 22 12 10 15
Extract 2 23 21 0 15
Positive control 0 0 0 0
Negative 0 0 0 0
control
1 2 3
Extract 1 20 15 20 18
Extract 2 12 18 16 15
Positive control 20 35 25 27
Negative 0 0 0 0
control
Table 10: shows result for group 3 which used methanol extract.
1 2 3
Negative 0 0 0 0
control
Table 11: shows result for group which used chloroform extract ( informations as per
provided by the group)
Extract 1 20
Positive control 22
Negative control 0
Table 12: shows result for group which used Chloroform:Methanol(4:1) extract.
1 2 3
Extract 1 0 0 0 0
Extract 2 0 0 0 0
Positive control 0 0 0 0
Negative 0 0 0 0
control
Figure 5: The results for the Antibacterial assay for our group.
Figure 6: The results for the Antibacterial assay for the group which used Methanol
chloroform (4:1)
Figure 8: The 96-wells Microplate for the group which used Chloramphenical.
Figure 9: The 96-wells Microplate for the group which used Chloroform.
Figure 10: The 96-wells Microplate for the group which used Methanol.
Figure 11: The 96-wells Microplate for the group which used Chloroform:methanol(1:1).
ANTIOXIDANT ASSAY
The antioxidant assay was conducted to determine the free radical scavenging activity
of the extracts. The table 21 to table 25 show the absorbance of the diluted solutions
and the antioxidant activity (AA%). The antioxidant activity (AA%) was calculated using
the formula:
AA %=
[( Absblank −Abssample )∗100 ]
Absblank
Table 13: The absorbance of the diluted solutions and the antioxidant activity (AA%) for
the group which used Quercetin.
40 0.930 -11.2
50 0.821 123.0
60 0.801 1.35
70 0.711 12.4
80 0.691 14.9
90 0.381 53.1
100 0.231 71.5
Table 14: The absorbance of the diluted solutions and the antioxidant activity (AA%) for
the group which used hexane.
Table 15: The absorbance of the diluted solutions and the antioxidant activity (AA%) for the
group which used Methanol.
Extract Absorbance AA%
blank 0.00
Rep1 0.064 -6.4
Table 16: The absorbance of the diluted solutions and the antioxidant activity (AA%) for the
group which used Chloroform:methanol(1:1).
Extract Absorbance AA%
blank 0.00
Rep1 0.164 -16.4
Rep2 0.146 -14.6
Rep3 0.105 -10.5
4.0. Discussion
Five solvents were tested on Psiadia crude extract which include methanol, Methanol:
Dichloromethane, Dichloromethane, Ethyl acetate and water. It is important to note that
the type of polarity of a specific solvent determine which type of compound it will
dissolve. Both methanol, Methanol: Dichloromethane was able to extract Coumarins,
Tannins and saponins while Dichloromethane solvent was able to exact all except for
Anthraquinones. (Table 2). Flavonoids was extracted only by Methanol:
Dichloromethane solvent. Tannins and saponins were extracted from all the solvents.
However ethyl acetic solvent was not able to extract coumarin, saponin and flavonoids
as illustrated in table 2. Polar molecules tend to move towards polar organic solvents
and stays in the aqueous phrase while non-polar molecules favours the organic phrase.
The total phenolic content and total flavonoid were also determined by the Folin –
ciocalteau method.It was seen that the phenolic content and flavonoid is low total so the
psiadia plant is not a good antioxidant.It was also noted that antimicrobial activity of
psiadia extract was more effective with the use of Chloroform:Methanol(4:1) than the
other extracts.
5.1 Conclusion
The phytochemical study of Psiadia plant has revealed the presence of phytochemical
composition such as tannins, saponin and couramins, phenol and flavonoids. Further
studies can be done on the psiadia plant to isolate the most bio constituent attributing to
the medicinal benefits of psiadia plant such as pain relief.