Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Article
It is difficult to extract high-quality RNA of sufficient quantity from the stem tissues of tree
legumes, such as Acacia koa and Leucaena leucocephala, because they contain high amounts
of phenolic compounds and polysaccharides. The objective of this study was to develop an
improved protocol that produces high-quality RNA from the stem tissues of these tree legumes.
We developed a modified method that utilizes a lysis buffer containing a mixture of two
commercially available reagents, RLT buffer from Qiagen RNeasy Kit and Fruit-mate™ from
Takara. Comparison of the modified method with four other RNA extraction methods (Qiagen
RNeasy, Fruit-mate™, TRIzol, and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)) showed that the
modified method was far superior to the other methods. The extracted RNA produced
reproducible DNA products in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). This
improved protocol is rapid and easy, and it will facilitate genetic studies of A. koa, L.
leucocephala, and other woody plants.
Keywords: RNA extraction, Acacia koa, Leucaena leucocephala, tropical tree legumes, Hawaii
INTRODUCTION
Acacia koa is a leguminous timber wood tree RNA extraction, like TRIzol, cetyltrimethylammonium
endemic to the Hawaiian Islands. With its beautiful bromide (CTAB), and Qiagen RNeasy kits, cannot
texture, hardiness, and carving quality of the wood, it is remove these compounds completely, which lowers the
the most economically important tree in Hawaii (Baker et quality and quantity of extracted RNA and affects the
al., 2009; Yanagida et al., 2004). Similarly, Leucaena downstream results of molecular biology techniques. As a
leucocephala is a tree legume, which is widely used for result, a variety of methods have been developed based
agroforestry (Brewbaker et al., 1990). For genetic studies on the modification of traditional extraction methods, such
of A. koa and L. leucocephala using molecular biology as modified CTAB and TRIzol protocols developed by
techniques such as complementary DNA (cDNA) library Gambino et al. (2008) and Jordon-Thaden et al. (2015) to
construction, reverse transcription-polymerase chain improve RNA extraction on polyphenol-rich grapevines
reactions (RT-PCR), and microarray analysis, it is a and woody plants.
critical step to extract high-quality RNA in sufficient
quantity. The isolation of RNA from these woody species
poses a particular challenge in that they often contain
high levels of polysaccharides and phenolic compounds, *Corresponding author: Dulal Borthakur, Department of
which can co-purify with RNA and inhibit enzymatic Molecular Biosciences and Bioengineering, University of
manipulations (Loomis, 1974; Nassuth et al., 2000; Hawaii at Manoa, 1955 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI
Wilkins et al., 1996). Many existing protocols for plant 96822, USA. E-mail: dulal@hawaii.edu
Ishihara et al. 031
We have observed that by using various RNA preparation were carried out according to Qiagen’s
extraction methods, it is often difficult to obtain sufficient instructions for the RNA purification from plant cells
amounts of high-quality RNA from seedlings of A. koa (https://www.qiagen.com/), except the additional washing
and L. leucocephala, especially from hardier stems. In step with 75% ethanol after the second wash with Buffer
this study, we report a modified RNA extraction method RPE from the RNeasy Plant Kit.
that utilizes a combination of the Qiagen RNeasy kit and (2) The RNeasy extraction: the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit
Takara Fruit-mate™. The results of this modified (cat. no. 74904, Qiagen, Germany) was carried out as
extraction method yielded sufficient quantity of high- described in the manufacturer's instructions.
quality RNA from seedlings of both A. koa and L. (3) The Fruit-mate™ extraction (cat. no. 9192, Takara,
leucocephala. Japan): Protocol 1 of the manufacturer’s instructions was
followed with the exception of the substitution of RNAiso
Plus (Takara) with TRI Reagent BD (cat. no. T3809,
MATERIALS AND METHODS Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA).
(4) The TRIzol method: TRI Reagent BD was used
Plant Material according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
(5) The CTAB method: it was carried out as described by
Seeds of A. koa were collected from the Chang et al. (1993).
Maunawili Research Station of Hawaii Agriculture
Research Center (HARC), Kailua, Hawaii. Seeds of L. RNA Analysis
leucocephala were collected from the Waimanalo
Research Station of University of Hawaii, Waimanalo, The quantity and quality of the RNA were
Hawaii. Seeds of both species were immersed in sulfuric assessed at wavelengths of 230, 260, and 280 nm using
acid for 10 min for scarification, rinsed with water, and a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer ND-1000 (NanoDrop
incubated in petri dishes with wet filter paper at 28ºC until Technologies, DE, USA). To confirm the quality, the RNA
they germinated (3-5 days) (Rushanaedy et al., 2012). was analyzed based on gel-like images and RNA
The resulting germinated seedlings were then planted Integrity Numbers (RIN) obtained through an Agilent
into a tray containing a vermiculite-perlite mixture and 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). Two-
maintained at 25°C ± 2°C with a 16/8-h light/dark sample t-test was performed to determine if the quantity
-1 -1
photoperiod with an irradiance of 30 µmol s m for six and quality of RNA obtained with the modified protocol
months. Stems were collected and immediately placed in were significantly different from the ones obtained with
liquid nitrogen prior to RNA extraction. the other four methods.
Table 1. Quantity and quality of total RNA extracted by five methods from woody stems of A. koa and L.
leucocephala (mean ± SE) (n=3)
* indicates that RIN value was not detectable due to the RNA concentrations being too low. † indicates significant
difference (p <0.05) with the modified protocol. †† indicates significant difference (p <0.01) with the modified protocol.
RNA instead of the synthesized cDNA as a template. Copois et al. (2007), the 28S/18S ratio even can be a
misleading indicator of RNA integrity. Therefore, we did
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION not use this ratio to assess the RNA integrity. The
modified method also yielded over 200 µg of RNA from
Quality and Quantity of RNA one gram of stem tissue of both A. koa and L.
leucocephala, which is higher than or within the range of
Compared to the other four methods, the the quantity obtained from previously published modified
modified method yielded sufficient amounts of high- RNA extraction protocols for woody plant species (Chang
quality RNA (Table 1). Typically, RNA with the A260/A280 et al., 1993; Gambino et al., 2008). The combination of
the two reagents creates a synergistic effect in RNA
and A260/A230ratios ≥2.0 is considered pure and required extraction, but mechanisms are not known; the
for accurate and consistent results in downstream compositions of both reagents are also not known as they
applications (Bilgin et al., 2009; Johnson et al., 2012). We are proprietary reagents.
found that the modified method was optimal for producing
reproducible good results. Among the five protocols Although the RNA yield from L. leucocephala
tested in this report, the modified method yielded the using the modified method was 25% lower than using the
best-quality RNA with the A260/A280 and A260/A230 ratios Fruit-mate™ method, the latter method had a RIN of 3.0
greater than 2 in both A. koa and L. leucocephala and produced a smear in the gel-like image, which
samples. indicated partial degradation. The TRIzol method
The total RNA extracted with the modified produced low-quality RNA from both legume species
protocol also had an RNA Integrity Number (RIN) of 8.0 (Table 1). These RNA samples did not produce any
for A. koa and 6.8 for L. leucocephala with clear, distinct visible bands of 18S and 28S rRNA in the gel-like image
bands of 28S and 18S rRNA without degradation, which (Figure 1), indicating that they were degraded. Similarly,
are the indicative of intact RNA (Figure 1). According to although the CTAB method produced a yield over 800 µg
Fleige and Pfaffl (2006), obtaining RNA with a high RIN is RNA/g plant tissue, the RNA was partially degraded; the
important as it has been shown to affect the results of gel-like image showed smearing and the 28S rRNA band
quantitative RT-PCR. An RIN greater than 6.5 is was fainter. Its RIN also indicated partial degradation of
generally considered to be acceptable as a quality index RNA, and such partially degraded RNA is not suitable for
for molecular studies (Durrenberger et al., 2010). The applications like cDNA library construction and
RIN increased significantly in the modified protocol quantitative PCR analysis (Fleige and Pfaffl, 2006).
compared to the other protocols (Table 1). The 28S/18S
ratio is also a common criterion to evaluate RNA integrity; RT-PCR
however, no significant correlation was observed
between the 28S/18S ratio and the quantitative RT-PCR The RT-PCR results showed that the modified
performance (Fleige and Pfaffl, 2006), and according to method produced high-quality RNA usable for
Ishihara et al. 033
Figure 1. Gel-like image of total RNA obtained from Agilent Bioanalyzer. Total RNA of A. koa, extracted by (lane 1) the
modified method, (lane 2) the Qiagen RNeasy method, (lane 3) the Fruit-mate™ method, (lane 4) the TRIzol method, and
(lane 5) the CTAB method. Total RNA of L. leucocephala, extracted by (lane 6) the modified method, (lane 7) the Qiagen
RNeasy method, (lane 8) the Fruit-mate™ method, (lane 9) the TRIzol method, (lane 10) the CTAB method. M - a marker.
downstream applications. All the RNA samples were greater amplification compared to the RNeasy method.
found to be free from DNA contamination because no-RT This result is consistent with the quality and integrity of
controls in the RT-PCR did not show any amplification for RNA, as the RNeasy-extracted RNA had a low A260/A230
both A. koa and L. leucocephala (Figures 2A and 2B). ratio, indicating presence of impurities, which interfere
From A. koa samples, RT-PCR with the RNA extracted with PCR amplification. Moreover, the A. koa RNA
with the modified protocol successfully amplified the actin samples extracted with the other three methods were
fragment (Figure 2C). Although RT-PCR of the A. koa highly degraded and produced no amplification (Figure
RNA obtained from the RNeasy method also produced 2C). Although RT-PCR with the L. leucocephala RNA
the actin fragment, the modified protocol resulted in samples extracted with all the protocols except the
Int. J. For. Wood Sci. 034
Figure 2. RT-PCR analysis of actin gene fragment. No-RT-PCR controls with RNA from (A) A. koa and (B) L. leucocephala
and RT-PCR of RNA from (C) A. koa and (D) L. leucocephala. RNA used was extracted by (lane 1) the modified method, (lane 2)
the Qiagen RNeasy method, (lane 3) the Fruit-mate™ method, (lane 4) the TRIzol method, and (lane 5) the CTAB method. M - a
1 kb DNA marker.