Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Comparation of Properties Between Cast Steel & Forged Steels For Rotary Kiln Rings

    Uploaded by

    sreeganeshr
    68 views10 pages
    casting of tyre

    Original Title

    Comparation of Properties Between Cast Steel & Forged Steels for Rotary Kiln Rings

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    casting of tyre

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    68 views10 pages

    Comparation of Properties Between Cast Steel & Forged Steels For Rotary Kiln Rings

    Uploaded by

    sreeganeshr
    casting of tyre

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 10
    7 A comparative stuay on Properties Between cast Steet ana rorgea steer Rotary Kiln Rings February, 1996 Material Engineering Dept. meroran Plant, as profes the t}xe and the roller for votary Kiln are normally used et. the temperatuxe xange of roum temperature to 200 deg.c, nd room temperature to 100 deg.C, respectively. mneiz Life will be determined by spalling caused by contact rolling fatigue phenomena. Because the detailed comparative study on rotary kiln rings. made by casting and forging have not been done in ISH, we have studied and compared about the characteristics of casting and forging crank throw and roll by Its own data, 2, Comparison of Internal and External qualities It is needless to cay that the quality of forgings superior Ti 4 unavoidsbie appearance of. casting defects such as ) A shrinkage, blow hole, sand inclusion, etc., in casting and it ke impossible to remove ell the defects followed by =epair welding. on the contrary, it 4e easy to got sound internal ana external quality in forging by forging operation. Especially, kenarkable improvenent of toughness ana auctitity wf12 be got because the principal ferging Gizection of ring Abrging ts parallel to the contact rolling direction of rotary kiln ring. comparison of Mechanical Properties vertical type moulding and forging which manufactured by JsW"s aie-forging method Although the chemical compositions of them are little bit @igferent, required quality levels and ultimate tensile strength are elnost cane. the test pieces for each test was taken from the sane location and same direction of each product (see Figs. 1, 2) ue_1 Chemica composition of exank throw( wt. © meteriaa] ¢ [si | mm |? | s [xi [ex | ca [mo | v casting | -25|-53 [1.25 | 012 | co7 | -a7 | -25{ - [- | 20 rorsing | .22| .26| -2| -011 | -o09 | -s0 | -2a] -24[-05 | 12 3 le] ° e A INS .\ f 1S |) on of Test Pieces from Cast Crank Throw , a/2zstensite If TRotation-perasng sRotation-Bending (medium) Fig. 2 Location of Test Pieces from Forging Crank Throw able 2 shows the mechanical properties of casted and forged crank throw. rable 2 Meet seat Pro} 35 mmc. Matbriai | vo(xgt/nm”)| 70 (xgt/nm”)| ELongation(s)| R.A. (9) castinh 34.6 57.2 23.3 4g sn forging sre superior to casting by comparing elongation and reduction of 4. Comparison of Fatigue Strength There are many comparstive study reports in fatigue strength of castings and forgings, and all the reports reveal the superiority of forgings. Fig. 2 and Pig. 4 show rotating-bending fatigue strefigth test results of small eide test pieces(10 mm aia.if and medium size test pleces(60 mm 55 am), respectively. \ Roth figures clearly show the superiority of forging. | Fepecially, the medivm size Lost result of casting var}os widely, which resulting from internal defects that confirm to the quality reguirements but cannot detect by tne ndn-~ Considering the above fact, the aisference of fatigue strength in actual large size product is remarkable and reliability of forging will be higher than that of casting. Fig. 5 shows the relation between fatigue strength and hardnese in 1¥c24o forged and cast steed. In general, it is said that the fatigue strength of sound casting is about 00% of forging's. In case of existing internal defects in casting, that ratio falls to about 50% depending on the size, shape, Aistribution, characteristics of the defects tt Ti a Hl | ti mad 3 smmanciemenponnahn Fig. 3. S-N curve/snaii size 7 18 tamer smear Pig. € S-M Curve/Medium Size 1? The Japan steed Works, bte. fength (kg/ast) Rotation bending fatigue Hardness (us Data sheet wo, Relation between fatigue strength and_hardness BR 2-2-1 in 1%CrHo forged, cast steel and cast iron ee Comparison of Rolling Contact Fatigue strength Fig. 6 shows the relation between hardness and life of forged roll. AU low hardness range («RC 22/25, which

    You might also like