You are on page 1of 4

genetic engineering Socratic Seminar AoL

{To be Held on Thursday December 19th}


LT: I can construct an argument on the impact of genetic engineering on the human race and society today.

Objective: For our genetics unit you have been studying heredity and the probability of traits being passed from
one generation to the next. What if as a baby your genome was altered? Would you alter the genes of your own
baby if you had the option of avoiding a premature death? These questions and more surrounding genetic
engineering and genetic equity will be researched and discussed during your socratic seminar AoL.

Guiding Discussion Question:


Is genetic engineering helpful or hurtful for the human race?
Resources: In order to prepare for your socratic seminar you will be using the resources provided in the
Genetic Engineering BBK AFL - Genetic Engineering AFL . The resource links provided supply the evidence
to support your claim.

➔ Format for the Socratic Seminar: 1) Fishbowl style (inner and outer circle).
2) Four rotating rounds between inner and outer circle.
3) Students in the inner circle engage in dialogue.
4) Students in the outer circle assess the students in the inner circle
and record notes to be able to be prepared for the next rotation.

➔ Grading for Socratic Seminar: 1) Genetic Engineering BBK AFL.


2) Evidence sheet for socratic seminar AoL.
3) Peer/teacher assessment during seminar.

CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS:


Exemplary Proficient Developing Beginning
Expectations
4 3 2 1

Genetic engineering BBK AFL


was completed in its entirety
prior to the socratic seminar Genetic engineering BBK AFL
AoL. The BBK AFL was was completed in its entirety Genetic engineering BBK
Genetic engineering BBK
completed prior to the deadline prior to the socratic seminar AFL was almost completed in
was either not turned in, or
Genetic Engineering and clearly outlined evidence to AoL. The BBK AFL was its entirety prior to the socratic
was turned in but missed the
BBK AFL support a claim about genetic completed prior to the deadline seminar AoL. The BBK AFL
deadline. Or the BBK AFL
engineering. The synthesis and outlined evidence to was at least started, but the
was missing evidence.
response elaborated on the topic. support a claim about genetic evidence was lacking.
engineering.
Evidence sheet for the socratic Evidence sheet for the socratic
Evidence sheet for the socratic
seminar AoL included a clearly seminar AoL included claims,
seminar AoL attempted to
stated claim, aligned evidence to aligned evidence to support, and Evidence sheet was either
Evidence Sheet for include claims, aligned
support, and reliable sources. reliable sources. The student incomplete, missing, or had
Socratic Seminar evidence to support, and
The student shared five or more shared at least four claims. three or less claims.
reliable sources. The student
claims.
shared less than four claims.

Peer assessment was provided


for another student during the
socratic seminar AoL process, Peer assessment was provided
AND student turned in peer for another student during the Student attempted to provide
Peer/Teacher Peer assessment was not
assessment sheet. Peer socratic seminar AoL process, feedback to a peer during the
Assessment of provided for another student,
assessment sheet was completed AND student turned in peer socratic seminar AoL process.
Performance during nor was a peer assessment
in its entirety and included assessment sheet. Peer Student may not have turned
Socratic Seminar sheet turned in.
written feedback. assessment sheet was in a peer assessment sheet.
completed.

Socratic Seminar Evidence Sheet


Guiding Question: Is genetic engineering helpful or hurtful for the human race?

Response: Some forms of genetic engineering, such as CRISPR-Cas9 are beneficial to humanity, but others
are unnecessary or potentially harmful.

Key Terms to Define:

Genetic equity - that our claims on one another and our mutual obligations derive from our status as
beings of a particular sort and not from contingent features of our lives, such as gender, race or genetic
constitution.

Bioethics - the ethics of medical and biological research.

Claim: Evidence: Source:


Example… “The ethical concerns focused on the NPR article: Human Pig embryos
possibility the human cells could create
Chimeras are unethical and therefore are animals that had human brain cells or NPR online article: Controversial Research on
Creation of Human-Animal Embryos
harmful to the human race, as the lines of tissues, blurring the line between the
Homo sapiens are blurred. species.”

It is said by many scientists that “With every passing year, the https://www.healthline.com/healt
cloning can never be made safe. question is less “could we” clone a h-news/research-for-human-clon
Cloning was tested on animals, human than “should we.” ing
such as sheep, and it was
successful. However, there are any
harmful after effects of cloning.
Cloning is unnecessary. Although
it may seem fascinating, cloning
humans will not benefit the human
race and has a multitude of risks
and concerns tied with it. It may be
possible at some point, but that it
doesn't mean it should happen.
There are downsides to cloning,
and not many valid reasons to do
besides pure experiment. It won't
benefit society greatly, and has the
possibility of causing harm. It is
also deemed unethical by many.

Three parent children are children “ But studies in mice have Three Parent Children -
whose mothers egg was taken out, shown that mixtures of Nature.com
nucleus was replaced by another mitochondria can result in
person's land then fertilized by the neurological disorders or
father's sperm. This is done when a metabolic conditions.”
mothers nucleu shas risk of
carrying or does carry a disease. “A three-page editorial
Although this procedure can accompanying the study notes
prevent some diseases from that the researchers had the
occurring, there’s no telling what baby's parents sign a consent
form acknowledging that their
can happen to the child in the
egg was undergoing an
future. There are risks that include
experimental technique. But the
neurological disorders and form only described the
metabolic conditions. procedure superficially”

“The value of the experiment


will be limited if scientists
cannot track the boy as he
grows, Egli says. “It looks like a
rush to use this as a treatment
and telling patients that this is
the treatment, during a time
when we still know very little
about what the outcomes are.”

Crispr-Cas9 is a genome editing “CRISPR-Cas9 has triggered a https://www.smh.com.au/technol


technique. It is a powerful revolution in which laboratories ogy/crispr-will-save-lives-and-tec
technology that can cure diseases around the world are using the hnology-can-t-come-soon-enoug
in the human genome. It involves technology for innovative h-20180225-p4z1n3.html
an enzyme that can cut DNA. it applications in biology”
locates the target DNA that carries
the virus, and cuts it, which “It’s the closest we’ve ever come
disables the virus. It can also to a cure for cancer. We’ve already
disable genes to observe their been able to cure HIV infection in
functions. This can be done in animal models, and even in human
cultured and stem cells, as well as cell cultures, by removing the viral
eggs. It can be used to target genes that insert themselves into
multiple genes at once. This can our DNA. Incurable genetic
combat many diseases. diseases, like Duchenne’s
Crispr-Cas9 has the capability of muscular dystrophy, could soon be
removing and preventing diseases a thing of the past. CRISPR has
in the human genome. It can cut already been used to cure the
out strands that carry viruses and disease in rats.”
replace them. This is revolutionary
and can save many lives and rid
them of the burden of their illness.
It has few risks and has made
huge advances in society and the
medical field.

You might also like