Professional Documents
Culture Documents
K2
K4 K5
_ +
K3 KA v
+
ef’ 1 S 'do K 3 efd 1 S A
+ Td Te
Electrical loop
K6
Ts
1
Mechanical Loop Mechanical Loop
K1 K1
Ts
_ _
1 377 1 377
+ +
Tm _ MS S
Tm MS D S
Td
S 377
Tm S M S D S 377 K1
D 2
Te
S
Td 377
Te Td Ts M
Te D K1 Ts
Tm S S 2 D M S
377 K1
M
S C
2
Tm S S 2 n S 2n
Damping Torque Synchronizing Torque Characteristic Equation
_ _
1 377 1 377
+ +
Tm MS D S
Tm MS D S
S
377
M
M S 377 K M
C C
Tm S S 2 D
Tm S 2 2 n S n2 S 1 S 2
1
S C where
Tm S S 2 2 n S n2
n j n 1 2
where
are the roots of the characteristic equation
377 K1
n Natural frequncey
M
D
Damping Coefficient
2M n
©Mohamed El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 7 ©Mohamed El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 8
2
Mechanical Loop Mechanical Loop
K1 K1
_ _
1 377 1 377
+ +
Tm MS D S
Tm MS D S
n j n 1 2
j d
j d n j n 1 2 n
Where j d
is the damping n
Roots n j n 1 2
Mechanical Loop
j d j d K1
0 n _
+ 1 377
1 MS D S
Tm
n S C
Tm
n 1 2
Tm S S 2 2 n S n2
K
1
Assume Tm is a step input
1 n Time
S
C K
S 2 2 n S 2n S
The time domain solution of the equation is
1 2
t 2
KC KC
sin d t e nt tan 1
0 n n d
©Mohamed El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 11 ©Mohamed El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 12
3
Time Response of Mechanical Loop Lack of Damping Torque
d
0
2 1
KC KC
2n 2n
1
Time Time
377 K1
KC
n
M
2n
KC
sin d t e nt
KC
lim lim 2
n 0
n 0
n nd
Time
4
Lack of Synchronizing Torque Synchronous Machine Model
K1
Mechanical loop
_
+ 1 377
Tm _ MS D S
K4 K5
KC K2
2n _ +
K3 KA v
+
ef’ 1 S 'do K 3 efd 1 S A
Electrical loop +
K6
Time
Te Te
K4 K5 K4 K5
K2 K2
_ + _ +
K3 v K3 v
+ +
ef’ 1 S 'do K 3 efd ef’ 1 S 'do K 3 efd
Electrical loop + Electrical loop +
K6 K6
5
Electrical Loop with VR Electrical Loop with VR
Te K 2 K3K 4 Te K 2 K3K 4
1 S do
'
K3 1 S do
'
K3
G j
K 2 K3 K 4
Te S K 2 K 3 K 4
1 do
'
K3 2
6
Electrical Loop with VR Electrical Loop with VR
Electrical Loop with VR Te
Electrical Loop with VR K5
K2
+
K3 KA v
Te
ef’ 1 S 'do K 3 efd 1 S A
K5 +
K2
+
K3 KA v
K6
ef’ 1 S 'do K 3 efd 1 S A
+
K K K
2 ' 5 A
Te S do A
S
K6
K
'
1 K3 K6 K A
S 2 A ' do 3 S
A do 3
K A do K 3
'
7
Te Te
Electrical Loop with VR K5 Electrical Loop with VR K5
K2 K2
+ +
K3 KA v K3 KA v
ef’ 1 S 'do K 3 efd 1 S A ef’ 1 S 'do K 3 efd 1 S A
+ +
K6 K6
Te S C Te j
; Replace S by j (Oscillation frequency) C 2
S S 2 2 n S n2 j
180 tan 1 2 n 2
2
2 2 n
2 2
n
Te j
n
C n
2
j
n 2 j 2 n Te Td
Te j
When K5>0
C 2 Synchronizing Torque is negative up to =n
180 tan 1 2 n 2
j 2
n
2 2 n
2 2
n
0 Ts
Te
Electrical Loop with VR K5 Negative Impact of VR
K2
+
K3 KA v
ef’ 1 S 'do K 3 efd 1 S A
+
0
K6
Td
Te j C 2
tan 1 2 n 2
j 2
n
2 2 n
2 2
n KA1
Ts 0
Td Te KA2 > KA1
When K5<0 n
Damping Torque is negative up to =n n 31
VR could enhance one of the torques but could reduce the other
8
Damping and Synchronizing Torques in
Multi-Machine System Electric Torques on ith Machine
j K1ii
K1ij
_ _
i
n
Tmi + 1 i 377 Tei S K1ij j K 2ij e 'fj
_ M i S Di S
_ j 1
efj’
K2ij K2ii
K4ii K5ii
j • The angle between machine buses
K5ij
K 3ii
_
efdi K Ai vi
+
+ determines the magnitude of the
efi’ 1 S 'doi K 3ii
_ _
+ 1 S Ai + synchronizing and/or damping torques
+ K6ij
efj’
1/K3ij K4ij
efj’ j
K6ii
©Mohamed El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 33 ©Mohamed El-Sharkawi, University of Washington 34