246 HIEIRS OF SOLIVA v. SOLIVA 4.

When the purchaser retains for himself a part of the purchase price;
G.R. No. 159611
DATE: April 22, 2015
By: GARCIA
Topic: Equitable Mortgage
Petitioner: Heirs of Antero Soliva
Respondent: Severino, Joel, Grace, Cenon, Jr., Renato et al all surnamed Soliva, Rogelio Rodela, and
Sanvic Enterprises Inc,
Ponente: Brion, J.
DOCTRINE: For the presumption of an equitable mortgage to arise under any of the circumstances
enumerated in Article 1602, however, two requisites must concur: (a) that the parties entered into a
contract denominated as a contract of sale; and (b) that their intention was to secure an existing debt
by way of mortgage.
FACTS: This case involves a parcel of land in Calbayog City, divided into 6 portions. Antero instituted a
complaint for Partition and accounting against Severino, Bicotriano, Grace, Cenaon, et al., Rogelio,
Roleda and Sanvic Enterprises. Antero et al. prayed to the RTC to declare the 1970 Pacto de Retro Sale
as an equitable mortgage, order the partition of the land and accounting for the proceeds of the sale of a
poriton of the land which was sold to Roleda. Antero is one of the siblings of the original owners spouses
Ceferino and Juana Soliva. The land was originally sold to Cenon through a Deed of Conditional Sale with
Pacto A Retro. Cenon sold to Roleda a portion of the said land and Roleda sold to SEI. Cenon died and
was survived by his children Joel, Grace and Cenon Jr., et al.
5. 5. When the vendor binds himself to pay the taxes on the thing sold;
6. In any other case where it may be fairly inferred that the real intention of the parties is that
the transaction shall secure the payment of a debt or the performance of any other
obligation.
In any of the foregoing cases, any money, fruits, or other benefit to be received by the vendee as rent or
otherwise shall be considered as interest, which shall be subject to the usury laws.
For the presumption of an equitable mortgage to arise under any of the circumstances enumerated in
Article 1602, however, two requisites must concur: (a) that the parties entered into a contract
denominated as a contract of sale; and (b) that their intention was to secure an existing debt by way of
mortgage.
Nothing in the facts presented by Antero that would support his theory that the sale with right to
repurchase was executed to secure a debt. Cenon immediately declared in his name the property sold
and and continuously paid for taxes, sourced from the property’s income and Cenon and his children
benefited from the property’s produce. Moreover, the vendor never questioned the natire of the sale as
a mortgage.

Anteno now maintains that, a portion of the land that was sold must be equally divided among the heirs
of Ceferino and Juana which includes him and the Pacto de Retro sale is on fact an equitable mortgage
because; (1) fro m the time of the alleged sale up to her death, Juana remained in possession of such
land that was sold; (2) the evidence on record like tax declarations and testimony of the witnesses,
shows that Cenon resided in Manila, and thus, was never in possession of the property; (3) the taxes was
paid from its income and fuits; and (4) the Deed of Pacto de Retro sale states that, after the lapse of the
repurchase period, the parties may execute another document to extend it.

ISSUE: Whether the Pacto de Retro sale of the portion of the subject property is in fact an equitable
mortgage.

HELD: NO.

RULING: The Supreme Court ruled that the Conditional Sale with Pacto de Retro is a true sale, not an
equitable mortgage under Article 1602 of the Civil Code.

An equitable mortgage is one which, although lacking the proper formalities, form or words, or other
requisites prescribed by law for a mortgage, nonetheless shows the real intention of the parties to make
the property subject of the contract as security for debt and contains nothing impossible or anything
contrary to law in this intent.

A contract of sale, whether an absolute sale or with a right of repurchase, is presumed by law to be an
equitable mortgage under any of the following circumstances: 32ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary

Art. 1602. The contract shall be presumed to be an equitable mortgage, in any of the following cases:
1. When the price of a sale with right to repurchase is unusually inadequate;
2. When the vendor remains in possession as lessee or otherwise;
3. When upon or after the expiration of the right to repurchase another instrument extending
the period of redemption or granting a new period is executed;
1