See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/342987861

book of beasts the bestiary j paul getty museum 2019 xiv 340 pp 60

Article  in  Renaissance Quarterly · July 2020

CITATIONS READS

0 1,016

1 author:

Simona Cohen
Tel Aviv University
39 PUBLICATIONS   6 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Animals in Medieval and Renaissance Art View project

Hybridity in the Colonial Arts of South India, 16th -19th Centuries View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Simona Cohen on 16 July 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 610 RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY VOLUME LXXIII, NO. 2

books, it is permissible to imagine the visual appeal that consistently colored illustra-
tions would have had. A multi-page index of all the manuscripts mentioned in the arti-
cles from internationally renowned libraries documents the breadth of the database used
here. Anyone interested in the materiality of the medieval book and questions from the
field of book archaeology should take a closer look at this volume.

Britta-Juliane Kruse, Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel

doi:10.1017/rqx.2020.15

Book of Beasts: The Bestiary in the Medieval World. Elizabeth Morrison, ed.
With Larisa Grollemond. Los Angeles, CA: J. Paul Getty Museum, 2019. xiv +
340 pp. $60.

This large and beautifully illustrated album was created as a catalogue to the J. Paul
Getty Museum exhibition. Articles by seventeen scholars, representing multifarious
aspects of bestiary scholarship, follow the introduction and an exemplary section
of bestiary entries with colorful illustrations. A total of twenty-seven writers contrib-
uted to the volume that includes a catalogue and appendixes. Only some can be
mentioned here.
Sarah Kay presents a brief overview of the Greek Physiologus, with its descriptive and
allegorical entries, didactic function, and Latin translations, discussing later additions of
encyclopedic works, such as Isidore of Seville’s Etymologies and the Dicta Chrysostomi, as
well as the Physiologus of Theobaldus, which expand and modify the bestiaries. Xenia
Muratova discusses tradition and modification in pictorial interpretations of illuminated
manuscripts following textual modifications. Examples from the Aberdeen and
Ashmole bestiaries, illustrating theological, moral, and didactic meanings of animals,
exegetic iconography, and mythological influences, demonstrate tradition and inven-
tion. Elizabeth Morrison examines the flexible relationships between text and image.
She discusses theories regarding connections between bestiary manuscripts and exam-
ines iconographic consistencies alongside textual recensions.
Ilya Dines investigates a group of miscellanies to ascertain the function of bestiaries
included in them. Noting that the original Physiologus, geared to a monastic audience,
was didactic, she questions the purpose of bestiaries that included encyclopedic knowl-
edge intended for highly educated readers. Susan Crane concentrates on a superbly illus-
trated bestiary (Bodleian MS 764) that expands the texts with images in which “animals
are given imaginative and social roles alongside, or instead of religious significance” (78).
Vernacular translations, beginning with the Physiologus and reworked in medieval
French bestiaries, are discussed by Emma Campbell. Latin and vernacular bestiaries
for late thirteenth-century French and Flemish courtly audiences are analyzed by

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. 13 Jul 2020 at 06:07:29, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use.
 REVIEWS 611

Larisa Grollemond. The last sections of the text, The Bestiary beyond the Book, explores
bestiary animals depicted in ecclesiastic sculpture, tapestries, misericords, encyclopedias,
manuscripts, maps and art objects, primarily in medieval art, followed by a section
devoted to the modern legacy.
Some writers enriched information with exemplary material that inspires curiosity
and speculation. The myth of the unicorn, tales of the cats at night, the hawk evoking
social rank, the fallen elephant, apotropaic griffons, and the mother ape and her babies,
are examples presented in the articles. The prognostic bird, called the caladrius, briefly
described by Muratova, was popular in bestiary illustrations. According to the
Physiologus, the bird turns his face away from the man whose illness will bring death,
but if the disease is not fatal, he stares at the sick man and releases him from his illness.
Unfortunately, scholars have neglected to investigate the history of this bird in ancient
Sanskrit sources. The Atharvaveda Kauśika Sutra (AVŚ 1, 22) discusses the treatment of
jaundice by this yellow bird (called haridrava) and the Sushruta Samhita describes it as a
bird of happy or evil augury. These sources are roughly dated to the early and mid-mil-
lennium BCE, suggesting that the myth originated in Indian texts on medicine, bird
divination, and magico-religious beliefs.
In her article on Islamic tradition, Rebecca Hill makes reference to an Indian book of
moralistic animal fables, the Panchatanta (ca. third century BCE), and its translations.
But her example of the Greedy Dog was not one of the Panchatantra fables; it originated
in Aesop’s Fables and was incorporated into Nasr Allah’s Persian translation, named
Kalila wa Dimna (ca. 1143). It might be noted that the earliest Western illustration
thereof appeared in the Aberdeen Bestiary (ca. 1200), shortly before Nasr Allah’s version
was illustrated in Baghdad.
The effort to coordinate the articles and their illustrations to the catalogue entries, on
the one hand, and catalogue illustrations, on the other, makes reading cumbersome.
Captions for illustrations lack dates when the reader is referred to the catalogue. The
excellent catalogue entries are scattered among the articles, thereby forcing readers to
interrupt their reading and search for the relevant reference. Perhaps the question of
readership should have been clarified in advance. This book conjoins an exhibition cat-
alogue, geared to an educated but non-professional audience, with academic studies for
specialists who are familiar with the material and can digest overloads of information. As
a comprehensive compilation it will provide interest and inspiration to both types of
readers.

Simona Cohen, Tel Aviv University

doi:10.1017/rqx.2020.16

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. 13 Jul 2020 at 06:07:29, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use.
View publication stats