Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ICEP Dawn Editorial 31oct
ICEP Dawn Editorial 31oct
Our Policy
We provide you with best quality analysis of Dawn newspaper on regular basis. The reason
behind this endeavor is clear as our policy is to educate you.
Knowing the current issues of Pakistan_ domestic and external is imperative for Civil service
aspirants. Unlike India, in Pakistan no such digital platform or academic work is available for
aspirants' ease of preparation. Here you are given detailed analysis of important news and
articles.
So, follow these instructions: Read these editorials and Opinions carefully and keenly. These
are important for widening your knowledge base, improving language skills, understanding key
issues, etc. This section(Editorial/ Opinions) is very useful for English Essay, Current Affairs,
Pakistan Affairs – and sometimes Islamiat – papers as they emphasize more on analysis than
facts. (M.Usman)
💬 To The Point
▪ Competitive Exams
▪ Essay Writing
▪ Current Affairs
▪ Pakistan Affairs
▪ Global Issues
▪ Geopolitics
▪ International Relations
▪ Foreign Policy
✍️Presented By:
Mohammad Usman & Rabia Kalhoro
OVER the years, the Council of Islamic Ideology has generated its fair share of
criticism for coming up with controversial observations.
Why in news
Detailed Analysis |
Thee dispute had been referred to it by the government of Prime Minister Imran
Khan. CII chairman Qibla Ayaz also took into account the concerns of those who
had opposed the building of the temple complex in the capital at state expense.
Hence, the government cannot spend directly on creating this temple and the
community centre meant for weddings and other ceremonies. For such funds, a new
head would have to be created exclusively for the community of which 3,000
members hope to use the promised facility as well as the nearby old temple in
Saidpur village.
Hiccup (noun,verb)
The decision also allows Saidpur temple and an adjoining
dharmsala to be handed over for use by the Hindu a small problem or delay
community. Hindu leaders are hoping that the project can
be executed without further hiccups. In agreement are a hiccup in the negotiations
others who believe in a dignified coexistence based on the
principles of tolerance and mutual respect — values that many in this country will
reflect on, especially today on the birthday of the Holy Prophet (PBUH).
THE food prices in the country have soared (rised) dramatically during the last
one year, fuelling concerns over the rapidly rising cost of living. Pakistanis have
been confronting the sticky, double-digit food inflation every day since August last
year.
Sticky (adjective)
Why in news
a sticky situation, question, or problem is
difficult or dangerous
The Pakistan Bureau of Statistics
data shows that the pace of increase of a sticky political issue
food inflation had slowed down to 12.4pc and 15.8pc for urban and
rural consumers last month after peaking at 19.5pc and nearly
24pc in January, it doesn’t quite alleviate the economic sufferings
of millions of people, especially in the midst of the pandemic. No data
can measure the impact of the massive spike in the price of wheat
flour or sugar or vegetables or pulses on the daily calorie intake or
monthly budget of low- to middle-income families. In fact, many think
that the PBS, which tracks the prices of a basket of essential goods and
services consumed by the majority, cannot even record the actual
price inflation because it does not have the capacity to do so. Thus, its
price data usually understates (down play) the actual situation.
Three, the reduction in the output of minor and major food crops, particularly
wheat, and an increase in demand since the virus outbreak also created a major
supply gap in the country. The failure of the government to predict the market,
especially in the case of wheat and sugar shortages, and make timely arrangements
to fill the gap through early imports have led prices to increase further. Instead, the
Scuttle (verb)
Why in News
mischievous (Adjective)
Detailed Analysis |
causing trouble or quarrels deliberately
The mischievous nature of the accord is a mischievous remark
evident from the fact that Tuesday’s
development is latest in a series of US-India
military agreements designed to counter China’s growing power in the Indo-Pacific
region. The United States and some other technologically advanced countries are
already providing globe’s cutting edge (modern) technologies and know-how to
India including nuclear and missile to sharpen military teeth of a country that is not
even hiding its expansionist designs and aggressive posture against all of its
neighbours.
The worst aspect of the entire episode is that both the United States and India are
not feeling ashamed in publicly declaring that their military cooperation was against
peace-loving China, which is spending hundreds of billions of dollars overseas on
economic cooperation. Mark Esper also announced that his country planned to
sell more fighter planes and drones to India at a time when New Delhi is engaged in
border conflict with Beijing and China is making endeavours for peaceful and
negotiated resolution of the crisis.
That’s why, Pakistan Foreign Office has legitimately warned that India’s massive
acquisition of armaments and expansion of its nuclear forces, including introduction
of new destabilizing weapon systems, are developments with serious repercussions
for peace and stability in South Asia. Remarks made by the two US officials in New
Delhi should leave no doubt about motives and designs of the two countries.
Way forward |
Therefore, other countries of the region especially Pakistan and China should go
deep into emerging developments and take measures together to safeguard their
interests.
Critical Analysis |
Way forward | Authorities must build on the knowledge and strengths that
helped them lower the curve previously and use the data available to take decisive
action. They must also improve their messaging to the public and convey how
serious the threat has become.
Reeling from (phrase)
Without strict adherence to the SOPs, the
closure of schools and businesses will become to be confused or shocked by a situation
inevitable — something that will deeply impact
the education sector and economy which are The party is still reeling from its recent
already reeling from the restrictions of the election defeat.
first wave.
AUTO Industry appears to be entering a new phase in Pakistan with greater focus on
electric vehicles and it is really heartening to see the government is trying to provide
an enabling environment for it. The ambitious electric vehicle policy unveiled in
June this year was the first step towards that direction which aims to bring half a
million electric motorcycles and rickshaws, along with more than 100,000 electric
cars, buses and trucks, into the transportation system over the next five years.
Shifting the transport sector to the electricity is also need of the hour as it will
greatly help the country cut oil and gas import bill which runs into billions of dollars
as well as mitigate the impact of climate change.
Why in news
▪ In the first phase, the British firm will manufacture electric buses
for Pakistan whilst in the next phase, it will help the country in
the production of vehicles locally.
This definitely will also a positive impact on the country’s economy and create
immense job opportunities for our youth.
Why in news
This raises the concern that medical colleges will deliberately take in a larger
number of foreign students or those who do not hold Pakistani passports and charge
them the higher fee rate, thereby increasing their own profits but in the process
damaging the education of Pakistani students. The entire situation is extremely
chaotic. Medical students want to return to the previous system in which the exam
syllabus was set by provinces. This has not as yet been accepted by the PMC, which
has put in place a centralised system with very few weeks of warning given to
students. In addition, it has also allowed a few colleges to set their own entry exam.
Students fear that this could be a precedent for other private medical universities,
which often offer inferior quality education and charge large amounts in fees to do
so, creating even less equity across the medical field. In other words, we as patients
would never know the quality of the doctor to whom we will go to when we are sick
or need medical help.
The problem is a dangerous one. Many believe that the PMC was set up essentially
on the demand of the private universities, which have grown in power since the
current government came to office. There has been no check on the quality of
education that the private universities offer. And now students have been placed
under a new burden. They have said they want a return to the old system, at
least for now, and some discussion with all stakeholders of quite why
the old measures are being changed and new ones taken at such short
notice. This would obviously be a sensible step in any case. All those involved
including the students and their parents need to know what is happening and for
what reason.
There are a number of worrying developments occurring near our borders which
Pakistan should be concerned about.
Why in news
Probable results |
Such developments can change the strategic disposition of the entire region.
Enemies of your enemy can be your friend and attempts to antagonise
China and Iran can push the two countries into a closer friendship. China
might see Iran as a closer partner now; which could potentially nullify the effect of
US restrictions against Iran.
There is much doubt that the Indian government will take this opportunity to
perhaps make amends even though this approach, to foster cordial relations going
forward, is reasonable, grounded, practical and beneficial for both countries—even
generous considering the severity of state-sponsored oppression in IIOK. All it
would take is for the Indian government to agree to comply by the UN’s suggested
and mandated solution: a plebiscite.
The misplaced bravado (pretense of bravery) that has been displayed by India,
especially all through recent years, has caused for regional tensions to remain at an
all-time high, disrupting not only the political, economic and social environment of
Pakistan and India itself, but neighbouring countries as well—particularly
considering that both states are nuclear powers. At some point, the interest of the
region and the world at large also has to be prioritised along with the grievances of
the Kashmiris. Thus, some initiatives to nurture peace should come from
across the border. However, the probability of that is incredibly low given the
determined intent with which India refuses to exit the area under military siege.
As one of the largest purported democracies in the world, we must hope that the
BJP government is reminded of the importance of the protection of human rights,
through pressure from the international community which acknowledges the daily
cruelty inflicted upon the people of Kashmir and accepts the friendly request put
through by Pakistan. Meanwhile diplomatic efforts to address the Kashmiri causes
on all platforms and incur change, should remain consistent if not bettered.
Purport (verb)
be purported to be something
— purportedly adverb
I hate to inflict an additional burden upon you, but someone has to clean the oven.
Why in news
It seems talks with the IMF are getting nowhere. The Fund is
adamant (firm,unyielding) that the
government raise electricity prices, Tranche (noun)
increase taxes and present a mini-budget
a portion of something, especially
in order for the second tranche of the money:
bailout program to be released. Yet the
government, for its part, just refuses any they released the first tranche of the loan.
measures that might increase prices at a
time when the people are already pretty upset about rising inflation,
which makes a lot of sense given the current political temperature and
the fact that the 11-party opposition alliance’s protests are clearly
gaining momentum.
Detailed Analysis | Govt will have to bite the bullet because of the catch-
22 situation it faces.
But while the prime minister’s position is pretty clear, it is not easy to figure out who
exactly the special advisor on finance is trying to convince. On the one hand he tells
the cabinet that these decisions will have to be accepted since it is essential to get
the program back on track, and on the other
he pleads with senior IMF executives not to Binding (Adjective)
make them binding right away.
adjective (of an agreement or promise)
involving an obligation that cannot be broken:
Being an IFI man himself, no doubt Hafeez
Sheikh understands that there is very little business agreements are intended to be
chance of the IMF bending on this one, no legally binding.
matter how justified PM Imran Khan’s
concerns might be. It was, after all, decided when the program was signed that these
measures would have to be implemented to get the second tranche. That is why it
was a bit of a surprise when the program fell apart in February precisely because
Islamabad just refused to honour the contract in the wider interest of the people.
Cold-blooded (adjective)
Yet the cold blooded logic of the market throws without emotion or pity; deliberately
a natural question to the noble-intentioned PM. cruel or callous.
If, in the interest of all those who would
"a cold-blooded murder"
surely suffer in the case of yet higher
prices, the PM is willing to keep the bailout program in deep freeze for
an indefinite period, won’t the middle and lower classes also suffer the
most if the aid is not resumed and the economy suffers?
Those familiar with IMF programs are beginning to predict that it is only a matter of
time before the government caves in. It just does not have the financial depth to
indulge in such adventures with those whose money is keeping the economy afloat
right now. That means it would have to drop another price bomb on the people. And
that, of course, is going to have political ramifications one of the outcomes of
which would surely be a more emboldened and empowered opposition. So the
government has a tough choice to make, and the sooner it bites the bullet the
better.
Vocabulary Description
Ramification:
Why in news
A day earlier, Prime Minister Imran Khan had hinted at such a possibility. Last
week, the National Counter-Terrorism Authority (Nacta) had issued security
alert for Quetta and Peshawar rallies of opposition parties, saying there was
‘credible information’ about possibility of subversive activities in the two cities.
An unidentified man left a suspicious bag, containing the bomb, inside the premises
of the religious school and when students started to file in(enter) at 8am, the
bomb went off (exploded) causing deaths and injuries. The madrassa
administration said 1,000 pupils studied at the school, and between 40 and 50
students were inside when the blast occurred. Two teachers were also injured in the
explosion. The wounded were rushed (move in a hurry) to different hospitals in the
city where doctors said most of them suffered burn injuries. Among the injured are
40 children. The police said the IED weighed five kilograms.
Way forward
On Monday, the PM had expressed apprehensions that India might use Afghan soil
to destablise Pakistan. Despite prior warnings, terrorists have succeeded. We all
should realise that we are in a cauldron of enmity; there is no room for
complacency. Awkward and tragic moments ought to be avoided.
Subversive propaganda/literature—
subversively adverb
Cauldron (noun)
Why in news
Why in news
Detailed Analysis |
The entire 2016 election only saw about 47 million early ballots cast. By the
time polls close, forecasters expect a record number of ballots to be cast, with some
predicting over 150 million people voting for a turnout of 65%, a number not seen in
over 100 years. Although ease of voting thanks to reforms in the mail-in and early
in-person voting deserves some credit, several analysts tie the increased turnout to
the polarising figure occupying the White House. There are few examples in
American history of a president drawing such visceral reactions from his opponents
and even his supporters.
While President Donald Trump continues his-last ditch effort to claw back
against Democratic candidate Joe Biden, the odds are stacked against him. So
far, his strategy has been to throw mud at Biden while denying many of the
problems he has created.
Despite his mismanagement of Covid-19, Trump claimed this week that his
administration was “doing a great job”. But his chief of staff apparently did not get
the message, admitting the same day that the Trump administration was “not going
to control the pandemic”.
Meanwhile, he continues accusing Biden and his son of graft (corruption), even
though US intelligence agencies say there is no truth to these rumours. The irony is
that Trump himself is being investigated for tax fraud, while his three older children
paid a multimillion-dollar settlement to avoid a conviction for defrauding several
charities. On the other hand, Biden continues with his calmly inspiring messaging of
centre-left policies and a return to normalcy. Yet, Trump still has a chance, because
this is America.
Graft:
Why in news
Incur (verb)
Report's indications
▪ The report Learning Losses in If you incur something unpleasant, it happens to
Pakistan due to Covid-19 School you because of something you have done
Closures has predicted that incur somebody’s displeasure/wrath/disapproval
learning poverty in the country etc
might rise to 79pc from the
present 75pc, owing to the She wondered what she’d done to incur his
closure of schools. displeasure this time.
▪ Considering that around 44pc of our children are already out of school, these
fresh pandemic-related dropouts could well mean that half of our child
population will have no opportunity to learn, grow and eventually become
productive members of the workforce.
▪ If this damage is not remedied, says the report, the country could in the next
20 years incur a loss of between $67bn and $155bn in GDP at its current
value. Keeping in mind the shambolic state of the country’s public education
system, these predictions hardly come as a surprise.
▪ Logistical issues including the absence and poor qualifications of teachers,
rundown school buildings and lack of drinking water and bathrooms are no
less than a curse that no government has managed to break.
Outline
1. Introduction
2. Brief history of nuclear weapons
3. Perils of nuclear weapons
4. Need to eliminate nuclear weapons
5. Global zero initiative
6. Is this goal achievable? Yes:
a. Historical support
b. Political will
c. Strong public support
d. New leadership
7. How to achieve it? Procedure/Strategy:
a. Ratification of NPT/CTBT
b. Reduction by the US and Russia
c. Elimination by all nuclear states
d. Follow up: control mechanism
8. Creation of International Nuclear Fuel-Bank
9. Advantages of nuclear zero
10. Conclusion
The perils of atomic weapons were manifest as the two cities of Japan were
wreaked when the bombs were dropped on them. In Hiroshima, some
75,000 people were immediately killed by blast, fire and radiation. Another
70,000 died by the end of 1945. Three days later in Nagasaki, plutonium
bomb killed about 40,000 people immediately, another 75,000 died by the
end of 1945. Five days after Nagasaki’s flattening, Japan surrendered. But
the impact didn’t stop there. Thousands people died in following years due
to radiation. Tens of thousands became disabled. Not only the people
present at the time suffered but the ‘unborn’ as well. Thousands others were
born with deformities and genetic disorders due to which successive
generations have suffered.
Today, the number of nuclear weapons around the world is about 30,000
bombs with far greater weight and destruction power. Even a fraction of
these weapons could put an end to human as well as other species on our
planet. It is clear that if we don’t achieve ‘Global Zero’, our planet is always
at risk, of being converted into a ‘Ground Zero’. This could happen not only
due to a deliberate act but also accidental incident. Therefore, there is a
strong reason that ‘these weapons must be abolished before they abolish us’.
The need to eliminate nuclear weapons is not only because these can be used
for destruction in war but also because they pose equal danger in times of
25 ICEP CSS-PMS Dawn
peace. There have been “Close Calls” to annihilation in various occasions.
[In 1995] President Boris Yeltsin was informed that a nuclear missile was
speeding towards the heart of Russia. Russian nuclear forces, already on
hair-trigger alert, were put in even higher alert. Russian policy called for a
“launch on warning”. The fate of the planet hung in the balance. Yeltsin
wisely waited. And within those moments, the alarm declared false. “An
unimaginable nuclear disaster had barely been avoided”, declared America’s
Defense Monitor, Center for Defence Information, December 26, 1999.
Another, important incident took place in the US on August 31, 2007. Air
Force crew loaded six live nuclear warheads onto a 8-52 Bomber and flew
from ‘Minot Air Force Base’ in North Dakota to ‘Barksdak Air Force Base’ in
cruising over the country’s heartland (Around 15 states). Each warhead was
10 times more powerful than the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and
Nagasaki. In analysis report, America’s Defence science Board (DSB)
revealed that ‘six of the planet’s most powerful weapons were missing and
no one noticed until they had landed in Louisiana after flight of 3 ½ hours.’
The report concluded that ‘human error was at the heart of the incident.’
This incident underscores the risk of accidental nuclear explosion threat due
to ‘human error’ even in the country of its origin and in the ‘peace times’. It
is important to note that this incident occurred in the US, which claims to
employ world’s best safety standards for nuclear weapons. While the US
itself keeps expressing concern over the safety of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.
It is learnt from these incidents that the humanity is at the risk of just single
human error, if the nuclear weapons exist in the world. Therefore, wisdom
calls for elimination of all nuclear weapons in order to make the future of
humanity—our generation and our future generations – safe and secure.
In addition, the Cold War which was the pushing force behind nuclear race
has ended two decades ago. Also due to the interdependence of states in the
current scenario, there is unlikeness of revival of such conflicts.
One of the major world powers, the USSR too, collapsed under the heavy
burden of extraordinary defence spending on economy. The developing
countries like India, Pakistan, and North Korea also joined the race. They
did succeed in acquiring nuclear weapons but their poor population is
suffering from abject poverty. A country like Pakistan, which is merely
surviving at the edge of economic insolvency, could gain much economic
growth, had the resources been utilised for the welfare of people. Iranians
are bearing the sanctions imposed by western powers through the UN for
pursuing nuclear technology, which according to them, is aimed at acquiring
26 ICEP CSS-PMS Dawn
weapons.
In order to seize this positive trend, to achieve the commitment of the entire
international community, and to re-energise effort for complete nuclear
disarmament, a new initiative “Global Zero” was launched on December 9,
2008, in Paris. The initiative was endorsed by 100 international political,
military, business and civic leaders across the world. The signatories
included former US President Jimmy Carter, former Soviet leader Mikhail
Gorbachev, former British Foreign Secretary Margaret Becket, Queen Noor
of Jordan, Ehasnul Haq, former Joint Chief of the Staff committee (JCSC) of
Pakistan, former Indian National Security advisor Brajes Mishra.
There are many positive indicators which indicate why this goal is
achievable. First; there is a strong historical support. Throughout the
nuclear age, even at the height of the Cold War, leaders foresaw a day when
27 ICEP CSS-PMS Dawn
the world could be free of nukes. In 1986, Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev
and US President Ronald Reagan agreed that: “A nuclear war could never be
won and must never be fought.” In 1999, Chinese President Jiang Zemin
stated: “There is no reason why nuclear weapons should not be
comprehensively banned and completely destroyed.”
Third; there is a strong support among majority of the people around the
world. A poll of 21 countries conducted by Program on International Policy
Attitudes (PIPA), USA, shows that global public opinion is overwhelmingly
in favours of an international agreement for eliminating all nuclear
weapons. 76 per cent of respondents, across all countries polled, favour such
an agreement. As the public opinion tends to direct the policies of
governments, it is likely that the leaders would come to the table.
This new and unprecedented political support from the heads of the world’s
most important governments’ for zero nuclear weapons has made this goal
possible. This moment offers both the possibilities and dangers.
Possibilities; because of new leadership in the US which appears to support
the goal of nuclear abolition. Dangers; because, if this moment passes
without action, then the nuclear-race could quickly gather pace with many
more states acquiring weapons and the risk of weapons falling into the
hands of terrorists would increase.
Thirdly; following the reductions by the US and Russia, the rest of the
countries can be brought on board for complete abolition of nukes. It would
not be a difficult task. Once the powerful countries lead the course, rest will
follow them. Perhaps others seem poised to welcome such move. The
willingness of China, the UK and France has already been mentioned. The
two South Asian countries India and Pakistan are also ready to shun the
nukes. Last June, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, backed the
same goal, saying that: “The only effective form of nuclear disarmament and
elimination of nuclear weapons is global disarmament.” President Zardari
has also talked of “nuclear weapon-free South Asia”. North Korea is already
on-board in six-party talks and has also committed to abolish nuclear
weapons for economic incentives. The only country which has stayed silent
is Israel which is undeclared nuclear state. But given the leverage,
Washington enjoys over it, Israel will have to be part of the process.
In this way, the world could not only be safe from destruction and the
humanity from annihilation, but the tremendous energy potential of the
nuclear resources could also be utilised for the welfare of people. The
resources that go into weapons would help keep people safe and healthy and
to give them opportunities. Not only the world is facing energy crisis due to
depletion of fossil fuels, but with their emissions our environment is being
damaged severely. Nuclear power possesses tremendous energy and
simultaneously it is clean energy. It is important for health purposes as it is
used in the treatment of many diseases, including cancer. Its use in
agriculture enhances crop yield which would help mitigate the food crisis.
Take Five: To take one brief (about five minutes) rest period
Tell It to the Marines: I don’t believe you; you must think I’m
gullible.
To Have One For the Road: To have one last (alcoholic) drink
before you go home
Too Many Cooks Spoil the Broth: A project works best if there is
input from a limited number of people
Two Peas in A Pod: Two people who are very similar in appearance
Thank God It’s Friday (TGIF): Let’s be happy that the workweek is
over!
That’s All She Wrote: That was the end of the story.
The Apple Never Falls Far From the Tree: Family characteristics
are usually inherited
The Cat Is Out of the Bag: The secret has been revealed.
The Cherry On the Cake: The final thing that makes something
perfect
The Jig Is Up: A secret illicit activity has been exposed; your trickery
is finished
The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same:
Although something may seem superficially new, it has not altered the
basic situation.
The Only Game in Town: The sole option for a particular service.
The Powers That Be: People in charge, often used when the speaker
does not want to identify them.
The Time is Ripe: If you say that the time is ripe, you mean that it is
a suitable point for a particular activity
There But For The Grace Of God Go I: I could easily have done
what that person did.
There’s More Than One Way to Skin a Cat: There’s more than
one way of achieving a certain goal.
Third Time’s a Charm: Even if you fail at something twice, you may
well succeed the third time.
This Has (Person X) Written All Over It: [Person X] would really
like or be well suited to this.
This Is Not Your Father’s ____: This item has been much updated
from its earlier versions.
Throw the Baby Out with the Bath Water: Eliminate something
good while discarding the bad parts of something
Thumbs-Up: Approval
Until You’re Blue in the Face: For a long time with no results
As the world in general continues to broil (heat up, suffer) in this toxic mix of
mostly man-made calamities, we in Pakistan face our own particular crises. Like the
rest of the world we are not immune to the effects of Covid-19 or the attendant
economic turbulence. But a recent spate (flood) of events — political instability,
the Motorway tragedy, rampant cases of
child abuse — point to our own considerable
failings as a society.
Take, for example, the Holy Prophet’s treatment of women and children.
Can we, who claim to love and follow him, honestly stake such a claim when we look
at the state of women and children in our society?
In the books of Seerah, we find nothing but respect and affection coming from the
Prophet for this noble lady, a testament to her lofty character. In fact, when she left
this mortal world, the year became known as Aam al Huzn (The year of
sorrow) for in the space of this one year the Holy Prophet had lost two of his most
steadfast (loyal) supporters in Makkah: Bibi Khadija and his uncle Hazrat
Abu Talib.
If those who believe in the Prophet in this country and beyond try to replicate the
respect and affection the Messenger showed to his spouse, the lives of Muslim
women could improve considerably. Instead, we cling (hang on) to outdated
notions of ‘honour’ and tribal customs to dictate our domestic affairs.
Prophet (PBUH)
treating female children
|
Coming to how the Messenger
treated children, the affection
he showered upon his daughter
Bibi Fatima Zehra is
exemplary. While the pagans of
Makkah taunted the Messenger for being ‘issueless’ as none of his male children
survived into adulthood, the Almighty saw things differently. Referring to Bibi
Fatima, in Surah Kauthar the Quran says “...We have given thee Abundance”
while in the same Surah declaring that the Prophet’s enemies are “without
posterity”.
As recorded in hadith, the Noble Messenger showered great affection upon Bibi
Fatima, standing up to greet her whenever she entered the room, declaring that
“Fatima is a part of me, and he who makes her angry, makes me angry”
(Bukhari).
Again, we, who follow the Prophet, need to ask ourselves how we treat our girl
children. Unfortunately, like in the days of ignorance, the preference for male
offspring makes many in this society neglect girl children when it comes to health,
education and even nutrition. If we really wanted to show our love for the Prophet,
44 ICEP CSS-PMS Dawn
there would be next to no street children roaming our cities and towns, susceptible
to abuse. The state, or conscientious citizens, would have ensured that these most
vulnerable members of society would have safe spaces where their childhood could
be protected. Certainly, there is much distance to cover when it comes to practising
what we preach.
Way forward |
While celebrations are great, and indeed an expression of our inner joy, let us also
try and emulate the Holy Prophet in how he treated those around him, by adopting
the ethical model he has left in the shape of his lofty character.
Given that India and Pakistan and Bangladesh are all patriarchal societies, it follows
that the histories of these lands that have been resuscitated (revive) from the past,
and presented to populations that do not have much of an idea of the past, have
been male histories. There are many male heroes and leaders, poets and writers,
men who gave memorable speeches and men who stood up to the British; the stories
of women are harder to find.
Lakshmibai Tilak |
In the late 1930s, a woman named Lakshmibai Tilak became one of the first
Indian women to write her autobiography. The book, which tells the story of Tilak’s
life, includes the story of her grandfather who was hanged in 1857 owing to his
participation in the uprising against the British. Born in 1868, she was married off at
an early age to a Marathi-language poet who was subject to many whims and
eccentricities and often just got up and left, leaving his family behind. It is quite
likely that it was owing to these events that Tilak advocated for women’s financial
and economic independence.
In an effort to do just this, she
began training as a nurse, an
endeavour she sadly had to
abandon owing to family
responsibilities.
Rakhmabai Raut |
Similarly spirited was Rakhmabai Raut, a woman who had been married early,
but who refused to leave her father’s home to live with her husband. The husband
sued in court when Rakhmabai was 19 years old. She still refused to join him,
pointing out his lack of education and his dishonest lifestyle. The British judge ruled
in favour of Rakhmabai, saying that she did not have to go and live with her
husband because the marriage had been arranged when she was a minor and had
never been consummated. The decision caused a huge outcry in India, where
marriages of minors were often arranged and where asking for the consent of the
parties was unheard of. Hindus
were particularly incensed by the
judge’s application of these
concepts of consent and
consummation because they
imagined marriage as a sacrament
(symbol) for eternity rather than a
contract lasting a single life.
In a similar manner to the feminists of today, those very early feminists were
accused of being puppets of the British. It was the emergence of the nationalist
Quit India movement against the British that ended up uniting reform-minded
men and women. Ruttie Jinnah, the wife of Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali
Jinnah, was also said to have been active in these movements.British women who
were busy advocating for the right to vote in Britain were eager to have Indian
women join their fight for suffrage. They were startled when many Indian feminists
from the time expressed no interest in getting the right to vote, alleging that they did
not wish to be equal to Indian men because both the men and they would still be
under the thumb of the British rulers. When we are free, they said, we will
have the right to vote in our free nations. This was correct; when India
and Pakistan were created in 1947, Indian and Pakistani women had the
right to vote alongside the men.
The feminists who float the idea build their narrative that violence against women
can be traced to her subordination before her male relations. She remains
dependent economically, morally and culturally on her partner, and that paves the
way of man superiority by compromising on women rights. Thus, if she will be
independent and follow her own self-directive modes, gender-based issues can be
reduced. Many feminists oppose the stance by terming it a “noxious concept” like
Sarah Hoagland , John Christman terms the concept as metaphysical and
impractical.
Later on, the majority of feminists and activists termed “autonomy” as a problem
creator and metaphysical rather than problem solver. Jessica Benjamin, a
psychologist, and Gillian, a dramatist, reject “autonomy” and project
“integration” by stating that men and women should develop their relation on
mutual understanding, and consciously mental changes are required to root out or
reduce gender-based violation. Special attention must be given to mental chemistry
and formation of both sexes’ mental mechanism by altering it following the
exponential changes.
The World Economic Forum also expressed its grievances on poor gender
disparity in the country. Unfortunately, parents, teachers and religious scholars
have specified their role on the name of cultural relativistic norms and values of our
society.
Way forward |
There is a dire need to empower women in all sectors, not like the West, but
according to our religious teachings and human rights, preserving cultural norms.
Government and the public ought to call to halt all sort of gender-based violation in
the country by empowering women, initiating awareness programmes and self-
accountable methods.
Today, I shall again write about the Nobel Peace Prize, as I also did
last week and the week before, noting that this year’s winner is the
World Food Programme (WFP). I shall present some formal
aspects regarding the prize and those who award it, and discuss how
correct and fair the awarding has been.
The Nobel Peace Prize is a very prestigious prize—to receive and to award—in Oslo
on 10 December.
Anne Enger is a retired top politician of the Centre (former Agrarian) party and a
county governor.
Finally, there is Asle Toje, a political scientist who earlier was a research
director at Nobel Institute.
There are three substitute members, Kristin Clemet, Inger Skjelsbæk, and
Sofie Høgestøl.
Olav Njølstad, a historian and writer, is the ex officio secretary and director of the
Nobel Institute.
Process of Selection |
Considering that hundreds of candidates are every year nominated for the Nobel
Peace Prize, the secretariat, the Nobel Institute and the Committee’s secretary, does
most of the work, including researching the candidates’ backgrounds and
achievements, and short-listing those they find most suitable. The winner or
winners (up to three) are announced in Oslo at the beginning of October, and an
award-winning ceremony on 10 December.
Formally, the regulations for the Nobel prizes have been set by the Swedish Nobel
Foundation, although it was decided by Alfred Nobel, (the rich industrialist who
established the prize and formulated the statutes in his will in 1895 (he died in
1897), that the Norwegian Parliament should appoint the awarding committee for
the peace prize; this was at a time when Norway was in a political union with
Sweden).
The four other prizes are awarded by the Swedes, in chemistry, physiology or
medicine, physics and literature; since 1968; a fifth prize has been added ‘in
memory of Alfred Nobel’, notably in economics. The Nobel Peace Prize was for the
first time awarded in 1901. Had Alfred Nobel lived today, he might well also have
established prizes in other fields, such as in social sciences, environment, gender,
development, human rights, and more. But then there are also other prestigious
prizes in those fields.
Heffermehl says that most of the time, the prize has not been awarded for
disarmament and struggle for peace and international dialogue. That was what
Alfred Nobel’s will said it should be for, not other well-meaning and good work in
those or related fields—and certainly not for warmongers, such presidents and other
leaders who have also been winners.
He even says that some popular prizes were wrongly awarded, such as to the great
humanitarian Mother Theresa (in 1979), Willy Brandt (in 1971), and even
Desmond Tutu (in 1984).
One of the worst prizes, lacking understanding for the age-old Chinese history and
civilisation, was the prize to Liu Xiaobo (in 2009), a poet and human rights
activist; the prize to Henry Kissinger (in 1973), and to Anwar al-Sadat and
Menachem Begin (in 1978), are extreme examples of prizes that should never
have been awarded.
▪ Heffermehl considers each Nobel Peace Prize and evaluates if the prize was
rightly awarded, or who should have received it if he finds it was wrongly
awarded, or the prize was cancelled, which has also happened. Heffermehl’s
list includes more women than the committee has chosen. But the most
serious shortcomings in the work and awarding of the prize, which Heffermehl
stresses, is simply that the Nobel Committee often does not base the awarding
on Alfred Nobel’s will and on independent and systematic evaluations of the
candidates.
Conclusion |
And then, in the end, in spite of all the shortcomings that Heffermehl explains about
the shortcomings awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize, and he is probably right most
of the time, it remains one of the world’s most prestigious and finest
prizes, perhaps the topmost.
As we all know that Pakistan’s name was placed on the list of jurisdictions under
increased monitoring due to non-compliance with terrorist financing regulations on
the motion pushed by USA and joined by the India. The main allegations levelled
against Pakistan were support to Islamic militants and failure to take actions against
the culprits of Bombay attacks that killed several people.
In result of the motion, in June 2018, Pakistan agreed with FATF to implement its
ten-point agenda to overcome strategic deficiencies with reference to Anti-
Money laundering and Combating financing of terrorism (AML-CFT).
During that time, Pakistan made significant progress, drafted laws and introduced
various regulations to comply with the FATF mandates. However, our progress with
reference to technical compliance and its effectiveness was rated poor by the
watchdog. In the recent assessment, as per consolidated rating assigned to us,
Pakistan was fully compliant of only two recommendations, partially compliant of
twenty-five whereas largely and non-compliant of nine and four recommendations
respectively.
Whereas, our measures with reference to their effectiveness rated on the scale of
high, substantial, medium and low level of effectiveness based on eleven immediate
outcomes (IOs). Pakistan’s level of measures related to their effectiveness rated low
for ten whereas medium for one immediate outcome (IO2) which relates to
international co-operation. Unfortunately, Pakistan failed to secure rating for
substantial or high level of effectiveness.
Apart from the internal rift of LEAs with previous civil Government, what stops the
current Government to comply with FATF mandates, when both military leadership
and the government is on the same page. Unfortunately, we are still using
conventional approach to satisfy the world when it comes to action against
proscribed organization and targeted individuals. Our measures with reference
terrorist related activities are not appealing to international community. Therefore,
despite lapse of almost thirty-four months, our narrative could not impress the
global watchdog and its members states so that we could be considered as
responsible state.
Even after plenary meeting, FATF press release highlighted that remaining
six action items relate to terrorists, their activities, financing
investigations, execution, generation of funds through non-profit
organization and their movement. Though we have arrested some individuals
and listed their organization in fourth schedule of the constitution, however, legal
proceedings against them are yet to be initiated, which at one hand create doubts in
the mind of international community and on the other hand shows lack of
determination to address these serious issues.
FATF Demands |
Moreover, FATF press briefing specifically highlighted that we have to implement
U.N resolution 1267 and 1373, which require targeted sanctions as well as
criminalization of terrorist financing, ensuring border security and actions against
arms trafficking, freezing of terrorist assets without delay, effective regulations of
Money or value transfer services to stop hawala transactions, effective control on
cash couriers, checks on raising funds through non-profit organization etc.
Conclusion |
Our Orthodox and archaic approach to address domestic and global issues is not
corroborating with global standards. Pakistan’s declining trends in each sector at
one hand impacting the life of its citizens and on the other side creating unrest and
political instability in the country. Our person specific legislation for trivial political
gains is not only undermining Pakistan’s credibility but also failing us at
international forums.
Way forward |
Let’s prioritize our national interests over our personal political gains and try to
address all these issues as one nation.
Introduction
For Pakistan specifically, the past suggests that Republican administrations have
been more beneficial than Democratic governments. Nevertheless – even if Joe
Biden wins the White House, he will have to continue much of the Republican
foreign policy towards Pakistan.
The US withdrawal from Afghanistan will continue a pace and Biden will still need
Pakistan’s support in getting the process completed before it is derailed by any
further acts of subversion. While there may be a greater focus on a couple of
Democratic pet peeves – human rights issues and eradicating remnants of militant
organisations – both will somewhat be sacrificed at the altar of needing Pakistani
support for exiting Afghanistan. For the reason that the Pakistan armed forces
continue to play a major role in advancing the peace process in
Afghanistan and have used their influence on the Taliban leadership to
engage and show flexibility so that the withdrawal can complete and lead
to sustainable peace in Afghanistan. The recent presence of Gulbedin
Hekmatyar and Mullah Baradar in Pakistan bears testimony to that fact and that
Pakistan espouses an amicable Afghanistan and will support any US administration
to reach that goal.
Afghanistan
The Trump White House plan to permanently keep approximately 5,000 ground
troops along with intelligence operatives in Afghanistan – to mostly monitor
Pakistan and Iran especially when it comes to their nuclear capability – will be
maintained even by a Biden White House. This is mostly because of the
constant albeit incorrect narrative built in the US by main stream media
and also because Biden has routinely criticised Pakistan over its nuclear
program. Why would he let a chance go by to put Pakistan under constant
pressure over its nuclear arsenal? Nevertheless, and continuing from the past,
Pakistan has been acutely aware of US designs and takes all realistic and
appropriate measures to ensure the integrity and safety of its nuclear and military
establishments – and will continue to do so.
US stance at China |
The US-China conflict will be something that Biden would want to deescalate but it
will be nearly impossible because of the hyped up Chinese narrative built by the
Trump administration over the last four years. From Coronavirus to economic
stagnation, it seems that Trump thinks China as the main culprit behind all of the
Conclusion |
In conclusion, a change of guard at the White House will not mean any
substantial change of fortunes for Pakistan. Pakistan will maintain a
strategic position in the region albeit being wary of fluctuating US
designs. Its place in any future security setup in a post Trump era will be as
relevant and as important as it is today and cannot be ignored at the expense of
other regional policy goals. Especially as Pakistan may yet again prove a powerful
ally to the US with respect to building bridges with Iran or mending fences with
China! It only goes to show the consistent geo-strategic importance Pakistan
maintains in the annals of global power calculations. It seems that the French writer
Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr was right – “the more things change, the more they
stay the same”!
About the writer | The writer is Director Programmes for an international ICT
organization based in the UK and writes on corporate strategy, socio-economic and
geopolitical
Introduction
It is clear that the whole West’s prejudice against Muslims is on the rise, but France
has once again crossed the line into Islamophobia, first in France blasphemous
sketches were published in newspapers and now those sketches are shown on
government buildings. This heinous game was backed by French President Macron,
but it is Charlie Hebdo magazine that has been involved in this nefarious
(evil) for many years. Charlie Hebdo was attacked by a group of Muslim youths
about four or five years ago, killing 12 people, including the staff of the magazine,
and just a few weeks ago, a Pakistani youth living in France stabbed and injured
some Charlie Hebdo workers for publishing a blasphemous sketch. The attack
injured some of Charlie Hebdo’s activists. Despite this, France has failed to
understand the basic point that Muslims cannot tolerate any act of insolence and
because of this; any Muslim can take the law into their own hands.
There is no doubt that the West is well aware of the faith of Muslims, yet publicity of
blasphemous sketches is not without purpose, especially in a country like France, it
would not expect to have any idea of the strong reaction of Muslims after the
publication of the blasphemous sketches. To think so would be tantamount to self-
deception. All such countries, including France and Norway, which promote
blasphemous sketches and seek to promote resentment among Muslims by taking
steps such as blasphemy, must have some motives and intentions that must be
understood.
62 ICEP CSS-PMS Dawn
The heinous game of Islamophobia is being played in the West. The West wants
to find out among the Muslims those who are ready to die for Islam so
that a war can be started against them and the rest can be openly ruled.
Muslims must adopt a common strategy considering all such possibilities. Unless
Muslims come together on one page to protect the honor and dignity of their
Prophet (P.B.U.H), punishing the West for blasphemy seems unthinkable. It seems
that because a few countries together cannot confront other world powers, including
France and Norway, the Muslim Ummah will have to take action on a united
platform against the countries that spread anti-Muslim sentiments and riots.
It has been a tragedy for the Muslim Ummah that the political leaders of Muslim
countries convene all-party conferences for their seats, form PDMs and hold rallies
for their own interests, but only verbal statements on the protection of the honor of
the Prophet (P.B.U.H) are used to satisfy the people.
The people are also painted in the colors of their political leaders. There was a time
when the news of blasphemy in the name of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) came to
light. People from all over the country used to come to the streets and guard the
honor of the Prophet (P.B.U.H) according to their means, but with the passage of
time, as the insolence (arrogance) has increased, unfortunately the spirit of faith
has also weakened. Nowadays, the reaction to the blasphemous sketches is only
visible on social media or small rallies in some areas.
A large number of people are beginning to understand that our protests do not
matter to them why we should expend our energies. If all Muslims adopt this
thinking, then understand that this is the success of these arrogant people. In fact,
their aim is to somehow remove the spirit of sacrificing one’s life for the sanctity of
the Holy Prophet (P.B.U.H) from the hearts of Muslims.
Way forward | Therefore, we should force the government to take practical steps
by protesting for the sanctity of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) to the best of our
ability, so that it is known to the world that the spirit of faith is still present in the
hearts of Muslims and they are ready to sacrifice their lives for the Holy Prophet
(PBUH).
Thesis statement
The USSR, China, Iran, India, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are the major
undertakers in the arena. After the US decamping Afghanistan, the US-Pak relations
will turn increasingly transactional. The US-Indian strategic ties to counter China
will result in misalignment of the US interests in Pakistan and will surely lose her
grip on Afghan affair. To hew out (shape out) some solution of Afghanistan
excluding Pakistan was not possible for the US otherwise the US might have done it
without Pakistan. Indian influence in Afghanistan is not much more than
conspiracies against Pakistan and destabilizing Afghanistan for fulfilling her dream
of Asian domination. It was crystal clear from the day first that the US has not
invaded to stay here but her interests undersurface were unlike. Provoking India
against China will worsen the situation in Asia.
The US is not much concerned about South Asia as she is not having any
immediate threat from the region. The US is just dividing China’s attention to
different borders by engaging China with India and announcing weapons for
Taiwan. One of the US strategies possibly would be to engage China on different
fronts and China-Indian skirmishes are the curtain raisers. The main part of the
power war is being
fought on economical
and tech fronts. The core
issue of Kashmir will
linger on without any
unusual change. It is
wise to join hands with
neighbors rather than a
far away ally who even
cannot reach in the need
of the hour.
In Case of Iran and Saudia ties with Pakistan, Pakistan has always tried
to keep balance but bending toward Riyadh has been stronger than
Tehran. The US will watch out the risk of nuclear proliferation from India to other
non nuclear states which may cause the US interests. The tension over Kashmir
between two nuclear powers of Asia will be intensified after the US decamping from
Afghanistan as it has been accelerated by abrogation of Articles 370 and 35-A. The
US offer of meditation over the Kashmir issue was not a purely friendly one but it
was a part of smoothing the US Taliban negotiation for the US withdrawal from
Afghanistan which has proved a graveyard for the US and her allies. The US
departure is also Mr. Trumps’ political stunt for winning forthcoming presidential
elections. The water war will be the future tussle between India and Pakistan as
Indian construction of reservoirs in the territory.
Internal dynamics of
both the countries will
compel Mr. Khan and
Modi to show reluctance for launching channels of rapprochement. The
security issue will rise up for all neighboring countries particularly for Pakistan for
being the major factor in Afghanistan affairs. Pakistan has already paid a high price
for being a major ally in the War against Terror. In return the US has put certain
hurdles for Pakistan demanding “do more” which was wholly in the US interest
rather than Pakistan. The sweet partners are stepping ahead in their best interests,
by facilitating the US for withdrawal and Pakistan for economical uplift and military
65 ICEP CSS-PMS Dawn
aid. The US is not getting rid of Afghanistan on a win-win position. She has used her
influence in FATF and IMF loans too.
But after American departure the US-Pak relations will take a different
turn as we have previous experience of the US-Pak relations during the
US interests and after it. It is the need of the hour to look for some other
alternative which will be in the best interests of the country. Even after the US
departs, she will move with Pakistan on interest bases rather than rewarding us by
dint of an ally on War against Terror. The US policy of using economic pressure on
Islamabad has lost its vitality now. The US-Pak bilateral trade and Pak-China
bilateral trade are the solid evidence. The US show in the region also looks grim
after relinquishing Afghanistan as Pakistan is no more the US dependent regarding
economic resort and military programs.
Conclusion |
There is a dire need for a new bloc in South Asia revolving around
mutually shared interests of major giants of the region namely Pakistan,
China, Iran and the USSR. India will no more be a part of the new block
as she is on confrontation policy against her neighboring countries. It
was once upon a time story when India and the USSR were having good ties. It is in
the best interest of all the major countries neighbouring Afghanistan to come
forward for a new bloc in South Asia for a stable and peaceful Afghanistan. It will
eradicate the future anticipated security issues in the region. The internal and
external religious factors having interlinks with Afghanistan may give the situation a
new twist after the US quits. There will be less India-China confrontation after the
US departure. India seems unaware of the saying “ It is folly to live in Rome
and strive with the pope.” After the US relinquishing new geopolitical, social-
economic and strategic ties will take place in the region.
Once again, the Muslim world has been deeply saddened and enraged by the heart-
wrenching comments of French president Emmanuel Macron about Islam and its
adherents. His remarks are the vivid depiction of his prejudice and bias towards
more than a billion peace mongering Muslims of the world. He, by passing such
anti-Islam remarks, rather uniting his people, has created deep fissures in French
society and furthered polarization and islamophobia.
Encouraged by the head of the state, French people are now hanging the
blasphemous cartoons by the walls of their homes which indubitably amounts to
grievous hurt to the sentiments of nearly six million Muslims living in France and
roughly more than a billion Muslims living all around the world.
Reactively, Muslims all around the globe are registering their protest in their
respective ways against Macron’s malicious and unfounded propaganda against
Islam.
“What else can be said to a head of state who does not understand freedom of belief
and who behaves in this way to millions of people living in his country who are
members of a different faith? First of all, have mental checks.
Another popular and charismatic leader of the Muslim world Imran Khan, Prime
Minister of Pakistan tweeted ”This is a time when President Macron could have put
healing touch & denied space to extremists rather than creating further polarization
& marginalization that inevitably leads to radicalization through encouraging the
display of blasphemous cartoons targeting Islam & our Prophet(SAW).” He added
“By attacking Islam, clearly without having any understanding of it, President
Macron has attacked & hurt the sentiments of millions of Muslims in Europe &
across the world.”
Further, Ali al-Qaradaghi, the secretary general of the International Union for
Muslim Scholars (IUMS) said, “We pity a ruler who is still living in crisis and the
specter of religious wars of the middle ages,” al-Qaradaghi said, adding: “If there is a
real crisis, it is due to the double standards of some western politicians.”
Unfortunately, Islam and its founder have repeatedly been subjected to such attacks
many times before. Previously, in 2005, the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten
provoked the protests across the world and riots in many Muslim countries by
publishing several cartoons of Mohammad (peace be upon him), including one
depicting the prophet with a bomb in his turban.
Every country that claims to be a part of a civilized and democratic world has put its
own limitations on freedom of expression in order to regulate a certain level of
human behavior and thereby protect the dignity of their moral, religious, social, and
societal values. The free propagation of child pornography, for instance, or the
stimulation of religious or racial antipathy in the media, is banned in many
countries.
If the right to freedom of expression is absolute, why are there no objections to laws
like these? Interestingly, some U.S States do have blasphemy laws in their statute
books. The U.S state of Massachusetts General Laws (chapter 272 section 36) states:
In addition, when the Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi compared himself to
Jesus Christ, the Vatican including Italian politicians reacted to his statement with
colossal shock and disgust. A senior official of Catholic Church added, “I know he
will say he was speaking in jest, but such things should not be spoken even in jest”.
Islam doesn’t oppose the freedom of expression. However, to ridicule and insult the
sacred elements in the name of freedom of speech can under no circumstances be
condoned. The similar views were expressed by Pope Francis while speaking about
the Paris attacks in January 2015. He said: “there are so many people who speak
badly about religions or other religions, who make fun of them, who make a game
out of the religions of others. They are provocateurs.”
The U.S state department condemned: “these cartoons are indeed offensive to the
belief of Muslims.” Spokesman, Kurtis commented: “We all fully respect freedom of
the press and expression but it must be coupled with press responsibility. Inciting
religious or ethnic hatred in this manner is not acceptable”.
Islam too teaches the principles of tolerance and co-existence, to live and let live. It
discourages the defamation of other Gods and religious symbols teaching respect to
mankind (Quran, al-Anam, 6:108).
Abdul Rasool Syed is a Legal Practitioner & columnist based in Quetta. The views
expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the
editorial policy of Global Village Space.
Armenia’s criminal actions also risk provoking a larger war. Its leadership hopes
that Azerbaijan will respond to these crimes in kind, which could then prompt
Russia into conventionally intervening, potentially even triggering Turkey’s
reciprocal intervention as well. Those regional stakeholders don’t want that dark
scenario to transpire, hence their close coordination in averting it, but it’s very
disturbing that the Armenian diaspora in Moscow and their media supporters there
are actively lobbying for the opposite.
This powerful influence network has thus far failed to achieve its goal, but that’s
certainly not for lack of trying. The international community must become more
aware of such warmongering efforts going forward in order to better defend against
similar attempts elsewhere. On the topic of influence, it must also be said that
Armenia’s information war against Azerbaijan has largely failed to achieve any
success. The only “victory” that it can speak of is temporarily diverting international
attempt from its war crimes, but that’s all.
On the military front, the Armenian forces and their separatist proxies are being
soundly defeated. Instead of respecting the two ceasefires that were brokered by
Moscow, they irresponsibly gambled from a position of desperation that their
violation of them could be manipulated into accusing Azerbaijan of breaking the
truce. Their scheme was to misrepresent Azerbaijan as the aggressor in the hopes of
securing more support for their envisioned political goal of legitimizing the illegal
status quo. That failed, and now they’re on the retreat again.
These regular peacemaking gestures speak to the political maturity and deep sense
of responsibility that characterize the Azerbaijani leadership. They have the
capabilities to obliterate the enemy forces, but that would make reconstruction
efforts after the war all the more difficult. It could also lead to the unnecessary loss
of civilian lives, which Baku wants to avoid at all costs since it regards the residents
of the occupied territories as its citizens, as it rightly should, considering their
international legal status.
Looking back upon the lessons that were learned over the past month, the
international community should urgently realize its shortcomings and mistakes
Not only does Azerbaijan talk the talk, but it also has a very credible chance to walk
the walk as well. Having avoided the oil curse that plagues so many other energy-
rich countries by investing heavily in its people and infrastructure at home,
Azerbaijan has both the financial means and established record of success to inspire
optimism that it’ll carry through with its promise to prioritize the reconstruction of
the occupied territories upon their liberation. This powerfully debunks Armenia’s
ridiculous claims of a “second genocide” if it loses.
International community
Looking back upon the lessons that were learned over the past month, the
international community should urgently realize its shortcomings and mistakes.
They can still make up for them by launching a campaign of maximum pressure
upon Armenia in order to rein in the rogue state and force it to return to peace talks,
albeit ensuring that tangible goals are achieved within clear-cut timelines unlike the
lack of action undertaken over nearly the last three decades.
With an eye on the future, the international community can prevent other rogue
states from emerging and thawing frozen conflicts like Armenia did as long as they
take heed of the lessons that were learned. In this sense, Azerbaijan’s ongoing
counteroffensive could literally change the world for the better by inspiring a
renewed sense of urgency for fulfilling the UN’s peacemaking role across the world.
Had they acted sooner, then this war might never have happened, but now they
might prevent others from occurring in the future.
Deep fakes have evolved from mere annoyance to high stake warfare for
creating social discord, increasing polarisation, and in some cases,
influencing an election outcome. It allows hyper-realistic digital falsification
that can inflict damage to individuals, institutions, businesses and
democracy.
Atomic energy is not just about bombs that are dropped over cities and people, but it
also has a potential for something positive for the mankind. There is a general lack
of awareness when it comes to the massive potential of atomic energy in solving
many of the mankind’s problems. Atom can be utilized in a whole range of ways for
achieving myriad peaceful goals, like producing electricity, purifying water, treating
cancer and producing high yield crops.
Pakistan’s achievements
Pakistan has a remarkable record of exploring nuclear technology for peaceful uses.
It has made considerable progress in the fields of energy, agriculture and medicine,
utilizing nuclear technology. It has also employed nuclear energy for industrial uses,
biotechnology and disease control. These achievements are often overlooked in the
context of sensitive security environment of South Asia, which keeps local and
international analysts preoccupied with the military component of the nuclear
program.
Nuclear power is also a clean source of energy, the CO2 emissions are zero, which
can be a great step towards combatting climate change
As early as the 1950s, Pakistan sent scientists and engineers abroad for training in
the peaceful application of nuclear technology. The civilian nuclear program
officially commenced in the 1970s, with the construction and operationalization of
137 MW Nuclear Power Plant in Karachi (KANUPP).
In the following decades, despite many difficulties, Pakistan did not give up on its
mission to have multiple plants and now has five fully functional nuclear power
plants, operating at high capacity, one in Karachi and four in Chashma. KANUPP
and four power plants in Chashma provide 1430 MWe to the national grid.
Two more nuclear power plants, K-2 and K-3 are under construction in Karachi,
while three are planned for future – one in Chashma and two in Muzaffargarh. The
plan is to produce at least 40,000 MWe electricity from nuclear energy by 2050.
Pakistan is one of the 30 countries that have fully operational nuclear power plants.
It has mastered complete nuclear fuel cycle and is amongst the 10 countries in the
world to have done so.
Atomic energy is a dual use source and can bring many benefits to humanity
PAEC has established 18 cancer treatment hospitals where yearly more than 0.7
million patients are treated, which is almost 80% of total cancer patients in
Pakistan. The atomic energy hospitals are state of art facilities for diagnosing and
treating cancer, through radiation and other nuclear techniques. The hospitals are
also engaged in awareness raising campaigns regarding cancer, which is reportedly
highly curable if diagnosed in the early stages.