Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters Age: Count Age Less Than 25 Year 26-30 Year 31-35 Year

Results:
All the analysis below given suggests that there are three significant factors
namely
1. Qty of camel milk in liters (Dependent, Demand)
2. Location
3. Family members
4. Daily milk consumption
On the basis of these three variable we can easily fit regression equation to forecast the
demand of camel milk.
Camel milk qty in litres = 0.111 + 1.2(Daily milk consumption) + 0.113(Family members)
+ 0.09(Location)
Assumptions:
1. Neither of these factors can assume the value of zero
Since the sample size is too small and data is homogenous so some important factors
are not becoming statistically significant. For the sake of understanding a new
regression model with below given variables is also introduced
1. Qty of camel milk in liters (Dependent, Demand)

2. Location
3. Family members
4. Daily milk consumption
5. Income
6. Milk price
7. Camel milk price
Camel milk qty in ltr = 0.695 - 0.071(Income) - 0.065(Location) + 0.608(Family

members) + 0.734(Daily milk consumption) - 0.683(Milk price) + 0.518(Camel Milk
Price)
Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Age
Crosstab
Count
Age
Less than 25 26-30 year 31-35 year

year
Camel Milk Qty Demand in 0.5 Ltr or less 0 3 0

Liters Between 0.5 and 1 Ltr 0 2 4
Between 1 and 1.5 Ltr 1 2 3
Between 1.5 and 2 Ltr 0 0 3
2.5 Ltr or more 0 0 1

Total 1 9 12
Crosstab
Count
Age Total
36-40 year 41-45 year
0.5 Ltr or less 0 1 4

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters

Total 6 3 31
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 18.637a 20 .546

Likelihood Ratio 22.063 20 .337
Linear-by-Linear Association .136 1 .712
N of Valid Cases 31
a. 30 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .06.
Symmetric Measures
Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

a
Error
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .067 .188 .364 .719c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .075 .197 .405 .688c
N of Valid Cases 31
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Gender
Crosstab
Count
Gender Total
Male Female
Camel Milk Qty Demand in Between 1 and 1.5 Ltr 6 1 7


Total 27 4 31
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

N of Valid Cases 31

Symmetric Measures
a
Error
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.067 .117 -.361 .720c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.039 .136 -.208 .836c
N of Valid Cases 31

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Years of Education
Crosstab
Count
Years of Education
16 years 18 years 19 years

education education education


Total 14 15 1
Crosstab
Count
Years of Education Total
22 years education
Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters 0.5 Ltr or less 0 4
Between 0.5 and 1 Ltr 1 10
Between 1 and 1.5 Ltr 0 7

2.5 Ltr or more 0 2
Total 1 31
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 14.679 15 .475
N of Valid Cases 31

Symmetric Measures

Errora

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.208 .163 -1.146 .261c
N of Valid Cases 31

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Location
Crosstab
Count
Location
Azad Jammu Gujranwala Islamabad Karachi

and Kashmir
0.5 Ltr or less 1 0 1 0
Between 0.5 and 1 Ltr 0 0 0 0
Camel Milk Qty Demand in Between 1 and 1.5 Ltr 0 0 0 0

Liters Between 1.5 and 2 Ltr 0 0 2 0
Between 2 and 2.5 Ltr 0 0 0 0
2.5 Ltr or more 0 1 0 1

Total 1 1 3 1
Crosstab
Count
Location
Khanewal Lahore Multan Kasur
0.5 Ltr or less 0 0 0 0

2.5 Ltr or more 0 0 0 0

Total 2 16 1 1
Crosstab
Count
Location
Sheikhupura Sialkot Toba Tek Singh Vehari
0.5 Ltr or less 0 1 0 1


2.5 Ltr or more 0 0 0 0

Total 1 1 2 1
Crosstab
Count
Total
Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters 0.5 Ltr or less 4
Between 0.5 and 1 Ltr 10

Between 1 and 1.5 Ltr 7
2.5 Ltr or more 2

Total 31
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.425 1 .233
N of Valid Cases 31

Symmetric Measures

a
Error
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.218 .230 -1.203 .239c

N of Valid Cases 31

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Income
Crosstab
Count
Income
Less than 100k 100k to 200k 200k to 300k


Total 9 11 4
Crosstab
Count
Income Total
300k to 400k Greater than 500k


Total 2 5 31
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

N of Valid Cases 31

Symmetric Measures
a
Error

N of Valid Cases 31

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Family Members
Crosstab
Count
Family Members
2 or Less 3 to 5 6 to 8 9 to 11
0.5 Ltr or less 2 1 1 0

2.5 Ltr or more 0 1 0 0

Total 3 15 7 5
Crosstab
Count
Family Members Total
12 or more
0.5 Ltr or less 0 4

2.5 Ltr or more 1 2

Total 1 31
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

N of Valid Cases 31

Symmetric Measures

a
Error
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .459 .154 2.781 .009c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .419 .156 2.487 .019c
N of Valid Cases 31

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Below 18 years family members
Crosstab
Count
Below 18 years family members
zero family one family two family

member member member
Camel Milk Qty Demand in 0.5 Ltr or less 3 0 1


Total 9 7 6
Crosstab
Count
Below 18 years family members
three family four family five family



Total 4 4 1
Crosstab
Count
Total
0.5 Ltr or less 4

2.5 Ltr or more 2

Total 31
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
N of Valid Cases 31

Symmetric Measures

Errora

N of Valid Cases 31

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Between 18 to 60 years
Crosstab
Count
Between 18 to 60 years
2 or Less 3 to 5 6 to 8 9 or More
0.5 Ltr or less 2 1 1 0

2.5 Ltr or more 1 0 1 0

Total 12 15 3 1
Crosstab
Count
Total
0.5 Ltr or less 4

2.5 Ltr or more 2

Total 31
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
N of Valid Cases 31

Symmetric Measures

Errora

N of Valid Cases 31

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Above 60 years

Crosstab
Count
Above 60 years
Zero family One family Two family



Total 16 9 6
Crosstab
Count
Total
0.5 Ltr or less 4

2.5 Ltr or more 2

Total 31
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

N of Valid Cases 31

Symmetric Measures

a
Error

N of Valid Cases 31

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Daily Milk Consumption
Crosstab
Count
Daily Milk Consumption
Less than 2 Ltr 3 to 5 Ltr 6 to 8 Ltr


Total 16 10 3
Crosstab
Count
Daily Milk Total

Consumption
More than 9 Ltr

2.5 Ltr or more 2 2

Total 2 31
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
N of Valid Cases 31

Symmetric Measures

Errora

N of Valid Cases 31

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Packed or Open
Crosstab
Count
Packed or Open Total

Packed Milk Open Milk


Total 9 22 31
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
N of Valid Cases 31

Symmetric Measures

Errora

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.082 .165 -.441 .663c
N of Valid Cases 31

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Price of Milk per Liter

Crosstab
Count
Price of Milk per Liter
Rs. 70 or Less from Rs. 70 to from Rs. 90 to

per Ltr 90 per Ltr 110 per Ltr


Total 3 5 13
Crosstab
Count
Price of Milk per Liter Total
from Rs. 110 to Rs. 130 or More

130 per Ltr per Ltr


Total 5 5 31
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

N of Valid Cases 31
Symmetric Measures

a
Error

N of Valid Cases 31

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Camel Milk Required
Crosstab
Count
Camel Milk Required Total
yes no may be
0.5 Ltr or less 0 2 2 4

2.5 Ltr or more 1 0 1 2

Total 10 4 17 31
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

N of Valid Cases 31

Symmetric Measures

Errora

N of Valid Cases 31

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Camel Milk Qty Demand
Crosstab
Count
Camel Milk Qty Demand
Full replacement Half Quarter

replacement replacement


Total 1 10 20
Crosstab
Count
Total
0.5 Ltr or less 4

2.5 Ltr or more 2

Total 31
Chi-Square Tests

sided)

N of Valid Cases 31

Symmetric Measures

a
Error

N of Valid Cases 31

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Camel Milk Price

Crosstab
Count
Camel Milk Price
Less than Rs. From Rs. 51 to From Rs. 71 to

50 Rs. 70 Rs. 90


Total 2 3 3
Crosstab
Count
Camel Milk Price
From Rs. 91 to From Rs. 111 to From Rs. 131 to

Rs. 110 Rs. 130 Rs. 150


Total 10 5 5
Crosstab
Count
Camel Milk Price Total
Rs. 151 and more

2.5 Ltr or more 0 2
Total 3 31
Chi-Square Tests

sided)
a
N of Valid Cases 31

Symmetric Measures

Errora

N of Valid Cases 31


Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters Age: Count Age Less Than 25 Year 26-30 Year 31-35 Year

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters Age: Count Age Less Than 25 Year 26-30 Year 31-35 Year

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Results:

1. Qty of camel milk in liters (Dependent, Demand)

Camel milk qty in ltr = 0.695 - 0.071(Income) - 0.065(Location) + 0.608(Family

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Age

Less than 25 26-30 year 31-35 year

Camel Milk Qty Demand in 0.5 Ltr or less 0 3 0

Between 1.5 and 2 Ltr 0 0 3

Between 2 and 2.5 Ltr 0 2 1

2.5 Ltr or more 0 0 1

36-40 year 41-45 year

0.5 Ltr or less 0 1 4

Between 0.5 and 1 Ltr 3 1 10

Between 1 and 1.5 Ltr 1 0 7

Between 2 and 2.5 Ltr 0 1 4

2.5 Ltr or more 1 0 2

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Pearson Chi-Square 18.637a 20 .546

a. 30 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Interval by Interval Pearson's R .067 .188 .364 .719c

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Gender

0.5 Ltr or less 4 0 4

Between 0.5 and 1 Ltr 8 2 10

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Between 1 and 1.5 Ltr 6 1 7

Between 2 and 2.5 Ltr 4 0 4

2.5 Ltr or more 2 0 2

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

Pearson Chi-Square 2.462a 5 .782

a. 10 cells (83.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.067 .117 -.361 .720c

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Years of Education

16 years 18 years 19 years

0.5 Ltr or less 1 3 0

Between 0.5 and 1 Ltr 3 6 0

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Between 1 and 1.5 Ltr 4 2 1

Between 2 and 2.5 Ltr 2 2 0

2.5 Ltr or more 0 2 0

Years of Education Total

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters 0.5 Ltr or less 0 4

Between 0.5 and 1 Ltr 1 10

Between 1 and 1.5 Ltr 0 7

Between 1.5 and 2 Ltr 0 4

Between 2 and 2.5 Ltr 0 4

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

a. 24 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.161 .131 -.878 .387c

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Liters * Location

Azad Jammu Gujranwala Islamabad Karachi

Between 0.5 and 1 Ltr 0 0 0 0

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Between 1 and 1.5 Ltr 0 0 0 0

Between 2 and 2.5 Ltr 0 0 0 0

2.5 Ltr or more 0 1 0 1

Khanewal Lahore Multan Kasur

0.5 Ltr or less 0 0 0 0

Between 0.5 and 1 Ltr 1 6 1 0

Camel Milk Qty Demand in Between 1 and 1.5 Ltr 0 7 0 0

Between 2 and 2.5 Ltr 1 1 0 1

2.5 Ltr or more 0 0 0 0

Sheikhupura Sialkot Toba Tek Singh Vehari