Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2.0 Changes
2.0 Changes
Version 2.0
1
Current Problems and Revision Points
ANPQP Revision
2
Current Problems and Revision Points
ANPQP Revision
3
Problems of Current Situation
Main VOCs about Current ANPQP
1.Time-consuming
・Take much time to reach information one demands.
・It takes much time to prepare and submit document because there are many kind of
documents.
2.Difficult to understand
・Because the number of documents required to submit differs depending on parts
assessment level, it is hard to know which document is applied to which parts.
・We don’t know what and how to write “List of sub-supplier” because there are no
example and format of it.
・Difficult to understand ANPQP because there is no description about the relationship
between each phase of ANPQP and Nissan project process.
4
Problems of current situation
5
Revision Point of ANPQP
Basic Revision Concept Revision Point
(1) To contain fundamental •Delete activity requirements of
activities for product management related
realization to make it e.g. Senior Management Support
practical and realistic • Reinforce activity requirements
e.g. Sub Supplier Management
(2) To optimize document - Change document submission
requirements frequency according to the
according to the risk to risk
make it efficient - Reduce the number of documents
(3) To make it easy to Change ANPQP structure
understand Change structure of activity
requirement page
Add “FAQ” page
6
Current Problems and Revision Points
ANPQP Revision
7
Format of ANPQP Revised Version
Activity Specified / Recommended Form
Completion Instruction
Requirement of each document and Completion example
Submission Level of
Output Documents Each Document
8
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
Main Changes
ANPQP Before change After change
requirements
Sub Supplier There is no format for Add format named Component Supply
Management Sub-Supplier List Chain Chart (CSCC)
Sub-Supplier list Extend scope of submission to M/H of
submission is requested assessment level.
only for Module parts
Supplier Insufficient explanation Add “Describe the preparation schedule for
Master of production the completion of the design, manufacture,
Schedule tool/die/gauge inspection & buy off of all tooling. The
schedule on Supplier schedule shall also include the date of
Master Schedule tooling design reviews and trials. Specify
the production place of tool/ die and trial
place.” on Supplier Master Schedule
DCI(Document Completion Instruction)
Design FMEA/ Action at design change Add “Review and update the DFMEA /
Product is not specified Product AMDEC whenever the design is
AMDEC changed or modified”
Special Regular tests on Add “Nissan require suppliers to make
Characteristics regulatory parts except regular tests on Important A/B, OBD and
Control Important A/B is not regulatory parts”
(Nissan only) specified
9
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
Main Changes
ANPQP Before change After change
requirements
Design Review Minimum contents Clarify minimum contents
Record requirement of Design requirement of Design Review Record
Review Record is not on DCI
clarified
Design -Joint check activity -Add “When requested, the supplier
Verification and between Renault/Nissan shall attend the Renault/ Nissan trial
Product / Process and supplier is not assembly activities to review the
Validation specified assembled part condition and confirm
-Continuous conformance Renault/ Nissan assembly
testing after SOP is not requirements”.
specified -Add “Carry out Continuous
Conformance Testing for functional
and performance requirements” in
Phase5 activity
Supplier Test Plan Concerning sample size of Add “This sample size must be
& Report test is not specified statistically valid or otherwise agreed
with Renault/ Nissan “
10
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
Main Changes
ANPQP Before change After change
requirements
Work Instruction Operator training is not Add “Train all operators based on
specified. the work instructions”
11
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
Main Changes
ANPQP Before change After change
requirements
Analysis of Process Action of process change for Add “Review and update the
Potential Failures Process FMEA is not specified PFMEA whenever the process
and Effects design is changed or modified”.
Activities during Detail requirement of Ramp-up Clarify definition and
Ramp-up activity is not specified. requirement of Ramp-up
activity.
Detail content requirement of Add minimum content
Ramp-up activity plan is not requirement of this plan in DCI.
specified.
Non Conforming Requirement of Add “Apply the
Product countermeasure to other countermeasure to other
Management similar parts/ processes similar parts/ processes
(horizontal deployment) is not (horizontal deployment)
clear.
Supplier Contact There is no document format Add document format of
Directory as a project contact directory as a project
12
3-1) Structure Improvement for Easy Understanding
13
(1) ANPQP Alliance Policy
Outline
1. The supplier is expected to provide products that meet
or exceed Renault / Nissan Quality, Cost and Delivery
targets.
2. Suppliers are required to comply with all ISO/TS 16949
requirements. This is a minimum requirement for the
application of ANPQP.
3. Renault / Nissan conduct an audit by using the Alliance
evaluation audit tools (ASES/ASAS-P).
4. The supplier is required to rigorously apply ANPQP.
Clarify compliance with ISO/TS16949 as a minimum
requirement in applying ANPQP.
(However, Nissan would not request the certification of
ISO/TS16949. In case a supplier delivers parts to Renault,
the supplier is required to get certification of ISO/TS16949.)
14
(2) Make Possible to Recognize
Requirements at One View
ANPQP Current ANPQP
2.19 Production
Preparation Monitoring
15
(2) Make Possible to Recognize
Requirements at One View
Activity Completion Instruction ANPQP V2.0
Requirement of each document Specified / Recommended Form
and Completion example
Submission Level of
Output Documents Each Document
Requirement items;
54 items to 23 activities
16
(2) Make Possible to Recognize
Requirements at One View
Integrate submission level from 6 to 4 patterns
Current ANPQP ANPQP V2.0
Submission Level Symbol Submission Level Sym Example of
bol Document
Approve A Document Engineering
1
Submit completed by Drawings,
S supplier and Control Plan,
Submit (Review by Renault / submitted to PSW, etc.
R Renault/Nissan for
Nissan and supplier) signature.
Retain (Submit if required) r Document 2 Supplier Test
completed by Report, Process
Prepare and Submit only when a supplier and Flow Chart, etc.
required by Renault and Nissan submitted to
Renault/ Nissan.
Based on experience, Renault /
Nissan have identified these as the Document 3 Work Instructions,
main documents subject to change completed by DR Record, etc.
supplier. Submitted
through the development and to Renault/ Nissan
production phases of any project. only by request.
Therefore these documents should be
submitted when they are initially Document ( ) Design Change
completed by Request, Process
produced and subsequently, only
supplier if neccesary. Change Request,
when the content has changed. 8D CCR, etc.
17
(3) Make Clear the Purpose of Each Requirement,
its Contents, and Output Document
1.3 Sub Supplier Management Current ANPQP
Description
Renault and / or Nissan requests that the first tier supplier identifies all the potential sub supplier
being considered for new projects.
In certain cases, Renault and / or Nissan will specify the sub-supplier to be used by the first tier
supplier.
・The purpose of activities was not clear
The supplier must deploy a product development system to ensure that its sub-suppliers shall
⇒Users may conduct activities without
design, manufacture and deliver a product in accordance with Renault and / or Nissan QCD
targets. This procedure shall be included in the Supplier Quality Plan.
understanding the purpose of activities.
Note:
・Hard to understand the consistency of requirements
It is the responsibility of the first tier supplier to manage all their sub suppliers in order that all
from the planning
ANPQP requirements are met in stage tofirst-tier
full by the SOPsupplier. For further guidance on the
management of suppliers which are specified by Renault and / or Nissan, refer to the
appropriate RFQ file(s).
Within all phase activities the first tier supplier shall ensure, through the use of project reviews, that
they are compliant with ANPQP requirements at phase 2,3 & 4 and that all ongoing design,
process and facility changes are managed during phase 5.
The updated 'List of Sub Suppliers' shall be included in the Supplier Quality Plan and / or the
Process Flow Chart.
Required Result
For module parts, the completed 'List of Sub Suppliers' with their respective evaluation levels (in
・・・・・
18
(3) Make Clear the Purpose of Each Requirement,
its Contents, and Output Document
Sub-Supplier Management ANPQP2.0
Activity purpose:
To manage all sub-suppliers to ensure products delivered to Renault / Nissan
achieve QCD targets.
・Clarify
Tier the
1 suppliers important
shall requirements,
be responsible for the management “why this is
and approval of
parts quality and associated documentation for all sub-supplier's (including
required”,
those and
specified by “what
Renault to do”
/ Nissan) unlessinotherwise
referring toineach
agreed content
the RFQ.
ofsub-supplier
No requirement.changes are allowed in phase 4, unless otherwise agreed by
Renault/ Nissan.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity -Identify all the sub-suppliers for the production phase, complete CSCC (Component Supply Chain
Content Chart), to understand the complete supply chain.
-Select and evaluate sub-suppliers based on their ability to supply products which satisfy Renault/
Nissan QCD target .
-Criteria for selection, evaluation, and re-evaluation shall be established including quality history and/or
・Possible to find activities of each phase
second or third party audit results.
-Deploy a product development system to ensure that sub-suppliers design, manufacture and deliver a
at 1 page.
product in accordance with Renault / Nissan QCD targets.
Select potential sub- -Finalise the CSCC Update the CSCC -No sub- -Apply the change
suppliers and make document. whenever there are supplier management
the draft of CSCC any changes to the changes activity before
document. sub-suppliers. any CSCC
change.
Output Component Supply Chain Chart(CSCC)
Document
19
(4) Change Structure of
Document Completion Instruction
SUPPLIER DOCUMENT COMPLETION REQUIREMENTS
Current ANPQP
List of Sub Suppliers
20
(4) Change Structure of
Document Completion Instruction
Document Completion Instruction ANPQP2.0
Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC)
Key Points
The Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC) is a chart which visualises the structure
of the component supply chain.
・Clarify the key points and minimum requirements of the
The CSCC shall be used to reinforce sub supplier management.
document.
Minimum ⇒Easy to understand
Content the purpose of document
Requirements
The CSCCcompletion
shall cover all and
tiers function of chain
of the supply the document.
down to raw material level
(including grease, sealant, solder, etc.).
・・・
Document Description
Item Completion Instructions
Part name and Part number delivered Describe Part name and Part number delivered to
to Renault /Nissan Renault/Nissan.
Supply Chain Structure and their Describe Supply Chain Structure with component parts' name.
component parts' name
21
3-2) Add FAQ
Example
Question Answer
Where is the Data Retention There is in the “Ground Rule of
requirement of documents? Document Submission”.
22
4. Other Changes; Document revision
Others
Improvement document format (easy to input)
Improvement of each document header
23
4. Other Changes; Document revision
Document integrated
Current document name Revision document name
Process Change Summary Process/ Facility Site Change
Facility Site Transfer Request
Summary
Document eliminated
Installation Plan
Internal Concern Management Procedures
Action Plan to achieve customers QCD targets
24
4. Other Changes; Document revision
Document name and format changed
Document name (V2.0) Format Name Document name(V1.4)
changed
Component Supply Chain Chart Add Y Sub-supplier List
(CSCC)
Supplier Production Preparation - Y Supplier Plan
Monitoring Plan
Supplier Proeduction - Y Supplier Status
Preparation Monitoring Status Report
Report
Supplier Test Plan & Report - Y Supplier Test
Report
Supplier Contact Directory Small - -
change
Work Instruction - Y Process Instruction
25
4. Other Changes; Renault included documents
Supplier Recommendations
26
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
Changed phase name (Phase 1 & 5) however keep phase
concept.
Requirements Requirements
Review and Review and
Planning Planning
Ramp-up
and Mass Production
27
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
Requirements review
Part
and Planning Submission
Warrant
Requirements
Organisationreview
Phase 1 (PSW)
Design Completion and
et Planning
Planning
Off Tool
confirmation
Supplier
Manufacturing
Approval
(AFF)
28
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
Vehicle Project Milestones
ENVU/EVIP
Phase 5
For all products
Suppliers Tooling Go
nominations Ahead
Supplier
RFQ PSW Manufacturing
I.O.D
Approval (AFF)
29
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
100% IOD
30
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
(Phase 1)
Phase 1
Requirements Requirements
Review and Planning
Review and Planning Phase 2
Design Completion Phase 3
Off tool Phase 4
Off process Ramp-up and
立上り後
Mass production
Phase 5
Tooling Release
Slot Supplier
Slot ET PT1 PT2 SOP
Process selection
DF DFC
V-3P DDlot VClot PTlot
lot lot
Process Tooling
Sourcing Parts
Confirmation Release Approval
31
32