Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Electromagnetic Waves: Electromagnetic Wave at The Interface Between Two Dielectric Media
Electromagnetic Waves: Electromagnetic Wave at The Interface Between Two Dielectric Media
Let us choose the interface to be the xy plane (z=0). The angles of incidence, reflection and refraction
are the angles made by the respective propagation vectors with the common normal at the interface.
1
We have indicated the propation vectors in the apprpriate medium by capital letters I, R and T so as not
to confuse with the notation for the position vector 𝑟𝑟⃗ and time t.
The principle that we use to establish the laws of reflection and refraction is the continuity of the
tangential components of the electric field at the interface, as discussed extensively during the course of
these lectures. Let us represent the component of the electric field parallel to the interface by the
superscript ∥. We then have,
∥
𝐸𝐸0𝐼𝐼 exp�𝑖𝑖 ���⃗ ∥
𝑘𝑘𝐼𝐼 ⋅ 𝑟𝑟⃗ − 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖� + 𝐸𝐸0𝑅𝑅 ����⃗
exp�𝑖𝑖𝑘𝑘 ����⃗
𝑅𝑅 ⋅ 𝑟𝑟⃗ − 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖� = 𝐸𝐸0𝑇𝑇 exp�𝑖𝑖 𝑘𝑘 𝑇𝑇 ⋅ 𝑟𝑟⃗ − 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖�
This equation must remain valid at all points in the interface and at all times. That is obviously possible
if the exponential factors is the same for all the three terms or if they differe at best by a constant phase
factor. Considering, the incident and the reflection terms, we have,
���⃗
𝑘𝑘𝐼𝐼 ⋅ 𝑟𝑟⃗ = ����⃗
𝑘𝑘𝑅𝑅 ⋅ 𝑟𝑟⃗ + 𝜙𝜙1
���⃗𝐼𝐼 − 𝑘𝑘
�𝑘𝑘 ����⃗
𝑅𝑅 � ⋅ 𝑟𝑟⃗ = 𝜙𝜙1
We are familiar with the vector equation to a plane and we know that if the position vector of a plane is
𝑟𝑟⃗ and the normal to the plane is represented by 𝑛𝑛�, the equation to the plane is given by 𝑛𝑛� ⋅ 𝑟𝑟⃗ =
constant. Thus ���⃗
𝑘𝑘𝐼𝐼 − ����⃗
𝑘𝑘𝑅𝑅 is normal to the interface plane. Since the interface is x-y plane, we take the
���⃗𝐼𝐼 and ����⃗
plane containing the 𝑘𝑘 𝑘𝑘𝑅𝑅 in the x-z plane.
���⃗𝐼𝐼 − 𝑘𝑘
Since 𝑘𝑘 ����⃗
𝑅𝑅 and the normal to the plane 𝑛𝑛
� is normal to the interface 𝑛𝑛� are in the same plane, we
have,
���⃗𝐼𝐼 − ����⃗
�𝑘𝑘 𝑘𝑘𝑅𝑅 � × 𝑛𝑛� = 0
���⃗𝐼𝐼 − 𝑘𝑘
�𝑘𝑘 ����⃗
𝑇𝑇 � ⋅ 𝑟𝑟⃗ = 𝜙𝜙2
2
which gives �𝑘𝑘���⃗𝐼𝐼 � sin 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 = �𝑘𝑘
����⃗ ���⃗ ����⃗
𝑇𝑇 � sin 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 . Since 𝑘𝑘𝐼𝐼 and 𝑘𝑘 𝑇𝑇 are in different media, we have,
recognizing that as the wave goes from one medium to another, its frequency does not change,
𝜔𝜔 𝜔𝜔
���⃗𝐼𝐼 � = ,
�𝑘𝑘 �𝑘𝑘�⃗ 𝑇𝑇 � =
𝑐𝑐 𝑣𝑣 𝑇𝑇
where 𝑣𝑣𝑇𝑇 is the velocity of the wave in the transmitted medium.
We, therefore, have,
sin 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 �𝑘𝑘�⃗ 𝑇𝑇 � 𝑐𝑐 𝑛𝑛 𝑇𝑇
= = = ≡ 𝑛𝑛
sin 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 �𝑘𝑘 ���⃗𝐼𝐼 � 𝑣𝑣 𝑛𝑛𝐼𝐼
Here n is the refractive index of the second medium with respect to the incident medium.
Fresnel’s Equations
Let us summarize the boundary conditions that we have derived in these lectures. We will
assume that both the media are non-magnetic so that the permeability of both media are the
same, viz., 𝜇𝜇0 . The two media differ by their dielectric constant, the incident medium is taken to
be air as above. We further assume that there are no free charges or currents on the surface so
that both the normal and tangential components of the fields are continuous.
We will consider two cases, the first case where the electric fields are parallel to the incident
plane. This case is known as p- polarization, p standing for “parallel”. The second case is where
the electric field is perpendicular to the incident plane. This is referred to as s- polarization, s
standing for a German word “senkrecht “ meaning perpendicular.
p- polarization
In this case, since the magnetic fields are perpendicular to the plane of incidence, we take the
directions of the H fields to come out of the plane of the page (the incident plane). Since the
electric field, the magnetic field and the direction of propagation are mutually perpendicular
being a right handed triad, we have indicated the directions of the electric fields accordingly. It
may be noted that in this picture, for the case of normal incidence, the incident and the
reflected electric fields are directed oppositely. (The assumption is not restrictive because, if it is
not true, a negative sign should appear in the equations ).
3
Taking the tangential components of the electric field (parallel to the interface), we have,
𝐸𝐸𝐼𝐼 cos 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 − 𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅 cos 𝜃𝜃𝑅𝑅 = 𝐸𝐸𝑇𝑇 cos 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 (1)
𝐻𝐻𝐼𝐼 = 𝐻𝐻𝑅𝑅 = 𝐻𝐻𝑇𝑇
As our medium is linear, we have the following relationship between the electric and the
magnetic field magnitudes,
𝐵𝐵 𝐸𝐸 𝐸𝐸 �𝜇𝜇0 𝜖𝜖 𝜖𝜖
𝐻𝐻 = = = = � 𝐸𝐸
𝜇𝜇 𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣 𝜇𝜇 𝜇𝜇
Thus the continuity of the tangential component of the magnetic field H can be expressed in
terms of electric field amplitudes
𝜖𝜖𝐼𝐼 𝜖𝜖 𝑇𝑇
� (𝐸𝐸𝐼𝐼 + 𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅 ) = � 𝐸𝐸𝑇𝑇 (2)
𝜇𝜇𝐼𝐼 𝜇𝜇 𝑇𝑇
Equations (1) and (2) can be simplified (we use 𝜃𝜃𝑅𝑅 = 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 )
4
Thus, we have,
which gives,
Let us take 𝜇𝜇𝐼𝐼 = 𝜇𝜇 𝑇𝑇 . The Fresnel’s equations are now expressible in terms of refractive indices of
the two media and the angles of incidence and transmission
Brewster’s Angle
𝑛𝑛 𝑇𝑇 sin 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼
Using = , we can express , 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 as follows.
𝑛𝑛 𝐼𝐼 sin 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇
,
sin θI cos 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 − sin 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 cos 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇
𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 =
sin θI cos 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 + sin 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 cos 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇
sin 2𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 − sin 2𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇
=
sin 2𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 − sin 2𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇
2 sin(𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 − 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 ) cos(𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 + 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 )
=
2 sin(𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 + 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 ) cos(𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 − 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 )
tan( 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 − 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 )
=
tan( 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 + 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 )
𝜋𝜋
If 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 + 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 = , i.e. if the angle between the reflected ray and the transmitted ray is 900, the
2
reflection coefficient for the parallel polarization becomes zero, because tan( 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 + 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 ) → ∞. If
we had started with an equal mixture of p polarized and s polarized waves (i.e. an unpolarized
wave), the reflected ray will have no p component, so that it will be plane polarized. The angle
of incidence at which this happens is called the Brewster’s angle”.
5
For this angle, we have
cos 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 sin 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼
tan 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 = cot 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 = = = 𝑛𝑛
sin 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 sin 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇
The following figure (right) , the red curve shows the variation in the reflected amplitude with
the angle of incidence for p-polarization. The blue curve is the corresponding variation for s –
polarization to be discussed below.
rs
rp
𝑛𝑛 𝑇𝑇 − 𝑛𝑛𝐼𝐼 𝑛𝑛 − 1
𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 = =
𝑛𝑛 𝑇𝑇 + 𝑛𝑛𝐼𝐼 𝑛𝑛 + 1
s –polarization
We next consider s polarization where the electric field is perpendicular to the incident plane.
As we have taken the plane of incidence to be the plane of the paper, the electric field will be
taken to come out of the plane of the paper.
6
The corresponding directions of the magnetic field is shown in the figure. The boundary
conditions give
𝐸𝐸𝐼𝐼 + 𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅 = 𝐸𝐸𝑇𝑇
(𝐻𝐻𝐼𝐼 − 𝐻𝐻𝑅𝑅 ) cos 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 = 𝐻𝐻𝑇𝑇 cos 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇
𝜖𝜖
Substituting 𝐻𝐻 = � 𝐸𝐸, we get for the reflection and transmission coefficient for the amplitudes
𝜇𝜇
sin(𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 − 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 )
𝑟𝑟𝑠𝑠 = −
sin(𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 + 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 )
2 sin 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 cos 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼
𝑡𝑡𝑠𝑠 =
sin(𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 + 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 )
𝑛𝑛𝐼𝐼 − 𝑛𝑛 𝑇𝑇 1 − 𝑛𝑛
𝑟𝑟𝑠𝑠 = =
𝑛𝑛 𝑇𝑇 + 𝑛𝑛𝐼𝐼 1 + 𝑛𝑛
Notice that the expression differs from the expression for 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 for normal incidence, while both
the results should have been the same. This is because of different conventions we took in fixing
7
the directions in the two cases; in the p –polarization case, for normal incidence, the electric
field directions are opposite for the incident and reflected rays while for the s-polarization, they
have been taken to be along the same direction.
Let us return back to the case of p polarization and consider the case where in the incident
medium has a higher refractive index than the transmitted medium. In this case, we can write
the amplitude reflection coefficient as
nT cos 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 − 𝑛𝑛𝐼𝐼 cos 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇
𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 =
nT cos 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 + 𝑛𝑛𝐼𝐼 cos 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇
ncos 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 − �1 − sin2 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇
=
ncos 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 + �1 − sin2 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇
𝑛𝑛 𝑇𝑇
where we have used the refractive index of the second medium as 𝑛𝑛 = < 1. Substituting
𝑛𝑛
Snell’s law into the above, we have, sin 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 = sin 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 ⁄𝑛𝑛, we can write the above as
It may be seen that for sin 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 > 𝑛𝑛, the magnitudes of both 𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝 and 𝑟𝑟𝑠𝑠 are both equal to unity because for
both these, the numerator and the denominator are complex conjugate of each other. Thus it implies
that when electromagnetic wave is incident at an angle of incidence greater than a “critical angle”
defined by
sin 𝜃𝜃𝑐𝑐 = 𝑛𝑛
where n here represents the refractive index of the (rarer) transmitted medium with respect to
the(denser) incident medium , the wave is totally reflected. (In text books on optics, the critical angle is
defined by the relation sin 𝜃𝜃𝑐𝑐 = 1⁄𝑛𝑛, because the refractive index there is conventionally defined as
that of the denser medium with respect to the rarer one).
8
In case of total internal reflection, is there a wave in the transmitted medium? The answer is yes, it
does as the following analysis shows.
Let us take the incident plane to be xz plane and the interface to be the xy plane so that the normal to
the plane is along the z direction. The transmitted wave can be written as
𝑘𝑘 𝑇𝑇 sin2 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼
𝑖𝑖𝑘𝑘�⃗ 𝑇𝑇 ⋅ 𝑟𝑟⃗ = 𝑖𝑖 � 𝑥𝑥 sin 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 + 𝑘𝑘 𝑇𝑇 𝑧𝑧�1 − �
𝑛𝑛 𝑛𝑛2
For angles greater than the critical angle the quantity within the square root is negative and we rewrite
it as
𝑘𝑘 𝑇𝑇 sin2 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼
𝑖𝑖𝑘𝑘�⃗ 𝑇𝑇 ⋅ 𝑟𝑟⃗ = 𝑖𝑖 � 𝑥𝑥 sin 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 + 𝑖𝑖𝑘𝑘 𝑇𝑇 𝑧𝑧� 2 − 1�
𝑛𝑛 𝑛𝑛
= 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 − 𝛼𝛼𝛼𝛼
𝑘𝑘 𝑇𝑇
𝛽𝛽 = sin 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼
𝑛𝑛
sin2 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼
𝛼𝛼 = 𝑘𝑘 𝑇𝑇 � −1
𝑛𝑛2
9
which shows that the wave in the second medium propagates along the interface. It penetrates into the
medium but its amplitude attenuates exponentially. This is known as “evanescent wave”.
The amplitude variation with angle of incidence is shown in the following figure.
10
No transfer of energy into the transmitted medium:
Though there is a wave in the transmitted medium, one can show that on an average, there is no
transfer of energy into the medium from the incident medium.
Consider, p polarization, for which the transmitted electric field, being parallel to the incident (xz) plane
is along the x direction.
From this we obtain the H- field using Faraday’s law, Since the H field is taken perpendicular to the
electric field , it would be in the y-z plane . Taking the components of ∇ × 𝐸𝐸�⃗ , we have,
𝜕𝜕𝐵𝐵𝑦𝑦 𝜕𝜕𝐸𝐸𝑥𝑥
− = 𝑖𝑖𝜇𝜇0 𝜔𝜔𝐻𝐻𝑦𝑦 = �∇ × 𝐸𝐸�⃗ �𝑦𝑦 = = −𝛼𝛼𝛼𝛼𝑇𝑇0 𝑒𝑒 −𝛼𝛼𝛼𝛼 exp(𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 − 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖)
𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕 𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕
and
𝜕𝜕𝐵𝐵𝑧𝑧 𝜕𝜕𝐸𝐸𝑦𝑦
− = 𝑖𝑖𝜇𝜇0 𝜔𝜔𝐻𝐻𝑧𝑧 = �∇ × 𝐸𝐸�⃗ �𝑧𝑧 = = +𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑇𝑇0 𝑒𝑒 −𝛼𝛼𝛼𝛼 exp(𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 − 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖)
𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕 𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕
so that,
𝐸𝐸𝑇𝑇0 −𝛼𝛼𝛼𝛼
�⃗ =
𝐻𝐻 𝑒𝑒 �𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑗𝑗̂ + 𝛽𝛽𝑘𝑘� � exp(𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 − 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖)
𝜇𝜇0 𝜔𝜔
Thus the average energy transfer Poynting vector. The complex Poynting vector can be written as
1
𝑆𝑆⃗ = 𝐸𝐸�⃗ × 𝐻𝐻
�⃗∗
2
1
〈𝑆𝑆⃗〉 = Re �𝐸𝐸�⃗ × 𝐻𝐻
�⃗∗ �
2
2
𝐸𝐸𝑇𝑇0
= e−2αz Re�−𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑘𝑘� − 𝛽𝛽𝑗𝑗̂�
2𝜇𝜇0 𝜔𝜔
2
𝐸𝐸𝑇𝑇0
=− e−2αz 𝛽𝛽𝑗𝑗̂
2𝜇𝜇0 𝜔𝜔
Since the normal to the surface is along the z direction, the average energy transferred to the second
medium is zero.
11
Electromagnetic Waves
Lecture34: Electromagnetic Theory
Tutorial Assignment
1. A plane electromagnetic wave described by its magnetic field is given by the expression
�⃗ = 𝐻𝐻0 sin(𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 − 𝜔𝜔𝜔𝜔)𝑦𝑦�
𝐻𝐻
Determine the corresponding electric field and the time average Poynting vector.
If it is incident normally on a perfect conductor and is totally reflected what would be the
pressure exerted on the surface? Determine the surface current generated at the interface.
2. A circularly polarized electromagnetic wave is given by
𝐸𝐸�⃗ = 𝐸𝐸0 sin(𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 − 𝜔𝜔𝜔𝜔)𝑥𝑥� + 𝐸𝐸0 cos(𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 − 𝜔𝜔𝜔𝜔)𝑦𝑦�
Show that the average value of the Poynting vector for the wave is equal to the sum of the
Poynting vectors of its components.
3.
1. The wave is propagating along the + z direction (before reflection). The electric field is given by
Maxwell- Ampere law,
12
𝜕𝜕𝐸𝐸�⃗
�⃗ = 𝜖𝜖0
∇ × 𝐻𝐻
𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕
�⃗ is along 𝑦𝑦� direction, and its y-component depends on z only, the curl is given by
Since 𝐻𝐻
𝜕𝜕𝐻𝐻𝑦𝑦 𝜕𝜕𝐸𝐸�⃗
−𝑥𝑥� = −𝑥𝑥� 𝐻𝐻0 𝑘𝑘cos(𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 − 𝜔𝜔𝜔𝜔) = 𝜖𝜖0
𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕 𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕
This gives,
𝐻𝐻0 𝑘𝑘 𝐻𝐻0
𝐸𝐸�⃗ = sin(𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 − 𝜔𝜔𝜔𝜔)𝑥𝑥� = sin(𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 − 𝜔𝜔𝜔𝜔)𝑥𝑥�
𝜔𝜔𝜖𝜖0 𝑐𝑐𝜖𝜖0
𝐻𝐻02
𝑆𝑆⃗ = 𝐸𝐸�⃗ × 𝐻𝐻
�⃗ = sin2 (𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 − 𝜔𝜔𝜔𝜔)𝑧𝑧̂
𝑐𝑐𝜖𝜖0
𝐻𝐻02
The time average Poynting vector is 〈𝑆𝑆⃗〉 = 𝑧𝑧̂ .
2𝑐𝑐𝜖𝜖 0
Since the wave is totally reflected, the change in momentum is twice the initial momentum carried. Thus
the pressure is given by
2|〈𝑆𝑆〉| 𝐻𝐻02
𝑃𝑃 = = 2
𝑐𝑐 𝑐𝑐 𝜖𝜖0
At the metallic interface (z=0), the tangential component of the electric field is zero. Since the wave is
totally reflected, the reflected wave must have oppositely directed electric field, i.e. in −𝑥𝑥� direction. The
direction of propagation having been reversed, the magnetic the field is given by
13
The individual components have average Poynting vectors given by
1 2 1
〈𝑆𝑆1 〉 = 𝐸𝐸0 〈sin2 (𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 − 𝜔𝜔𝜔𝜔)〉 = 𝐸𝐸 2
𝜇𝜇0 𝑐𝑐 2𝜇𝜇0 𝑐𝑐 0
1 2 1
〈𝑆𝑆2 〉 = 𝐸𝐸0 〈cos 2 (𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 − 𝜔𝜔𝜔𝜔)〉 = 𝐸𝐸 2
𝜇𝜇0 𝑐𝑐 2𝜇𝜇0 𝑐𝑐 0
Electromagnetic Waves
Lecture34: Electromagnetic Theory
1. The electric field of a plane electromagnetic wave propagating in free space is described by
𝐸𝐸�⃗ = 𝐸𝐸0 sin(𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 − 𝜔𝜔𝜔𝜔)𝑦𝑦�
Determine the corresponding magnetic field and the time average Poynting vector for the
wave.
2. Show that an s –polarized wave cannot be totally transmitted to another medium.
3. An electromagnetic wave given by
𝐸𝐸�⃗ = 𝐸𝐸0 sin(𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 − 𝜔𝜔𝜔𝜔)𝑥𝑥�
is incident on the surface of a perfect conductor and is totally reflected. The incident and
the reflected waves combine and form a pattern. What is the average Poynting vector?
14
Solutions to Self Assessment Questions
1. The wave is propagating in +x direction so that the propagation vector is 𝑘𝑘�⃗ = 𝑘𝑘𝑥𝑥�. Using
Faraday’s law, we have, 𝑘𝑘�⃗ × 𝐸𝐸�⃗ = 𝜔𝜔𝐵𝐵
�⃗ which gives magnetic field directed along the z direction,
𝐸𝐸
�⃗ = 0 sin(𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 − 𝜔𝜔𝜔𝜔)𝑧𝑧̂
𝐵𝐵
𝑐𝑐
The Poynting vector is given by
1 𝐸𝐸 2
�⃗ = 0 sin2 (𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 − 𝜔𝜔𝜔𝜔) 𝑥𝑥�
𝑆𝑆⃗ = 𝐸𝐸�⃗ × 𝐵𝐵
𝜇𝜇0 𝑐𝑐𝜇𝜇0
𝐸𝐸02
The time average of the Poynting vector is 〈𝑆𝑆⃗〉 = .
2𝑐𝑐𝜇𝜇 0
2. Considering Fresnel equations for s polarization,
For total transmission 𝑟𝑟𝑠𝑠 = 0, so that nI cos 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 = 𝑛𝑛 𝑇𝑇 cos 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 . From Snell’s law, we have, nI sin 𝜃𝜃𝐼𝐼 =
𝑛𝑛 𝑇𝑇 sin 𝜃𝜃𝑇𝑇 . Squaring and adding, we get 𝑛𝑛𝐼𝐼2 = 𝑛𝑛2𝑇𝑇 , which is not correct.
15