The document discusses the coal logistics transformation in South Sumatra from 2009 to 2020, including the various logistic modes used over three periods and what aspects worked well and didn't work well for each. The modes included various ports, use of railways, and river transport, with the goals being to reduce hauling distances, increase volume transported more cost effectively, and address issues like limited licenses, road conditions, port capacity, and river depth. Over time the logistic operations became more organized as different ports and transport methods were utilized to improve coal delivery from mining areas to loading stations.
The document discusses the coal logistics transformation in South Sumatra from 2009 to 2020, including the various logistic modes used over three periods and what aspects worked well and didn't work well for each. The modes included various ports, use of railways, and river transport, with the goals being to reduce hauling distances, increase volume transported more cost effectively, and address issues like limited licenses, road conditions, port capacity, and river depth. Over time the logistic operations became more organized as different ports and transport methods were utilized to improve coal delivery from mining areas to loading stations.
The document discusses the coal logistics transformation in South Sumatra from 2009 to 2020, including the various logistic modes used over three periods and what aspects worked well and didn't work well for each. The modes included various ports, use of railways, and river transport, with the goals being to reduce hauling distances, increase volume transported more cost effectively, and address issues like limited licenses, road conditions, port capacity, and river depth. Over time the logistic operations became more organized as different ports and transport methods were utilized to improve coal delivery from mining areas to loading stations.
c Logistic Mode What went well What didn’t go well
Port @ TAA • Pioneering • Limited license
Period I • SDJ Tj Lago • Near to open sea (transhipment) • Long distance 250km* 2009-2012 • SMJ, LKS • Bigger volume (tronton & >300” barge) • Passing Simpang Airport’ • Not passing Ampera • Bad road TAA & Inner Jetty
Period II • RMK, FMS, Diza • Reduced distance to 200 km* • Passing Ampera (max 300” barge) 2012-2018 • More organized operation • Limited haul time & max truck weight 10 mt Ports & Kertapati (Railway) • More volume transported • PTBA, BAU & MAS • More organized barge loading • R/W: exclusive,need contract & unit price more expensive Ports @ Lematang • Closer truck distance to 140 km* (more • EPI & SDJ Servo trips in a week) • SDJ for private use only • Options for transhipment • EPI operated with limited capacity space & some social issues Ports @ Plaju & Mariana • Same advantage with TAA • Bagus Kuning & LBES • Truck hauling safety issue & passing plantation road Ports @ Lematang Period III • SDJ Titan (2008-) • In accordance with Gov regulation • Stockpile & schedule issues 2018-current • EPI (2020-) • Port congestion Ports via Simpang (Railway) • River depth issue in summer • RMK & FMS • Closer truck hauling to loading station • Kertapati • More volume hauled • Loading station issue • More cost effective • Limited time for truck hauling Transport by Riverway • BM via EPI, BK • More cost effective options available • Investment in mini barges • Dredging issue * Distance from MME site Muara Enim Source: MME documentation –2020.10.15 Dr. Agustinus Thamrin