Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business Dynamics:
Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World
Chapter 2
John D. Sterman
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Sloan School of Management
Published by Irwin/McGraw-Hill, an imprint of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020.
Copyright 2001 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The contents, or parts thereof, may be reproduced in print form solely for classroom use with
BUSINESS DYNAMICS: SYSTEMS THINKING AND MODELING FOR A COMPLEX WORLD
provided such reproductions bear copyright notice, but may not be reproduced in any other form or for any other purpose without the prior written consent the
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., including, but not limited to, in any network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning.
Business Dynamics
A simple model of the automobile market
Figure 2-1
Business Dynamics
Figure 2-2
Source: Adapted from GM Decision Support Center diagram. Used with permission.
Business Dynamics
Figure 2-3 Policy Analysis
Source: Adapted from GM DSC diagram. Used with permission.
Business Dynamics
Figure 2-4 Bathtub diagram to illustrate the impact of leasing
Business Dynamics
Used car prices, 1989-1999
160
150
140
130
120
110
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Figure 2-5
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, series CUSROOSETA02
Business Dynamics
Stock and flow structure of a project phase
Figure 2-6
Source:: Adapted
from a diagram
developed by
Pugh-Roberts
Associates,
Cambridge, MA.
Business Dynamics
Side effects of corrective measures lead to vicious cycles.
Figure 2-7
Source: Adapted from a diagram developed by Pugh-Roberts Associates, Cambridge, MA.
Business Dynamics
Defect creation and elimination
Figure 2-8
Business Dynamics
Positive feedbacks undercutting planned maintenance
Figure 2-9
Business Dynamics
Additional positive feedbacks leading to a reactive maintenance culture
Figure 2-10
Business Dynamics
Results from selected policy simulations
Head Change in
Policy Mix Count Uptime Profit
($ million/year)
0. Typical plant under existing 91 83.5 0.00
policies
Table 1-1
Source: Winston Ledet, Park Paich, Tony Cardella, and Mark Downing (1991), “The Value of Integrating the CMLT Key
Pursuits,” Du Pont internal report.
Business Dynamics
Worse-before-better behavior of maintenance costs at a
typical plant
Figure 2-11
Source: Allen (1993).
Business Dynamics
Improvement at the Lima refinery
Lima Refinery pump MTBF up from 12 to 58 months (pump failures down from
more than 640 in 1991 to 131 in 1998). Direct savings: $1.8 million/year.
Total flare-off of hydrocarbon down from 1.5% to 0.35%. Direct savings:
$0.27/barrel. Improved environmental quality.
On-line analyzer uptime improvement from 75% and not trusted to 97% and
trusted, permitting real-time optimization of product flow. Savings: $0.10-
0.12/barrel.
Thirty-four production records set.
Safety incidents and lost hours cut by factor of 4.
Cash margin improved by $0.77 per barrel of oil processed.
Total new value created: $43 million/year. Total cost: $320,000/year.
Ratio: 143:1.
BP wide learning initiative under way for all other refineries and plants. Over
2000 people from sites in the US, UK, Australia, North Sea, Alaska, and Europe
had participated in the workshop and game by 1998.
Table 2-2
Source: Paul Monus, personal communication; Monus, P. (1997) “Proactive Manufacturing at BP’s Lima Oil Refinery,”
presented at NPRA Maintenance Conference, 20-23 May 1997, New Orleans; and NPRA Maintenance Conference, MC-98-92.
Business Dynamics