Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WELDING RESEARCH
BY Y. WANG AND L. LI
Y. WANG is a PhD candidate and L. LI (leijun@ualberta.ca) is a professor with the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta,
Edmonton, AB, Canada.
WELDING RESEARCH
WELDING RESEARCH
Table 1 — Chemical Composition of Grade 91 Base Material and Filler Metals (wt%)
Materials C Cr Mo Mn Si Ni Al V Nb S P N
ER90SB9 GTAW 0.097 8.830 0.928 0.560 0.250 0.307 0.002 0.197 0.064 0.004 0.006 0.030
E91T1B9 FCAW 0.100 8.830 0.880 0.790 0.280 0.550 0.001 0.200 0.030 0.008 0.020 0.050
Base Metal 0.110 8.470 0.940 0.370 0.370 0.080 0.002 0.190 0.071 0.002 0.016 0.048
WELDING RESEARCH
Fig. 8 — A — Backscattered electron (BSE) images of the aswelded FGHAZ; B — deep where N is the number of pixels in a
etched with 10% Nital to show the prior austenitic grain boundaries (PAGBs).
grain, n is the number of neighboring
pixels, and ji is the misorientation be-
HAZ were cut from the three thermal step size of 0.15, 0.10, and 0.13 m tween the measured pixel j and neigh-
conditions, as-welded (AW), after were used in EBSD for AW, PWHT, and boring pixel i. It is proved that GAM
postweld heat treatment (PWHT), and crept specimens, respectively. provides a reliable measurement of re-
after creep test (crept). These speci- The EBSD-analyzed areas for each crystallized grains (Refs. 32, 33). In
mens were mounted, ground, and pol- test condition were 390 m2 (as-weld- this study, the recrystallized fraction
ished by using a conventional mechan- ed), 390 m2 (PWHT), and 1049 m2 of grains in the FGHAZ was evaluated
ical polishing method. Grit #360, (crept). The increase in the area for the by using GAM with a commonly used
#600, #1200 SiC sandpapers were used crept samples was to make sure a com- threshold (c) of 1.0 deg.
for grinding. Three-m and 1-m dia- parable number of grains was ana- The logic flow for classification of
mond suspension, 0.5-m and 0.05- lyzed, as there was significant grain the grains is shown in Fig. 3. The inter-
m alumina suspension, and 0.02-m growth in the crept samples. Speci- nal average misorientation angle within
colloidal silica were used for polishing. mens for EBSD characterization were the grain and misorientation between
Electron backscatter diffraction in as-polished condition without etch- subgrains was measured to categorize
(EBSD) analysis on FGHAZ was con- ing. The polished specimens for optical the grains. The grain with an internal
ducted on two specimens for each test and FESEM microscope analysis were grain average misorientation (GAM)
condition by using a Zeiss Sigma field- etched with 10% Nital for 2 to 10 min. higher than the threshold (c) is defined
emission SEM (FESEM) equipped with Phase identification and orienta- as an “unrecrystallized grain.” When the
an Oxford AZtec system under 20-kV tion relationship of the matrix grains GAM of the grain is lower than the
accelerate voltage, and 60-m objec- and precipitates were analyzed by threshold (c), but the misorientation
tive aperture. A spot size of 10 nm and EBSD with Oxford AZtec software. between the subgrains (SB) is higher
WELDING RESEARCH
Experimental Results
Creep Test and Microhardness Fig. 9 — A — Backscattered electron (BSE) images of FGHAZ following PWHT; B — fol
lowing creep rupture (10% Nital etch).
Figure 4 shows creep curves of the
P91 cross-weld specimen after PWHT A C
and the as-received base metal tested at
650°C with a stress level of 70 MPa. The
creep curve of the P91 cross-weld shows
a typical three-stage curve, including
primary creep regime, secondary creep
regime, and tertiary creep regime. The
primary creep regime of base metal is
much longer than that of the weld. The
curve of the weld shows it quickly en- B
ters the secondary creep regime with a
constant strain rate. In the tertiary
creep regime, the cavities promote the
rapid deformation of the weld with an
increasing strain rate. The weld rup-
tured at testing time 649 h with an av-
erage tensile strain of 1.2% over the en-
tire gauge length. The test of the as-
received base metal was terminated in Fig. 10 — Highangle grain boundary (HAGB) and lowangle grain boundary (LAGB)
the secondary creep regime at 2402 h distributions in FGHAZ. A — In the aswelded; B — postweld heattreated; C — creep
with an average tensile strain of 1.0% rupture tested (dark lines indicate HAGB, misorientation > 15 deg, light lines indicate
LAGB, misorientation = 2~15 deg, cavities are marked by arrows).
over the entire gauge section. It is obvi-
ous that the creep rupture strength of
the weld is much lower than that of the A B
base metal.
Microhardness traverse distribu-
tion as affected by the thermal histo-
ries is shown in Fig. 5. Hardness of all
regions decreased after PWHT and the
creep test. The fusion zone shows the
highest hardness, 463 HV1, in the AW
condition due to untempered marten-
site formed following weld cooling.
Hardness in AW-CGHAZ gradually de-
creases along with the gradient peak Fig. 11 — Relative frequency distribution of grain boundary misorientation in FGHAZ. A —
temperature (above AC3) and cooling Misorientation range from 0 to 15 deg; B — misorientation range from 15 to 62.8 deg.
rate during the welding process. The Aswelded FGHAZ (red circle and line), PWHT FGHAZ (blue triangle and line, and crept
FGHAZ is the softest region, with a FGHAZ (black cubic and line). Mackenzie distribution for random misorientation is also
shown in B.
hardness value of 220 HV1 for AW,
206 HV1 for PWHT, and 115 HV1 for
the crept condition, weld metal, much of the HAZ, and the Fig. 6B. Because of the creep strength
respectively. base metal show no large plastic defor- variation between fusion zone and
Figure 6 shows a typical Type IV mation during creep. The plastic de- base metal, a shear deformation oc-
creep rupture of the cross-weld P91 formation (shown as the shear- curred during creep test. Failure of the
joint tested at 650°C with a stress level deformed steps in Fig. 6A) was ob- weld is caused by the formation of the
of 70 MPa. Failure of the weld joint oc- served at a region 0.5 mm wide, locat- cavities in the shear deformation zone.
curred in the outer edge of the FGHAZ ed near the outer edge of the HAZ, The cavity damage is observed to have
and ICHAZ close to base metal. The where the creep cavity concentrated — started in the middle thickness of the
WELDING RESEARCH
A C
Fig. 12 — Inverse pole figure (IPF) in Z [001] direction (perpendicular to the screen)
shows the grain orientation distribution. A — AWFGHAZ; B — PWTHFGHAZ; C —
creptFGHAZ.
A C
WELDING RESEARCH
A C
Fig. 15 — Overlapping of local misorientation (KAM) map and grain boundary map of grain growth and further recrystalliza-
FGHAZ shows the high strain level in AW condition and neighboring grains around cavi tion contribute to even more HAGBs —
ties. A — AW; B — PWHT; C — crept.
Fig. 10C.
Misorientation distribution of the
along the PAGBs and subgrain bound- boundaries during recrystallization and grain boundaries in FGHAZ is shown
aries — Fig. 7B. After creep test, the grain growth. Fine precipitates concen- in Fig. 11. Misorientation distribution
precipitates grow even bigger and redis- trate in some particular grains, but not peaks of HAGBs in FGHAZ shift from
tribute along PAGBs and within the sub- in all grains. The wedge-type cavity 45 deg in the Mackenzie distribution
grains — Figs. 7C, 9B. All wedge-type forms on those grain boundaries with of randomly misoriented grains to
cavities are observed along the PAGBs. dispersed coarse precipitates. It must be 50~60 deg due the recovery and re-
Backscattered electron (BSE) images pointed out that the current discussion crystallization effects shown in Fig.
in Fig. 8 reveal more structural details is based on distributions of precipitates 11B.
of the as-welded FGHAZ. Fine and detectable by FESEM and EBSD (such as Relative frequency of LAGB and
coarse precipitates are distributed on in Fig. 9), and the effects of precipitates HAGB is calculated and presented in
PAGBs and subgrain boundaries. Deep- smaller than 0.1 m are not considered. Table 2. The ratio of HAGB/LAGB in-
etched FGHAZ in Fig. 8B clearly shows Low-angle grain boundaries (LAGB, creases from 0.48 to 0.88 and 1.06.
the short martensite laths within PAGs. with a misorientation of 2 to 15 deg) Fine lath-shaped subgrains are ob-
Fine precipitates distribute within the and high-angle grain boundaries served in AW-FGHAZ. Coarse lath-
martensite laths or on lath boundaries. (HAGB, with a misorientation > 15 deg) shaped grains and fine equiaxed grains
After PWHT, the lath martensite sub- of the matrix grains in FGHAZ were are the characteristic grains of PWHT-
structure is tempered and decomposed classified by measuring the misorienta- FGHAZ. Crept-FGHAZ shows coarse
into a fine equiaxed ferrite — Fig. 9A. tion between adjacent grains — Fig. 10. equiaxed grains. The average grain
PAGBs with coarse precipitates are still Subgrain boundaries, such as lath and sizes, determined by the line intercept
visible. Coarse precipitates stay at the block/packet boundaries within PAGs, procedure of ASTM E211, of the matrix
former martensite lath boundaries. Fin- have lower misorientation than that of grains are shown in Table 2. The as-
er particles precipitate within the PAGBs. PAGBs are identified as HAGBs welded FGHAZ has the smallest aver-
equiaxed subgrains. Following further due to their higher misorientation. In age grain size of 1.2 m. After PWHT,
tempering and accumulated strain dur- the as-welded condition, the tempered the FGHAZ has a slightly increased av-
ing creep test, larger equiaxed grains are martensite substructure obtains more erage grain size of 1.8 m. After creep
observed — Fig. 9B. Some coarse pre- LAGBs — Fig. 10A. After PWHT, recov- test, the FGHAZ has a significantly in-
cipitates lie at the triple points of grain ery and recrystallization of the marten- creased grain size of 3.1 m.
boundaries. PAGBs are not clearly re- sitic grains result in more HAGBs — The inverse pole figure (IPF) in Z
vealed due the migration of the grain Fig. 10B. When creep test is performed, [001] direction (perpendicular to the
Table 2 — Grain Size, Phase, GB, and Grain Distribution of FGHAZ in Three Thermal Histories
Ferrite Area Fraction (%) of GB Frequency (%) Area Fraction (%) of Ferrite
Specimen Phases Ratio of
Condition Grain Size Standard HAGB LAGB HAGB/LAGB
μm Deviation Febcc/bct Precipitates (>15 deg) (2~15 deg) Recrystallized Substructured Unrecrystallized
AW 1.2 1.14 88.5 11.5 32.4 67.6 0.48 14.3 45.0 40.7
PWHT 1.8 0.94 88.9 11.1 46.7 53.3 0.88 27.0 68.1 4.9
Crept 3.1 2.67 88.7 11.3 51.5 48.5 1.06 45.1 50.8 3.1
WELDING RESEARCH
A B
Fig. 17 — Overlapping of EBSD phase map and grain boundary map of FGHAZ show coarsening and segregation of the precipitates, espe
cially M23C6 carbides in AW, PWHT, and crept conditions. A — AW; B — PWHT; C — crept. Phases show as different color symbols. Marten
site and ferrite are processed as the same phase background color in pink.
screen) in Fig. 12 shows the grain ori- Table 2. It is notable that the relative tion of 3 deg (highest deformation).
entation distribution in FGHAZ. A leg- fraction of carbides remains a constant The as-welded FGHAZ shows a rela-
end in Fig. 12C illustrates different during the evolution of the mi- tively higher local misorientation in
orientations in different colors. The crostructure, although their sizes and Fig. 15A. Furthermore, grain bound-
as-welded FGHAZ shows the largest distributions will change. In the as- aries have a higher deformation and
grain orientation variation due to fine welded condition, the FGHAZ has the misorientation. After PWHT, the unre-
nucleated grains. Because of the recov- highest fraction of unrecrystallized crystallized grains are tempered and
ery and recrystallization of the matrix grains (28.5%) and the lowest fraction recovered, resulting in a lower degree
grains after PWHT, a relatively lower of recrystallized grains (4.9%). On the of deformation and misorientation in
grain orientation variation is observed contrary, the FGHAZ in the crept con- Fig. 15B. Some intersections of grain
in PWHT-FGHAZ. Crept-FGHAZ has dition consists of the lowest fraction boundaries still show a relatively high-
the lowest grain orientation variation of unrecrystallized grains (3.1%) and er misorientation. After the creep test,
due to the highly recrystallized grains. the highest fraction of fully recrystal- the matrix is further tempered to give
The misorientation profiles in Fig. lized grains (45.1%). The substruc- the lowest misorientation, but the re-
13 are calculated based on the neigh- tured grains, which are in the interme- gions close to the cavities still show a
boring pixels across grains with similar diate state between the unrecrystal- high misorientation — Fig. 15C. The
orientation in three thermal stages. It lized and fully recrystallized, are domi- statistical kernel average misorienta-
clearly shows the grain in the AW con- nant in all three conditions of the tion distribution is shown in Fig. 16.
dition has the highest misorientation welds. Relative frequency peak of AW-FG-
(> 4.0 deg), which indicates its greater Kernel average misorientation HAZ shifts to higher misorientation
crystal distortion. In the PWHT condi- (KAM) is the arithmetic mean of the values. Crept-FGHAZ obtains the
tion, the highest misorientation in the scalar misorientations between groups largest frequency of low-angle misori-
FGHAZ is 1.5 deg. In the crept condi- of pixels, or kernels, that measures lo- entation value.
tion, the FGHAZ shows the lowest cal strain levels of the grains (Ref. 29). Figure 17 shows the microstructure
misorientation (0.1 deg). Figure 15 illustrates the local misori- evolution of the matrix grains and pre-
Distribution of the unrecrystallized entation distribution in the FGHAZ cipitates before and after the creep
grains, substructured, and recrystal- for the three thermal stages (as-weld- test. Firstly, the recovered and recrys-
lized grains, including precipitates, is ed, PWHT, and crept) by KAM maps. tallized grains turn to coarse equiaxed
shown in Fig. 14. The area fraction for The blue color stands for a misorienta- grains. Cr-rich M23C6 carbides distrib-
each of the three kinds of matrix tion of 0 deg (lowest deformation) and ute within some, not all, grains follow-
grains is calculated and tabulated in the red color stands for a misorienta- ing the PWHT. This uneven distribu-
WELDING RESEARCH
WELDING RESEARCH
ed zone after welding in Mod.9Cr–1Mo IV creep damage in grade 91 steel welds. Ma-
Acknowledgments
steel. Materials Characterization 101: terials Science and Engineering A 578:
106–113. 430–437.
12. Paddea, S., Francis, J. A., Paradowska, 24. Parker, J. 2014. In-service behavior of
This work has been financially spon-
A. M., Bouchard, P. J., and Shibli, I. A. 2012. creep strength enhanced ferritic steels grade
sored by the U.S. DOE Office of Nuclear Residual stress distributions in a P91 steel- 91 and grade 92 — Part 2 weld issues. Inter-
Energy’s Nuclear Energy University Pro- pipe girth weld before and after post weld national Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping
grams and by the Discovery program of heat treatment. Materials Science and Engi- 114: 76–87.
Natural Sciences and Engineering Re- neering A 534: 663–672. 25. AbdEl-Azim, M. E., Ibrahim, O. H.,
search Council (NSERC) of Canada. 13. Albert, S. K., Matsui, M., Watanabe, and El-Desoky, O. E. 2013. Long term creep
T., Hongo, H., Kubo, K., and Tabuchi, M. behaviour of welded joints of P91 steel at
2003. Variation in the type IV cracking be- 650°C. Materials Science and Engineering A
References havior of a high Cr steel weld with post weld 560: 678–684.
heat treatment. International Journal of Pres- 26. Liu, Y., Tsukamoto, S., Shirane, T.,
sure Vessels and Piping 80: 405–413. and Abe, F. 2013. Formation mechanism of
1. Choudhary, B. K., Saroja, S., Bhanu- 14. Liu, Y., Tsukamoto, S., Sawada, K., type IV failure in high Cr ferritic heat-resis-
Sankara Rao, K., and Mannan, S. L. 1999. and Abe, F. 2014. Role of boundary tant steel-welded joint. Metallurgical and Ma-
Creep-rupture behavior of forged, thick sec- strengthening on prevention of type IV fail- terials Transactions A 44(1): 4626–4633.
tion 9Cr-1Mo ferritic steel. Metallurgical and ure in high Cr ferritic heat resistant steels. 27. ASTM standard E139-06, 2006. Stan-
Materials Transactions A 30(11): 2825–2834. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A dard test methods for conducting creep,
2. Shrestha, T., Basirat, M., Charit, I., 45(3): 1306–1314. creep-rupture, and stress-rupture tests of
Potirniche, G. P., and Rink, K. K. 2013. Creep 15. Abe, F. 2008. Precipitate design for metallic materials. ASTM International, West
rupture behavior of grade 91 steel. Materials creep strengthening of 9% Cr tempered Conshohocken, Pa., 2006, DOI:
Science and Engineering A 565: 382–391. martensitic steel for ultra-supercritical pow- 10.1520/E0139-06, astm.org.
3. Aghajani, A., Somsen, C., and Eggeler, er plants. Science and Technology of Advanced 28. Wright, S. I., Nowell, M. M., and
G. 2009. On the effect of long-term creep on Materials 09: 01–15. Field, D. P. 2011. A review of strain analysis
the microstructure of a 12% chromium tem- 16. Yu, X., Babu, S. S., Terasaki, H., Komi- using electron backscatter diffraction. Mi-
pered martensite ferritic steel. Acta Materi- zo, Y., Yamamoto, Y., and Santella, M. L. croscopy and Microanalysis 17: 316–329.
alia 57(17): 5093–5106. 2013. Correlation of precipitate stability to 29. Schwartz, A. J., Kumar, M., Adams, B.
4. Silwal, B., Li, L., Deceuster, A., and increased creep resistance of Cr–Mo steel L., and Field, D. P. 2009. Electron Backscatter
Griffiths, B. 2013. Effect of postweld heat welds. Acta Materialia 61(6): 2194–2206. Diffraction in Materials Science. New York,
treatment on the toughness of heat-affected 17. Dawson, K. E., Tatlock, G. J., Chi, K., Springer.
zone for grade 91 steel. Welding Journal and Barnard, P. 2013. Changes in precipitate 30. Konrad, J., Zaefferer, S., and Raabe,
91(3): 80-s to 87-s. distributions and the microstructural evolu- D. 2006. Investigation of orientation gradi-
5. Das, C. R., Albert, S. K., Bhaduri, A. K., tion of P24/P91 dissimilar metal welds dur- ents around a hard laves particle in a warm-
Srinivasan, G., and Murty, B. S. 2008. Effect ing PWHT. Metallurgical and Materials Trans- rolled Fe3Al-based alloy using a 3D EBSD-
of prior microstructure on microstructure actions A 44(11): 5065–5080. FIB technique. Acta Materialia 54(5):
and mechanical properties of modified 9Cr– 18. Zavaleta Gutiérrez, N., De Cicco, H., 1969–1980.
1Mo steel weld joints. Materials Science and Marrero, J., Danón, C. A., and Luppo, M. I. 31. Cho, J. H., Rollett, A. D., Cho, J. S.,
Engineering A 477: 185–192. 2011. Evolution of precipitated phases dur- Park, Y. J., Moon, J. T., and Oh, K. H. 2006.
6. Sireesha, M., Sundaresan, S., and Al- ing prolonged tempering in a 9%Cr1% Investigation of recrystallization and grain
bert, S. K. 2001. Microstructure and me- MoVNb ferritic–martensitic steel: Influence growth of copper and gold bonding wires.
chanical properties of weld fusion zones in on creep performance. Materials Science and Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
modified 9Cr-1Mo steel. Journal of Materials Engineering A 528: 4019–4029. 37(1): 3085–3097.
Engineering and Performance 10(1): 320–330. 19. Laha, K., Chandravathi, K. S., Para- 32. Dziaszyk, S., Payton, E. J., Friedel, F.,
7. Abe, F., Kern, T. U., and Viswanathan, meswaran, P., BhanuSankara Rao, K., and Marx, V., and Eggeler, G. 2010. On the char-
R. 2008. Creep-Resistant Steels. Cambridge, Mannan, S. L. 2007. Characterization of mi- acterization of recrystallized fraction using
Woodhead Publishing. crostructures across the heat-affected zone electron backscatter diffraction: A direct
8. Mayr, P. 2007. Weldability of Modern of the modified 9Cr-1Mo weld joint to un- comparison to local hardness in an IF steel
9%Cr Steels for Application in USC Power derstand its role in promoting type IV crack- using nanoindentation. Materials Science and
Plants. PhD dissertation. Styria, Graz Uni- ing. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions Engineering A 527: 7854–7864.
versity of Technology. A 38(1): 58–68. 33. McCabe, R. J., and Teter, D. F. 2006.
9. Kou, S. 1987. Welding Metallurgy. 20. Francis, J. A., Mazur, W., and Analysis of recrystallized volume fractions in
Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Bhadeshia, H. 2006.Type IV cracking in fer- uranium using electron backscatter diffrac-
10. Mayr, P., Schlacher, C., and Mitsche, ritic power plant steels. Materials Science and tion. Journal of Microscopy 223(1): 33–39.
S. 2011. Critical issues with creep-exposed Technology 22(12): 1387–1395. 34. Rollett, A., Humphreys, F. J., Rohrer,
ferritic-martensitic welded joints for ther- 21. Abson, D. J., and Rothwell, J. S. 2013. G. S., and Hatherly, M. 2004. Recrystalliza-
mal power plants. Proceedings of the IIW In- Review of type IV cracking of weldments in tion and Related Annealing Phenomena. Ox-
ternational Conference on Global Trends in 9–12%Cr creep strength enhanced ferritic ford, Elsevier.
Joining, Cutting and Surfacing Technology. steels. International Materials Reviews 58(8): 35. Doherty, R. D., Hughes, D. A.,
eds. D. V. Kulkarni , M. Samant, S. Krishnan, 438–473. Humphreys, F. J., Jonas, J. J., Jensen, D. J.,
A. De, J. Krishnan, H. D. Patel, and A. K. 22. Shinozaki, K., and Kuroki, H. 2003. Kassner, M. E., King, W. E., McNelley, T. R.,
Bhaduri, pp. 417–425. Narosa Publishing Stress-strain analysis of creep deterioration McQueen, H. J., and Rollett, A. D. 1997.
House Pvt Ltd. in heat affected weld zone in high Cr ferritic Current issues in recrystallization: A review.
11. Sawada, K., Hara, T., Tabuchi, M., heat resistant steel. Materials Science and Materials Science and Engineering A 238:
Kimura, K., and Kubushiro, K. 2015. Mi- Technology 19(9): 1253–1261. 219–274.
crostructure characterization of heat affect- 23. Parker, J. 2013. Factors affecting type