You are on page 1of 3

Surname 1

Student
Course
Professor
Institution
Date
Healthcare Is Not A Right

A human right is a right with a lot of significance to humans. Various reasons exist on

why health need not be defined as a human right. The proposition that health care is a human

right in wrongly headed and insignificant. Mature debates on the limiting and allocation of the

limited funds barely take place when people begin from the health care foundation is their right.

The notion by the proponents is driven by the idea that it adds more weight to the concept that

healthcare is important. It is essential to understand that healthcare, in all its premises, cannot be

considered a right.

The first premise is that healthcare is problematic to define, and it includes protective

care, public health, health raise and conduct of recognized illnesses. Different healthcare services

may be clustered as a right while others cannot literary be a right. For a premise to count as a

privilege, the minimum obligation needs to be that the right in query is proficient of defining

(Sean, 615). For healthcare, different services such as cosmetic surgery, transplant, sterility

treatment and more costly health care procedures make the definition of healthcare expenses.

People seek different health services from different providers who give them services at different

rates. Therefore, to say that health service is a right would create chaos and challenges in service

delivery and compromise the quality of care and safety of the patients.

The other avenue is that every right held by a person implies a responsibility on the

portion of others. Therefore, the mandate to a fair trial enforces an obligation on the prosecution
Surname 2

to be reasonable. It is unclear to determine where a person who does the work to offer health care

to the citizens of the world. It is also difficult to determine whether it is a duty of the individual

doctors or facilities or the government to offer the care services. It is challenging to see how any

provisions of profits can be named as human rights when to meet the requirements would

execute an unbearable load on others.

The third element is that the ethical basis of every human rights is always shaky.

Liberalism and humanism, the central philosophers of the western consensuses, need human

rights. Religion needs God, although it is not in itself indication of the existence of God. Many

people can see the benefits of maintaining the concepts of civil and radical rights. However, it is

difficult to find a rational and pragmatic basis for watching health care in the similar ways.

Having healthcare considered a right makes it a complicated premise.

While health care cannot be viewed a right, there are various reasons to believe it should

be made a right. Former President Obama shared the same premise, and it motivated him to pass

the Affordable Care Act (Jill & Daniel, n.p). The president and advocates the bill thought it was

the right of everyone to attain medical care. The proponents believed that when people fall ill,

they have a right to be treated and access the best healthcare services.

Although there are conflicting views about the issue, many premises point to the fact that

health care is not a right. The main aspect is that rights have to be defined while healthcare

cannot be defined. It is a complicated aspect that needs critical review and considerations, but it

still won’t be possible to classify it a right.


Surname 3

Works Cited

Quadagno, Jill & Lanford, Daniel. The Obama Health Care Legacy: The Origins,

Implementation, and Effort to Repeal the Affordable Care Act of 2010: Hope and

Change. 2019. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01545-9_4

Rife, Sean. Is there a Natural Right to Healthcare? Human Affairs. 2012. 22. 613-622.

http://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0049-5

You might also like