Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. external diffusion:
o transport of substrates towards the surface, and
products away
o In series with catalytic conversion of substrates to
products at the surface (the processes is consecutive)
2. internal diffusion:
o transport of the substrates and products, within the
pores of immobilised enzyme particlesis
o In parallel with the catalysed reaction (the processes
is simultaneous).
Effects of diffusion on kinetics of immobilised enzymes
h= v/vfree
• Generally lies between 0 and 1
• Assumptions:
(1) Michaelis-Menten kinetics
(2) the enzyme is immobilised to a flat impervious support
(3) steady state conditions
where A is the total surface area and Vmax is the maximum rate of
reaction catalysed by unit area of surface.
• [So] and [S] are the substrate concentrations in the bulk of the
solution and the microenvironment next to the surface,
respectively.
• KL is the (local liquid phase) mass transfer coefficient
Molecular Diffusivity
• It depends upon the molecular Substance
weight (m2 s-1)
weight and dimensions of the Oxygen 32 21.0 x10-10
substrate, and the temperature, Glucose 180 6.7 x10-10
viscosity and composition of the Sucrose 342 4.5 x10-10
liquid phase. Inulin 5,200 2.3 x10-10
• The higher the molecular weight Albumin 67,000 0.7 x10-10
Urease 480,000 0.3 x10-10
and the solution viscosity, the
Bushy stunt virus 10,700,000 0.1 x10-10
lower will be the diffusivity
Derivation of the effect of external diffusion on the rate of an
enzyme catalysed reaction
• then:
The combined effect of the bulk substrate concentration (b0) and substrate
modulus (m) on the effectiveness factor (h).
(a) area of kinetic control, (b) intermediate control and (c) diffusional control.
• The conditions that produce an increased probability of
external diffusional control over the rate of an immobilised
enzyme catalysed reaction may be summarised as follows:
1. High enzyme loading on the surface.
2. Low bulk substrate concentration.
3. Low substrate diffusivity.
4. Low Km.
5. Low rate of stirring or mixing.
6. Flat surfaces (e.g. large average particle diameter)
Competitive
Uncompetitive
Noncompetitive
• In Competitive and noncompetitive inhibitions mi < m
• Substrate diffusional resistance have less affect.
• This is because inhibited reactions are slower and less likely to
be controlled by the rate of substrate diffusion.
• Uncompetitive inhibition has no effect as it has negligible affect
on the rate of reaction at low substrate concentrations.
• For all cases, the effect of the degree of inhibition becomes
negligible at high substrate modulus (m > 50)
Product inhibition
• More severe in immobilised enzymes (product having to diffuse
away from the site of reaction).
• Its concentration is likely to be much higher within the
microenvironment than in the bulk of the solution
• At the beginning of the reaction, product concentration builds
up until the concentration gradient to the bulk
macroenvironment is sufficient to allow it to diffuse away at an
equal rate to its production by the reaction.
Where, kLS and kLP are substrate and product mass transfer
coefficients, and [P] and [P0] are product concentrations in the
microenvironment and bulk
• Under diffusional control, [P]>>[Po] and [S0]>>[S]
With:
• Eadie-Hofstee plots illustrating the effect of external diffusional
resistance on the kinetics of an immobilised enzyme.
• The lines represent the kinetically controlled reaction and
increasing substrate modulus (m)
(a) non-reversible (b) reversible (Keq =1.14)
Enzyme activity
• Diffusional resistance can lead to an apparent increase in the
stability of immobilised enzymes.
• At a high loading of active enzyme, the activity is independent
of the inherent activity of the immobilised enzyme.