Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: This study investigated the microfiltration of microalgae, Chlorella sp., in the presence of polymethyl-
Received 12 July 2016 methacrylate (PMMA) under dead-end and cross-flow modes. The concentration of microalgae was
Received in revised form 21 October 2016 10 mg/L, while PMMA concentration varied from 10 to 40 mg/L. Flux increased with increasing concen-
Accepted 31 October 2016
tration of PMMA in dead-end microfiltration, and the specific cake resistance decreased as PMMA con-
Available online xxxx
centration increased under three different trans-membrane pressure (TMP) of 20, 40, and 60 kPa. The
cake compressibility decreased in the presence of PMMA. In cross-flow microfiltration of microalgae in
Keywords:
the presence of PMMA, the flux increased as cross-flow velocity increased, and the effect became more
Compression
Harvesting
pronounced as PMMA concentration increased. It was because the rigid PMMA particles rendered the dis-
Microalgae tribution of local specific resistance more uniform along the cake thickness. In addition, the cake growth
Microfiltration became more containable by increasing cross-flow velocity when more PMMA particles were present,
Water treatment and resulted in higher steady flux under both laminar and turbulent flow conditions.
Ó 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.063
1383-5866/Ó 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: M.T. Hung, J.C. Liu, Microfiltration of microalgae in the presence of rigid particles, Separ. Purif. Technol. (2016), http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.063
2 M.T. Hung, J.C. Liu / Separation and Purification Technology xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
in-series model was used to assess the fouling mechanisms during measured with a small-angle light scattering instrument (Malvern,
microfiltration. Mastersizer 2000) as shown in Fig. 1. The hydrophilic mixed cellu-
lose ester membrane (Corning, Membra-Fil) with a nominal pore
size of 0.22 lm was utilized in this study.
2. Materials and methods
The microalgae species, Chlorella sp., was cultivated in the lab- 2.2.1. Dead-end microfiltration
oratory. The procedure for microalgae cultivation and the subse- The experimental apparatus for dead-end microfiltration is
quent cleaning are described in our previous work [9]. The mean shown in Fig. 2. The 2-L microalgae suspension was poured into
diameter of Chlorella sp. is 3.8 lm. The commercial PMMA particles the tank, which was kept at 25 °C throughout the process. The
(Soken, MX-300) with a mean diameter of 3.68 lm were used to membrane module made of acrylic with the effective filtration area
mimic incompressible particulates in natural water. The stock sus- of 4 cm2 was submerged into suspension. As filtrate began to flow
pension of PMMA (1000 mg/L) was first prepared using 1-L ultra- into the receiver while the vacuum pump (Gast, DOA-P104-AA)
pure water. After stirring for 24 h, the suspension was filtered was switched on to create negative pressure. Trans-membrane
with a 0.45 lm GF/C membrane. The retained PMMA particles pressure (TMP) for dead-end microfiltration was set at 20, 40,
were again suspended with 1-L ultrapure water. Aforementioned and 60 kPa, respectively. The weight of filtrate was recorded as a
procedures were repeated twice to clean PMMA particles. The con- function of operation time by the personal computer that acquired
centration of microalgae was controlled at 10 mg/L for all experi- data from the electronic balance (Ohaus, adventurer). The proce-
ments with PMMA concentration of 0, 10, 20, 40 mg/L, dure for the classification of hydrodynamic resistances, such as
respectively. The size distribution of microalgae with PMMA was membrane resistance (Rm,b), fouling resistance (Rm,f), cake resis-
tance (Rc), and total resistance (Rt) is illustrated in the previous
work [9].
Please cite this article in press as: M.T. Hung, J.C. Liu, Microfiltration of microalgae in the presence of rigid particles, Separ. Purif. Technol. (2016), http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.063
M.T. Hung, J.C. Liu / Separation and Purification Technology xxx (2016) xxx–xxx 3
a ¼ A 1 DP n ð3Þ
where A1 is the empirical coefficient (m/kg) and n the compressibil-
ity coefficient of cake.
Fig. 4. Filtration curves of the plot of dt/dv versus v of 10 mg/L of microalgae with
various concentration of PMMA under TMP of (a) 20 kPa; (b) 40 kPa; and (c) 60 kPa.
Please cite this article in press as: M.T. Hung, J.C. Liu, Microfiltration of microalgae in the presence of rigid particles, Separ. Purif. Technol. (2016), http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.063
4 M.T. Hung, J.C. Liu / Separation and Purification Technology xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
Table 1
The classification of hydrodynamic resistance as affected by PMMA concentration under three TMPs.
tion in the plot of dt/dv versus v shows a prefect linear profile (data
10 3.62E+12 43.3 1.57E+11
20 1.91E+12 76.7 1.47E+11
not shown). Unlike the experiments under TMP of 20 kPa, flux 40 1.11E+12 118.6 1.36E+11
increased with increasing PMMA concentration when under TMP
of 40 kPa (Fig. 4b). The curvature of filtration curve decreased at
PMMA concentration of 10 mg/L. Furthermore, the filtration curve helped to counteract cake compression. However, it also led to
exhibited a linear profile when the PMMA concentration increased the increase in cake mass. Basically, cake resistance is determined
to 20 and 40 mg/L. Fig. 4c shows the results under TMP of 60 kPa. by the product of cake mass and specific cake resistance. Table 2
The effects of PMMA particles on flux and curvature of filtration shows how cake resistance was simultaneously affected by the
curve under TMP of 60 kPa were identical to those observed under specific cake resistance and the cake mass. When under TMP of
TMP of 40 kPa. 20 kPa, cake resistance decreased in the presence of 10 mg/L of
Table 1 shows the classification of hydrodynamic resistances PMMA. It was because the decrease in specific cake resistance
(Rm,b, Rm,f, Rc) as affected by PMMA concentration under three was more significant than the increase of the cake mass in con-
TMPs. It is obvious that cake resistance (Rc) accounted for the tributing to cake resistance. Nevertheless, the increase of the cake
majority of total resistance among all dead-end microfiltration. mass became more dominant in determining cake resistance when
The fouling resistance (Rm,f) was not affected by the concentration 20 mg/L or more PMMA were involved. Therefore, the cake resis-
of PMMA, while the Rm,f always contributed the least to total resis- tance began to increase as long as the concentration of PMMA
tance. The presence of PMMA particles did not inflict additional was higher than 10 mg/L when under TMP of 20 kPa. On the con-
fouling resistance on membrane even though some of PMMA par- trary, the flux gradually increased as PMMA concentration
ticles were just slightly greater than membrane pores. This result increased from 10 to 40 mg/L when under TMP of 40 and 60 kPa,
further verified that all concave upward profiles in the plot of dt/ respectively. It is probably because the specific cake resistance
dv versus v were mainly due to cake compression instead of pore played a dominant role in determining the cake resistance rather
blockage. Table 2 shows that the specific cake resistance decreased than the cake mass when under higher TMP. Table 3 shows the
as PMMA concentration increased under three TMPs. It implied
that the packing of PMMA particles gained more space for filtrate
to pass through the cake layer, which rendered the specific cake Table 3
resistance lower. It implied that the presence of clay particles, rigid Cake compressibility index (n) as affected by mass ratio of microalgae to PMMA.
and negatively charged just like PMMA, would benefit filtration Mass ratio of microalgae to PMMA Compressibility index (–)
separation of microalgae. However, the PMMA used in the current 1:0 0.82
study was mono-dispersed with same size of microalgae, while 1:1 0.47
clay particles in natural water are not. Further study is needed to 1:2 0.33
verify this. In general, the presence of PMMA in the microalgae 1:4 0.08
Please cite this article in press as: M.T. Hung, J.C. Liu, Microfiltration of microalgae in the presence of rigid particles, Separ. Purif. Technol. (2016), http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.063
M.T. Hung, J.C. Liu / Separation and Purification Technology xxx (2016) xxx–xxx 5
Table 4
The classification of hydrodynamic resistance as affected by PMMA concentration under laminar and turbulent flow conditions.
Please cite this article in press as: M.T. Hung, J.C. Liu, Microfiltration of microalgae in the presence of rigid particles, Separ. Purif. Technol. (2016), http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.063
6 M.T. Hung, J.C. Liu / Separation and Purification Technology xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
References
[1] G. Joh, Y.S. Choi, J.K. Shin, J. Lee, Problematic algae in the sedimentation and
filtration process of water treatment plants, J. Water SRT-Aqua 2011 (60)
(2011) 219–230.
Fig. 6. Filtration curves of the plot of dt/dv versus v of 10 mg/L of microalgae at [2] J.A. Westrick, D.C. Szlag, B.J. Southwell, J. Sinclair, A review of cyanobacteria
various concentration of PMMA under turbulent flow condition. and cyanotoxins removal/inactivation in drinking water treatment, Anal.
Bioanal. Chem. 397 (2010) 1705–1712.
[3] M. Pivokonsky, J. Naceradska, I. Kopecka, M. Baresova, B. Jefferson, X. Li, R.K.
dt/dv versus v. The filtration curve was approximately linear at Henderson, The impact of algogenic organic matter on water treatment plant
operation and water quality: a review, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016
10 mg/L of PMMA. It then became concave downward as PMMA (46) (2016) 291–335.
concentration increased to 20 and 40 mg/L. It could be reasoned [4] C.R. Dunlap, K.S. Sklenar, L. Blake, A costly endeavor: addressing algae
that steady state flux was more readily obtained when under problems in a water supply, J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 107 (2015) 255–262.
[5] M.R. Bilad, H.A. Arafat, I.F.J. Vankelecom, Membrane technology in microalgae
higher cross-flow velocity and in the presence of PMMA. cultivation and harvesting: a review, Biotechnol. Adv. 32 (2014) 1283–1300.
The reduction in cake compressibility when in the presence of [6] F. Wicaksana, A.G. Fane, P. Pongpairoj, R. Field, Microfiltration of algae
10 mg/L PMMA particles seemed more significant under turbulent (Chlorella sorokiniana): critical flux, fouling and transmission, J. Membr. Sci.
387–388 (2012) 83–92.
flow than that under laminar flow, judging by the variation in the
[7] K.J. Hwang, S.J. Lin, Filtration flux-shear stress-cake mass relationships in
curvature of filtration curves. The particle size distribution, shown microalgae rotating-disk dynamic microfiltration, Chem. Eng. J. 244 (2014)
in Fig. 1, indicated that a certain amount of PMMA particles were 429–437.
submicron, ranging between 0.28 and 0.99 lm. Hwang et al. [19] [8] S. Babel, S. Takizawa, Microfiltration membrane fouling and cake behavior
during algal filtration, Desalination 261 (2010) 46–51.
reveal that the deposition probability decreases rapidly as particle [9] M.T. Hung, J.C. Liu, Microfiltration for separation of green algae from water,
size increases since the lift force causes particles to depart from the Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 51 (2006) 157–164.
contact points. This means that more submicron PMMA particles [10] W. Huang, H. Chu, B. Dong, Characteristics of algogenic organic matter
generated under different nutrient conditions and subsequent impact on
would deposit on membrane surface when increasing cross-flow microfiltration membrane fouling, Desalination 293 (2012) 104–111.
velocity. Consequently, the cake compression was more effectively [11] R. Rautenbach, R. Albrecht, On the behavior of asymmetric membranes in
suppressed since more PMMA particles were present in cake depo- pervaporation, J. Membr. Sci. 19 (1984) 1–22.
[12] F.M. Tiller, O.V. Anantharamakrishnan, Filtration with variable slurry
sition when increasing cross-flow velocity. concentration, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 13 (1980) 380–385.
In summary, the presence of rigid PMMA was beneficial to [13] K.J. Hwang, C.Y. Liao, K.L. Tung, Analysis of particle fouling during
microfiltration of microalgae in both dead-end and cross-flow microfiltration by use of blocking models, J. Membr. Sci. 287 (2007) 287–293.
[14] K.J. Hwang, C.L. Hsueh, Dynamic analysis of cake properties in microfiltration
mode. Specific cake resistance and cake compressibility decreased of soft colloids, J. Membr. Sci. 214 (2003) 259–273.
significantly in the presence of PMMA in dead-end microfiltration. [15] K.J. Hwang, Y.T. Wang, E. Iritani, N. Katagiri, Effects of porous gel particle
Cake resistance was the dominant one in cross-flow microfiltra- compression properties on microfiltration characteristics, J. Membr. Sci. 341
(2009) 286–293.
tion. Increasing cross-flow velocity resulted in more pronounced
[16] W.M. Lu, K.L. Tung, S.M. Hung, J.S. Shiau, K.J. Hwang, Constant pressure
improvement in flux, since distribution of local specific resistance filtration of mono-dispersed deformable particle slurry, Sep. Sci. Technol. 36
became more uniform. (2001) 2355–2383.
[17] K. O’Mahony, R. Freitag, B. Dhote, P. Muller, I. Schumacher, Capture of bacteria
from fermentation broth by body feed filtration: a solved problem?, Biotech
4. Conclusions Prog. 2 (2006) 471–483.
[18] W.M. Lu, K.L. Tung, C.H. Pan, K.J. Hwang, Cross-flow microfiltration of mono-
dispersed deformable particle suspension, J. Membr. Sci. 198 (2002) 225–243.
The microfiltration of microalgae yielded very low flux in both [19] K.J. Hwang, Y.L. Hsu, K.L. Tung, Effect of particle size on the performance of
dead-end and cross-flow mode due to serious cake compression, cross-flow microfiltration, Adv. Powder Technol. 17 (2006) 189–206.
and the formation of a very thin and dense layer on membrane sur-
Please cite this article in press as: M.T. Hung, J.C. Liu, Microfiltration of microalgae in the presence of rigid particles, Separ. Purif. Technol. (2016), http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.063