Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.springerlink.com/content/1738-494x(Print)/1976-3824(Online)
DOI 10.1007/s12206-016-1124-3
(Manuscript Received November 12, 2015; Revised July 12, 2016; Accepted July 26, 2016)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract
This work focuses on experimental and numerical investigation of the deflection on VAWT blade surface against the high measured
wind speeds that were simulated in FLUENT to obtain the corresponding static forces. The effect of forces, blade setting angle and thick-
ness to chord ratio along with their combined effects on deflection were assessed experimentally and numerically. Three airfoils of
gradually increasing thickness to chord ratio, NACA 0015, 0021 and 4412, were selected along with three levels of forces and tested at 5°,
10° and 15° of blade setting angle. A 33 factorial experimental design was used to perform experiments and Analysis of variance
(ANOVA) confirmed that individual effects of force and thickness to chord ratio were the most significant factors while blade setting
angle had lesser significance on deflected values. However, interactive effects of these parameters were significant. Minimum deflections
were observed in the range of 0.25-0.28 mm on NACA 0021 at 3 kg force in combination with all blade setting angles. Maximum ob-
served value of defection was 1 mm, which occurred at 9 kg force at 5°, 10° and 15° of blade setting angle on NACA 0015 and 4412
airfoil shapes. The results ensure that the blade structure remains stable at 9 kg which corresponds to 20 m/s wind speed without affecting
the performance. The deflections obtained from Finite element method were compared with experimental results and found in good
agreement with each other.
Keywords: Deflection; Wind loadings; Factorial design of experiments; Forces; Blade setting angles; Thickness to chord ratio; Finite element method
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) (b)
Fig. 2. (a) Cross sectional structure of blade; (b) fabricated wind turbine blade.
(a) (b)
Fig. 3. (a) Thickness to chord ratios of three airfoils; (b) complete assembly of vertical axis wind turbine.
(a) (b)
Fig. 4. (a) Static testing rig with length adjustment feature; (b) drilled at 5° for blade setting angle adjustment.
percentage of chord length of the blade. For example, for shaped links. These links serve as rigid stand for wind turbine
NACA 0021, 21 represents thickness in percentage of total blades and are provided with two guide bushes at each side of
chord length. The straight line connecting the leading and single stand to align them easily.
trailing edge is the chord length while thickness is the height These links can be easily assembled or folded to make
of the airfoil measured perpendicular to chord length up to transportation effortless; a complete assembled testing rig is
maximum point as illustrated in Fig. 3(a). shown in Fig. 4(a). The length of blade used for experimenta-
tion is 1.5 m but the length in the testing rig can be adjusted
from 0.5 m to 2 m. Blade setting angle is one of the three im-
2.3 Fabrication of static testing rig
portant selected factors. The adjustment of blade setting angle
The structure of testing rig consists of five trapezoidal is provided in the testing rig. Two galvanized sheets of steel, 4
5558 M. Muzamil et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 30 (12) (2016) 5555~5563
mm thick were bended at 90°. First bended sheet was fixed Table 1. Resultant forces obtained from fluent in X, Y and Z axes.
with trapezoidal stand and the second sheet was joined with
Wind
first sheet through pivoted joint. The second sheet was drilled Forces in Forces in Forces in Resultant
Air foil speed Mass (kg)
at 12 locations, each at a difference of 5°as shown in Fig. 4(b). x-axis (N) y-axis (N) z-axis (N) force (N)
(m/s)
Therefore, the second sheet can produce both clockwise and 10 2.556003 24.30384 -0.00083 24.43787 2.491119
anticlockwise moments up to 30° with a difference of 5°. 4412 15 5.104227 51.3505 -0.00387 51.60356 5.260302
When the desired angle is set, a specially designed and heat
20 8.491541 86.40789 -0.01126 86.82413 8.850574
treated pin passes through the plates to tighten it.
10 5.476619 17.9492 -0.00038 18.76611 1.912957
0021 15 10.88943 37.35605 -0.00056 38.91085 3.966447
2.4 Simulation of wind loads on fluent 20 17.97584 61.30276 -0.00049 63.88396 6.512126
Static forces corresponding to measured wind speeds must 10 3.736095 18.67607 -0.00148 19.0461 1.941498
be determined to obtain deflection. The values of free stream 0015 15 7.528013 39.25951 -0.00484 39.97475 4.074898
velocities were divided in appropriate levels in order to simu- 20 12.5177 65.40283 -0.00419 66.58996 6.787968
late actual weather conditions. While deciding levels of ve-
locities, cut in, rated and cut off speeds must be under consid- Table 2. Factors and their levels.
eration for specific case. The first level was selected at 10 m/s,
Levels
which was the highest observed velocity from weather station. Factors
The next levels of wind speeds were selected at 15 m/s and 20 I II III
m/s to check the deflection under extreme natural conditions Forces (Mass) 3 kg 6 kg 9 kg
and may serve as rated or cut out speed. However, the blades Blade setting angle 5° 10° 15°
of wind turbine may be locked at higher speeds, i.e., 20 m/s to T/C ratio 0.12 0.15 0.21
avoid damage to structure and electrical generator, but wind
loads will continuously develop at the blade surfaces.
Analytically it is an extensive job to convert the data into acceleration due to gravity. These weights were applied
static forces. From available softwares [13, 14], GAMBIT was through specially stitched nylon belts as shown in Fig. 5(a).
used to model the blades and apply boundary conditions. All the corresponding weights were added and subtracted in
Meshed files were exported on FLUENT to solve all the weight stand according to set levels of weight. At centroidal
simulation cases. Nine different simulation cases were run on points of two spans of blade, deflection was measured through
FLUENT for selected three NACA airfoils. Each blade was Mitutoyo Japan Deflectometers as shown in Fig. 5(b).
placed in domain three times separately at 5°, 10° and 15°
blade setting angle to obtain pressure distribution.
2.6 Statistical analysis of experiment
The structural response of blade against wind loads can be
obtained through Fluid Structure Interaction in the form of The factors and their levels are shown in Table 2. Factorial
vector pressure distribution on the surface of blade [12, 15]. design was selected for experimental layout. The design con-
This is one of the available methods to obtain load concentra- sists of three independent factors, each being at three levels.
tion at various points against the input load but a different Thus it will be a 33 (3k) factorial design. There were 27 treat-
approach was used from the available options in the operating ment combinations with 2 replicates resulting in 54 runs.
window of software. The resultant forces in the x, y and z axes
of blade were obtained against the generated pressure distribu-
2.7 Finite element modeling using ANSYS
tion and converted into resultant forces as shown in Table 1.
These mass values were applied as weights on blade surfaces The development of blade geometry, element selection,
to determine deflection; moreover, the three levels of forces mesh generation, applying load and boundary conditions on
(Mass) were also derived from it (i.e. 3 kg, 6 kg and 9 kg). the structure similar to experimentation conditions were per-
formed on ANSYS. There were two materials associated with
2.5 Static load test the structure. The outer skin of blade consisted of Fiber glass
reinforced plastic (FRP) and the remaining inside hollow vol-
The static load test was performed on the fabricated testing ume occupied by core or filler material, Polystyrene. Linear
rig as shown in Fig. 4(a). IEC 61400-TS-23 standard was used structural orthotropic model and linear structural isotropic
as technical specification guidelines to design and perform model were selected for skin and core of the blade respec-
static testing. The calculated resultant load is the point load tively. The mechanical properties of glass fiber woven fabric
which acts at the centroid of the blade. This load was further were obtained from the manufacturer as well as confirmed
divided into two equally distributed spans of blades using the from the literature as given in Table 3.
theory of equivalent systems in Mechanics. All the loads were The elements available in ANSYS which are capable of
converted into their corresponding weights by dividing by modeling composite materials are SHELL 91, SHELL 99,
M. Muzamil et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 30 (12) (2016) 5555~5563 5559
SHELL 181, SHELL 281, SOLID 146, SOLID 185, SOLID shown in Figs. 3(b), 5(a) and (b). Furthermore, the calculated
186 and SOLID 191. The design requires stabilizing both the pressure force was applied at two points; the area of applied
skinned geometry and the core [16]. pressure force is equal to the width of nylon belt on experi-
Shell 99 would be selected for skinned geometry, being the mental testing rig. As depicted in Fig. 6(b), the pressure force
most widely used for similar cases analyzing the wind turbine is highlighted with red color grid and blade is constrained at
blade. The core material required a structural solid element, three points in all degrees of freedom.
SOLID 186 with eight nodes element was selected out of the
available element models. It supports large deflections and is
3. Results and discussions
well suited to model irregular meshes more accurately. The
blade was fixed through three links with the testing rig; a simi- The objective is to select the combination of factors for
lar boundary condition was created and applied in ANSYS as minimum and maximum values of deflections as depicted in
main effect and interaction plot in Figs. 7(a) and (b). Deflec-
Table 3. Mechanical properties of FRP [17]. tion values at each testing combination are listed in Table 4. In
the Analysis of variance (ANOVA) Table 5 illustrates that
Skin FRP material
main effects of Forces and T/C ratio have significant effect on
Elastic moduli (GPA) Shear moduli (GPA) Poisson ratios
response owing to very low P-values, whereas blade setting
E1 26 G12 3.8 V12 0.1 angle is marginally insignificant as its P-value is very close to
E2 26 G23 2.8 V23 0.25 level of significance. Two factor interactions between forces
E3 26 G13 2.8 V13 0.25 and blade setting angle, forces and T/C ratio and, blade setting
Filler material polystyrene angle and T/C ratio are all significant. Similarly three factor
E 3.5 V 0.34 interactions between Forces, Blade setting angle and T/C ratio
are also significant. It may be noted that although blade setting
(a) (b)
Fig. 5. (a) Static load testing rig with Nylon belt; (b) deflectometer for measuring the deflection against applied load.
(a) (b)
Fig. 6. (a) Boundary conditions, constraint at three points in all DOF; (b) applied loads at two point with boundary conditions.
5560 M. Muzamil et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 30 (12) (2016) 5555~5563
angle is not significant marginally, but its interaction with the yield minimum deflection at 3 kg and NACA 0021 series,
rest of the factors forces and T/C ratio are very significant. whereas that between blade setting angle and T/C ratio yields
From interactions plot between forces and blade setting angle, minimum deflection at 5° and NACA 0021 series. Thus for
it can be concluded that minimum deflection will be obtained minimum deflection, force must be 3 kg, T/C ratio for NACA
at 3 kg and 15°. Interactions plot between forces and T/C ratio 0021 and, blade setting angle may be any value since there are
M. Muzamil et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 30 (12) (2016) 5555~5563 5561
(a) (b)
Fig. 7. (a) Interaction plots between forces, blade setting angle and T/C ratio; (b) main effect plots of forces, blade setting anle and T/C ratio.
(a) (b)
Fig. 8. (a) ANSYS deflection results for case load 3 k, 5° and NACA 0021; (b) ANSYS deflection results for case load 3 k, 15° and NACA 0021.
very small differences between deflection values at varying perfect goodness of fit of the model. Further analysis was
blade setting angle. performed for comparison of results between experimental
Maximum deflections are obtained at 9 kg force on NACA and numerical techniques. Finite element analysis is a well-
4412 and NACA 0015 at 5°, 10°, 15° of blade setting angle, known numerical technique for structural analysis. In Figs.
observed from main effects and interactions plot for deflection 8(a) and (b), it is evident that stress field is created at two
in Figs. 7(a) and (b). R-square value for the model is 99.84 % points in the form of circular rings. These rings have high
whereas R-square (adjusted) is 99.69 % indicating almost deflected values at the centers, which are points of applied
5562 M. Muzamil et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 30 (12) (2016) 5555~5563
Table 6. Comparisons of numerical and experimental results. [5] J. Butbul, D. MacPhee and A. Beyene, The impact of iner-
tial forces on morphing wind turbine blade in vertical axis
Numerical results obtained from ANSYS
configuration, Energy Conversion and Management, 91
Blade setting Deflection
Case NACA 0021 Load (2015) 54-62.
angle (mm)
[6] M. Elkhoury, T. Kiwata and E. Aoun, Experimental and
1 5° 0021 3 kg 0.287
numerical investigation of a three-dimensional vertical-axis
2 15° 0021 3 kg 0.237
wind turbine with variable-pitch, Journal of Wind Engineer-
Experimental results ing and Industrial Aerodynamics, 139 (2015) 111-123.
Blade setting Deflection [7] R. Rafiee, M. Tahani and M. Moradi, Simulation of aeroe-
Case NACA 0021 Load
angle (mm)
lastic behavior in a composite wind turbine blade, Journal
1 5° 0021 3 kg 0.25 of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 151
2 15° 0021 3 kg 0.265 (2016) 60-69.
Percentage of error [8] L. C. Overgaard, E. Lund and O. T. Thomsen, Structural
Case 1 15 % collapse of a wind turbine blade. Part A: Static test and
Case 2 10.56 % equivalent single layered models, Composites Part A: Ap-
plied Science and Manufacturing, 41 (2) (2010) 257-270.
[9] J. Yang, C. Peng, J. Xiao, J. Zeng, S. Xing, J. Jin and H.
pressure fields, and gradually decrease as we move outward Deng, Structural investigation of composite wind turbine
radially. Deflection results obtained from numerical analysis blade considering structural collapse in full-scale static
(ANSYS) were compared with the experimental solution [18] tests, Composite Structures, 97 (2013) 15-29.
of the same combination treatment; results are summarized in [10] J. Chen, Q. Wang, W. Z. Shen, X. Li, S Pang and X. Guo,
Table 6. Structural optimization study of composite wind turbine
blade, Materials & Design, 46 (2010) 247-255.
[11] C. Kong, J. Bang and Y. Sugiyama, Structural investiga-
4. Conclusion tion of composite wind turbine blade considering various
In this experimental study, it was concluded that forces and load cases and fatigue life, Energy, 30 (11) (2005) 2101-
thickness to chord ratios of airfoil shapes were significant 2114.
while Blade setting angle was marginally insignificant of de- [12] Y. J. Lee, Y. T. Jhan and C. H. Chung, Fluid structure
flection values. However, all interactions turned out signifi- interaction of FRP wind turbine blades under aerodynamic
cant. The minimum values of deflection are observed on effect, Composites Part B: Engineering, 43 (5) (2012)
NACA 0021 at 3 kg force with any combination of blade set- 2180-2191.
ting angle. These experimental values are in good agreement [13] M. S. Hameed and F. Shahid, Evaluation of aerodynamic
with the obtained numerical results. However, the stated error forces over a vertical axis wind turbine blade through CFD
can be further reduced by using the RCBD (Randomized analysis, Journal of Applied Mechanical Engineering
complete block design) for fabrication and testing. The maxi- (2013).
mum values of deflection are obtained on NACA 4412 and [14] Q. Chen and X. Yang, Calculation analysis of thermal
NACA 0015 at 9 kg force in combination with all blades set- loss and temperature field of in-wheel motor in micro-
ting angle. As a future opportunity, efficiency losses in terms electric vehicle, Journal of Mechanical Science and Tech-
of power will be evaluated through CFD analysis under other nology, 28 (8) (2014) 3189-3195.
loading conditions as well. [15] J. Ren, X. Zhang, J. Yang, C. Wang, Y. Liu and W. Yang,
Structural analysis and testing of a miniature flexible joint
under pressure and vector loading, Journal of Mechanical
References Science and Technology, 28 (9) (2014) 3637-3643.
[1] S. Mertens, Wind energy in the built environment, concen- [16] C. P. Chen and T. Y. Kam, Failure analysis of small com-
trator effects of buildings, Delft University of Technology, posite sandwich turbine blade subjected to extreme wind
Delft, Netherlands (2006). load, Procedia Engineering, 14 (2011) 1973-1981.
[2] H. F. Zhou, H. Y. Dou, L. Z. Qin, Y. Ni. Y. Q. Chen and J. [17] C. Menna, D. Asprone, G. Caprino, V. Lopresto and A.
M. Ko, A review of full-scale structural testing of wind Prota, Numerical simulation of impact tests on GFRP
turbine blades, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Re- composite laminates, International Journal of Impact En-
views, 33 (2014) 177-187. gineering, 38 (8) (2011) 677-685.
[3] P. J. Schubel and R. J. Crossley, Wind turbine blade design, [18] R. Bertolaso, M. Cheikh, Y. Barranger, J. C. Dupre, A.
Energies, 5 (9) (2012) 3425-3449. Germaneau and P. Doumalin, Experimental and numerical
[4] P. D. Clausen, F. Reynal and D. H. Wood, Advances in study of the load distribution in a ball-screw system, Jour-
Wind Turbine Blade Design and Materials, A volume in nal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 28 (4) (2014)
Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy (2013) 413-431. 1411-1420.
M. Muzamil et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 30 (12) (2016) 5555~5563 5563