This document outlines a rubric for evaluating advocacy speeches. It assesses topics like organization, argument logic, research integration, language use, physical delivery, and vocal delivery. Speeches are scored on a scale from 0 to 20 based on how well they meet expectations in each area. Key criteria include having a clear topic and persuasive goal, strong structure, logical arguments backed by research, proper grammar and defined terms, eye contact, gestures, extemporaneous style, and clear pronunciation. The total score depends on performance in all of these areas.
This document outlines a rubric for evaluating advocacy speeches. It assesses topics like organization, argument logic, research integration, language use, physical delivery, and vocal delivery. Speeches are scored on a scale from 0 to 20 based on how well they meet expectations in each area. Key criteria include having a clear topic and persuasive goal, strong structure, logical arguments backed by research, proper grammar and defined terms, eye contact, gestures, extemporaneous style, and clear pronunciation. The total score depends on performance in all of these areas.
This document outlines a rubric for evaluating advocacy speeches. It assesses topics like organization, argument logic, research integration, language use, physical delivery, and vocal delivery. Speeches are scored on a scale from 0 to 20 based on how well they meet expectations in each area. Key criteria include having a clear topic and persuasive goal, strong structure, logical arguments backed by research, proper grammar and defined terms, eye contact, gestures, extemporaneous style, and clear pronunciation. The total score depends on performance in all of these areas.
expectations expectations expectations expectations (13-0) (15-14) (17-16) (20-18) Topic & Organization Your cause, organization, or social movement is clear and appropriate Your persuasive goal is appropriate and clearly articulated Your speech had a strong introduction, clear main points, clear transitions, and a strong conclusion You managed your time (+/- 15s grace period. You will lose two points for every additional +/-15s) Logics & Research Your argument was logical and well reasoned Your evidence, inferences, and conclusions were sound You established and maintained positive ethos You included appropriate pathos You included two quality counter arguments You included a clear call to action Research & Language You fully cited research from 3 quality sources You integrated your research in a meaningful way You defined terms, explained jargon, explained numerical data, and clarified challenging concepts You included a well-prepared, purposeful presentational aid. Your grammar, syntax, and word choice was appropriate for a college level audience Physical Delivery You used appropriate eye contact and facial expressions. You used appropriate, dynamic gestures. You avoided reading and achieved dynamic extemporaneous style using appropriate notes. You effectively interacted with your presentational aid. Vocal Delivery You spoke at an appropriate volume and rate. You demonstrated conversational vocal variety. You avoided verbal fillers and vocalized pauses. You clearly enunciated, articulated, and pronounced words according to conventions of speech. Time: TOTAL POINTS: