Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TECHNIQUES
OVERVIEW
OVERVIEW
When interviewing consumers it’s often hard to get an open
and honest conversations about the brand. Projective
interview techniques helps to uncover the real reason why
consumers act the way they act.
Enjoy,
Debo & Julian
● This is called Hawthorne effect. The term is often used to suggest that
individuals may change their behavior due to the attention they are
receiving from researchers
● Although this may be true, it may not be the real reason why we eat
chocolate: it may be just a line of reasoning we follow to feel less guilty
about eating something high in fat and sugar
● They may not even be aware that they hold a particular attitude, belief
or opinion
● They may feel their motivations or opinions will reflect badly on them
“Give him a mask,
and he will tell you
the truth”
Oscar Wilde
PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES
● Projective techniques facilitate the articulation of otherwise repressed or
withheld thoughts by allowing the respondent to ‘project’ their own thoughts
onto someone or something other than themselves
● These are techniques that enable them to respond in ways in which they
would otherwise not feel able to respond
● They are asked to respond to stimuli and the hope is that they will project
aspects of their own thoughts or feelings via the use of the stimuli
● ‘They may be used in qualitative as well as quantitative studies and they are
useful in both’
Projective techniques are
rooted in clinical psychology
The Rorschach Inkblot Test, probably the most
famous projective test, comes from the
psychoanalytic branch of clinical psychology and
was popular in the 1960’s. The Rorschach Inkblot
Test involves the use of ambiguous images
(inkblots). Individuals are asked to name what
they see and responses are interpreted by a
psychologist specifically trained to do the test.
Life Stage
Fairy Tale Invert the Issue Third Person &
Projection
Role Play
● What does it look like? What are the people like?What are the buildings
like? How do you feel? What do you see, hear and smell? Who do you talk
to? What do they say? How do you feel about spending 6 months here?
How do you feel when you’re asked to leave?
1.2.4. PLANETS
● At the end of the projective the group make their notes and debrief to
the moderator
○ “Nike is …”,
● They can be
● Gives an insight into how strong is the people’s bond with a category
or a brand. Also, helps to identify substitute categories and
competing brands
1.3.3. INVERT THE ISSUE
● Example - Jeff Bezos faces a problem, he wants to increase his sales
● Instead of stating this as an issue, invert the issue and how could Jeff
decrease his sales
○ Multi-tasking is a hoax
● Brings out deeper beliefs and motivations which one may not state
outright
1.4. Ordering Techniques
1.4. ORDERING TECHNIQUES
● The respondent is asked to choose from among or to give some orderly
sequence to stimuli—for example, to choose from or arrange a set of
cards, pictures or inkblots
1.4.1. POPULARITY METER
● Ask respondents to indicate how
popular is your brand and why do
they think so
● Later the brands are switched, and again the respondents are asked to
debate
● The choice stated and explanation given are often a reflection of the
people’s state of mind and their outlook towards life
STRATEGY
EXPLORATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS
STATEMENT
USE OF PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES
STRATEGY
EXPLORATIONS
STATEMENT
USE OF PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES
A
C C
U
A U
B D
T L STRATEGY
R I
E T
G
A E
U STATEMENT
N N
O R
D C
R E
E
Y
CATEGORY
USING PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES
● In understanding
○ Role the category plays in people’s lives
○ People’s relationship with the category
○ Threats from substitute categories
○ Complementary categories
○ Image of a category buyer
BRAND
USING PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES
● In understanding
○ A brand’s perception, personality & user image
○ Its role
○ Its strengths and weaknesses
○ The competition it has
○ The problem it’s facing
○ The opportunities it has
○ Its threats from new entrants
AUDIENCE
USING PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES
● In understanding their
○ Needs and unmet needs
○ Mood, desires, aspirations and tensions
○ Existing attitude, behavior and usage
CULTURE
USING PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES
● In understanding
○ Shared meanings and points of view
○ Cultural practices and reasons behind them
○ Conflicts and tensions
DEVELOPING STRATEGY STATEMENT
USING PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES
● In developing
○ Brand ladders - From rational and functional benefits to a compelling
emotional benefit
○ Propositions, concepts and strategic ideas
BRAND LADDER
WITH PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES
Up to 12 hours of fresh
breath
Magical transformation
Elite exclusivity
● Use more than one tool to collect the responses on same topic
● This sort of triangulation (cross-checking) is often undertaken by
comparing the responses from the use of one technique with those gained
from another
● The objective is to founding the credibility of qualitative analyses and it can
be used as an alternative to traditional criteria like reliability and validity
● Also, the purpose of triangulation is not just to cross-validate responses but
to capture different dimensions of the same phenomenon as well
Case of Instant Coffee
THE STUDY
WITH TWO SHOPPING LISTS
● This study used two almost identical shopping lists of items where one list
included instant coffee and one included non-instant coffee
● Housewives were asked to describe each of the purchasers of each shopping
list
● The housewife who was said to buy the list containing the (Nescafé) instant
coffee was more commonly said to be lazy and sloppy, whereas the
housewife said to buy the list containing the (Maxwell-House) non-instant
coffee was more commonly said to be thrifty and a good housewife
TRIANGULATION
WITH PANTRY CHECK
● Two further studies were conducted to examine the phenomena further and
in the third study negative projections of the instant coffee housewife were
correlated with non-instant coffee purchase (via a pantry check)
● The research illustrated that housewives who projected negative
characteristics onto instant coffee buyers were largely not buying instant
coffee themselves
● Conclusion: some motives, because they are socially unacceptable, exist
below the level of verbalisation and these motives can be assessed if
approached indirectly
CONCLUSION
A LITTLE NUDGE GOES A LONG WAY