Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Journal of
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 21(2008) 241-246
Aeronautics
www.elsevier.com/locate/cja
Abstract
The reasons of the static strength dispersion and the fatigue life dispersion of composite laminates are analyzed in this article. It is
concluded that the inner original defects, which derived from the manufacturing process of composite laminates, are the common and
major reason of causing the random distributions of the static strength and the fatigue life. And there is a correlative relation between the
two distributions. With the study of statistical relationship between the fatigue loading and the fatigue life in the uniform confidence
level and the same survival rate S-N curves of material, the relationship between the static strength distribution and the fatigue life dis-
tribution through a material S-N curve model has been obtained. And then the model which is used to describe the distributions of fatigue
life of composites, based on their distributions of static strength, is set up. This model reasonably reflects the effects of the inner original
defects on the static strength dispersion and on the fatigue life dispersion of composite laminates. The experimental data of three kinds of
composite laminates are employed to verify this model, and the results show that this model can predict the random distributions of fa-
tigue life for composites under any fatigue loads fairly well.
Keywords: composite; static strength; fatigue life; S-N curve; random distribution
³0 f V dV ³0 h V max N dV ³0 g N V max dn
max
a S-N curve model, which can describe all regions It is reasonable[13-16] to assume that the statistical
of material S-N curve. Based on the S-N curve distribution of the static strength Vult follows a
model, a model is presented to describe the rela- two-parameter Weibull distribution
tionship between static strength distribution and
§ § X ·D ·
fatigue life distribution in this article. Three sets of FV ult X P ^V ult d X ` 1 exp ¨ ¨ ¸ ¸ (2)
¨ ©E¹ ¸
experimental data are employed to verify this model, © ¹
and the results show that the model describes the where FV X denotes the failure probability when
ult
relationship fairly well. the specimen is subjected to a static load X, Vult the
static strength, D the shape parameter, and E the
2 Statistical Distribution Model
scale parameter. The parameters D and E can be
Under cyclic load, the non-inverse structural calculated by statistical method
changes will occur in the micro local field or macro
§ 1·
structure of materials. These changes produce the X EX E ī ¨1 (3a)
© D ¸¹
generalized monotonic decreasing characteristics of 2½
° § 2 · ª § 1 ·º ° (3b)
material S-N curve, as shown in Fig 1. The failure S2 D X E 2 ® ī ¨1 ī 1 ¾
°¯ © D ¸¹ «¬ ¨© D ¸¹ »¼ ¿°
probability of the specimen being subjected to N
fatigue cycles for given fatigue strength Vmax* and where X and S2 are the mean and variance of the
the failure probability of the specimen being sub- experimental sample, respectively, and E(X) and
jected to fatigue strength Vmax for given fatigue life D(X) the mean and variance of random variable,
N* are same with the same confidence level. The respectively. The shape parameter D describes the
failure probabilities for different assigned fatigue failure mechanism of laminates. The larger the pa-
lives are also the same, because the S-N curves of rameter D is, the less the variation coefficient or
materials are derived form the test results with the dispersion of random variable X is. The scale pa-
same survival rate. Therefore, the failure probabili- rameter E is also the characteristic strength of ran-
ties of the static strength and the fatigue life for dif- dom variable X.
Wu Fuqiang et al. / Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 21(2008) 241-246 · 243 ·
The author had presented a S-N curve model of quencies of static strength or fatigue life of lami-
composite laminates[10] as nates are calculated by
§ § § lg N ·a · · i
V max pi (8)
1 m ¨ exp ¨ ¨ ¸ 1¸ (4) k 1
V ult ¨ ¨ © b ¸¹ ¸ ¸
© © ¹ ¹
where k is the sample size of experimental data and
where Vmax is the maximum stress and parameters a,
the arrangement sequence of experimental data is
b and m the experimental constants. Based on Eq.(1),
monotone increasing, and i the ith number of the
the failure probability of fatigue life of composite
sample. Refs.[13-15] provide 25 items of static
laminate can be expressed as
strength experimental data of T300/934 [0/45/90/
FN n P ^ N d n` P ^V ult d X ` (5) – 452/90/45/0]2, 15 items of static strength experi-
mental data of T300/5208 [±45]2S and 15 items of
where FN(n) denotes the failure probability of the
static strength experimental data of T300/5208
specimen being subjected to n fatigue cycles. Sub-
[90/±45/0]S, respectively. Based on these experi-
stituting Eq.(4) and Eq.(5) into Eq.(2) yields
mental data, the parameter D and E of the static
§ § D ·
· strength distribution function can be calculated by
¨ ¨ ¸ ¸
¨ ¨ ¸ ¸ Eq.(3) and the empirical frequencies of the static
V max
FN n 1 exp ¨¨ ¨ ¸ ¸
¸ strength can be calculated by Eq.(8). Then, the cor-
¨ § § § lg N
a· ·· ¸
¨ ¨ E ¨ 1 m ¨ exp ¨ § · ¸
¸ 1¸ ¸ ¸ relation coefficient R2 between the empirical fre-
¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨© b ¸¹ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸
¨ © © © © ¹ ¹¹ ¹ ¸ quencies and the functional values of Eq.(2) can be
© ¹
(6) calculated. The calculated results are presented in
Eq.(6) describes the relationship between static Table 1. According to these results, the two-para-
strength distribution and fatigue life distribution. meter Weibull function describes the statistical dis-
When the parameters D, E, a, b and m are obtained tribution of static strength fairly well, as shown in
from experiments, the failure probability of fatigue Fig 2.
life of composite laminate for any given fatigue load Table 1 Parameter values of the statistical distribution
can be calculated by Eq.(6). of static strength
Eq.(4) can be rewritten as
Laminate D E R2
V max
V
V ult (7) [0/45/90/–452/
§ § § lg N · a · · 25.099 70.641 0.972 3
90/45/0]2[13]
1 m ¨ exp ¨ ¨ ¸ 1¸
¨ ¨ © b ¸¹ ¸ ¸ [±45]2S [14] 43.357 14.441 0.931 1
© © ¹ ¹
[90/±45/0]S[15] 25.156 88.787 0.903 7
When the experimental data of fatigue life are ob-
tained, the estimated static strength V* can be calcu-
lated by Eq.(7). A comparison between the esti-
mated static strength statistical distribution obtained
by Eq.(7) and the test results can be made. Then, the
rationality of Eq.(6) that describes the relationship
between the static strength distribution and the fa-
tigue life distribution of composite laminates can be
verified by the comparison.
3 Verification
The data cited from Refs.[13-15] are used to
validate the presented model. The empirical fre- Fig.2 Distribution of static strength.
· 244 · Wu Fuqiang et al. / Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 21(2008) 241-246
Laminate a b m R2
[0/45/90/-452/
2.216 5.539 0.54 0.991 7
90/45/0]2[13]
From the calculated results of three kinds of distribution of laminate is described by a two-pa-
laminates experimental data, it is concluded that the rameter Weibull function in this article. When a S-N
two-parameter Weibull function can be used to de- curve model that can predict the fatigue life of
scribe the statistical distribution of static strength material in whole region is employed to integrate
and when the static strength distribution and the S-N the distributions, a model used to predict the fatigue
curve of laminate are obtained, Eq.(6) can be used life distribution of laminate is then set up. The
to predict the distribution of fatigue life of compos- model is Eq.(6). Eq.(6) approximately follows a
ite laminates for different fatigue loading. two-parameter Weibull distribution and its shape
parameter approximates the parameter D. The pa-
4 Discussion and Conclusions rameter D is obtained from static strength experi-
The location, size and type of the inner original ment and it involves the effects of original defects
defects are derived from the manufacturing process on fatigue life dispersion. However, the effect of
of composite laminates. The distribution of defects fatigue loading way on fatigue life dispersion is not
is a random original distribution and it is the major involved in parameter D. It is the major reason that
factor to form the static strength dispersion and fa- Eq.(6) is not able to accurately predict the fatigue
tigue life dispersion of laminates. Therefore, the life dispersion of laminates.
distribution form, dispersion degree and change To analyze the factors influencing the disper-
trend of the static strength dispersion and the fatigue sion of static strength and fatigue life, it is necessary
life dispersion are consistent, and their distribution to do more experiments. However, this approach is
functions are similar. The way of loading of the infeasible in engineering application. The relation-
static strength experiment of composite laminate is ship between the static strength dispersion and the
monotonously increasing the load until the speci- fatigue life dispersion is analyzed in this article.
men being failed. The way of loading of fatigue ex- Then, an effective model is presented to describe the
periment of composite laminate is the specimen be- fatigue life distribution. Several sets of validated
ing subjected to cyclic load until it being failed. The results show that the present model can be used to
cyclic load is less than the static strength of lami- predict the laminate fatigue life distribution for any
nate. The differences of loading ways determine the given fatigue load.
differences of crack propagation rates and ways, and References
lead to the differences of the static strength disper-
[1] Chinese Aeronautics Research Institute. Handbook of composite
sion and the fatigue life dispersion of composite
structure design. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2001:72-74. [in
laminates. Therefore, their distribution functions can
Chinese]
not uniquely determine each other. For the S-N
[2] Talreja R. Fatigue of composite material. Lancaster, Pennsylvania:
curve of composite laminate with uniform confi-
Technomic Publishing Company, Inc, 1987.
dence level and same survival rate, the failure
[3] Yang J N, Liu M D. Residual strength degradation model and
probability of the specimen being subjected to static
theory of periodic proof tests for Graphite/Epoxy laminates. Jour-
load is equal to the failure probability of the speci-
nal of Composite Materials 1977; 11(2): 176-203.
men being subjected to fatigue cycles. Then, the
[4] Yang J N. Reliability prediction and cost optimization for com-
static strength distribution function and the fatigue
posites including periodic proof tests in service. ASTM STP 1977;
life distribution function can be integrated with the
617: 272-294.
S-N curve model of composite laminate.
[5] Caprino G. Predicting fatigue life of composite laminates sub-
The statistical distributions of the static
jected to tension-tension fatigue. Journal of Composite Materials
strength and the fatigue life obey the statistical
2000; 34(16): 1334-1355.
“weak link” theory of materials. Theoretically, they
[6] D’Amore A, Caprino G, Stupak P, et al. Effect of stress ratio on the
follow the Weibull distribution. The static strength
· 246 · Wu Fuqiang et al. / Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 21(2008) 241-246
flexural fatigue behaviour of continuous strand mat reinforced ite/Epoxy composites under tension-compression cyclic loading.
plastics. Science and Engineering of Composite Materials 1996; Journal of Composite Materials 1978; 12(1): 19-39.
[7] Caprino G, D’Amore A. Flexural fatigue behaviour of random gle-ply laminates in shear. Journal of Composite Materials 1978;
Science and Technology 1998; 58(6): 957-965. [15] Yang J N, Miller R K, Sun C T. Effect of high load on statistical
[8] Caprino G, D’Amore A, Facciolo F. Fatigue sensitivity of random fatigue of unnotched graphite/epoxy laminates. Journal of Com-
glass fibre reinforced plastics. Journal of Composite Materials posite Materials 1980; 14(4): 82-94.
[9] Prisco U, Caprino G, Giorleo G. Influence of the flexibiliser con- PEEK laminate composites. Composites 1995; 26(8): 551-559.