Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hypothetical Plate Waste Study
Hypothetical Plate Waste Study
Introduction
There are a number of reasons why foodservice facilities conduct plate waste studies.
One of the most important reasons is to ensure that the healthy food that is being served is
actually benefiting the students. What good is a nutritious school lunch or breakfast program, if
food is being thrown away? It is estimated that 10% to 36% of food served to NSLP participants
is wasted every year. This estimate equates to ~$600 million in annual plate waste.1 Research
from different plate waste studies has found that the most common reasons children do not eat
their school lunches are quality of food, hunger levels, and social environments. This
hypothetical plate waste study will help Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) measure costs,
food acceptability and nutritional intake for their school lunches served in the middle schools.2
The most common types of plate waste studies are weighed, visual and recall. Each type
helps answer a different type of research question. Weighed methods most appropriate when
nutrient intakes are of concern. If average food intake and acceptability of food is of concern,
visual methods are most appropriate. A recall method is most commonly used when 24-hour
The goal of this hypothetical study is to observe food acceptability and nutritional intake
for middle schools in LCPS during a normal school year. COVID-19 has presented many
challenges, including variation to the normal lunch menu. A lunch menu from the previous
school year will be used (2019-2020), which includes shepherd pie, steamed broccoli, assorted
fresh fruit and milk. The outcomes of this study can be used to develop action plans for
Methods
This study utilized the weighed method to evaluate uneaten edible food and beverage
thrown away by students. This type of method is thought to be most accurate, however it can be
time consuming and requires that staff be properly trained to ensure success. Weighed methods
can be done on an individual level by weighing out each student’s waste or by combining all
student’s waste. This study combined waste for all students but divided it by food type. The
Set up weigh station near dirty dish area. Create signage/instructions so that directions are
Set up separate bins for students to put waste into. Have one staff member at each bin to
help students and ensure proper food going into correct bin. Weigh each bin with bag
Devise method of identifying which trays will be studied. (all trays vs only reimbursable
meals)
Weight bins after all trays have been collected. Obtain total waste # by subtracting post-
Calculate % waste
Materials Needed
Standardized recipes
Prior notification to students and teachers so they can prepare and know what to expect
Calculator
Analysis
Percent plate waste= total plate waste/ total amount served x100
Menu Item Menu Item Weight Total Amount Total plate Percent plate
Prepared Served waste waste
determined by
waste bins
Shepherd’s Pie 41# 36# 10# 28%
Significant waste is considered 75% or more thrown away. Results from this plate waste
study indicate that waste is not significant. Regardless, improvements can always be made to
improve food intake for the middle school population. A limitation of this study is the ability to
correctly obtain waste percent for milk. More planning is needed in the future to obtain this data.
Some strategies recommended by the USDA to reduce food waste at K-12 schools include offer-
versus-serve, increased marketing, extending mealtimes to 30 minutes, utilizing share tables, and
donating uneaten edible food to local food banks.3 During a normal school year, LCPS could
References
1. Buzby JC, Guthrie JF. Plate Waste in School Nutrition Programs: Final Report to
Congress. Electronic Publications from the Food Assistance & Nutrition Research
Program. 2002;2(9).
2. Zhao C, Panizza C, Fox K, et al. Plate Waste in School Lunch: Barriers, Motivators,
and Perspectives of SNAP-Eligible Early Adolescents in the US. Journal of Nutrition
Education and Behavior. 2019;51(8):967-975. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2019.05.590