Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paper Evaluation:
Accepted as submitted
Accepted after minor corrections indicated below in this review form.
X Extensive revision is required and resubmission encouraged as:
Article X Technical Note Case History
Rejected (Please present the reasons for rejection below).
General comment:
Authors are kindly requested to include a section for describing the study area, comprising Table 1 and
Figs. 1 to 3, together with a brief description of the regional geology, which may be not familiar to non-
Brazilian readers (and would be needed for estimating the rock parameters in Table 6.
This section on the study area should also contain instrument details, sampling characteristics, and
testing procedures for strength tests (which are missing in the paper; i.e., soil parameters were obtained
from satured or unsaturated specimens?).
In Table 6, please comment on the peak friction angle being smaller for Rock than for Residual Soil and
Coluvium.
Specific comments:
Please pay attention to the need of detailed corrections in the use of English and a review of technical
expressions.
As examples, the paper contains several references to FS as Safety Factor (page 12) or Security
Factor (in the Abstract), and calls the Mohr-Coulomb as a Rupture Criterion, rather than a
Strength Criterion or a Failure Criterion. In Page 7, it is written collapse, rather than failure.
Table 4 – explain or correct: minimum NA, critical NA, and maximum NA, when referring to
water levels.
the Authors are also kindly asked to explain the choice and inherent limitations for presenting a
3
FEM analysis to evaluate the slope stability (based on “linear-elastic” soil parameters estimated
from SPT) rather than consideringing a more realistic non-linear behavior, from appropriate
triaxial lab data, which is readily available from common softwares, such as Plaxis, for this is
much simpler and may handle some of the simplified assumptions presented in the manuscript
more adequately.
Pages 6 and others: displacement rate rather than displacement speed.
Fig. 5 and 6 – dates must be in English format; also define distortions from inclinometers.
2.2.2 - Movement Classification
Please explain very slow to extremely slow movements
References: should include more recent papers (if possible, from past issues of Soils and Rocks);
and need a careful review to avoid Portuguese words. Examples:
Brugger, P. J., Ehrlich, M. e Lacerda, W. A. (1997),
Feijó, R. L., Paes, N. M. e d´Orsi, R. N. (2001), Chuvas e Movimentos de Massa no Município
do Rio de Janeiro, Anais da III Conferência Brasileira sobre Estabilidade de Encostas – III
COBRAE, Rio de Janeiro, p. 223-230. Turner, A.K. e Schuster, R.L. (1996), Landsdiles-
Investigation and Mitigation, Special Report 247, 1996, Transportation Research Board,
National Research Council, Nacional Academy Press, Washington D.C., 525-554.
Duncan, J. M., (1996), Soil Slope Stability Analisis, In: Landslides : Investigation and
Mitigation. Transportation Research Board Special report 247, Washington, D. C., Estados
Unidos da América, p. 337-371.
Davis, 2004 – not listed, but referred in Table 2
4