Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The newer friction products include combinations such as aluminum with boron
carbide, silicon-silicon carbide-graphite, and carbon-carbon. The Al-B4C composite
is formed from mixed powders using hot pressing, while the Si-SiC-C composites rely
on infiltration of molten silicon into a graphite preform followed by a bake to partially
react the two phases. In carbon-carbon composites, graphite fibers are bonded using
resin infiltration. That mixture is baked to convert the resin into graphite. Although
expensive, graphite composites are widely adopted for aircraft brakes.
Following the discovery of radioactivity in the late 1890s, needs arose for safe
means to ship and handle radioactive materials [34]. The solution came from high
tungsten content composites. Usually, the composite is consolidated using a liquid
phase at temperatures near 1500 C (1773 K). Normally, tungsten is brittle at room
temperature, but when alloyed with the transition metals such as Ni, Cu, Co, or Fe,
there is surprising ductility imparted by the matrix phase [34–38]. These tungsten
heavy alloys are abbreviated WHA, W being the chemical symbol for tungsten.
Most tungsten heavy alloys range from 15 to 19 g/cm3, density levels consider-
ably higher than lead. Due to the high density, the tungsten composites provide
excellent containment for radioactive materials. Although lead is soft and easily
fabricated, tungsten composites require less volume and avoid toxicity associated
with lead, mercury, or uranium. Tungsten heavy alloys are significantly lower cost
when compared to high atomic number options, such as platinum, rhenium,
osmium, iridium, or gold. Tungsten is the safest and lowest cost option among
the high density metals.
The tungsten heavy alloys consist of tungsten grains in an alloy matrix. Fig-
ure 11.23 is a microstructure showing single crystal tungsten grains surrounded by
the alloy matrix. In this case the composition is W-3.5Ni-1.5Fe, corresponding to
about 88 vol% tungsten. Note the tungsten grains bond to form a three-dimensional
skeleton. The matrix alloy occupies the spaces between the tungsten grains to form
a second interpenetrating network. The matrix alloy is designed to avoid interme-
tallic formation during cooling from the sintering temperature, ensuring a high
ductility. For this reason the alloys favor specific ratios such as Ni:Cu ¼ 6:4 or Ni:
Fe ¼ 7:3. An example is W-7Ni-3Fe. When sintered at 1500 C (1773 K) this
composite exceeds a density of 17.4 g/cm3 with a yield strength of 675 MPa and
29 % fracture elongation. Further property adjustments are possible through post-
sintering heat treatments.
Inertial materials have high densities for used in applications such as in radiation
absorption, medical X-ray shielding, sporting equipment weights, projectiles,
vibration dampening weights, watch winding weights, gyroscope balances, and
aircraft wing counterbalances. They are also used in armor piercing projectiles.
Long rod shapes are produced by deformation and heat treated to reach high
strength levels. Several applications are summarized in Table 11.11.
392 11 Applications
Table 11.13 Representative properties of heavy alloy composites [1, 38, 39]
Density, Hardness, Yield strength, Tensile Elongation,
Composition g/cm3 HV MPa strength, MPa %
74W-16Mo- 15.3 365 850 1150 10
8Ni-2Fe
82W-8Mo-8Ni- 16.2 315 690 980 24
2Fe
85W-5Ta-7Ni- 16.6 354 740 1025 3
3Fe
86W-4Mo-7Ni- 16.6 280 625 980 24
3Fe
90W-8Ni-2Fe 17.2 290 550 920 36
90W-5Mo-3Ni- 17.4 280 620 1000 17
2Fe
90W-7Ni-3Fe 17.1 270 530 920 29
93W-5Ni-2Fe 17.7 280 590 930 30
94W-3Ni-1.5Fe- 18.3 325 645 940 25
0.5Co
95W-3.5Ni- 18.1 280 600 920 18
1.5Fe
97W-2Ni-1Cu 18.6 280 600 660 3
97W-2Ni-1Fe 18.6 300 610 900 19
Fig. 11.24 Six factors determine the mechanical properties of tungsten heavy alloys, especially
elongation and toughness. These include the (1) composition in terms of W content, matrix type,
and ratio of ingredients in the matrix; (2) powders in terms of the particle size and purity;
(3) processing cycle including the forming pressure, heating rate, peak temperature, and hold
time; (4) post-sintering deformation and heat treatment cycles; (5) defects including residual
porosity; and (6) microstructure grain size
Fig. 11.25 A schematic of the four possible fracture paths in a composite consisting of (1) brittle
grain cleavage, (2) ductile matrix failure, (3) grain boundary separation, and (4) interface separa-
tion. The latter two paths are sensitive to impurity segregation and are manipulated by heat
treatments and cooling rates
396 11 Applications
Fig. 11.26 Fracture surface imaged by backscatter scanning electron microscopy, where the
tungsten is white and the lower atomic number matrix is dark. The fracture paths noted in
Fig. 11.25 are evident here. The predominance of grain-matrix interface failure indicates this
material was not optimized for fracture resistance, since impurity segregation on cooling is a
typical cause of interface separation
Property trade-offs are possible via composition, deformation, and heat treat-
ment. Figure 11.27 is a plot of yield strength versus fracture elongation. Although
scattered, the behavior illustrates how the composite provides either a high strength
or high ductility, but not both. For low ductility compositions the ultimate tensile
Iron Neodymium Boron Magnets 397
strength is also low. Figure 11.28 plots fracture elongation versus composition for
the same materials shown in Fig. 11.27. Underlying these plots are changes in the
tungsten grain boundary area, a typical weakness in the microstructure. A few
applications are pictured in Fig. 11.29, including weighted throwing darts, vibration
weights, birdshot, fragmentation projectiles, and fishing weights.