VEHICLE FIRE

SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT

Reference No.

009938

One Stanton Street  |  Marinette, WI 54143-2542, USA  | +1-715-735-7411 | www.ansul.com

© 2021 Johnson Controls. All rights reserved. All specifications and other information shown were
current as of document revision date and are subject to change without notice.  | Template No. F-2015250-05
Fire Risk Assessment Report

DISCLAIMER
Johnson Controls makes no representations or warranties with respect
to the contents or use of this document, and specifically disclaims any
express or implied warranties or usefulness for any particular purpose.
Johnson Controls reserves the right to change or revise this document at
any time.
The objective of this fire risk assessment tool is to formalize a process for
use in identifying, analyzing, evaluating, and mitigating fire hazards on a
vehicle or piece of equipment (vehicle/equipment). The information and
recommendations within this report are advisory in nature and are there
to assist stakeholders in reducing the risk of damage or loss of property
because of a fire. The report is not intended to imply that no other hazards
exist. Final responsibility for the condition and operation of the relevant
systems and related equipment lies with the end user.

STATEMENT
ANSUL® and the product names listed in this material are marks and/or
registered marks. Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.

Note: The converted metric values in this document are provided for
reference only and do not reflect an actual measurement.
Fire Risk Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS
REV. 05 PAGE TOC-1

SECTION PAGE

1 INTRODUCTION
FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Key Personnel (Assessors/Key Contributors). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Key Personnel List (Assessors/Key Contributors) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
SITE AND VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT DETAILS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

2 FIRE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

OVERALL FIRE RISK LOCATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
IDENTIFICATION OF FUEL SOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
POLAR SOLVENTS AND CHEMICAL OXIDIZERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
TYPE OF INDUSTRY / OPERATING ENVIRONMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
IDENTIFICATION OF IGNITION SOURCES. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT SHUTDOWN AND/OR RUNDOWN TIME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
PREVIOUS FIRE INCIDENTS OR COMPONENT FAILURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
EXTERNAL CONTRIBUTING FACTORS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

3 QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS

QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Other Considerations and Consequential Effects. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Existing Risk Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Equipment Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

4 FIRE RISK REDUCTION MEASURES (MITIGATION)

QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS RESULTS – RISK REDUCTION MEASURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Fire Risk Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS
REV. 05 PAGE TOC-2

NOTES:
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
REV. 05    PAGE 5

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS

This interactive fire risk assessment tool facilitates a process to complete and document a vehicle/equipment fire risk assessment.
The tool allows the creator of the risk assessment to identify a team of qualified members and document their inputs throughout
the process. This documentation includes identification of potential fire hazard areas (Section 2), determination and ranking of the
respective risk levels for each area (Section 3), evaluation of the risks identified (Section 3), and development of a fire protection
scheme to mitigate the risk to an acceptable level (Section 4).
The Fire Risk Assessment (FRA) has considered Australian Standard AS5062 Fire Protection for Mobile and Transportable
Equipment, and the FM Approved, tested and listed ANSUL® Vehicle Fire Suppression System limitations and guidelines.

NOTICE
The scope of this report does not address or include process(es) or assessment(s) for risk mitigation regarding
design and/or construction of the vehicle/equipment indicated. Nor does it address routes for personnel egress,
or risks that can result during vehicle/equipment servicing, or from human error, equipment misuse, or neglect.
Only data applicable to identified fire risks, the risk levels, and recommended risk reduction measures are included
in this report.

The basic process of the FRA is structured to address and include the following:
1. Fire Hazard Identification
a. Identify hazard areas
 Primary: Contains a fuel and ignition source; medium to high risk
 Secondary: May contain a fuel and/or ignition source; low to medium risk
b. Fuel Sources
 Categorized into Class A, B, C, or D (per US standards)
c. Polar Solvent/Chemical Oxidizers
d. Type of Industry/Operating Environments
e. Ignition Sources
 Determine if the source can be superheated during normal and abnormal operating conditions
f. Equipment Operational Process
 Procedures to shutdown the equipment should be put in place to reduce fire propagation and re-flash, while not
hindering the fire suppression system’s effectiveness
g. Previous Fire Incidents or Component Failures
 Previous incidents need to be taken into account during the risk analysis portion
2. Qualitative Fire Risk Analysis
a. Determine possible fire scenarios
 What can happen?
 When and where can it happen?
 Why and how can it happen?
b. Determine possible fire risk:
 How likely is it to happen?
 What will be the consequences?
 What aspects of the fire scenario need to be addressed?

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
REV. 05    PAGE 6

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS (Continued)

3. Fire Risk Reduction Measures (Mitigation)
a. Recommended Risk Reduction (Mitigation) Details
 Will a fire suppression system be able to reasonably/effectively address the risks?
 If fire suppression is required, to what extent is protection needed to provide optimal safety to personnel, while
minimizing disruption to the production process, and maximizing asset protection?
 If fire suppression is required, what systems should be designed and installed (wet chemical, dry chemical,
clean agent, and so on)
 Should the fire suppression system be operated manually, or include automatic detection and actuation? If automatic,
what detection options should be utilized?
 How should the fire suppression system detection options be configured (heat, flame, and so on)?
b. Anticipated Risk Level After Mitigation

NOTICE
This Fire Risk Assessment Report is compiled based on the combined input from various key personnel, which
may include the representatives from the fire suppression system manufacturer, the manufacturer’s authorized
distributor, the equipment owner or representatives, the maintenance and operation staff of the equipment to be
protected, as well as an equipment manufacturer’s representative.

Risk levels indicated in this report, are based on several factors including input from other Key Personnel, who
are familiar with the vehicle/equipment and/or have a keen interest in the final risk reduction measures. After
assessing results and subsequent risk reduction recommendations indicated in this report, the vehicle/equipment
owner is ultimately responsible for final risk reduction measures.

There may be situations where consensus cannot be made between key personnel (the vehicle/equipment owner
and the fire system designer, and so on.). For example, the fire suppression system designer identifies a Risk Area
and recommends a certain level of protection/detection; and the owner or owner’s representative does not agree.
The owner or owner’s representative can accept and acknowledge the risk by electronic signature in the “Risk
Accepted without Proposed Mitigation” column, see Risk Reduction (Section 4 - Fire Risk Reduction Measures).
The column displays the results of the checkbox entry completed in the online tool. When accepting the risk, the
key personnel name with date/time stamp displays in the column, otherwise a simple “No,” indicates a refusal to
accept the risk. If needed, a comment can be provided in the appropriate sections, and may be included in this
report.

The submitter of this FRA shall consider reasonably expected risks within the context of the vehicle/equipment being assessed
and the vehicle/equipment expected operating environment at the time of this fire risk assessment

Key Personnel (Assessors/Key Contributors)

Australian Standard AS 5062, 2.2 CONSULTATION, requires the fire risk assessment process to be performed by qualified
individuals, as identified in this report, in consultation with other key personnel familiar with the vehicle/equipment and/or others
with a keen interest in the final risk reduction measures. This concerted effort is essential and should be undertaken by at least
three individuals. At a minimum, a Creator, Reviewer, and Approver are required to complete a fire risk assessment.
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
REV. 05    PAGE 7

KEY PERSONNEL LIST (ASSESSORS/KEY CONTRIBUTORS)

The following personnel contributed information that has been considered with regards to identifying, assessing, and providing
recommended mitigation of various fire risks and fire risk locations on the specified vehicle/equipment. Key contributors may
have also identified previous fire history or fire incidents that have been considered, as well as information regarding operating
environments.

Key Personnel - Assessors

Role Name Company Position Information Provided

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Key Personnel - Contributors

Name Company Information Provided

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
REV. 05    PAGE 8

SITE AND VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT DETAILS

Site and Vehicle/Equipment Details

Reference Number Site Name/Reference Site Address

Equipment Make Equipment Model Equipment Serial Number

Equipment Operating Wgt. Equipment Type Equipment Operating Environment

Power Source Make Model Power

Risk Assessment Sign-off

Role Name Company Position Information Provided

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 2 – FIRE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
REV. 05    PAGE 9

OVERALL FIRE RISK LOCATIONS

Overall fire risk locations are identified in the following tables. Primary fire hazard locations may be considered medium to high
risk hazards containing both a fuel source and a potential source of ignition. Secondary fire hazard locations may be considered
low to medium risk hazards, and may contain a fuel source and/or an ignition source. A secondary hazard location can become
involved in a fire incident, because fire propagates from a primary fire hazard location.
In Overall Fire Hazard Locations below, the overall fire risk areas identified by the Key Personnel have been considered and
identified with:
1. Primary - Identified Risk Area is a Primary Fire Hazard Location (medium to high risk).
2. Secondary - Identified Risk Area is a Secondary Fire Hazard Location (low to medium risk).

Overall Fire Hazard Locations

ID HAZARD / RISK AREAS Primary or Secondary

1

2 Secondary
Primary

3 Secondary
Primary

4 Secondary
Primary

5 Secondary
Primary

6 Secondary
Primary

7 Secondary
Primary

8 Secondary
Primary

9
Secondary
Primary

10 Secondary
Primary
Secondary
Primary

Overall Fire Hazard Locations - Comments

Reviewed/Approved
Role Name without Comments Comments

Yes No

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Yes No
Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Yes No

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Yes No

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Yes No

Approver
Reviewer
Creator
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 2 – FIRE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
REV. 05    PAGE 10

IDENTIFICATION OF FUEL SOURCES

When assessing a potential fire hazard location, each fuel source is identified. Applicable fuels that will either be utilized and/or
transported by the vehicle/equipment that can potentially leak, spray, or flow to a heat source, or fuels that can accumulate from
a process have been taken into account. Also, various vehicle/equipment construction materials that can become a fuel source in
the event of a fire may have been identified. Additional comments may also have been included.

Fire Classification Types

In the USA there are four applicable fire classification types (Class A, B, C, and D). Europe and Australia are slightly different.
Review the following fire classification types and descriptions:

USA European Australia Descriptions

Class A Class A Class A Ordinary combustible materials, such as wood, cloth, paper, rubber, and many plastics
Class B Class B Class B Flammable liquids, petroleum greases, tars, oils, oil-based paints, solvents, lacquers,
alcohols
Class C Class C Flammable gases
Class D Class D Class D Combustible metals, such as magnesium, titanium, zirconium, sodium, lithium, potassium
Class C Class E Class E Fire involving energized electrical equipment

Each identified fuel source has been assessed, and given a Risk Rating (High, Medium, or Low) in Fuel Sources below.

Fuel Sources

(USA) Fire Ignition

Risk Areas Fuel Source Qty.* Classification (Risk Rating)

Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
*Quantity = total estimated amount in fire risk area
*Quantity [blank] = quantity unknown.
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 2 – FIRE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
REV. 05    PAGE 11

IDENTIFICATION OF FUEL SOURCES (Continued)

Fuel Sources (Continued)

(USA) Fire Ignition

Risk Areas Fuel Source Qty.* Classification (Risk Rating)

Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High

*Quantity = total estimated amount in fire risk area.

Low
Medium
High
*Quantity [blank] = quantity unknown.

Fuel Sources - Comments

Role Name Comments

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 2 – FIRE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
REV. 05    PAGE 12

POLAR SOLVENTS AND CHEMICAL OXIDIZERS

Polar solvents (such as ethylene glycol) may require consideration, as the solvents may be a fuel source that contacts an ignition
source within an Overall Hazard Risk Location. A chemical oxidizer on-board the vehicle/equipment may also require additional
fire protection consideration because the chemical reaction can be a severe fire hazard. Even though chemical oxidizers are
not necessarily combustible, the reaction can intensify combustion by increasing oxygen levels during a fire, or increase the
flammable range, so combustible materials ignite more readily. If applicable to the vehicle/equipment, a list of chemical oxidizers
and/or polar solvents and their quantitys may be included in the Polar Solvents and Chemical Oxidizers List below. Additional
comments may also be included.

Polar Solvents and Chemical Oxidizers List

Polar Solvents / Ignition

Location Chemical Oxidizers Qty. (Risk Rating)*

Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
* High, Medium or Low

Polar Solvents and Chemical Oxidizers - Comments

Role Name Comments

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 2 – FIRE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
REV. 05    PAGE 13

TYPE OF INDUSTRY / OPERATING ENVIRONMENTS

Listed in Type Of Industry / Operating Environments below are fire hazards or fuel sources within the operating environment
that may be at risk from a fire burning on-board the vehicle/equipment. Alternatively, environmental fire hazards that could pose a
fire/safety risk to personnel on-board the vehicle/equipment or to the vehicle/equipment are also considered.

Type of Industry / Operating Environments

Ignition
Typical Fire Hazard Fire Classification Type (Risk Rating)*
To Environment:

Low
Medium
High

To Vehicle/Equipment: Low
Medium
High

Low
Medium
High

* High, Medium or Low

Low
Medium
High

Type of Industry / Operating Environments - Comments

Role Name Comments

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 2 – FIRE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
REV. 05    PAGE 14

IDENTIFICATION OF IGNITION SOURCES

While assessing the vehicle/equipment, ignition sources and locations have been identified and listed in Ignition Sources and
Locations below are categorized according to the energy type that can cause fire ignition to occur (for example, Heat Energy,
Electrical Energy, or Mechanical Energy).
Note: For each Ignition Source listed, operating temperatures greater than or equal to 850 °F (454 °C), or operating temperatures
less than 850 °F (454 °C) are indicated.

Ignition Sources and Locations

Operating Operating
Temp. Temp.
Ignition Energy ≥ 8 50 °F < 8 50 °F
Location Source Type* (454 °C) (454 °C)

Mechanical
Electrical
Heat

Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
* Heat, Electrical, or Mechanical.
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 2 – FIRE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
REV. 05    PAGE 15

IDENTIFICATION OF IGNITION SOURCES (Continued)

Ignition Sources and Locations (Continued)

Operating Operating
Temp. Temp.
Ignition Energy ≥ 8 50 °F < 8 50 °F
Location Source Type* (454 °C) (454 °C)

Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
Mechanical
Electrical
Heat
* Heat, Electrical, or Mechanical.

Ignition Sources and Locations - Comments

Role Name Comments

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 2 – FIRE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
REV. 05    PAGE 16

VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT SHUTDOWN AND/OR RUNDOWN TIME

Continued vehicle/equipment operation and/or rundown time after shutdown may contribute to or increase the chance of
heightened fire risk levels. As long as the vehicle/equipment remains running, pressurized flammable liquids, such as engine fuel,
engine oil, hydraulic oil, or steering fluids, can continue to flow or be pumped into fire risk areas, as a result of ruptured fuel, oil,
steering, or hydraulic lines, faulty hose or tubing connections, or damaged equipment. Consequently vehicle/equipment shutdown
is considered, as well as equipment rundown time. This important consideration may have major impact on final fire suppression
recommendations.
In addition, forced air flow from an engine bay radiator fan, engine oil cooling fan or hydraulic fluid cooling fan, which continues to
run, even after vehicle/equipment (engine) shutdown, can continue to supply oxygen to one or more fire risk locations.
Equipment Operational Process - Shutdown Considerations below identifies equipment considered with regards to vehicle/
equipment shutdown and/or equipment rundown time after vehicle/equipment shutdown occurs. Additional comments may also be
included.

Equipment Operational Process - Shutdown Considerations

Shutdown Needs Shutdown to be Rundown Time (sec) Egress Time (sec) (in the
Considerations Shutdown Provided (after shutoff, if known) event of an emergency)

Equipment Operational Process/Shutdown Considerations - Comments

Role Name Comments

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 2 – FIRE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
REV. 05    PAGE 17

PREVIOUS FIRE INCIDENTS OR COMPONENT FAILURES

Special hazards may exist in the vehicle/equipment being assessed or in similar vehicle/equipment that may have experienced
previous fire events. Vehicle/equipment areas with components that have had known single or intermittent failures, or operations
which are unique to the type of usage, may increase fire risk potential and may be considered fire hazard risks. Assistance from
applicable personnel may result in discovering potential fire hazard areas otherwise not identified during the fire risk assessment
process.
Personnel listed in Previous Fire Incidents Or Component Failures below had either identified knowledge of previous fire
incidents on similar vehicles/equipment, or periodic component failure. Additional comments may also be included.

Previous Fire Incidents Or Component Failures

Information Regarding Previous Hazard Area Fire Incidents and/or Component Failures (if available)
Contributor Failure and Location Fire Occurred? Risk Reduced?
Position
Name of Fire Incident (Explain) Yes / No Yes /No
Yes No Yes No

Yes No Yes No

Yes No Yes No

Yes No Yes No

Previous Fire Incidents or Component Failures - Comments

Name Position Comments

EXTERNAL CONTRIBUTING FACTORS

NOTICE
External contributing factors, such as but not limited to: equipment misuse or human error, collision with other
equipment, damage from equipment or from equipment component failure, welding/grinding or other miscella-
neous maintenance activity, can create or contribute to a fire hazard. Other fire types may introduce additional
fuel and/or ignition sources not known at the time of this Fire Risk Assessment and are not identified and
may not be mitigated in this Fire Risk Assessment Report.

1. Personnel carrying out grinding and/or welding operations on the vehicle/equipment should adhere to all on-site work and
safety policies and procedures.
2. Extra precautions must be taken if the fire suppression system is left isolated during maintenance, particularly during
procedures that result in heat buildup.
3. In the event of a fire occurring during maintenance, with the fire suppression system in an isolation mode, the fire
suppression system must be operated manually.
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 3 – QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS
REV. 05    PAGE 18

QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS

In Section 2 – Fire Hazard Identification, potential fire hazard area locations were identified that contained a fuel source, an
ignition source, or both. In this section, each Overall Fire Hazard/Risk Area is broken down into one or more specific fire risks
within the hazard area. In Risk Analysis And Priority Values Matrix (page 19) and Level Of Risk (pages 20 to 29) each
specific risk identified includes one or more associated fire scenarios that indicate what, when, where, why, or how the fire
scenario can occur.
A fire risk analysis and evaluation is performed to determine the probability and consequences associated with each identified
fire scenario. This process ultimately results in identifying a Level of Risk, as well as a Priority Value for each fire risk. Performing
a fire risk analysis and evaluation is needed to determine whether identified fire risks require mitigation, as well as which, and to
what extent, appropriate risk reduction measures need to be taken.

Other Considerations and Consequential Effects

The fire risk analysis and evaluation process includes several considerations that may result in consequential impact, including
but not limited to, environmental and economic impact, as well as life safety. The following are general considerations made when
assessing potential fire risks:
1. The safety of the equipment operator and any passengers and/or personnel within the vicinity of the equipment.
2. The potential for: Property loss, Production loss, Environmental damage.
3. Propagation of fire or other materials from primary fire hazard areas within vehicle or equipment to internal secondary or
non-fire hazard areas or externally to surrounding areas/environment:
In the event of a fire, subsequent consequences may include, thermal radiation, products of combustion and decomposition
including toxic gases, and fire effluents escaping to surrounding areas. Site mandated safety procedures should ensure all other
equipment and personnel are moved away from any fire situation.

Existing Risk Controls

Although not fully addressed and/or mitigated in this report, a review of existing risk controls that are already in place for the
vehicle or equipment and relevant to a fire scenario should be discussed with the owner or owner’s representative, including but
not limited to:
1. Normal and emergency paths of egress for personnel (site mandated safety procedures should ensure and maintain clear,
easily identified, and accessible paths of egress in the event of a fire).
2. Existing fire protection and/or procedures including, but not limited to; existing means of fire detection, availability and appli-
cable types of portable fire extinguishers, existence of fire-fighting personnel or external support/available apparatus.
This should be included in site safety procedures and training of vehicle/equipment operators/service personnel. Periodic
training by qualified site personnel should be standard operating procedure.

Equipment Assessment
Levels of Risk may be different depending upon the type of vehicle/equipment being assessed. The results of the fire risk analysis
and evaluation for the vehicle/equipment previously identified in this report have been documented in Level of Risk (pages 20 to
29). The Level of Risk for each Overall Hazard Risk Area has been determined by analyzing each individual fire risk within each
area, and quantifying the risk with an associated Risk Level, and Risk Priority Value.
Risk Analysis and Priority Values Matrix (page 19) also identifies one or more fire scenarios that can occur within each risk
area. Fire scenarios are based on associated ignition sources that can come in contact with various fuels in a given area. A fire
scenario is derived from considering several factors previously discussed in this report, including questions such as: What can
happen? When is it most likely to occur? And, why and how does it occur? The qualitative analysis process begins with deter-
mining the severity of risk for each fire scenario.
To quantify the level of fire risk for an Overall Hazard Risk Area, each ignition source and associated fire scenario is analyzed,
using Level of Risk (pages 20 to 29) to determine the Probability of its occurrence and the Consequence of its occurrence. The
resulting evaluation process determines a Level of Risk (High, Moderate, Low, or Very Low), as well as a numerical Priority Value
(1.1 - highest priority to 4.3 - lowest priority) for each ignition source and associated fire scenarios. An Overall Hazard Risk Area
will assume the highest Risk Level and Priority Value that was determined for the ignition sources and associated fire scenarios
within that area. Resulting Risk Levels and Priority Values assist in determining which Overall Hazard Risk Areas are of highest
concern, needing immediate risk reduction attention. Refer to Risk Analysis Matrix Description of Terms (page 19) to assist in
understanding how identified levels of fire scenario Probability and Consequence were determined.
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 3 – QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS
REV. 05    PAGE 19

QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS (Continued)

Equipment Assessment (Continued)

Risk Analysis And Priority Values Matrix (use for values in Level Of Risk (pages 20 to 29) and Risk Reduction (pages
30 to 35))
Consequence* (Priority Value (PV))
Probability* Catastrophic Critical Marginal Negligible
Frequent 1.1 1.3 1.6 3.6
Probable 1.2 1.5 2.4 3.7
Occasional 1.4 2.2 3.3 4.1
Remote 2.1 2.3 3.4 4.2
Improbable 3.1 3.2 3.5 4.3

Risk Level (RL) High (H) Medium (M) Low (L) Very Low (VL)

* Refer to definition of terms in Risk Analysis Matrix Definition Of Terms below.

Risk Analysis Matrix Definition Of Terms

Probability Description
Frequent Likely to occur often in the life cycle of an individual component/equipment
(almost certain to occur more than once annually).
Probable Likely to occur several times in the life cycle of an individual component/equipment
(or at least once annually).
Occasional Has potential to occur in the life cycle of an individual component/equipment
(may occur at times, but not often).
Remote Relatively unlikely, but still possible.
Improbable Rare, if at all, and highly unlikely.
Consequence Description
Catastrophic Potential for fatalities. Serious and costly damage or total loss of vehicle/equipment. Major harm/
damage to environment. Global reputation/image impacted and regulatory intervention.
Critical Potential for severe injury(s) or health impact. Localized environmental damage, could have resulted in
catastrophic consequences. Major damage resulting in costly repair and loss of production. National or
local reputation/image impacted. Possibly regulatory intervention.
Marginal Minor injury or health impact. Damage repairable on-site, minimal downtime. Minimal environmental
exposure or harm potential. Local reputation/image impacted. Possible regulatory intervention.
Negligible Possible slight injuries, minimal, if any health impact. Limited environment impact. Minor damage,
minimal cost, little to no downtime. Local reputation/image only slightly impacted, if any.
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 3 – QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS
REV. 05    PAGE 20

VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT

Make:
Model:
Type:
Note: Above matches the equivalent information entered on page 8.

Level Of Risk*

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 1 Highest Priority

(from Overall Fire Hazards Locations, page 9) Value (PV)**

For fuel sources see Fuel Sources, page 9.

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Ignition Sources Fire Scenarios PV

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

*For definitions and values see page 19.

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
**1.1 is the highest. Select highest value from following Area PV assessments.

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 3 – QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS
REV. 05    PAGE 21

VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT (Continued)

Make:
Model:
Type:
Note: Above matches the equivalent information entered on page 8.

Level Of Risk* (Continued)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 2 Highest Priority

(from Overall Fire Hazards Locations, page 9) Value (PV)**

For fuel sources see Fuel Sources, page 9.

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Ignition Sources Fire Scenarios PV

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
*For definitions and values see page 19.
**1.1 is the highest. Select highest value from following Area PV assessments.

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 3 – QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS
REV. 05    PAGE 22

VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT (Continued)

Make:
Model:
Type:
Note: Above matches the equivalent information entered on page 8.

Level Of Risk* (Continued)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 3 Highest Priority

(from Overall Fire Hazards Locations, page 9) Value (PV)**

For fuel sources see Fuel Sources, page 9.

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Ignition Sources Fire Scenarios PV

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
*For definitions and values see page 19.
**1.1 is the highest. Select highest value from following Area PV assessments.

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 3 – QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS
REV. 05    PAGE 23

VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT (Continued)

Make:
Model:
Type:
Note: Above matches the equivalent information entered on page 8.

Level Of Risk* (Continued)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 4 Highest Priority

(from Overall Fire Hazards Locations, page 9) Value (PV)**

For fuel sources see Fuel Sources, page 9.

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Ignition Sources Fire Scenarios PV

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
*For definitions and values see page 19.
**1.1 is the highest. Select highest value from following Area PV assessments.
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 3 – QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS
REV. 05    PAGE 24

VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT (Continued)

Make:
Model:
Type:
Note: Above matches the equivalent information entered on page 8.

Level Of Risk* (Continued)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 5 Highest Priority

(from Overall Fire Hazards Locations, page 9) Value (PV)**

For fuel sources see Fuel Sources, page 9.

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Ignition Sources Fire Scenarios PV

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
*For definitions and values see page 19.
**1.1 is the highest. Select highest value from following Area PV assessments.

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 3 – QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS
REV. 05    PAGE 25

VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT (Continued)

Make:
Model:
Type:
Note: Above matches the equivalent information entered on page 8.

Level Of Risk* (Continued)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 6 Highest Priority

(from Overall Fire Hazards Locations, page 9) Value (PV)**

For fuel sources see Fuel Sources, page 9.

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Ignition Sources Fire Scenarios PV

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

*For definitions and values see page 19. 1.1 Very

1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
**1.1 is the highest. Select highest value from following Area PV assessments.

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 3 – QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS
REV. 05    PAGE 26

VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT (Continued)

Make:
Model:
Type:
Note: Above matches the equivalent information entered on page 8.

Level Of Risk* (Continued)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 7 Highest Priority

(from Overall Fire Hazards Locations, page 9) Value (PV)**

For fuel sources see Fuel Sources, page 9.

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Ignition Sources Fire Scenarios PV

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

*For definitions and values see page 19. 1.1 Very

1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
**1.1 is the highest. Select highest value from following Area PV assessments.

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 3 – QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS
REV. 05    PAGE 27

VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT (Continued)

Make:
Model:
Type:
Note: Above matches the equivalent information entered on page 8.

Level Of Risk* (Continued)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 8 Highest Priority

(from Overall Fire Hazards Locations, page 9) Value (PV)**

For fuel sources see Fuel Sources, page 9.

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Ignition Sources Fire Scenarios PV

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
*For definitions and values see page 19.
**1.1 is the highest. Select highest value from following Area PV assessments.

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 3 – QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS
REV. 05    PAGE 28

VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT (Continued)

Make:
Model:
Type:
Note: Above matches the equivalent information entered on page 8.

Level Of Risk* (Continued)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 9 Highest Priority

(from Overall Fire Hazards Locations, page 9) Value (PV)**

For fuel sources see Fuel Sources, page 9.

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Ignition Sources Fire Scenarios PV

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
*For definitions and values see page 19.
**1.1 is the highest. Select highest value from following Area PV assessments.

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 3 – QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS
REV. 05    PAGE 29

VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT (Continued)

Make:
Model:
Type:
Note: Above matches the equivalent information entered on page 8.

Level Of Risk* (Continued)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 10 Highest Priority

(from Overall Fire Hazards Locations, page 9) Value (PV)**

For fuel sources see Fuel Sources, page 9.

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Ignition Sources Fire Scenarios PV

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low

*For definitions and values see page 19.

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
**1.1 is the highest. Select highest value from following Area PV assessments.

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 4 – FIRE RISK REDUCTION
MEASURES (MITIGATION)
REV. 05    PAGE 30

QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS RESULTS – RISK REDUCTION MEASURES

Each fire scenario identified in Level of Risk (see Section 3), has been reviewed and considered, and a numerical Priority Value
has been determined for each. The highest Priority Value (PV) (1.1 being the highest) of all scenarios entered in a given Overall
Hazard / Risk Area, is transferred to Risk Reduction below.
Design and installation of fire suppression equipment is required when other risk reduction measures will not reduce fire risks
to acceptable levels. Based on the overall highest Priority Value determined for each Overall Hazard / Risk Area, general fire
suppression and detection options are indicated in the following Risk Reduction to mitigate fire risk consequence to anticipated
levels that are deemed acceptable.
Fire Protection Equipment - Where the Fire Risk Assessment or Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) requires or determines the
need for fire protection, the fire protection options shall comply with the relevant requirements in Australian Standard AS 5062,
NFPA 17, 17A (Annex B), 120, 122, and NFPA 10, as well as other federal, state, and local code requirements.
Note: T
 his Fire Risk Assessment provides recommendations for fire protection utilizing:
ANSUL® Vehicle Fire Suppression Systems, tested and approved by FM and AS 5062 compliant.
ANSUL® Cartridge-Operated Portable Fire Extinguishers, FM Approved and Underwriters Laboratories (UL) listed.

Make:
Model:
Type:

Risk Reduction
(See Level of Risk, page 20)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 1 (from page 9)* Fire Risk Before Mitigation: Highest Priority Value (PV)

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Recommended Fire Risk Reduction / Mitigation
Actuation Method
Manual
Automatic
No Detection,
Actuation
Detection
No Actuation
Only
/and
Only
Manual
Automatic
Actuation
Actuation
Suppressing
Agents Wet Chemical Dry Chemical Clean Agent

Detection Method Heat Detection Flame Detection

and Other
Component Shutdown Portable Extinguishers

Anticipated Fire Risk After Mitigation:

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Risk Accepted Without Proposed Mitigation Yes

*Overall Fire Hazard Locations

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 4 – FIRE RISK REDUCTION
MEASURES (MITIGATION)
REV. 05    PAGE 31

QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS RESULTS – RISK REDUCTION MEASURES (Continued)

Make:
Model:
Type:

Risk Reduction (Continued)

(See Level of Risk, page 21 and 22)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 2 (from page 9)* Fire Risk Before Mitigation: Highest Priority Value (PV)

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Recommended Fire Risk Reduction / Mitigation
Actuation Method
Manual
Automatic
No Detection,
Actuation
Detection
No Actuation
Only
/and
Only
Manual
Automatic
Actuation
Actuation
Suppressing
Agents Wet Chemical Dry Chemical Clean Agent

Detection Method Heat Detection Flame Detection

and Other
Component Shutdown Portable Extinguishers

Anticipated Fire Risk After Mitigation:

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Risk Accepted Without Proposed Mitigation Yes

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 3 (from page 9)* Fire Risk Before Mitigation: Highest Priority Value (PV)

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Recommended Fire Risk Reduction / Mitigation

Actuation Method
Manual
Automatic
No Detection,
Actuation
Detection
No Actuation
Only
/and
Only
Manual
Automatic
Actuation
Actuation
Suppressing
Agents Wet Chemical Dry Chemical Clean Agent

Detection Method Heat Detection Flame Detection

and Other
Component Shutdown Portable Extinguishers

Anticipated Fire Risk After Mitigation:

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Risk Accepted Without Proposed Mitigation Yes

*Overall Fire Hazard Locations

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 4 – FIRE RISK REDUCTION
MEASURES (MITIGATION)
REV. 05    PAGE 32

QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS RESULTS – RISK REDUCTION MEASURES (Continued)

Make:
Model:
Type:

Risk Reduction (Continued)

(See Level of Risk, page 23 and 24)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 4 (from page 9)* Fire Risk Before Mitigation: Highest Priority Value (PV)

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Recommended Fire Risk Reduction / Mitigation
Actuation Method
Manual
Automatic
No Detection,
Actuation
Detection
No Actuation
Only
/and
Only
Manual
Automatic
Actuation
Actuation
Suppressing
Agents Wet Chemical Dry Chemical Clean Agent

Detection Method Heat Detection Flame Detection

and Other
Component Shutdown Portable Extinguishers

Anticipated Fire Risk After Mitigation:

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Risk Accepted Without Proposed Mitigation Yes

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 5 (from page 9)* Fire Risk Before Mitigation: Highest Priority Value (PV)

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Recommended Fire Risk Reduction / Mitigation

Actuation Method
Manual
Automatic
No Detection,
Actuation
Detection
No Actuation
Only
/and
Only
Manual
Automatic
Actuation
Actuation
Suppressing
Agents Wet Chemical Dry Chemical Clean Agent

Detection Method Heat Detection Flame Detection

and Other
Component Shutdown Portable Extinguishers

Anticipated Fire Risk After Mitigation:

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Risk Accepted Without Proposed Mitigation Yes

*Overall Fire Hazard Locations

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 4 – FIRE RISK REDUCTION
MEASURES (MITIGATION)
REV. 05    PAGE 33

QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS RESULTS – RISK REDUCTION MEASURES (Continued)

Make:
Model:
Type:

Risk Reduction (Continued)

(See Level of Risk, page 25 and 26)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 6 (from page 9)* Fire Risk Before Mitigation: Highest Priority Value (PV)

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Recommended Fire Risk Reduction / Mitigation
Actuation Method
Manual
Automatic
No Detection,
Actuation
Detection
No Actuation
Only
/and
Only
Manual
Automatic
Actuation
Actuation
Suppressing
Agents Wet Chemical Dry Chemical Clean Agent

Detection Method Heat Detection Flame Detection

and Other
Component Shutdown Portable Extinguishers

Anticipated Fire Risk After Mitigation:

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Risk Accepted Without Proposed Mitigation Yes

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 7 (from page 9)* Fire Risk Before Mitigation: Highest Priority Value (PV)

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Recommended Fire Risk Reduction / Mitigation

Actuation Method
Manual
Automatic
No Detection,
Actuation
Detection
No Actuation
Only
/and
Only
Manual
Automatic
Actuation
Actuation
Suppressing
Agents Wet Chemical Dry Chemical Clean Agent

Detection Method Heat Detection Flame Detection

and Other
Component Shutdown Portable Extinguishers

Anticipated Fire Risk After Mitigation:

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Risk Accepted Without Proposed Mitigation Yes

*Overall Fire Hazard Locations

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 4 – FIRE RISK REDUCTION
MEASURES (MITIGATION)
REV. 05    PAGE 34

QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS RESULTS – RISK REDUCTION MEASURES (Continued)

Make:
Model:
Type:

Risk Reduction (Continued)

(See Level of Risk, page 27 and 28)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 8 (from page 9)* Fire Risk Before Mitigation: Highest Priority Value (PV)

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Recommended Fire Risk Reduction / Mitigation
Actuation Method
Manual
Automatic
No Detection,
Actuation
Detection
No Actuation
Only
/and
Only
Manual
Automatic
Actuation
Actuation
Suppressing
Agents Wet Chemical Dry Chemical Clean Agent

Detection Method Heat Detection Flame Detection

and Other
Component Shutdown Portable Extinguisher(s)

Anticipated Fire Risk After Mitigation:

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Risk Accepted Without Proposed Mitigation Yes

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 9 (from page 9)* Fire Risk Before Mitigation: Highest Priority Value (PV)

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Recommended Fire Risk Reduction / Mitigation

Actuation Method
Manual
Automatic
No Detection,
Actuation
Detection
No Actuation
Only
/and
Only
Manual
Automatic
Actuation
Actuation
Suppressing
Agents Wet Chemical Dry Chemical Clean Agent

Detection Method Heat Detection Flame Detection

and Other
Component Shutdown Portable Extinguishers

Anticipated Fire Risk After Mitigation:

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Risk Accepted Without Proposed Mitigation Yes

*Overall Fire Hazard Locations

Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 4 – FIRE RISK REDUCTION
MEASURES (MITIGATION)
REV. 05    PAGE 35

QUALITATIVE FIRE RISK ANALYSIS RESULTS – RISK REDUCTION MEASURES (Continued)

Make:
Model:
Type:

Risk Reduction (Continued)

(See Level of Risk, page 29)

Overall Hazard / Risk Area, ID 10 (from page 9)* Fire Risk Before Mitigation: Highest Priority Value (PV)

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Recommended Fire Risk Reduction / Mitigation
Actuation Method
Manual
Automatic
No Detection,
Actuation
Detection
No Actuation
Only
/and
Only
Manual
Automatic
Actuation
Actuation
Suppressing
Agents Wet Chemical Dry Chemical Clean Agent

Detection Method Heat Detection Flame Detection

and Other
Component Shutdown Portable Extinguishers

Anticipated Fire Risk After Mitigation:

1.1 Very
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3 High Low
Medium
Low
Risk Accepted Without Proposed Mitigation Yes

*Overall Fire Hazard Locations

Risk Reduction - Comments

Role Name Comments

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator

Approver
Reviewer
Creator
Fire Risk Assessment Report SECTION 4 – FIRE RISK REDUCTION
MEASURES (MITIGATION)
REV. 05    PAGE 36

NOTES: