Professional Documents
Culture Documents
100 Years of What
100 Years of What
The news that hit the Indian dailies on March 8, was the denial of Euthanasia
plea for Aruna Shanbaug, a nurse in vegetative stage for the past 37 years.
Newspapers of the country celebrated this sensitive issue and all the media,
including social networking sites saw active discussions and heated debates. For
majority of the public, the denial to die with dignity was considered a serious
flaw in the administration of Indian Judicial System and thorough non-human
judgment. But our opinions about Aruna cannot be validated as we are all mere
spectators of what the media has told us. No where her opinion to live or not is
found to be recorded. What if she wishes to live in the care and caressings of
those hospital staff? What if she opt to live with dignity and not to die with
dignity. The judgment read right – “The Indian systems are not emotionally
mature to accept Euthanasia”. But the same Indian judicial systems freed the
villain of Aruna’s sufferings after just 10 years of imprisonment, where as Aruna
is living a life-sentence granted by her destiny.
And another daily read the next day “Food, fun, shopping, plays and discussions
galore on Women’s Day”. A lot of messages have been seen sent through mobile
phones and social networking sites wishing “A Happy Women’s Day!”. But isn’t
this commercialization diluting its social signification and isn’t it an evidence for
the deviation from its true core? Those who are capable of speaking and
celebrating a Women’s Day, including myself, are in no way eligible to represent
this day, as they are well aware of their rights and enjoy life in a well protected
social aura. How can the creamy layer of women just make merry like they do for
Christmas or New Year when the major lot of women in this country is still
unattended and is reeling in the stinking age old social taboos?