You are on page 1of 1

COVER STORY

Firms
will start
thinking like
start-ups
Forget robot lawyers – the “Uberisation” of legal services poses the biggest threat to
the legal industry. That’s according to US-based legal innovator and professor of law
Daniel Martin Katz, who delivered the keynote speech at the 2018 FLIP Conference.
The race is on

Katz, a professor of law at Illinois Institute of been a service business, but it is becoming a for firms to
Technology and Michigan State University, product-service hybrid.”
said recent media reports had caused Katz, who described himself as an offer products
misdirected panic among lawyers by focusing academic-cum-scientist, technologist, teacher,
on the so-called “rise of the robo-lawyer” in a consultant and advisor, is highly qualified to and scalable
shrinking jobs market. But, he said, the most speak on the issue. He is known as a change
significant threat to lawyers’ wages and firm leader in the legal profession internationally tech solutions
profitability would come from smaller start- and was named in the “Fastcase 50”, an award
ups and fusion businesses such as consulting that “recognises 50 of the smartest, most to continue to
and accounting firms. courageous innovators, techies, visionaries,
“The media loves the ‘robot lawyers’ thesis, and leaders in the law”. Katz was also named compete in the
but legal innovation is far broader than legal one of the American Bar Association Journal’s
tech per se,” said Katz. “Legal Rebels” in 2018. legal industry.
Katz explained that in recent years start- Katz is the Chief Strategy Officer of his
ups and consulting businesses had begun to own legal-consulting hybrid called LexPredict, DANIEL MARTIN KATZ
compete with law firms by “Uberising” the which works with Fortune 500 companies to
sale of legal services. He said these businesses solve technical and strategic problems.
tended to compartmentalise individual In its mission statement, “#MakeLawBetter”,
documents or products and offer them cheaper Katz notes that his company is just one of the
than traditional firms – with their expensive more than 70 legal tech start-ups listed by
office overheads and staff salary bills – could Stanford University in the US. Most of these
afford to. start-ups have been doing the “lion’s share”
He gave the example of an online start-up of research and development in the legal
offering downloadable legal documents for industry, said Katz.
a fi xed fee, such as employment contracts or He said traditional law firms would do well
wills. These contracts often have artificial to take a leaf out of the books of start-ups, by
intelligence solutions built in, enabling users exploring technology solutions to help lawyers
to adjust certain terms and produce a legal do business more efficiently and for lower cost.
document suited to their individual practice. “Pick a problem with good monetisation
LegalVision, Zegal and LawPath are some value, and offer a product that solves that
Australian examples of firms working this way. problem,” advised Katz.
“The lines have become blurred “The race is on for firms to offer products
and boundaries between industries are and scalable tech solutions to continue to
disappearing,” said Katz. “Law has historically compete in the legal industry.”

ISSUE 50 I NOVEMBER 2018 I LSJ 31

p30-35_Cover Story.indd 2 24/10/18 4:44 pm

You might also like