Government of Karnataka

Department of Collegiate Education

State Quality Assurance Cell
Criterion-6 Scheme of Evaluation (QnM)
Key Indicator Annexure Weight Parameters and Scoring
/ age
Template
s No.
6.2.3 6.2.3
Implementatio NAAC
n of e- Template All of Any 3 of the Any 2 of the above Any one of the None of
4 the above above the above
governance in
areas of above
QnM
operation
1. Admini
stration 4 3 2 1 0

2. Financ
e and
Accoun
ts
3. Student
Admiss
ion and
Suppor
t
4. Examin
ation

Note: Link of the documents to be uploaded.

6.3.2 6.3.2 10 Formula:
Average NAAC QnM
percentage of template
teachers
provided with
financial
support to
attend
conferences/w
orkshops and
towards
membership Percentage per year
fee of
professional
bodies

10 08 06 04 02 0
If it is Nil
80% to 100 % 60% to 80% 40% to 20% to Less than 20%
60% 40%
 Note: 5 years data to be considered

6.3.3 6.3.3 5 Formula:

Average NAAC QnM
number of template
professional
development
/administrative
training
programs
organized by 5 4 3 2 1 0
the institution If it is
>9 >7 >5 >3 >0 Nil

Note: 5 years data to be considered

Seminars / invited talks cannot be included in this metric
Year wise data to be
check

6.3.4 Average 6.3.4 Formula:

5
percentage of NAAC
teachers template Qn
undergoing M
online/face-to-
face Faculty
development Percentage per year =
Programmes
(FDP)
 5 4 3 2 1 0
If it is Nil
80% to 100 % 60% to 80% 40% to 20% to 40% Less than 20%
60%
Note: 5 years data to be considered
Attending seminars / invited talks not to be considered.
Programs of duration less than one week will not be considered
One teacher attending one or more professional development Program in a year to be counted as one only

6.4.2 6.4.2
8 6 4 2 0
Funds / Grants NAAC 8
received from template QnM
nongovernmen
t bodies, >=10 lakh >= 6 lakh >= 4 lakh >=1 rupee If it is Nil
individuals,
philanthropes
 Note: Funds from own institutions/own trust and sister institutions not to be considered
Contribution in the form of equipment / software etc not be counted.
Grants received under criterion III not to be repeated here.
Link of the audited statement to be check

6.5.3 Quality 6.5.3 10 10 8 5 3 1 0

assurance NAAC QnM If >5 quality initiatives If >4 quality If >3 quality If >2 quality If any one If Nil
initiatives template implemented initiatives initiatives initiatives or 2
1. Regular implemented implemented implemented quality
meeting of initiatives
Internal implemen
Quality ted
Assurance Cell
(IQAC);
2. Feedback
collected,
analysed and
used for
improvements
3.
Collaborative
quality
intitiatives
with other
institution(s)
4. Participation
in NIRF
5. any other
quality audit
recognized by
state, national
or international
agencies (ISO
Certification,
NBA)
Note: AQAR not applicable for cycle I
Collaborative quality initiatives with sister institutions under the same management will not be considered.
Total 42 (out of 100 weightages only 42 weightages considered)
weightage
considered for
scoring