Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What is learning?
Learning can be commonly defined as the act, process, or experience of gaining knowledge or skill. In psychology and education,
learning refers to a process that brings together cognitive, emotional, and environmental influences and experiences for acquiring,
enhancing, or making changes in one’s knowledge, skills, values, and world views (Illeris, 2000; Ormorod, 1995, cited in wikipedia).
For some theorists learning is a change in behavior. For others, it’s an internal mental process (including insight, information
processing, memory, perception). Learning as a process focuses on what happens when the learning takes place. Explanations of
learning as a product or as a process constitute learning theories.
Learning theories
There are three major categories of learning theories:
•Behaviorism,
•Cognitivism,
•and Constructivism.
These theories do not give us ready-made solutions. However, but they guide us to those variables that are crucial in finding
solutions. The philosophical frameworks behind these learning theories try to describe or explain how people learn and under what
conditions.
•Behaviorism focuses only on the objectively observable aspects of learning.
•Cognitive theories look beyond behavior to explain brain-based learning.
•Constructivism views learning as a process in which the learner actively constructs or builds new ideas or concepts.
Behaviorism
A Description of Behaviorism
Behaviorism is a learning theory which considers anything an organism do as a behavior. According to the behaviorist, these
behaviors can be scientifically studied regardless of what happens in the mind (psychological constructs such as thoughts, feelings…)
As a theory behaviorism focuses on observable behaviors and contends that there are no philosophical differences between publicly
observable processes (such as actions) and privately observable processes (such as thinking and feeling.)
Behaviorism main figures were:
•Ivan Pavlov, who investigated classical conditioning,
•Edward Lee Thorndike,
•John B. Watson who rejected introspective methods and sought to restrict psychology to experimental methods,
•and B.F. Skinner who conducted research on operant conditioning
Behaviorists believe in three basic assumptions:
1.Learning is manifested by a change in behavior.
2.The environment shapes behavior.
3.The principles of contiguity (how close in time two events must be for a bond to be formed) and reinforcement (any means of
increasing the likelihood that an event will be repeated) are central to explaining the learning process.
For behaviorists, learning is the acquisition of new behavior through conditioning.
Classical Conditioning
J. B Watson, the father of Behaviorism, defined learning as a sequence of stimulus and response actions in observable cause and
effect relationships. For example in the case of Pavlov’s conditioning experiments on dogs, behavior becomes a reflex response to
stimulus. In conducting the experiment, Pavlov noticed that the dog would salivate (response), upon hearing the ringing of a bell.
This occurred because the dog had learned to associate its unconditional stimuli (normally feeding), with the neutral stimuli of the
bell ringing simultaneously with the feeding process. Watson, believed that the stimuli that humans receive may be generated
internally (for example hunger), or externally (for example, a loud noise).
Criticism of Behaviorism
•Behavioral theories do not account for free will and internal influences such as moods, thoughts, and feelings.
•As a learning theory, Behaviorism doesn’t take into account important internal processes that take place in the mind.
•Language acquisition was one type of learning Skinners learning theory cannot account for. Chomsky for example, responding
to Skinner’s Verbal behavior, shows that language acquisition occurs because of some innate abilities that children are endowed
with which explains that they can produce an indefinite number of utterances they have never heard.
•There are many instances of learning that occurs without the use of reinforcements or punishments.
•People and animals are able to adapt their behavior when new information is introduced, even if a previous behavior pattern has
been established through reinforcement.
•Behaviorists focus on the target, desirable behavior, that is the product. They fail to explain how humans learn, the process
through which the learning takes place.
•For a behaviorist what occurs between the stimulus and the response (the black box) is of little importance. The very meaning of
the learning process is banned from any scientific analysis in the behavioristic approach (the black box shouldn’t be opened.)
Conclusion
As a learning theory Behaviorism focuses on the observable behavior which they claim must be the subject of a scientific study.
Although this type of study will yield measurable results, and can be applicable to a number of cases, such as in treatments for
human disorders including autism, anxiety disorders and antisocial behavior, it fails to account for the learning process and how the
mind and the affective domain interfere in the processing of information. New learning approaches and theories appeared in the 20th
century as a response to these shortcomings. Cognitivism and constructivism are the major trends of this movement.
Description of Cognitivism
Description of Cognitivism
Cognitivism is a learning theory that focuses on the processes involved in learning rather than on the observed behavior. As opposed
to Behaviorists, Cognitivists do not require an outward exhibition of learning, but focus more on the internal processes and
connections that take place during learning. Cognitivism contends that “the black box” of the mind should be opened and understood.
The learner is viewed as an information processor. Knowledge can be seen as schema or symbolic mental constructions and learning
is defined as change in a learner’s schemata. Some important classroom principles from cognitive psychology include meaningful
learning, organization, and elaboration.
Cognitivism as a reaction against Behaviorism
Cognitivist theory developed as a reaction to Behaviorism. Cognitivists objected to behaviorists because they felt that behaviorists
thought learning was simply a reaction to a stimulus and ignored the idea that thinking plays an important role. One of the most
famous criticisms addressed to Behaviorism was Chomsky’s argument that language could not be acquired purely through
conditioning, and must be at least partly explained by the existence of some inner abilities. Behaviorism for example falls short to
explain how children can learn an infinite number of utterance that they have never heard of.
Notable cognitivists
A few of the cognitivists who have contributed to developing the cognitive theory are the following:
•Piaget
•Bloom
•Bruner
•Ausubel
Constructivist Theory
This post is about Jerome Bruner’s constructivist theory. Jerome Bruner was one of the most influential constructivists. He was
influenced by Piaget’s ideas about cognitive development in children. His ideas have been widely discussed among educators and
teachers. Some of Bruner’s theoretical principles focus on these ideas:
•Nature of Learning and learning process.
•Instructional scaffolding
•The intellectual development of the learner
Effective instruction
Bruner emphasized four characteristics of effective instruction that emerged from his theoretical constructs.
1.Personalized: instruction should relate to learners’ predisposition, and facilitate interest in learning,
2.Content Structure: content should be structured so it can be most easily grasped by the learner
3.Sequencing: sequencing is an important aspect of the presentation of material
4.Reinforcement: rewards and punishment should be selected and paced appropriately.
Bruner also contends that any child can be instructed any subject in some intellectually honest form any stage of development. This
notion led Bruner to present his concept of the spiral curriculum which states that a curriculum should revisit basic ideas, building on
them until the student had grasped the full formal concept.
Instructional scaffolding
Based on Vygotsky‘s ideas about the Zone of Proximal Development, Jerome Bruner and other educational psychologists
developed the important concept of instructional scaffolding. This refers to the process through which able peers or adults offer
supports for learning. This assistance becomes gradually less frequent as it becomes unnecessary, as when constructing a building a
scaffold is removed.
Intellectual development
Bruner postulated three stages of intellectual development in his constructivist theory.
1.Enactive
A person learns about the world through actions on physical objects and the outcomes of these actions.
2.Iconic
Using models and pictures to obtain learning.
3.Symbolic
Developing the ability to think in abstract terms.
According to Bruner, when the learner is faced with new knowledge, a combination of concrete, pictorial, and symbolic activities
will lead to more effective learning. This holds true even for adult learners. These stages are not necessarily neatly delineated. They
are, however, modes of representation that are integrated and only loosely sequential as they “translate” into each other.
Learning to learn
How to scaffold
Different ways can be used to scaffold:
•A very useful strategy is to start from prior knowledge of the students.
•Offering a context which will set the foundations for the construction of the new knowledge.
•Providing appropriate resources can be of great help to learners.
•It would be also useful to break a difficult task into easier discrete steps that would assist some learners to achieve the desired
goals.
•Modeling is another way to scaffold as when showing students an example of the target work.
•Providing cues or hints to solve a problem.
•Using graphic organizer, historical timelines…
•Providing templates, outlines and guides.
•Teaching key vocabulary and asking focus questions before the accomplishment of a task.
Finally, a key feature of scaffolding is that it is available for just-in-time learning, is skippable by those who don’t need it and fades
away when it is not needed anymore as students become more able.
Approaches to language autonomy in language learning
Autonomy in language learning
The main idea behind learner autonomy is that learners should be able to take charge of their own learning. Being dependent on the
teacher wouldn’t help the learning process. Students should be encouraged to construct knowledge from direct experience through
hypothesizing, experimenting, acquiring, transforming and transferring learning. Ideal autonomous learners are people who:
•are willing to take risks,
•have insights into their learning styles and strategies,
•and are willing to revise and reject hypotheses.
Approaches To Learner Autonomy In Language Learning
Assessment Strategies
Assessment Strategies: Formative, Summative and Alternative
Assessment
Teachers use formative and summative assessment to test their students progress. Formative assessment is used to evaluate students’
progress and understanding in order to identify learning needs and adapt teaching appropriately. Summative testing, however,
evaluates student learning according to a benchmark, for example at the end of an instructional unit. There is however anther type of
assessment which does not fall into the categories of tests mentioned above. This is called alternative assessment.
In this article on Edutopia, Todd Finley introduces Alternative formative assessment (AFA) and says that these strategies:
can be as simple (and important) as checking the oil in your car — hence the name “dipsticks.” They’re especially
effective when students are given tactical feedback, immediately followed by time to practice the skill. My favorite
techniques are those with simple directions, like The 60 Second Paper, which asks students to describe the most
important thing they learned and identify any areas of confusion in under a minute.
He also provides a downloadable list of 53 ways to check for understanding. Here is the link to the article:
Dipsticks: Efficient Ways to Check for Understanding
And here is the link to the:
Downloadable list of 53 ways to check for understanding
1. DIPSTICKS
Like using a dipstick to check the oil in a car, teachers can use short, quick checks virtually to make
sure that students are on track—both academically and emotionally.
At the start of a live class, pose a general question about the previous day’s lesson, like “Does
everyone feel comfortable with what we learned about [fill in the blank]?” and have students
respond individually by dropping an emoji or a thumbs-up/thumbs-down in their chat box or video
window. Students can also hold up a sticky note or piece of paper to the screen with a response.
They don’t all have to be serious questions; funny questions can help get students engaged at the
start of a lesson. In this Twitter thread, teachers share fun question ideas like: “Are Pop-Tarts a kind
of ravioli?” and “Would you rather have no elbows or no knees?"
Another option: Ask students a more specific question about content you’ve recently covered, then
have them assess their understanding on a 1–5 rating scale. They can hold up the appropriate
number of fingers as signals during a live class online. The popular stoplight approach also works.
Ask students to show a color based on how they feel about the topic you’re teaching: green—go
ahead to the next topic; yellow—proceed slowly as I’m still processing; or red—stop, I don’t
understand.