Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONTROL
SYMBOL UNIT LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
FACTOR
performance characteristics has been used to determine predicted data provided by the mathematical models can be
optimal machining parameters for maximization of MRR and transformed into a signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio; based on three
minimization of SF in wire EDM. criteria. The characteristic that higher value represents better
machining performance, such as MRR, „higher-the-better, HB;
Experiments have been carried out using Taguchi‟s and inversely, the characteristic that lower value represents
L9 Orthogonal Array (OA) experimental design which better machining performance, such as surface roughness is
consists of 9 combinations of four process parameters. called „lower-the-better‟, LB. Therefore, HB for the MRR, LB
According to the design catalogue (Peace, 1993) prepared by for the SF have been selected for obtaining optimum
Taguchi, L9 Orthogonal Array design of experiment has been machining performance characteristics
found suitable in the present work. It considers four process
parameters (without interaction) to be varied in three discrete
levels. Based on Taguchi‟s L9 Orthogonal Array design, the
The nine cutting experiments with the assigned In this study most important output performances in
levels of the process parameters are run on selected L9 WEDM such as material removal rate (MRR), surface
orthogonal layout. For both the work pieces are machined on roughness (RA) were considered for optimizing machining
the WEDM. parameters. The surface finish value (in µm) was obtained by
Table II measuring the mean absolute deviation, Ra (surface
orthogonal array roughness) from the average surface level using a computer
S.No A B C D controlled surface roughness tester.
The material removal rate (MRR) is
1 1 1 1 1 calculated as,
2 1 2 2 2
3 3 Where, Wi = initial weight of workpiece (gm)
3 1 3 Wf = final weight of workpiece (gm)
4 2 1 2 3 t = machining time (sec)
ρ = density of magnesium (gm/mm3) = (7.8
5 2 2 3 1 * 10-3 gm/mm3)
6 2 3 1 2
7 3 1 3 2
8 3 2 1 3
9 3 3 2 1
Table III
Orthogonal Array And Experimental Results Of Mg SicP 10%
CONTROL
RESPONSES
FACTORS
EXP.NO
A B C D MRR(mm³/sec) RA(µm)
1 4.1295
1 1 1 1 6.33
1 3.769
2 2 2 2 6.48
1 3.7145
3 3 3 3 6.58
2 3.6605
4 1 2 3 6.81
2 3.607
5 2 3 1 6.73
2 3.7475
6 3 1 2 6.99
3 3.9875
7 1 3 2 7.28
3 4.026
8 2 1 3 7.14
3 1 4.161
9 3 2 7.13
Table IV
Orthogonal array and experimental results of Mg SicP 20%
Table V
S/N Ratio Values Of Mg SicP 10%
Table VI
S/N ratio values of Mg SicP 20%
CONTROL FACTORS
S/N RATIO
EXP.NO
A B C D MRR(mm³/sec) RA(µm)
1
1 1 1 1 16.0281 -11.0339
1
2 2 2 2 16.3381 -11.3898
1
3 3 3 3 15.8898 -11.5153
2
4 1 2 3 16.5989 -11.7945
2
5 2 3 1 16.3645 -12.2153
2
6 3 1 2 16.7518 -11.8834
3
7 1 3 2 16.8147 -11.3593
3
8 2 1 3 17.0740 -11.6655
3 1
9 3 2 16.9391 -11.4991
3.2 To find normalized S/N ratio values into an acceptable range for further analysis. In this study, a
In the grey relational analysis, a data pre- linear normalization of the S/N ratio is performed in the range
processing is first performed in order to normalize the raw between zero and unity, which is also called the grey
data for analysis. Normalization is a transformation performed relational generating. yij is normalized as Zij (0≤Zij≤1) by the
on a single data input to distribute the data evenly and scale it following formula to avoid the effect of adopting different
units and to reduce the variability. The normalized material The surface roughness and kerf width should follow the
removal rate corresponding to the larger-the-better criterion lower-the-better criterion and can be expressed as
can be expressed as Zij =
Zij = The normalized S/N ratio values are given in Tables below
Table VII
Normalised S/N values of Mg SicP 10%
CONTROL FACTORS
EXP.NO NORMALISED S/N RATIO
A B C D MRR(mm³/sec) RA(µm)
1 1 1 1 1 0 0.947
2 1 2 2 2 0.167 0.307
3 1 3 3 3 0.276 0.206
4 2 1 2 3 0.506 0.104
5 2 2 3 1 0.393 0
6 2 3 1 2 0.701 0.268
7 3 1 3 2 1 0.702
8 3 2 1 3 0.861 0.769
9 3 3 2 1 0.851 1
Table VIII
Normalised S/N values of Mg SicP 20%
CONTROL FACTORS
EXP.NO NORMALISED S/N RATIO
A B C D MRR(mm³/sec) RA(µm)
1 1 1 1 1 0.116 0
2 1 2 2 2 0.378 0.301
3 1 3 3 3 0 0.407
4 2 1 2 3 0.598 0.643
5 2 2 3 1 0.400 1
6 2 3 1 2 0.727 0.791
7 3 1 3 2 0.781 0.275
8 3 2 1 3 1 0.537
9 3 3 2 1 0.886 0.393
3.3 To find grey relational coefficient Where ξ is the distinguishing coefficient, which is defined in
The grey relational coefficient is calculated to the range 0≤ ξ ≤1. The WEDM process parameters are equally
express the relationship between the ideal (best) and actual weighted in this study, and therefore ζ is 0.5
normalized experimental results. The grey relational 3.4 To find grey relational grade
coefficient can be expressed as The grey relational grade is determined by averaging
the grey relational coefficient corresponding to each
( ) performance characteristic. The overall performance
Where j = 1, 2...n; k = 1, 2...m, n is the number of characteristic of the multiple response process depends on the
experimental data items and m is the number of responses. yo calculated grey relational grade. This approach converts a
(k) is the reference sequence (yo(k) = 1,k=1,2...m); yj(k) is the multiple response process optimization problem into a single
specific comparison sequence. response optimization situation with the objective function of
∆oj = || yo(k) - yi(k) || = the absolute value of the difference an overall grey relational grade. Table shows the grey relation
between yo(k) and yj (k). coefficient and grey relational grade for each experiment using
∆ Min = min min || yo(k) - yi(k) || is the smallest value of the L9 orthogonal array. The higher grey relational grade
yj(k). reveals that the corresponding experimental result is closer to
∆ Max = max max || yo(k) - yi(k) || is the largest value of the ideally normalized value.
yj(k).
Table IX
Grey relational co-efficient and grey relational grade of Mg SicP 10%
Grey
Control factors
Grey relational co-efficient grade
Exp.no NO
A B C D MRR(mm³/sec) RA(µm)
UNIT
1
1 1 1 1 1 0.053 0.6185
1
2 2 2 2 0.833 0.693 0.397
1
3 3 3 3 0.724 0.794 0.395
2
4 1 2 3 0.494 0.896 0.430
2
5 2 3 1 0.607 1 0.392
2
6 3 1 2 0.291 0.732 0.518
3
7 1 3 2 0 0.298 0.813
3
8 2 1 3 0.139 0.231 0.7325
3 1
9 3 2 0.149 0 0.885
Table X
Grey relational co-efficient and grey relational grade of Mg SicP 20%
GREY
CONTROL FACTORS
Grey relational coefficient GRADE
EXP.NO
A B C D MRR(mm³/sec) RA(µm) NO UNIT
1
1 1 1 1 0.884 1 0.347
1
2 2 2 2 0.622 0.699 0.431
1
3 3 3 3 1 0.593 0.395
2
4 1 2 3 0.402 0.357 0.568
2
5 2 3 1 0.6 0 0.727
2
6 3 1 2 0.273 0.281 0.643
3
7 1 3 2 0.219 0.725 0.551
3
8 2 1 3 0 0.463 0.759
3 1
9 3 2 0.114 0.607 0.6850
Fig. 4 . Graph for grey relational grades for maximum MRR , minimum Ra for Mg SicP 10%
Fig. 5 . Graph for grey relational grades for maximum MRR , minimum Ra for pure Mg SicP 20%
3.5 To find optimum levels of the factors respectively. The mean of the grey relational grade for each
Since the experimental design is orthogonal, it is level of the other machining parameters can be computed in a
possible to separate out the effect of each machining similar manner. The mean of the grey relational grade for each
parameter on the grey relational grade at different levels as the level of the machining parameters is summarized and shown
mean of the grey relational grade for the gap voltage at levels in Tables
1, 2 and 3 can be calculated by averaging the grey relational
grade for the experiments 1 to 3, 4 to 6, and 7 to 9,
Table XI
The main effects of the factors on the grey relational grade for Mg SicP 10%
SYMBOL CONTROL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
FACTORS
The optimal factor and its level combination are determined machining parameters for the multiple performance
by the grey relational grade graph. Basically, the larger the characteristics still needs to be known, so that the optimal
grey relational grade, the better is the multiple performance combinations of the machining
characteristic. However, the relative importance among the
The optimal factor setting obtained for the Mg SicP 10%from the graphs and table are (speed – 1500 rpm) , (feed – 0.5 mm/min)
, (pulse on – 124 µs ) , (pulse off – 44 µs).
The optimal factor setting obtained for the Mg SicP 20% from the graphs and table are (speed – 1500 rpm) , (feed – 0.6
mm/min) , (pulse on – 124 µs ) , (pulse off – 46 µs).
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION For Mg SicP20% the optimal value from the L9
The confirmation test for the optimal parameter orthogonal array is (EX. NO 6) with (speed – 1500 rpm) ,
setting with its selected levels was conducted to evaluate the (feed – 0.6 mm/min) , (pulse on – 124 µs ) , (pulse off – 46
quality characteristics for WEDM of Mg SicP10% & Mg µs). were as the optimal value obtained from the Grey theory
SicP20% . design is (speed – 1500 rpm) , (feed – 0.6 mm/min) , (pulse on
For Mg SicP10% the optimal value from the L9 – 120 µs ) , (pulse off – 46 µs) .
orthogonal array is (EX. NO 7) with (speed – 1500 rpm) , Hence a confirmation experiment is conducted to
(feed – 0.7 mm/min) , (pulse on – 124 µs ) , (pulse off – 42 find the improvements in the process and is as shown below
µs) .were as the optimal value obtained from the Grey theory
design is (speed – 1500 rpm) , (feed – 0.6 mm/min) , (pulse on
– 124 µs ) , (pulse off – 42 µs) .
Table XIII
Optimal process parameters
MRR
Error
FACTOR LEVEL RA(µm)
MATERIAL
(mm³/sec) %
Mg SicP10% 10.35
Grey theory design A3B2C2D1 7.93 4.234
Mg SicP20% 13
Grey theory design A3B1C2D3 7.74 4.102
Above table shows that the significant machining Analysis for the Wire Cut EDM of Mg SicP10% include
parameters for performance measures surface roughness in (speed – 1500 rpm) , (feed – 0.5
the WEDM process. Factors like speed, feed, Time on and
Time off have been found to play a significant role for mm/min) , (pulse on – 124 µs ) , (pulse off – 44 µs).
MRR and surface roughness. Taguchi‟s method is used to
obtain optimum parameters combination for maximization 2. The optimal process parameters based on Grey Relational
of surface roughness. The conformation experiments were Analysis for the Wire Cut EDM of Mg SicP20% include
conducted to evaluate the result predicted from Taguchi (speed – 1500 rpm) , (feed – 0.6
Optimization.
mm/min) , (pulse on – 124 µs ) , (pulse off – 46 µs).
CONCLUSION
In this project, an application of combined Taguchi 3. While applying the Grey Taguchi method, The Material
Method and Grey Relational Analysis, to improve the multi- Removal Rate
response characteristics of MRR (Material Removal Rate),
Surface roughness in the Wire-Cut EDM (Electrical Discharge Shows an increased value of 7.28 (mm³/sec) to 7.93
Machining) of Mg SicP10% & Mg SicP20% has been done. As (mm³/sec) . Thus, it can be concluded that the Grey
a result, this method greatly simplifies the optimization of Taguchi Method, is suitable for the parametric
complicated multiple performance characteristics and since it optimization of the Wire Cut EDM process, when using
does not involve complicated mathematical computations, this the multiple performance characteristics such as MRR
can be easily utilized by the Manufacturing world. (Material Removal Rate), Surface Roughness for
1. The optimal process parameters based on Grey Relational machining the Mg SicP10% & Mg SicP20%.
REFERENCES
[1] Mr.N Neera Sharma et al.,(2013) explained “modelling and multi
response optimization on WEDM for HSLA by RSM”. International
Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Vol. 3, Issue. 3, May.-
June. 2013 pp-1645-1648
[2] Mr.C.Gao et al.,(2012) demonstrates “research on WEDM process
optimization for PCD micro milling tool” International Journal of
Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 2, Issue 12, December
2012 1 ISSN 2250-3153.
[3] Mr. D.Kamal jangra v et al .,(2013) explained that” optimization of
multi machining characteristics in wedm of WC-5.3%Co composite
using integrated approach of taguchi method” International Journal of
Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 3, March 2013 1
ISSN 2250-3153
[4] Mr.H Muthu Kumar v et al. (2010) demonstrates “ optimization of
Wire Electrical Discharge Machining process parameters of Incoloy800
super alloy”
[5] Mr. D.Saurav Datta v et al.(2010) demonstrates “Modeling, simulation
and parametric optimization of wire EDM process using response
surface methodology coupled with grey-Taguchi technique”
International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology Vol. 2,
No. 5, 2010, pp. 162-183.
[6] Mr. kuo-Wei Lin, Che-Chung Wang (2010), Optimizing Multiple
Quality Characteristics of Wire Electrical Discharge Machining via
Taguchi method-based Gray analysis for Magnesium Alloy. Journal of
C.C.I.T., VOL.39, NO.1, May 2010 [10]
[7] Mr. kamal Jangra, Sandeep Grover and Aman Agarwal (2011)
Simultaneous optimization of material removal rate and surface
roughness for WEDM of WCCo composite using grey relational
analysis along with Taguchi method, International Journal of Industrial
Engineering Computations 2 (2011) 479–490.
[8] Mr. H. Singh, R. Garg (2009) Effects of process parameters on material
removal rate in WEDM, Journal of achievements in material and
manufacturing engineering, Volume 32, Issue.
[9] Mr. Mohd Amri Lajis, H.C.D. Mohd Radzi, A.K.M. Nurul Amin (2009)
The Implementation of Taguchi Method on EDM Process of Tungsten
Carbide. European Journal of Scientific Research, ISSN 1450-216X
Vol.26 No.4 (2009), pp.609-617
[10] Rao, R. V. and Pawar, P. J. Modelling and optimization of process
parameters of wire electrical discharge machining. Proc IMechE, Part B:
J. Engng Manufact., 2009, 233, 1431–1440.