You are on page 1of 6

Chief Editor

Dr. A. Singaraj, M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D.

Managing Editor
Mrs.M.Josephin Immaculate Ruba

EDITORIAL ADVISORS ISSN (Online): 2455-7838


1. Prof. Dr.Said I.Shalaby, MD,Ph.D.
Professor & Vice President   SJIF Impact Factor : 8.013
Tropical Medicine, ISI I.F. Value : 1.241
Hepatology & Gastroenterology, NRC,
Academy of Scientific Research and Technology,
DOI : 10.36713/epra2016
Cairo, Egypt.
2. Dr. Mussie T. Tessema,  
Associate Professor, EPRA International Journal of
Department of Business Administration,
Winona State University, MN, 
United States of America,
3. Dr. Mengsteab Tesfayohannes,
Research &
Associate Professor,
Department of Management,
Sigmund Weis School of Business,
Development
Susquehanna University, (IJRD)
Selinsgrove, PENN,
 United States of America, Monthly Peer Reviewed & Indexed
4. Dr. Ahmed Sebihi
International Online Journal
Associate Professor
Islamic Culture and Social Sciences (ICSS),
Department of General Education (DGE),  
Gulf Medical University (GMU), Volume: 6, Issue:5, May 2021
UAE.
5. Dr. Anne Maduka,
Assistant Professor,  Indexed By:
Department of Economics,
Anambra State University,
Igbariam Campus, 
Nigeria.
6. Dr. D.K. Awasthi, M.SC., Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Chemistry,
Sri J.N.P.G. College,
Charbagh, Lucknow,
Uttar Pradesh. India
7. Dr. Tirtharaj Bhoi,  M.A, Ph.D, 
Assistant Professor,
School of Social Science,
University of Jammu,
Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India.
8. Dr. Pradeep Kumar Choudhury, 
Assistant Professor,
Institute for Studies in Industrial Development, 
An ICSSR Research Institute,
New Delhi- 110070, India.
9. Dr. Gyanendra Awasthi, M.Sc., Ph.D., NET
Associate Professor & HOD
Department of Biochemistry,
Dolphin (PG) Institute of Biomedical & Natural Published By
Sciences, EPRA Publishing
Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
10. Dr. C. Satapathy, CC License
Director,
Amity Humanity Foundation,
Amity Business School, Bhubaneswar,
Orissa, India.
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016 ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
Volume: 6 | Issue: 5 | May 2021 - Peer Reviewed Journal

VOLLEYBALL PLAYERS' SKILL OUTPUT IN


RESPONSE TO PLYOMETRIC TRAINING

S. Senthil Kumaran1, P. Jenith2, A. Abdul Halik3, N. Kodeeswaran4


1 Director, Unicorn Fitness, Madurai, Tamilnadu, India.
2,3,4PhD, Research Scholar, Department of Physical Education, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore,
Tamilnadu.

ABSTRACT
The reasoning of this examination was to investigate the volleyball players' skill output in response to plyometric
training. To accomplish this reason for the investigation thirty school level young men volleyball players were
chosen from St.Britto Hr. Sec. School, Madurai, Tamilnadu, India were randomly chosen as subjects. Their age
ran in the middle of 13 and 16 years. The subjects were isolated into two groups specifically plyometric group and
control group. The plyometric group was exposed to plyometric preparing (for week by week three days monday,
wednesday, friday) at evening meeting for about six weeks. Spiking, Service and Passing was chosen as reliant
variable. After the assortment of fitting information, it was genuinely examined by utilizing paired’t’ test. The
degree of importance was set at 0.05. The consequence of the current examination showed that the plyometric
preparing has huge enhancement for spiking, administration and passing capacity of volleyball players.
KEYWORDS: Plyometric Training, Skill Performance Variables, Volleyball Players.

INTRODUCTION developments by utilizing both the normal flexible


Plyometric (otherwise called "ploys") is a sort parts of muscle and ligament and the stretch reflex.
of activity preparing intended to deliver quick, To successfully utilize plyometric as a feature of a
incredible developments, and improve the elements preparation program, it is essential to get: (1) the
of the sensory system, by and large to improve mechanics and physiology of plyometric work out,
execution in sports. Plyometric developments, in (2) standards of plyometric program plan and (3)
which a muscle is stacked and afterward contracted strategies for securely and adequately performing
in quick arrangement, utilize the strength, flexibility explicit plyometric works out. Plyometric include
and innervations of muscle and encompassing tissues power hopping, dull jumping and fast power creation.
to 23 bounce higher, run quicker, toss further, or hit At the point when your muscles unpredictably
more enthusiastically, contingent upon the ideal contract, or abbreviate, at that point quickly extend
preparing objective. Plyometric is utilized to speed and protract, they produce maximal force ideal for
up or power of solid constrictions, giving touchiness athletic circumstances. It is a quick development that
to an assortment of game explicit exercises. occurs over a brief period. Plyometric are ideal for
Plyometric has been appeared across the writing to be competitors or individuals hoping to improve strong
useful to an assortment of competitors. Advantages force, speed and strength (Baechle, 2008).
range from injury anticipation, power improvement Volleyball is a group activity where two
and run execution among others. Plyometric practice groups of six players are isolated by a net. Each
alludes to those exercises that empower a muscle to group attempts to score focuses by establishing a ball
arrive at maximal power in the briefest conceivable in the other group's court under coordinated
time. "Plyometric" is a mix of Greek words that in a guidelines. It has been a piece of the authority
real sense intends to expand estimation plyometric program of the Summer Olympic Games since 1964.
practice is a speedy, incredible development utilizing The total standards are broad. Be that as it may, just,
a pre-stretch or counter development, which includes play continues as follows: a player in one of the
the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC). The reason for groups starts a 'rally' by serving the ball (throwing or
plyometric practice is to build the force of resulting delivering it and afterward hitting it with a hand or

2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016 | www.eprajournals.com |176 |


SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016 ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
Volume: 6 | Issue: 5 | May 2021 - Peer Reviewed Journal

arm), from behind the back limit line of the court, men volleyball players were chosen from St.Britto
over the net, and into the accepting group's court. As Hr. Sec. School, Madurai, Tamilnadu, India were
volleyball match-up includes a greater amount of randomly chosen as subjects. Their age ran in the
expertise execution. Which construct the parts for the middle of 13 and 16 years. The subjects were isolated
game, as an exploration researcher extraordinary into two groups specifically plyometric group and
arranged plyometric preparing program for the school control group. The plyometric group was exposed to
level young men volleyball players (Holyoke, plyometric preparing (for week by week three days
1985). monday, wednesday, friday) at evening meeting for
about six weeks. Spiking, Service and Passing was
METHODOLOGY chosen as reliant variable. After the assortment of
The reasoning of this examination was to fitting information, it was genuinely examined by
investigate the volleyball players' skill output in utilizing paired’t’ test. The degree of importance was
response to plyometric training. To accomplish this set at 0.05.
reason for the investigation thirty school level young

Table-I
Criterion Measures
Skill Performance Variables
Variables Test Items Unit of Measurement
Helman Volleyball Test
Spiking (Wall Spike Test) Points
Russell Lange Volleyball Test
Service (Serving Test) Points
Helman Volleyball Test
Passing (Wall Pass Test) Points

TRAINING PROTOCOL subjects went through their preparation programs


For plyometric group went through their according to the time tables; for example, side to side
preparation program as three days out of each week lower leg bounces, twofold leg jumps, split hops,
for about six weeks. Preparing was given in the sidelong cone jumps and single leg bouncing under
evening meeting. The instructional course the severe management of the examiner. During test
incorporates warm up and cool down. Consistently period control bunch didn't take an interest in any of
the exercise went on for 45 to an hour roughly. The the unique preparing.

RESULTS
Table-II
Comparison of Mean, and‘t’-Values of Skill Performance Variables between
Pre & Post Test among Plyometric and Control Groups

Performance
S. No Groups Test Mean ‘t’ Values
variables
Pre Test 21.86
Plyometric group 10.42*
Post Test 25.60
1. Spiking
Pre Test 19.13
Control group 1.32
Post Test 21.26
Pre Test 31.60
Plyometric group 13.46*
2. Post Test 39.53
Service
Pre Test 30.46
Control group 0.18
Post Test 30.53
Pre Test 20.73
Plyometric group 11.21*
Post Test 25.06
3. Passing
Pre Test 19.53
Control group 0.64
Post Test 19.33
*Significant at 0.05 level of confidence

2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016 | www.eprajournals.com |177 |


SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016 ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
Volume: 6 | Issue: 5 | May 2021 - Peer Reviewed Journal

Table-II reveals that the obtained mean group were 19.13 and 21.26, 30.46 and 30.53, 19.53
values of per test and post test of plyometric group and 19.33 respectively, the obtained‘t’ ratio was 1.32,
for spiking, service and passing were 21.86 and 0.18 and 0.64. The required table value is 2.14 at
25.60, 31.60 and 39.53, 20.73 and 25.06 respectively; 0.05 level of confidence for the degree of freedom
the obtained ‘t’ ratio were 10.42*, 13.46* and 11.21* 14. The calculated‘t’ ratio was lesser than the table
respectively. The tabulated‘t’ value is 2.14 at 0.05 value. It is found to be insignificant changes in
level of confidence for the degree of freedom 14. The spiking, service and passing of the volleyball players.
calculated‘t’ ratio was greater than the table value. It The mean values of skill performance variables
is found to be significant change in spiking, service among plyometric group and control group are
and passing of the volleyball players. The obtained graphically represented in figure-1.
mean values of pre test and post test scores of control

39.53
40
31.6 30.46 30.53
30 25.6 25.06
21.86 21.26 20.73
19.13 19.53 19.33
20

10
PRE
0
POST

Figure-1: Bar Diagram Showing the Pre Test and Post Test on Skill Performance Variables of
Plyometric and Control Groups

DISCUSSION ON FINDINGS
The results of the study indicated that the skill CONCLUSION
performances variables such as spiking, passing and Based on the findings and within the limitation of the
service were improved significantly after undergoing study
plyometric training. The changes in the selected 1. It was noticed that practice of plyometric
parameters were attributed the proper planning, training helped to improve skill performance
preparation and execution of the training package variables of school level boys volleyball
given to the players. The findings of the present study players.
had similarity with the findings of Annadurai 2. It was also seen that there is progressive
(2014), S Senthil kumaran (2018), Veeramani improvement in the selected criterion
(2015), The results of the present study indicates that variables of experimental group of school
the plyometric training methods is appropriate level boys volleyball players after six weeks
protocol to improve spiking, passing and service of of plyometric training programme.
school level boys volleyball players. From the result 3. Further, it also helps to improve skill
of the present study it is very clear that the skill performance variables spiking, service and
performances variables such as spiking, passing and passing.
service improvement significantly due to plyometric
training.

2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016 | www.eprajournals.com |178 |


SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016 ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
Volume: 6 | Issue: 5 | May 2021 - Peer Reviewed Journal

REFERENCES
1. S Senthil Kumaran. Impacts of plyometric
training on selected physical fitness variables
among basketball players, International Journal
of Yoga, Physiotherapy and Physical Education.
2018; 3(4): 52-54.
2. Annadurai R (2014) Effect of swiss ball and
plyometric training programme on selected
physical variables and skill performance of inter
collegiate men volleyball players. Academic
Sports Scholar, Volume. 3, Issue. 5.
3. D.Bala Krishna (2016), Effects of skill training
and plyometric training on selected skill
performance variable (service) among school
volleyball players International Journal of
Physical Education, Sports and Health Vol. 3
Issue 2, Part D.
4. P.Selvakumar and Dr. G Palanisamy (2017),
Effect of strength and plyometric training on
selected skill performance variables of male
volleyball players International Journal of
Physical Education, Sports and Health, Vol. 4
Issue 3, Part B.
5. R.Varathan (2018), Effect of plyometric training
on speed, speed endurance and agility of
sedentary college men. International Journal of
Physical Education, Sports and Health, Vol. 5
Issue 2, Part B.
6. Veeramani (2015) Effect on package of low
impact plyometric exercise on selected
performance related fitness variables among
volleyball players. International Journal of
Physical Education, Volume. 2(1), pp. 20-22.
7. Vladan et al., (2008) The Effect of plyometric
training on the explosive strength of leg muscles
of volleyball players on single foot and two-foot
takeoff jumps series. Physical Education and
Sport, Volume. 6, pp. 169 -179.

2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016 | www.eprajournals.com |179 |

You might also like