Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Learning Material
Fundamentals of Outcome-based
Curriculum in Engineering
Education
MODULE–1: Introduction to Curriculum Development in
Engineering Education
Unit 1.4: Approaches to Curriculum Design
Dr. V.H.Radhakrishnan
Professor of Curriculum Development ( Engg. Related Fields),
National Institute of Technical Teachers’ Training Research,
Shamla Hills, Bhopal M.P.INDIA 462002
Course Name: Fundamentals of Outcome-based Curriculum in Engineering Education
Unit 1.4 Approaches to Curriculum Design
UNIT 1.4
Unit Outcomes: After studying this unit you will be able to:
1. Explain the salient features of the some of the approaches to curriculum development.
2. Choose a suitable approach to design an engineering curriculum.
1.4.1 INTRODUCTION
From the review of literature, it is noted that different philosophical approaches have been
discussed by curriculum experts and educationists, which reflect traditional values of higher
education system, beliefs on the needs and understanding of how students construct their
learning and relevance to the requirements of knowledge and performance and
understanding of social and environmental aspects.
In this unit some approaches to curriculum design are briefly discussed, though they
are not discrete as we all know that engineering programme curricula are not always
coherent. The importance and values attached in the curricula are normally reflected
through the objectives/outcomes specified, time and weight allocated to different
courses/topics, opportunities provided to students for learning activities and assessment
aspects.
The broad approaches to curriculum design include Humanistic Approach,
Discipline-based Approach, Analytic or Systems Approach, social demand approach and
Futuristic Approach, which are not necessarily mutually exclusive. An approach need to
be adopted or formulated depending upon the broad aims/goals of education. Some of
these approaches are briefly discussed in this unit.
courses are derived and decided rationally based upon a structured body of knowledge in
the discipline. The philosophy of such an approach is believed to be around the received
body of disciplines specific knowledge and knowable structures. The curriculum is organized
around separate specific subjects or disciplines. Therefore 'discipline' in the context of
'curriculum' shall have definite meaning to understand it better.
The discipline is an organized body of knowledge and there is a logical order in the
structure of knowledge within the discipline. The body of knowledge in the discipline is the
key to learning of students. The term ‘discipline-based’ covers the range of
interconnectedness and derivative subjects or fields of study, both, the more traditional and
the newer areas. Typical examples of discipline/subject-based approach may be found in the
procedures used in developing curricula through various national curriculum projects in
subject areas like physics, mathematics/ biology and even for postgraduate studies of basic
sciences in many countries. It is seen as an organised body of knowledge in many areas like
sciences, technology disciplines, medicine, law, history and others.
The structure of concepts and principles in the body of knowledge in areas/subjects like
physical science, mechanics of structures, fluid mechanics are characterized by
interconnectedness and derivations that make linkage of one idea with the other. At the
same time there are areas and subjects of study those by themselves are not disciplines as
per the above meaning of disciplines e.g. Electrical Wiring, Estimating and Costing, Steel
Structures, Composite Blocks etc.
Topics covered are mostly represent the breadth of the discipline, the depth is
normally not given much weight and content in the topics generally are logically placed with
appropriate sequencing. The problem here is to decide what should be included and what
should be left out. Figure 1.4.2 depicts a typical model to develop the curriculum based on
the subject based approach and the feedback taken at all stages to fine tune the curriculum
development. The emphasis is on identifying "organised bodies of knowledge" and inclusion
of those into curriculum. Critique also points out that keeping an extreme view that areas of
study which are not considered as 'discipline' are not suitable for instruction may not be
correct, as instruction in the 'discipline' alone will not establish the relationship within and
with other disciplines or with real life work problems and jobs.
The approach is built around the conceptual clusters of the discipline that constitute
the work of people in the specific discipline. It is a kind of "product" oriented approach of
curriculum development". Learners must have frequent and recurring opportunities to
practice their disciplinary skills throughout their fields of study in a way that allows later
courses to build on the work of earlier ones. The discipline-based curriculum tends to be
specific, current, and covering information and skills as it emerges from the discipline
experts. A discipline-based curriculum approach characterizes teaching practice within one
subject and encourages teachers for specialization in the subjects related to the discipline.
This kind of approach does not necessarily give importance to the social issues, interest of
individuals and their learning requirements.
System: Shrode and Voich (i) define a 'system' as "A set of interrelated parts,
working independently and jointly, in pursuit of common objectives of the whole,
within a complex environment".
In general systems theory, a system is any collection of interrelated component parts
or elements that together constitute a larger whole. These component parts, or elements of
the system are intimately linked with one another, either directly or indirectly, and any
change in one or more elements may affect the overall performance of the system, either
beneficially or adversely.
B Output
Input to
a System A C from a
System
D
FEEDBACK
One of the important feature of the systems’ approach is its output orientation,
as a product/s. In the context of curriculum development, from systems' point of view,
the analysis of these products of the system is the basis for determining the quantity,
quality of different inputs, their mix and the transformation process needed for
producing the expected output with value addition. "System analysis" as a tool is used
in this approach for curriculum design.
It is important to know the other characteristics of ‘system’, apart from product
orientation. These are:
Figure 1.4.5 depicts a typical simple diagram to design and develop the curriculum
from system's point of view. Model consists of subsystems such as identification of needs,
formulation of objectives, selection and organization of content, which are interdependent
and interrelated. Applying the concept of systems/analytic approach, each subsystem can
be analyzed further into elements. Consider the analysis of subsystem of 'identification of
needs'. The input to such sub system could be Govt. policy manpower demand, job
functions performed by engineers, socio economic environmental issues, Industrial
service sector growth and so on.
Figure 1.4.5 A Model for curriculum Design and Development- System's View
The processes would involve needs assessment through surveys, search conferences,
interviews and identifying future developments trends/ forecasting of changes in
technology role of engineers by expert teams/curriculum teams. The expected output from
such an analysis would contain activity profile of engineers, competency identified, job
description of engineers, personal development needs, professional growth needs and
needs related to social and environmental aspects. Similarly all sub systems can be analyzed
for obtaining that subsystem related outputs. The output of any subsystem, as a result will
be input for one or more subsequent subsystems.
Based on the valid and reliable information and data, considered decisions by the
groups working on curriculum would produce a draft document containing all the above or
some of the above major components. It would be appropriate and justifiable to try out
such a plan on a select institutions containing above aspects/ components to take corrective
measures and refinements before large scale implementation.
It would be more practical to visualize the model that as a part whole system of total
technical education, the major objective/aim of which is to provide technical manpower of
the right kind, and of right quality and quantity for the development of country. The
systems’ approach is also common with state universities / some boards of technical
education, where large masses of students are to be educated. The content normally is not
influenced by teachers or by students’ interests. It is derived from the analysis of needs and
required practices in the profession. But there seems a logical question to the systems’
approach when used for curriculum design. While analyzing subsystem /system the
possibility of absence of data or distortions of data-intended or otherwise leading to the
decisions based on inadequate or partially incorrect data cannot be ruled out. Under
such conditions is it possible to precisely predict or define the quantitative/qualitative
characteristics of the expected output/product by analyzing the output?
Competency based curriculum and skill-based curriculum are some examples of such
an approach. All aspects of teaching -learning and assessment are more inclined towards
application and demonstration of performance as expected of students when they join the
world of work. The assessment of student's achievement is expected to be based on
performance criteria.
it job/trade specific approach. For instance, the most recent example is the curriculum for
‘bachelor’s in vocational education’ and ‘diploma in vocational education’ announced by
AICTE can be considered under this approach.
Other typical examples of this approach are also found on analysing the curricula of
training programmes of ‘finishing schools’ around the country which are designed to
improve the employability levels of specific groups of people. Short-term training
programmes to meet the industrial and military needs are also examples of this type of
curricular approach.
******
REFERENCES, BIBLIOGRAPHY AND FURTHER READINGS
[1] Balu S.A. (1983) Overview of Curriculum Design and Development- CPSC Course Module-Course in
Technician Curriculum Design, and Evaluation Process- 83/106 /1983)
[2] Banthiya N.K.et.al., (1999) Module -7 "Develop Curriculum for a subject/ programme"-' A
competency- based self- learning module' REC-British Council Project July 1999 coordinated
authored by a team led by Dr . N.K.Banthiya et.al. Technical Teachers' Training Institute (TTTI)-Bhopal,
Publication,
[3] Colombo Plan Staff College for Technician Education (1989) - 'Aspects of Curriculum for Technician
Education', CPSC publication 1989 ,MIA D 3120 Philippines
[4] Jain K.K. and Radhakrishnan V.H. (2014) " Identification of labour market oriented abilities for
curriculum of a diploma programme: industry perspective-a case in India" International Journal of
Business and Management Studies, CD-ROM. ISSN: 2158-1479 :: 03(03):329–339 (2014) Copyright c
2014 by University Publications.net
[5] Heywood John, Engineering Education -Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction IEEE
Press Willey –Interscience
[6] Radhakrishnan V.H. and Jain K.K. (2017) "outcome based curriculum of diploma programmes in the
state of Gujarat: implications with respect to Implementation and assessment" Journal of Teaching
and Education, CD-ROM. ISSN: 2165-6266 :: 07(01):393–406 (2017)
[7] Radhakrishnan V.H. and Earnest, Joshua (1997) ; "A snap study to ascertain the labour market
orientation of the skills required of technicians as listed by curriculum development centre of the
state of Gujarat"- a report May 1997 TTTI Bhopal
[8] Radhakrishnan V.H. (2013) : Power point Presentation and video progranmme on " Syllabus,
Curriculum and Implementation Aspects" , NITTTR Bhopal Production Nov. 2013
[9] Radhakrishnan V.H.: " PPT on Approaches to Curriculum Development" NITTTR Bhopal 2009
[10] Radhakrishnan V.H. (2013) : "Employability and curricular Interventions in Technical Education "-
Journal of Engineering, Science and Management education-Vol. (6) III 145-154, 2013
[11] Radhakrishnan V.H. (2013) : “Revised PPT on Curriculum implementation - System's View NITTTR
Bhopal 2013.
[12] Radhakrishnan V.H. (2004) : Handout- Resource material on “quality learning in the context of
effective curriculum implementation" March, 2004,NITTTR Bhopal
[13] Radhakrishnan V.H. (2015) : PPT notes on "Curriculum Framework -Curriculum Development
Methodology” in a National Workshop on Innovations in Curriculum, Teaching and Instruction for
Teachers of Professional and Technical Institutions Organized by CEDBEC, Christ University,
Bengaluru 4-6 the March 2015
[14] Smith, M. K. (1996, 2000) 'Curriculum theory and practice' the encyclopedia of informal education,
www.infed.org/biblio/b-curric.htm, last updated 4th Dec 2007, accessed on 12.12.2007 and 02.10
2018.
[15] Susan Toohey (1999) , “Designing courses in Higher Education , -'The society for Research into Higher
Education Open University Press 1999.
[16] Taba, H. (1962) Curriculum Development: Theory and practice, New York: Harcourt Brace and World.
[17] Tyler, R. W. (1949) Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
******