Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Digital Object Identifier: Xiaoming Dai and Zhenyu Zhang are with the University of Science and Technology Beijing; Baoming Bai is with Xidian University;
10.1109/MWC.2018.1700084 Shanzhi Chen and Shaohui Sun are with the China Academy of Telecommunications Technology.
⎡ x
1
⎤ We compute the CC sum-rates of pattern
⎡ h11 h12 h13 ⎤ ⎡ 1 2 0 ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎡ n1 ⎤
y=⎢ ⎥⊙⎢ ⎥ ⎢ x2 ⎥+⎢ ⎥. matrices S(2×3)
dm and S(4×6)
dm as shown in Fig.
⎢⎣ h21 h22 h23 ⎥ ⎢ 1
⎦ ⎣ 0 2 ⎥⎦ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢⎣ n2 ⎥⎦ 3, where the CC sum capacity of OMA is also
⎢⎣ x3 ⎥⎦
depicted for comparison. We can ascertain that
(1)
⎡ h x + h 2x ⎤ ⎡ n ⎤ all PDMA matrices can achieve a maximum sum-
⎢ 11 1 12
=Utilizing
2 ⎥
+⎢
1
⎥.
⎢ h x + hthe2 xchain
⎥ ⎢ rule
n2 ⎥ from the information rate of 3 b/s/Hz in the high signal-to-noise ratio
21 1 23 3 ⎣
theory,
⎣ we can express⎦ the⎦ sum of the CC capac- (SNR) regime, indicating a 50 percent throughput
ity as follows: increase compared with the conventional OMA (2×3)
scheme. The average CC sum-rate of the S dm
I (x, y) = I(x1 : y) + I(x2 : yx1) + I(x3 : yx1, x2), (2) is only 3 percent less than that of the S(4×6) in
dm
the low- and intermediate-SNR range due to less
where I (x, y) = H (y) − H (y x1 ), H (y) average diversity order of users.
1 For PDMA with pattern matrices S(2×3)dm and
=− ∫ p(y)log2 d y, p(y) = 3
Xk
∑ p(y x), S(4×6)
dm , we have d f = 2 and d f = 4, respective-
∏ k=1 x ly. The computational complexity of PDMA with
S(2×3)
dm is O(X2) compared with O(X4) of the
and XK denotes the size of modulation order PDMA with S(4×6)dm . Although the PDMA with
of the kth user, which is assumed to be 4 (i.e., S(4×6)
dm achieves slightly higher CC sum-rate than
quadrature phase shift keying [QPSK] constella- the PDMA with S(2×3)dm
, its computational com-
tion is considered) for all users in this article with- plexity is about 16 times higher for MUD when
Hard
decision
LLRs LLRs
y in out
BP based Channel
MUD decoder 10-1
BLER
A priori
LLR -
Constellation + Outer-it = 0
probability Outer-it = 1
calculator 10-2 Outer-it = 2
Extrinsic LLR: log-likelihood ratio Outer-it = 3
LLRs
2 4 6 8 10 12
SNR (dB)
FIGURE 2. Turbo BP receiver structure for the PDMA and its performance.
CC sum-rate (b/s/Hz)
is beneficial for initi 10-1
2
ating the convergence
BLER
of the iterative detec- 1.5 10-2 PDMA, 150%
(46)
tion, especially for the PDMA with Sdm PDMA, 233%
PDMA with Sdm(23) PDMA, 300%
most difficult 1 OFDMA
Conventional OMA 10-3
equi-powered 0 5 10 15 20 25
-2 0 2 4 6
case. SNR (dB) SNR (dB)
FIGURE 3. Comparison of CC sum-rate of the FIGURE 4. BLER performance of the PDMA with
PDMA scheme and the OMA scheme. different overload factors in the uplink.
QPSK is employed; thus, it is less attractive for ments N = 2, 3, and 4, the maximum overload
practical applications. Therefore, a PDMA scheme factor can be 150, 233, and 375 percent, respec-
with pattern matrix S(2×3)
dm achieves an attractive tively. Therefore, by varying N, we can accommo-
performance-complexity tradeoff to realize the date a flexible overload for versatile applications.
required overload of 150 percent. We evaluated the performance of the PDMA
via a link-level simulation. The ITU Urban Macro
C -C
omplexity onstrained apacity chieving C -A
(UMa) channel with a 2 GHz carrier frequency
NOMA D
esign rinciple P was adopted. The maximum Doppler frequency,
Assuming Gaussian MAC (GMAC), the sum-rate f d, was set to 5.55 Hz, which corresponds to 3
of the NOMA system can be expressed as km/h at the carrier frequency of 2 GHz. A perfect
channel state information is assumed. In all sce-
1 ⎡ ⎛ 1 H⎞
⎤ narios, QPSK was employed, and the maximum
Rsum = log ⎢det ⎜ I + 2 SS ⎟⎥.
N ⎣ ⎝ σ ⎠⎦ throughput of each user was assumed to be the
same. Figure 4 illustrates the curves of average
R sum achieves the upper bound of the GMAC BLER of all users of PDMA with the overload fac-
when SS H = KI. The BP-based receiver can tors 150, 233, and 300 percent (the first 12 col-
achieve near-perfect interference cancellation for umns of S(4×15)
dm ), respectively. The BLER results of
properly designed S and the associated computa- the OMA-based 4G system were also provided as
tional complexity is a baseline.
It is shown from Fig. 4 that the BLER perfor-
⎛ d max (s) ⎞ mance of the PDMA degrades as the overload
O⎜ X f ⎟
⎝ ⎠ factor increases in the intermediate SNR region.
As the SNR increases, the BLER performance of
[12]. Therefore, it is highly desirable to design that the PDMA approaches that of the 150 percent
fulfills: 1) SSH = KI and 2) exhibits low dfmax(s) as case, indicating a near-perfect interference cancel-
much as possible. We can thus rigorously summa- lation for PDMA even with a high overload. The
rize these two design targets as follows: maximum network throughput can be increased
by 200 percent (this is not shown due to space
min d max
f (S) constraints). The better performance of PDMA
s (3) over OFDMA is explained as follows: The PDMA
2
s.t. SS H = KI, d max
f (S) < K, s k = N.
users exhibit either better diversity order (for
those with df>1) or better frequency diversity than
The PDMA matrix provided in work exhibits that of OFDMA.2
good performance-complexity tradeoff as demon-
strated later. However, the approach to the com- R
obustness in attern ollision ases P C C
plexity-constrained capacity-achieving NOMA Machine type communications (MTC) are nor-
design defined in Eq. 3 still remains an open prob- mally battery powered, and low power con-
lem. sumption is essential for its implementation. The
excessive transmission delay and large signaling
PDMA for Massive Connectivity Applications overhead in the current scheduling-based grant
A key performance indicator (KPI) for 5G is the access mechanism are too expensive for low-cost
ability to support massive connectivity with a large MTC equipment. To address this issue, the con-
number of devices such as smartphones, tablet tention-based grant-free access can be applied
computers, and IoT devices. In this section, we to substantially reduce the transmission latency
first provide the link-level simulation of a PDMA and signaling overhead by eliminating the conven-
system with different overload factors. We then tional “request-and-grant” procedure. However,
carry out the system-level simulation to illustrate such an “arrive-and-send” mechanism will inevi-
2 We applied localized its advantages over conventional OMA schemes tably introduce collisions among users. It is thus
mapping for OFDMA since for massive connectivity applications. essential to design a multiple access scheme with
it closely resembles that tolerance to multi-user collisions, which can fortu-
of the localized mapping
DFT-spread OFDM. The
S F
upport of lexible and arge verload L O
nately be realized by the PDMA scheme due to
distributed-mapping of the For a PDMA system, the maximum overload fac- its convergence-amenable property.
PDMA thus exhibits better tor increases as the length of pattern N increases. In Fig. 5, we evaluate the link-level perfor-
frequency diversity. For the number of orthogonal radio resource ele- mance of PDMA with user pattern collision. The
60 a promising candidate
40 technique for 5G mul-
10-2 20
tiple access due to it
being able to triple the
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 0
1% outage 5% outage overall system through-
SNR (dB) System outage
put while keeping a
FIGURE 5. Performance of user collision. FIGURE 6. Number of supported users by PDMA link performance
and OFDMA under different outage probability close to orthogonal
ideal case is no user collision, while user collision constraints. transmissions.
happens when any two users randomly select the
same user pattern. It is shown in Fig. 5 that the loads and is thus suitable for diverse applications.
performance degradation due to pattern collision Furthermore, PDMA exhibits robust collision tol-
is about 0.25 dB at the BLER of 10 -2, which is erance and is amenable to grant-free scenarios,
acceptable for practical applications. which is essential for IoT applications. Numerical
results from link-level and system-level simulations
Support of Massive Connectivity in illustrate that PDMA is a promising candidate
Contention-Based Scenarios technique for 5G multiple access due to it being
In this subsection, we present a system-level sim- able to triple the overall system throughput while
ulation of the potential gains of PDMA over the keeping a link performance close to orthogonal
OFDMA scheme (currently used by 4G) in con- transmissions.
tention-based scenarios. We consider an applica-
tion scenario for small packet transmission with Acknowledgment
tight latency constraints. We employ a 19-hex- This research is supported by the China
agonal macrocell model with 3 sectors per cell. Mobile Research Institute with grant number
The cell radius of each macrocell is set to be R170001240.
500 m. The locations of the users are randomly References
assigned with uniform distribution. The system [1] L. Dai et al., “Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access for 5G: Solu-
bandwidth is set to 10 MHz, and the transmis- tions, Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Research Trends,”
sion power of the macrocell is 46 dBm. The IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 53, no. 9, Sept. 2015, pp. 74-81.
[2] T. Cover, “Broadcast Channels,” IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, vol.
antenna gains at the macrocell and user equip- 18, no. 1, Jan. 1972, pp. 2–14.
ment (UE) are 17 dBi and 0 dBi, respectively. [3] P. Wang, J. Xiao, and P. Li, “Comparison of Orthogonal and
The contention region is set to be 6 resource Non-Orthogonal Approaches to Future Wireless Cellular Sys-
block (RB) pairs. Uplink traffic for each user fol- tems,” IEEE Vehic. Tech. Mag., vol. 1, no. 3, Sept. 2006, pp. 4–11.
[4] S. Yuya et al., “Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA)
lows Poisson distribution with a mean packet for Cellular Future Radio Access,” Proc. IEEE VTC-Spring
inter-arrival time of 120 ms per user. The turbo 2013, May, 2013, pp. 1–5.
BP receiver is employed for PDMA, while a lin- [5] K. Higuchi and A. Benjebbour, “Non-Orthogonal Multiple
ear MMSE receiver is employed for OFDMA. Access (NOMA) with Successive Interference Cancellation
for Future Radio Access,” IEICE Trans. Commun., vol. E98-B,
The system performance is evaluated in terms no. 3, Mar. 2015, pp. 403–14.
of outage probability, where the system outage [6] B. Wang et al., “Spectrum and Energy Efficient Beamspace
is defined as the user’s packet drop rate being MIMO-NOMA for Millimeter- Wave Communications Using
larger than 1 or 5 percent. lens Antenna Array,” IEEE JSAC, vol. 35, no. 10, Oct. 2017,
pp. 2370–82.
Figure 6 illustrates that PDMA can support 116 [7] X. Dai et al. “Successive Interference Cancelation Amenable
users for system outage of 5 percent, while con- Multiple Access (SAMA) for Future Wireless Communica-
ventional OFDMA can only accommodate 46 tions,” Proc. IEEE ICCS, Nov. 12–15, 2014, pp. 222–26.
users; that is, about 1.5 times more users can be [8] S. Chen et al., “Pattern Division Multiple Access-A Novel
Nonorthogonal Multiple Access for Fifth-Generation Radio
supported by PDMA. For a system outage of 1 Networks,” IEEE Trans. Vehic. Tech., vol. 66, no. 4, Apr.
percent, PDMA is able to achieve a more prom- 2017, pp. 3185–96.
inent performance gain; that is, about 2.2 times [9] A. J. Viterbi, “Very Low Rate Convolutional Codes for Max-
more users can be accommodated by PDMA. imum Theoretical Performance of Spread-Spectrum Multi-
ple-Access Channels,” IEEE JSAC, vol. 8, no. 3, Mar. 1990,
Thus, PDMA demonstrates an obvious advantage pp. 641–649.
over OFDMA in terms of supported number of [10] N. Jindal and A. Goldsmith, “Dirty Paper Coding vs. TDMA
users while achieving the same system outage for MIMO Broadcast Channels,” IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, vol.
performance. 51, no. 7, May 2004, pp. 1783–94.
[11] X. Wang and H. V. Poor, “Iterative (Turbo) Soft-Interference
Conclusions Cancellation and Decoding for Coded CDMA,” IEEE Trans.
Commun., vol. 47, no. 7, July 1999, pp. 1046–61.
In this article, we first introduce the complexi- [12] F. R. Kschischang and B. J. Frey, “Iterative Decoding of
ty-constrained capacity-achieving NOMA design Compound Codes by Probability Propagation in Graphical
Models,” IEEE JSAC, vol. 16, no. 2, Feb. 1998, pp. 219–30.
principle. Then a new NOMA scheme named [13] G. Caire and S. Shamai (Shitz), “On the Achievable
PDMA was devised. The PDMA scheme is based Throughput of A Multi-Antenna Gaussian Broadcast Chan-
on a joint transmitter and receiver design that nel,” IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, vol. 49, no. 7, July 2003, pp.
facilitates low-complexity SIC-based MUD with 1691–1706.
[14] Z. Ding, P. Fan, and H. V. Poor, “Impact of User Pairing
substantially improved performance over con- on 5G Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Downlink Trans-
ventional OMA schemes. The PDMA scheme is missions,” IEEE Trans. Vehic. Tech., vol. 19, no. 8, 2015, pp.
flexibly designed to accommodate various over- 1462–65.