Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effects of Fibre Geometry and Volume Fraction On The Flexural Behavior of Steel-Fiber Reinforced Concrete
Effects of Fibre Geometry and Volume Fraction On The Flexural Behavior of Steel-Fiber Reinforced Concrete
ABSTRACT: This work aims in studying the mechanical behaviour of concrete, reinforced with steel
fibres of different geometry and volume fraction. Experiments include compression tests and four-
point bending tests. Slump and air content tests were performed on fresh concrete. The flexural
toughness, flexural strength and residual strength factors of the beam specimens were evaluated in
accordance with ASTM C1609/C1609M-05 standard. Improvement in the mechanical properties, in
particular the toughness, was observed with the increase of the volume fraction of steel-fibres in the
concrete. The fibre geometry was found to be a key factor affecting the mechanical performance of
the material.
KEY WORDS: fibre geometry, fibre volume fraction, fibre-reinforced concrete, flexural toughness,
four-point bending, steel-fibres
improved with increasing the fibre aspect ratio (i.e. Table 2: Mix proportions of concrete mixtures (kg m)3)
fibre length/fibre diameter ratio) and fibre volume
fraction [6]. Material Plain H0.5 H1 H1.5 W0.5 W1 W1.5
Next to the above, the ability of fibre-reinforced Cement II42.5 440 440 440 440 440 440 440
concrete composites to absorb energy has long been Water 220 220 220 220 220 220 220
recognised as one of the most important benefits of Sand 1225 1215 1205 1193 1215 1205 1193
the incorporation of fibres in plain concrete [15]. A Coarse 366 363 360 356 363 360 356
aggregate
concrete beam containing steel fibres suffers dam-
Superplasticizer 3 3.2 3.7 4 3.2 3.7 4
age by gradual development of single or multiple
Fibres – 39 79 118 39 79 118
cracks with increasing deflection, but retains some
Sum 2254 2280 2308 2331 2280 2308 2331
degree of structural integrity and post-crack resis-
tance even under considerable deflection. A similar
beam without steel fibres fails suddenly at a small
deflection by separation into two pieces [1]. Experiments
Experimental investigations have shown that the
increase of the volume fraction of steel fibres con- Characterization of fresh concrete
tributed to the enhancement of the flexural
Slump tests [19] and air content tests [20] were
toughness [16–18].
performed on all the fresh concrete mixtures. The
The present study investigates the effect of the
quantity of the superplasticizer was adjusted in
geometry and volume fraction of steel fibres on the
every mixture, in order to maintain the workabil-
compressive strength, the flexural strength and
ity of the fibre reinforced concretes at the same
toughness, as well as on the slump and air content
level.
properties of fresh concrete. Two different geometries
of steel fibres were used in this study. For each one of
the two geometries, three different volume fractions Compression testing
of fibres were selected.
Three cubic specimens of 150 · 150 · 150 mm in
size were prepared for each of the concrete mixtures.
Compression tests were conducted after 28 days of
Materials
concrete curing, on a compression testing machine
with maximum load of 2000 kN.
Two geometries of fibres, waved fibres and fibres with
hooked ends were used in this work. For each of the
two geometries, three different fibre volume fractions Four-point bending testing
were used in the concrete mixes; 0.5, 1, and 1.5% by
To establish the flexural toughness, the flexural
concrete volume. In total, seven different mixture
strength and the residual strength factors of the
compositions were prepared, one of which was plain,
beams, the ASTM C1609/C1609M-05 [21] standard
unreinforced, concrete. The properties of the fibres
was followed. The four-point bending tests were
are given in Table 1, and the mix proportions of the
conducted on beam specimens sized 100 ·
concrete mixtures are given in Table 2.
100 · 400 mm (three specimens for each concrete
The mixtures consisted of 23% coarse aggregates
mixture), with span length of 300 mm. The tests were
(maximum aggregate size was 10 mm) and 77% sand,
conducted on a servo-hydraulic Instron 8801
while water/cement ratio was 0.50.
machine with 100 kN maximum load. The loading
and support system was designed in accordance with
Table 1: Fibre properties ASTM C78-02 [22] and was capable of applying third
point loading to the specimen without eccentricity or
Mixture code Geometry Vf (%) d (mm) l (mm) l/d ratio torque. The displacement rate was 0.08 mm min)1
Plain – – – – – (see Figure 1A).
H0.5 Hooked ends 0.5 0.75 31 41 An accurate measurement of deflection is very
H1 Hooked ends 1 0.75 31 41 important to characterise the toughness of SFRC. In
H1.5 Hooked ends 1.5 0.75 31 41 flexural toughness tests of SFRC, it is common
W0.5 Waved 0.5 0.75 25 33 practice to measure the beam midpoint deflection
W1 Waved 1 0.75 25 33 between the tension face of the beam and a fixed
W1.5 Waved 1.5 0.75 25 33
reference on the machine crosshead. This method of
Vf, fibre volume fraction; l, fibre length; d, diameter; l/d, fibre aspect ratio. deflection measurement includes, in addition to the
(A)
25.4 mm min
d = L/3 = 100 mm
Specimen Load-applying
and support blocks
(B)
Load-applying and
support system Yoke
100 mm
Digital
deflectometer 300 mm
Figure 1: (A) Schematic of load applying support system, (B) four point bending test set-up
Table 5: Four-point bending tests results (mean values from three specimens)
Mixture Code P1 (N) f1 (MPa) PP (N) fP (MPa) P100,0.50 (N) f100,0.50 (MPa) P100,2.0 (N) f100,2.0 (MPa) T100,2.0 (J)
concrete, for each type of fibre geometry, is shown in Post-cracking load-deformation characteristics great-
the curves in Figure 3. As it is shown in Table 5 and ly depend on the choice of fibre geometry and the
Figure 3, the increase in volume fraction raises the volume percentage of the specific fibres used [2]. The
first-peak strength, the peak strength, the residual unreinforced concrete specimens failed catastrophi-
strength and especially the flexural toughness. Mix- cally by a single crack by separation into two pieces
tures with hooked-ended fibres (H0.5, H1, H1.5) (Figure 4A). On the contrary, the fibre-reinforced
present higher toughness and residual strength concrete specimens, even those with small Vf (0.5%),
(f100,0.50, f100,2.0) than mixtures with waved fibres retained post-cracking ability to carry the load (Fig-
(W0.5, W1, W1.5). On the contrary, mixtures W0.5, ure 4B). This behaviour of fibre concrete, leads to the
W1, W1.5 present higher first-peak strength and enhancement of energy absorption compared to
peak-strength compared to mixtures H0.5, H1, H1.5. unreinforced concrete.
Figure 5 shows the variation of the mean value of
(A) the specimen’s toughness T100, 2.0 for each concrete
mixture, as a function of the fibre volume fraction. It
(A)
(B)
(B)
9. Johnston, C. D. and Skarendahl, Å. (1992) Comparative 18. Khaloo, A. R. and Afshari, M. (2005) Flexural behaviour of
flexural performance evaluation of steel fibre-reinforced small steel fibre reinforced concrete slabs. Cem. Con.
concretes according to ASTM C1018 shows importance of Comp. 27, 141–149.
fibre parameters. Mater. Struct. 25, 191–200. 19. ASTM C 143/C 143M – 98. (1998) Standard Test Method for
10. Antonaci, P., Bocca, P. and Grazzini, A. (2006) In situ Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete. American Society for
determination of toughness indices of fibre reinforced Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.
concrete. Mater. Struct. 39, 283–290. 20. ASTM C231-97. (1997) Standard Test Method for air Content
11. Naaman, A. E. Optimized Geometries of fiber reinforce- of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method. American
ments of cement, ceramic and polymeric based compos- Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.
ites. US Patent No. 5,989,713, November 23, 1999. 21. ASTM C1609/C1609M-05. (2005) Standard Test Method for
12. Naaman, A. E. (2003) Engineered steel fibers with optimal Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using
properties for reinforcement of cement composites. Adv. Beam With Third-Point Loading). American Society for
Conc. Technol. 1, 241–252. Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.
13. Banthia, N. and Armelin, H. S. (2002) A novel double 22. ASTM C78-02. (2002) Standard Test Method for Flexural
anchored steel fiber for shotcrete. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 29, 58–63. Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam With Third-Point
14. Williamson, G. R. (1974) The Effect of Steel Fibers on the Loading). American Society for Testing and Materials, West
Compressive Strength of Concrete. American Concrete Insti- Conshohocken.
tute, Farmington Hills, Fiber Reinforced Concrete SP-44, 23. El-Shakra, Z. M. and Gopalaratnam, V. S. (1993) Deflec-
195–207. tion measurements and toughness evaluations for FRC.
15. Gopalaratnam, V. S. and Gettu, R. (1995) On the charac- Cem. Conc. Res. 23, 1455–1466.
terization of flexural toughness in fiber reinforced con- 24. ASTM C1018-97. (1997) Standard Test Method for Flexural
cretes. Cem. Con. Comp. 17, 239–254. Toughness and First-Crack Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Con-
16. Song, P. S. and Hwang, S. (2004) Mechanical properties of crete (Using Beam With Third-Point Loading). American
high strength steel fiber- reinforced concrete. Const. Buil. Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.
Mater. 18, 669–673.
17. Sukontasukkul, P. (2004) Toughness evaluation of steel
and polypropylene fibre reinforced concrete beams under
bending. Thammasat Int. J. Sc. Tech. 9, 35–41.