Professional Documents
Culture Documents
As well as presenting Rowe's ideas, I also deal with some theoretical issues. My
essay has sections on "Social Radicalism", "Aboriginals and Ecocentrism", "Forest
Ecology" and "Relationship to Deep Ecology." The full review is at:
http://home.ca.inter.net/~greenweb/Rowe.htm
***********
_Earth Alive: Essays On Ecology_, by Stan Rowe, NeWest Press, Edmonton, Alberta,
2006, 274 pages, paperback, ISBN: 13: 978-1-897126-03-5.
_Home Place: Essays on Ecology_, by Stan Rowe, NeWest Publishers Limited, Edmonton,
Alberta, 1990, 253 pages, paperback, ISBN: 0-920897-78-9.
....
Conclusion
I have tried to show that Stan Rowe was at the forefront of Canadian ecocentric
thinking. He is a treasure, like the late John Livingston, and both have helped so
many of us come to see the importance of being Earth-centered and what this really
means. Rowe used his own life experiences in the essays in _Home Place_ and _Earth
Alive_ so as to deepen the readers' appreciation of the natural world. He was also
sympathetic and supportive of the orientation of the left biocentric theoretical
tendency, which seeks to reconcile ecocentrism and social justice. I am full of
admiration for the contribution, both ecocentric and political, that Rowe made. He
was a person of the Left who saw the importance of social justice, even if this was
not yet perhaps satisfactorily integrated with his ecocentric philosophy.
My main criticism of Stan Rowe in this review is that he did not see himself as
writing in the deep ecology tradition established by Arne Naess but in some way saw
his own ideas as in opposition to those of Naess. He saw his own ecocentric ideas
as "deeper" than those of Naess. I have argued in this essay that Rowe was quite
mistaken in ascribing biocentrism, as he understood this, as an overall adequate
description of the deep ecology philosophy.
Stan Rowe was someone who can be an ecocentric (and social justice) role model for
those trying to come into a sustainable relationship with the Earth. This
notwithstanding the critical comments raised in my essay, about his understanding
of and his relationship to the philosophy of deep ecology. I urge those on a deeper
ecological path to read the two books of essays. They are not generally hard to
read.
They are thoughtful, illustrate the ecocentric perspective, show how attuned he was
to the natural world around him and also show the consistent pro-feminism to which
he subscribed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Visit the Green Web Home Page at:
http://home.ca.inter.net/~greenweb/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
Ecopolitics mailing list
Ecopolitics@lists.opn.org
http://www.lists.opn.org/mailman/listinfo/ecopolitics_lists.opn.org