Development occurs as a result of economic growth. Aid, investments,
spending (expenditure) and savings is necessary for economic development. Accelerated capital accumulation (purpose of producing a product not for social uses, rather profit) was priority in economic development. The goal is to increase investments. Let’s look at four types of economic growth: -Linear stage of growth model (1950s and 1960s)- it means you have natural resources and the money is coming and you’re slowly improving. You are slowly improving your economy. That is an old model and we still have it today. -Theories and patterns of structural change (1970s)- this is where you are changing your whole economy in order to improve more growth. The government intervenes and changes its taxing policy and its development policy in order to jump-start the economy. You invest money in research, you invest money in university, you invest money in private sector (you build the private sector, if necessary), so this is where the government has to step in. Singapore, Russia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Saudi Arabia all stopped in the linear stage of growth. Singapore and Korea are the countries that are sitting on the structural change; they went from peasant culture to developing/building culture/manufacturing culture. -International-dependence revolution (1970s)- these are the countries whose economies are depending on other countries. Without another country, you broke. Your economy is based on the foreign help. Let’s give an example. You take Palestine for example. It needs constantly aim of other countries to survive. They are dependent on aid. Some countries in Africa are also dependent on aid. -Free-market revolution (1980s and 1990s)- this is where they go from government control to capitalist free market method.
Rostow’s stages of growth. There are five stages:
1) The traditional/agricultural economy- lack of class or individual economic mobility (Russia in 1900s; China in 1920 and 1930). 2) The pre-conditions for take off- external demand for resources, commercial agriculture, widespread and enhanced investments, increase of technology, change in social structure, and development of national pride and economic interests. This is the stage where you actually take off to become a much more powerful economy. 3) The take-off- Urbanization increases, industrialization proceeds, technological breakthrough, shift from primary sectors in the economy towards secondary. Baku in 1920s can be given as an example (from agriculture to developing something new). This is American in 1800s (industrial revolution basically). 4) The drive to maturity- rapid development of infrastructure and large investments, shift from investment driven goods to domestic consumption. This is for example China in 2000s when China used to produce everything for the outside and now in 2000 they start producing for themselves. Today China’s economy is well run, so it doesn’t necessarily have to have all these friends outside purchasing their products; they can actually develop products for their own people. Let’s give an example. Today China buys a lot of rice than it actually produces. They are the point where there is not enough rice for Chinese people, so they have to eat potatoes. China imports a lot of meats now, they do not have enough cows to make for themselves, so they have to buy from India or elsewhere because they are at the point where they consume. This is America in 1930. 5) The age of high mass consumption- dominance of the economy by the industrial base, widespread and consumption of high value goods, disposable income and beyond all basic needs. This is America, France, Great Britain, Germany, Japan or South Korea. It means you are at that point where your economy is so well; you start consuming things that you don’t necessarily need. Whenever you reach this stage you are finally at the place where high-value products you start investing money in luxuries; you start buying things that you don’t need necessarily but because you have the money for it.
The Harrod-Domar Growth Model- he believes that the principal
strategy for development is mobilization of saving and generation of investments to accelerate economic growth (the H-D model). It basically argues that if you have investments then the growth will occur. This is more of a conservative approach to economy. Some economists like H-D believes that if you save a lot of money; if you have a lot of savings then that means you are a powerful person; you can be trusted and you can be invested money. Modern outlook of economy argues that if you don’t have money you can borrow money; you borrow money and you make money out of it (spend money make money). You borrow money then you put it to work and from there you make money. You borrow money to start a business, you make money, you pay your loan back and you still keep making money. H-D model argues that you have savings, which leads to investment. What does that mean? The idea is very simple. If another country sees you as a strong country with savings they are more likely to invest in your country simply because you have the money to cover that; you have the money to match it. You only invest in an economy that has money. Whenever they have money, you put money down, they will match it. Having savings in itself is not considered intelligent any more today. As Warren Buffet would say if you have savings and you keep those savings that means you are not a good finance person/good economist. A good economist will actually have its money invested and will be making money out of money. For example, if you have 50,000 manats and it is sitting somewhere (50,000 manats in cash) then you are losing value of your money every day because of inflation. It drops in value. If devaluation happens your money is gone in value. A good finance person would actually take 50,000 manats and purchase the business, a house, a bus or something. Some economists would argue that having oil is a saving. It is just money that has not been turned into bills like gold. The next model is endogenous growth model. It is a very common economic theory on growth. This theory holds that economic growth is primary the result of endogenous forces such as investment in human capital, innovation, and knowledge that contributes to economic growth. If the government invests in people, helps them to develop their skills and with that growth will happen. For example, provision of better public education in computer science has a positive impact on computer technology that creates jobs and further increases growth. Hence, subsidizing research for education, technology, and science creates innovation. Which countries do that? Japan, South Korea, the U.S, the UK, and almost all western countries. They understand that we don’t have to extract oil; that can be part of your economy but people develop things (investment in research and innovation). Companies are interested in developing and bringing in intelligent people. There is AK theory of endogenous growth theory, which argues that economy’s long run growth rate depends on its savings rate. An increase on savings rate will lead to a permanently higher growth rate. Innovation based model argues that intellectual capita is the source of technological progress and it is different from human or physical capital. It is not the human capital that matters but it is the innovation that matters. You should not just invest in people for the sake of educating them; just because you are educated doesn’t mean that you have much impact. Just because you get a degree in history then what is your impact on the economy? Just because you are investing in people doesn’t mean that all of them will have financial impact. You should create programs like engineering, computer science, or finance as they can actually have an impact. Endogeneity of savings- per capita income and distribution is influenced by economic growth. Endogeneity of population growth- when population grows, so does the economy. Hence, economic growth is dependent on population. Solow-Swan model is typically an exogenous growth model that analyses long run economic growth within the framework of neoclassical economics. It highlights that economic growth is in technological progress. Hence, population growth, capital accumulation, and increase in productivity are part of technological progress. You can imitate from other models or different places and you can just develop it. Let’s give an example. Today oil prices are low. Why are oil prices so low? Because today to find oil is very easy. It is not as hard as it used to be. Or we can say that it is not easy but it is not simple. You go to Azerbaijan for example, you drill down, and extract oil. The idea is that with this particular model you don’t have to invest in people; all you need to do is that any other country has invented technology and you take that technology and develop it. You can increase your productivity through the technological progress. Let’s talk about the structural change model. This theory focuses on the mechanism whereby underdeveloped economies transform their domestic economic structures from traditional to an industrial economy. These are the countries that basically don’t have much choice and they have to either change or die out. Examples can be Japan, China, or South Korea. China went from peasant/agricultural economy to industrial economy within just about 15-20 years. Let’s talk about economic development. How does economic development occur in the government? You have to have economic development plan. Planning takes a lot of time and a lot of resources. Community development is another one. People have to be interested in changing and growing; if people are not interested then nothing is going to happen. Marketing communities is another one. -cutting down monopolies; economic freedom, economic liberty