Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MAY,2019
WM - 06
Tadesse Ayalew
Bekele Jebessa
Geremew Tarekegn
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS.............................................................................................................................. v
LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................... vii
LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................................... vii
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................................................. viii
NATIONAL FOREWORD......................................................................................................................... xi
PREAMBLE ............................................................................................................................................... xv
SECTION 1: GENERAL ............................................................................................................................ 1
1.1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2. Document information ........................................................................................................................ 2
1.3. Scope and Application ......................................................................................................................... 3
1.4. Normative References.......................................................................................................................... 4
1.5. Purpose and / or Objectives ............................................................................................................... 5
1.6. Policies, Principles and Considerations ............................................................................................. 5
1.7. Terms and Definitions ......................................................................................................................... 8
1.8. CPPM High Process Map .................................................................................................................... 9
SECTION 2: PROCESS GROUPS...........................................................................................................10
2.1. Process group one: Plan Construction Procurement Management................................................12
2.1.1. Plan Construction Procurement Management: Inputs ...............................................................13
2.1.2. Plan Construction Materials Management: Mechanisms ...........................................................16
2.1.3. Plan Construction Materials Management: Constraints.............................................................18
2.1.4. Plan Construction Materials Management: Outputs ..................................................................18
2.1.5. Plan Procurement Management: Activities .................................................................................22
2.2. Process group two: Conduct Procurement Management ...............................................................23
2.2.1. Conduct Procurement Management: Inputs ...............................................................................24
2.2.2. Conduct Procurement Management: Mechanisms .....................................................................26
2.2.3. Conduct Procurement Management: Constraints ......................................................................33
2.2.4. Conduct Procurement Management: Outputs ............................................................................33
2.2.5. Conduct Procurement Management: Activities ..........................................................................34
2.3. Process group three: Administer and Control CP Procurement Management .............................35
2.3.1. Administer and Control CP Procurement Management: Inputs ...............................................36
2.3.2. Administer and Control CP Procurement Management: Mechanisms .....................................37
2.3.3. Administer and Control CP Procurement Management: Constraints .....................................45
2.3.4. Administer and Control CP Procurement Management: Outputs ............................................45
2.3.5. Control and Administer CP Procurement Management: Activities ..........................................47
2.4. Process group four: Close CP Procurement .....................................................................................48
2.4.1. Close Procurement Management: Inputs ....................................................................................49
2.4.2. Close CP Procurement Management: Mechanisms ....................................................................49
2.4.3. Close Procurement Management: Controls & Constraints ........................................................50
2.4.4. Close CP Procurement Management: Outputs ...........................................................................50
2.4.5. Close CP Procurement Management: Activities .........................................................................51
2.5. Procurement Management for Engineering Services .......................................................................52
2.5.1. Procurement methodologies.........................................................................................................52
2.5.2. Legal nature of consultant’s role for engineering services .........................................................52
2.5.3. Engineering Contract Administration .........................................................................................53
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1.1:CPPMM HIGH LEVEL PROCESS MAP .................................................................................. 9
FIGURE 2. 1: CONSTRUCTION PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT PROCESSES .......................................... 11
FIGURE 2.2: IMCOS OR MODIFIED IDEFO ELEMENTS ........................................................................... 12
FIGURE 2. 3: IMCO OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN .............................................................. 13
FIGURE 2. 4: CONTRACT TYPES, DEGREE OF PARTICIPATION, AND RISK TAKING................................. 16
FIGURE 2. 5 : IMCO DIAGRAM FOR CONDUCT CP PROCUREMENT ........................................................ 24
FIGURE 2.6: IMCO FOR ADMINISTER AND CONTROL CP PROCUREMENT ............................................. 36
FIGURE 2.7: IMCO FOR CLOSE CP PROCUREMENT................................................................................ 49
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1.1: CPPMM POLICY DOCUMENT................................................................................................ 5
TABLE 1. 2: CPPMM PRINCIPLES ............................................................................................................ 6
TABLE 2. 1: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROCUREMENT KNOWLEDGE AREA AND PROCESS GROUPS ....... 11
TABLE 2. 2 : CHARACTERISTICS OF CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY ................................................... 59
TABLE 2.3: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE CP IMPLEMENTATION METHODOLOGIES .... 60
NATIONAL FOREWORD
The proclamation to define the powers and duties of the executive organs of the Federal
Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Proclamation No 1097/2018 empowers the Ministry of Urban
Development and Construction (MUDC) to prepare and issue Standards for design and
construction works, and follow up and supervise their implementation.
This document forms a part of the CPMM Package that enlists Nineteen Manuals of which
Sixteen of them are Construction Project Management Manuals, two of them are general guides
(CPMM Organization and Setup and User Guide), and one of them is operational (Construction
Project Design Services) Manual. The CPMM package was developed with a clear view of the
integration of both the Project Management processes and knowledge areas so as to manage the
project as a holistic single entity. It is thus believed that the package will be instrumental in
creating modern and unified construction project management system in Ethiopian Construction
Industry.
The Ethiopian Construction Project Management Institute (ECPMI) has initiated and led the
overall development of the CPMM Package. The Ministry of Urban Development and
Construction would like to extend its appreciation to Construction Solutions PLC (Consol), and
Ethiopian Institute of Architecture, Building Construction and City Development (EiABC) who
contractually worked with ECPMI in the preparation of the original version of CPMM Package,
while the latter has validated and assured the quality of the original ones and produced the
released version the CPMM Package.
As the CPMM Package constitutes working manuals that are technical documents which, by
their nature, require periodic updating; revised editions will be issued by the Ministry from time
to time as appropriate. MUDC will establish Manuals Preparation and Revision Standing
Committee which collects feedbacks during the manual's three years operation period and
makes the required amendments and revisions accordingly.
PREAMBLE
Whereas; Ethiopia Construction Project Management Institute (ECPMI), to partially cater for the
deficiencies of project management practices in the Construction Industry; has envisioned the
development of Construction Project Management Manuals (CPMMs) which are Critically
Adapted, Practice Oriented, User Friendly and Responsive to Continuous Improvement that:
1. describe Specific, Supplemental and Standardized Knowledge and Practices that are
generally accepted as "good industry practices" on most construction projects most of the
time,
2. define the Conceptual, Applicable and Technological contents, processes and their What
and How elements sufficiently,
3. reflect the peculiar features of the Construction Industry in Ethiopia and can be
implemented by the resources in practice currently,
4. lay down the policies, principles, processes and procedures in order to effectively
discharge duties and responsibilities, and
5. can be applied to any project nationwide with minor and moderate modifications.
Whereas; ECPMI identifies and enlist Nineteen Manuals of which Sixteen of them are
Construction Project Management Manuals, two of them are general guides (CPMM
Organization and Setup and User Guide), and one of them is operational (Construction Project
Design Services) Manual.
Whereas; ECPMI as the mandated body, to foster the development of Proactive and System
based CPMMs policies and principles and application of modern Construction Project
Management in Ethiopia governed by fundamental and best practices, envisions to cause the
applications of these CPMMs in order to improve the performances of Construction Projects;
Whereas; CPMMs are one among the critical bases for Initiating, Planning, Implementation
including Changes Administration, Monitoring & Evaluation, and Closing of Construction
Projects along the Business ↔ Project ↔ Product Management linkages with respect to their (1)
General Requirements, (2) Process Groups, (3) High Level Process Map (4) Detail Processes, (5)
Procedures or Instructions, and (6) Auxiliary or Annex Documents;
ECPMI has therefore caused the development of one of these CPPMs; namely: “Construction
Project Procurement Management Manual (CPPMM)” as a framework to guide and govern
Construction Projects Procurement Management in line with the expected level of Construction
Projects Performances Worldwide with respect to planning, Conducting procurement,
administering CP procurement and Closing Procurement to ensure effective management of
Engineering procurements and other Resources by Balancing or Prioritizing Competing
Demands, Tailoring for specific situations, and Managing the relationships and
interdependencies.
1. SECTION 1: GENERAL
1.1. Introduction
The CPMMs are one among the focus areas and the cause for deficiencies in the expected
contributions of the Construction Industry in Ethiopia. ECPMI in collaboration with
Construction Solutions Plc. and the Construction Technology and Management Competence
Unit of the EIABC / AAU identified and developed the following nineteen CPM manuals under
three categories:
Document availability : The hard copy of the document is available at the Ethiopian
Construction Project Management Institute (ECPMI) and the
electronic copy / form is located on the following websites
www.ecpmi.gov.et
Construction project procurement management is the process by which acquiring Services and
Works required from initiation of the process to closing. The organization can be either the buyer
or the seller of the Services or Works.
The manual scope includes the process for developing a detailed Procurement management for
construction project decisions. This document is applicable to all construction projects including
Services and Works Procurement.
The purpose of this manual is to describe and document procurement process and procedures
for an effective construction project management and to ensure that budget/funds are used for
the intended purpose, with due considerations to quality, economy and efficiency of the project
and to underline the principles of economy, efficiency, transparency, equal opportunity and
competitive procedures during procurement management.
Purpose: The main purpose of preparing this policy document is to create guidance
that should be followed during the use of CPPMM processes, procedures and
instructions in order to determine learning inputs for continuous improvement.
Scope: This policy will be applicable mainly to practitioners involved in:
1. Construction Project Communication Management for: (a) Construction
Management Services, (b) Construction Design Services, (C) Construction
Works, (d) Construction Works Quality Assurance and Contract Administration
Services, (e) Construction Design Services and Works, and (f) Construction
Design Reviews, Quality Assurance and Contract Administration Services
2. Construction Industry Stakeholders (Mainly the Employer, the Consultants and
the Contractors), and
3. Construction Projects undertaken or to be undertaken based on the DBB or DB
delivery methods.
Responsible Bodies: The Responsible bodies for regulating and improving the
CPCMM are:
1. ECPMI for Regulating the application of the CPPMM
2. CoTM Competence Unit of the EiABC for monitoring the implementation
and continuously improving the CPCMM based on the forthcoming Contract
Policy Statements: This CPPMM policy document is to ensure achievements
regarding successful completion of the CPPM process ; such that the:
CPPM is properly planned
CPPM Conducted based standard template and procedures
Proper Engineering procurement management is ensured
the Contract administration of engineering services are implemented
The following constitute the CPPMM principles and are described below (Table 1.2).
Techniques are terms that refer to a defined systematic procedure that may use one or
more tools to perform an activity in a process.
3) Constraints: terms that refer to limiting or dictating factors that affect the
implementations of CPPM process groups or the actions of the CPPM Team such as
Enterprise Environment Factors, Project Documents including Risk or Lesson Learned
Registers, Agreements, etc.; and
4) Outputs: terms that refer to products, services, documents as results generated by the
CPPM process groups which may be an input to a successor process group.
For the purpose of this manual the following definitions shall apply.
CPPMM high level process map mainly involves the development of the following four major
outcomes or deliverables; namely:
1. Plan CP procurement
2. Conduct CP procurement
3. Administer/Control procurement
4. Close procurement through the following high level CPPM process map (Figure 1.1)
constituting four major process groups.
Start
Plan CP Procurement
management
Administer CP Procurement
Close CP Procurement
END
END
When the organization is the buyer, the construction project procurement management includes
contract management and change control processes required to develop and administer contracts
issued by designated project team members.
When the organization is the seller, construction project procurement management includes
controlling the follow-up and management of the tender process and, in case contract is awarded
to the organization, the contract entered into; and execution and administering the contractual
obligations placed on the project team through the contract.
The construction project procurement management process for consulting services is designed to
obtain a consultant which will deliver the best or optimum quality at reasonable prices.
Sometimes it may entirely focus on best quality. The process involves waiting time for the
Consultants to look at the needs of the project and to respond accordingly. The process can thus,
take from one month to three months to respond for this type of procurement. The project
manager needs to be involved in the entire process of procurement management and he also
needs to plan for the amount of time the procurement may requires.
The project manager and project team are required to have the required skills and competency
levels to execute the procurement process. The purpose of the competencies is to frame
expectation within procurement roles and help identify skills, development opportunities and
career paths. The following are the major categories of skills and competencies required for a
Procurement Manager/Expert.
The skills required from a procurement expert/manager are speaking/language, critical thinking,
active listening, persuasion, negotiation, reading comprehension, judgment and decision
making, complex problem solving, writing, active learning, time management, dependability,
attention to detail, analytical thinking, integrity, flexibility, stress tolerance, self-control,
persistence and concern for others.
Conduct CP Administer/
Plan CP Close
procurement Control
procurement procurement
procurement
When the organization is service provider the above project procurement management
processes involves activities from client solicitation, preparation of proposal based on buyer
requirements and contract award. It also includes contract negotiation, contract signing and
contract administration.
Ethiopian Construction Project Management Institute manuals are divided into seventeen
knowledge areas and one additional subject (Organizational set-up) is added to supplement the
construction project management. The knowledge areas consist of processes applicable to
construction projects. The Procurement management processes are defined in terms of purpose,
description and primary inputs, mechanisms, control/constraints and outputs in sections herein
below, and are interdependent.
Procurement management
The procurement management knowledge area includes the processes required to plan, conduct,
control and close procurement.
The relationship between each process is mapped, employing IMCO diagram technique, in
Figure 2.3.
Constraints
Processes /
Inputs Functions
Out puts
Mechanism
s
Plan Procurement is a process of identifying which project needs will be best met through
procuring Services or Works and what to procure will be identified together with an
arrangement of resources to undertake the procurement. Plan procurement shall be undertaken
during scope definition phases and involves thorough consideration of whether or not to
procure, how to procure, what to procure, how much to procure and when to procure.
This process involves the preparation of the documents needed to support invitations. Bids and
proposals are received from prospective proponents detailing how much needs can be met.
Procurement strategy is a key factor in determining the most appropriate procurement method
given the complexity and monetary value of the requirement, and market availability. The
procurement strategy shall be developed in conjunction with planning the ‘when’.
The strategy that is developed has to take into consideration the various procurement principles;
primarily, quality, economy and efficiency. Consideration needs to always be given to whatever
savings (or economies of scale) that can be achieved by strategically planning how procurements
shall be carried out over the period covered by the procurement plan. This might entail
consulting with the various requesting entities to determine if there are any extenuating
circumstances that warrant making their procurement in a special manner and in any way
different from the rest of the planned procurements of similar items.
Requesting entities should also be involved and consulted on whatever decisions are to made in
the planning and strategy phase, in order to obtain their agreement and to avoid planning their
requirements in such a manner that could be counterproductive to their operations.
The Inputs, Mechanisms (Tools & Techniques & competencies), Controls / Constraints and
Outputs [IMCO] for plan procurement process is depicted in Figure 2.3 below.
Constraints
Procurement legislations
Procurement guidelines or directives
Organizational guidelines or directives
Enterprise environmental factors
required delivery dates
Available skills
Resources
Attitude
Lack of experience
The scope statement clearly specifies what the project shall deliver. Scope statement includes the
list of deliverables, and acceptance criteria, as well as important information regarding technical
issues or concerns in connection with the project.
The work breakdown structure (WBS) and related detailed statements of work provides an
identification of the deliverables and a description of the work for each WBS component
required to produce each deliverable.
The list of resources required for each activity for the project. This will be the basis for
preparation of procurement documents, procurement method selection and selection criteria.
Project schedule includes information on timelines to be met for the project schedule, lead times
and market delivery periods.
Cost estimate shall be developed by the procuring entity and will be used for budgetary and
evaluation of bid prices.
vii.)Stakeholder Register
The stakeholder register gives details and interest of the project participants and this will help to
consider their importance and influence on the procurement management. Refer Stakeholders
Management Manual for details.
These are market conditions, availability and type of products and services on the market,
supplier’s performance and reputation, and any special local requirements and conditions which
will help design the procurement strategy and method.
Organizational process asset Includes management systems that are essential in developing the
procurement management plan and selecting the contractual relationships to be used. The
processes and procedures for conducting work available to project team with the organization in
which the project is being conducted, such as standard process, policies, product life cycle,
quality, standardized guidelines, templates, performance measurement criteria.
The Knowledge of major kinds of project delivery methods / contract types helps to choose the
one that creates the most fair and workable deal for an organization and the
Consultant/Contractor.
Generally, project delivery approaches are classified as traditional, integrated and turnkey based
on the general approach for delivering the project.
Integrated Project Delivery and Turnkey Approaches; integrated and turnkey project
delivery methods integrate people, systems, business structures, and practices most often
into a single construction project contract process. List of integrated project delivery and
turnkey approaches are provided below.
Generally, in the Ethiopian Construction Industry, Works contracts based on the contract types
are categorized as lump sum or fixed price and unit price or re-measurable contracts; whilst
Consultancy Contracts are classified as Lump sum or Time-based contracts. Only the contract
types that are common to Ethiopian construction industry are discussed. Annex 2 provides the
details for most common types of construction contracts.
The make or buy decision involves whether to carry out the required services in-house or to
procure it from a third party. The outcome of this analysis should be a decision that maximizes
the long-term economic advantages for an organization. There are a number of factors to be
considered when making this decision, includes the following:
Capacity. Does the organization have sufficient capacity to deliver the services
by the project team? Alternatively, is the supplier reliable enough to carry out
quality services in a timely manner?
Bottleneck. Will shifting the services to a consultant ease the burden on the
organization's bottleneck operation? If so, this can be a good reason to outsource.
Strategic importance. How important is the service to the corporate strategy? If it
is very important, then it could make more sense that the organization carry out
the services, in order to maintain complete control over it. Conversely, something
having little importance can more easily be shifted to a supplier.
Available contract types. The risk allocation in the available contract types is
also important in this analysis.
Cost. Which alternative presents the lowest total out-of-pocket cost?
Experts are treated as assets in any organization and provide inputs to planning and estimating
any activity as their opinions are considered to be crucial. The experts can be stakeholders or
customers. Expert Judgment is one of the best accepted approaches and most useful too during
the planning phases of many activities. The expert judgment would be crucial in selecting the
contract strategy and also which method of procurement to use.
It includes the identification, interest and availability of service providers, their technical
capability and financial capacity, and price trends. The extent of a market assessment depends
on, and is determined by, the degree of complexity and monetary value of the requirement. A
market study can be done using the online review and/or by soliciting information potential
suppliers, consultants or service providers, conferences etc. It can be done in-house, or by hiring
a specialized firm to carry-out the study.
It is very useful to develop a template for recording and filing the results of a market study, and
for future use when procuring similar services or works from similar market.
iv.) Meetings
Research alone may not provide specific information to formulate a procurement strategy
without additional information interchange meetings with potential bidders. By collaborating
with potential bidders, the organization purchasing the material or service may benefit while the
supplier can influence a mutually beneficial approach or product.
v.) Competencies
The competencies required for a Procurement Manager/Expert Compiler, Result seeker, Innovator,
Functional Expert Adapter and Influencer.
The skills required from a procurement expert/manager are speaking/language, critical thinking,
active listening, persuasion, negotiation, reading comprehension, judgment and decision
making, complex problem solving, writing, active learning, time management, dependability,
attention to detail, analytical thinking, integrity, flexibility, stress tolerance, self-control,
persistence and concern for others.
Controls are items that must be employed to ensure the plan procurement management process
achieve the procurement objectives and be executed in accordance with the regulations and
guidelines. The plan procurement is mainly controlled by
Procurement legislations
Procurement guidelines or directives
Organization process assets
Enterprise environmental factors
required delivery dates;
available skilled resources;
enterprise environmental factors;
attitude of stakeholders;
organizational process assets;
lack of experience;
lack of relevant input data
2.1.4. Plan Construction Materials Management: Outputs
The document describes how items will be procured during the project and the approach to be
used from initiation and development of procurement documents to contract closure. Specific
areas to describe include:
Procurement process: - This section provides a brief overview of the process requirements
necessary to manage procurement of the identified needs. It should include:
Roles and responsibilities: This section describes the various roles on the project that has
some connection to procurement. This section should describe who can request outside
resources, which can approve the requests, any secondary approvers, etc.
Identified procurement needs: This section details the services identified for outside
procurement. Each listed item should include a justification statement explaining why this
should be an outside purchase if there is the possibility of inside sourcing (make vs. buy
decision).
Timing: This section will describe the timeframe that resources are needed. This will provide
a better sense for when the procurement process needs to be started for each item.
Change review and approval process: Describe how changes are made to procurement
documents to ensure the changes are valid, understood and approved by the appropriate
people.
The work to be done on procurement is called procurement statement of work. The procurement
statement of work must be clear, complete and as concise as possible. It should also describe the
work and activities that the seller is required to complete. The activities also include meetings,
reports and communications. The statement of work (SOW) for CP procurement is developed
from the project scope baseline and defines only that portion of the project scope that is to be
included within the related contract. The procurement SOW describes the procurement item in
sufficient detail to allow prospective sellers to determine if they are capable of providing the
products, services, or results. Sufficient detail can vary based on the nature of the item, the needs
of the buyer, or the expected contract form. Information included in a SOW can include objective
and scope of the service, tasks to be carried out, outputs/deliverables, reporting requirements,
data and services to be provided by the purchaser, number and qualification of key staff position
requirements, period of performance, work location, and other requirements.
The procurement SOW includes a description of any collateral services required, such as
performance reporting or post-project operational support for the procured item. In some
application areas, there are specific content and format requirements for a procurement SOW.
Each individual procurement item requires a SOW; however, multiple products or services can
be grouped as one procurement item within a single SOW.
The procurement SOW can be revised and refined as required as it moves through the
procurement process until incorporated into a signed agreement.
The buyer structures procurement documents to facilitate an accurate and complete response
from each prospective Consultant/Contractor and to facilitate easy evaluation of the responses.
These documents include a description of the desired form of the response, the relevant
procurement statement of work (SOW) and any required contractual provisions.
With government contracting, some or all of the content and structure of procurement
documents is normally defined by regulation.
The Public Property and Procurement Administration Agency of Ministry of Finance and
Economic Development of FDRE has issued Standard Bidding Documents (SBDs) and Request
for Proposals for use by public entities. The SBDs are located at www.ppa.gov.et
The complexity and level of detail of the procurement documents should be consistent with the
value of, and risks associated with the planned procurement. Procurement documents are
required to be sufficient to ensure consistent, appropriate responses, in some cases they may
need also to be flexible enough to allow consideration of any seller suggestions for better ways to
satisfy the same requirements
Issuing a procurement request to potential sellers to submit a proposal or bid is normally done in
accordance with the policies of the buyer’s organization, which can include publication of the
request in public newspapers, in trade journals, in public registries, or on the internet.
Source selection criteria are often included as a part of the procurement documents. Such criteria
are developed and used to rate or score seller proposals, and can be objective or subjective.
Selection criteria may be limited to only the purchase price if the procurement item is readily
available from a number of acceptable sellers. Purchase price in this context includes both the
cost of the item and all ancillary expenses such as delivery.
Other selection criteria can be identified and documented to support an assessment for more
complex services. Some possible source selection criteria are:
Technical capability: - Does the seller have, or can the seller be reasonably expected to
acquire, the technical skills and knowledge needed. Has the company the type of experts
needed to deliver/carry out the services?
Past performance of the Consultant: - Does the Firm have experience of carrying out
similar assignment in the past? Has it delivered such assignment with good
performance?
References: - Can the Firm provide references from prior customers verifying its work
experience and compliance with contractual requirements?
A decision that involves procuring Services or Works may require a change request. Other
decisions during procurement planning can also create the need for additional change requests.
Change requests are processed for review and disposition through the Perform Integrated
Change Control process. (Refer Construction Project Scope Management Manual for details).
Changes to the project management plan and other components may result in change requests
that impact procurement actions.
Requirements documentation,
Requirements traceability matrix, and
Risk register.
The instructions below provide the activities that shall be carried out for plan procurement
management:
a) Identify need
b) Build procurement team
c) Develop specifications / terms of reference / statement of works (scope of Work)
d) Define or Determine method of procurement
e) Perform market research
f) Determine contract type
g) Finalize specifications/terms of references/statement of works (scope of work)
h) Develop bid/proposal evaluation strategy
The Inputs, Mechanisms (Tools & Techniques & competencies), Constraints and Outputs [IMCO]
for conduct procurement process is shown in Figure 2.5 below.
Constraints
Procurement legislations
Procurement guidelines or directives
Organization process assets
Enterprise environmental factors
required delivery dates
Available skilled resources
Attitude of stakeholders
Lack of experience
Inputs
Outputs
Procurement management plan
Cost estimate (budget) Procurement documents
Procurement procedures and Conduct CP Awarded bidder
processes
Annual procurement plan Procurement Plan CP Contract agreements
Resource calendars
Request for proposals
Project specifications Change request
Stakeholders commitments Project management plan updates
Procurement documents
Evaluation criteria
Mechanisms
In Case of Design and Build Contracts (integrated type of contract delivery method) where the
Purchaser has not prepared detail BOQ, the cost estimate must be based on a preliminary or
In Case of Consulting Services, the cost estimate shall be based on the purchaser’s assessment of
the resources needed to carry out the assignment: experts’ time, logistical support, and physical
inputs (for example, vehicles, laboratory equipment). Costs shall be divided into two broad
categories: (a) fee or remuneration (according to the type of contract used), and (b) direct
expenses and reimbursable items. The RFP shall indicate the estimated level of experts’ time
inputs or the estimated total cost of the contract (budget).
Experts should be familiar with the different process and procedures to be followed in a specific
contract to be procured. The procedures to be followed shall be legislated by law, and/or
commercial practices of an entity. Below is the process to be followed to conduct procurement.
Annual Procurement Plan shall be published on Purchaser’s website, on Newspapers and Notice
Boards at the beginning of each Fiscal year. The Procurement Plan shall be prepared and should
be posted on a website by the relevant procurement focal person in the procuring entity.
In case of Projects/Programs financed by donors like World Bank, African Development Bank, a
General Procurement Notice (GPN) should be published on UNDB website. The GPN describes
the objective of the program, the scope of procurement, and the name and address of the person
to be contacted for additional information regarding the announcement. The Procurement unit is
responsible for updating the GPN as needed. Only after the GPN is published, the “Specific
Procurement Notices” (SPN) for works respectively shall be posted.
After preparation of the procurement plan, the Procurement process follows with the
preparation of the bidding documents. Among other information, which must appear in the
documents, it is particularly important to ensure that information on technical and functional
specifications are complete and sufficiently detailed, and that it accurately reflects the needs of
the end-users. Technical specifications must be drawn by a competent technical authority or
person, with advice and external technical assistance if required. The solicitation can be either of
the two types:
Open Tendering
Selective Tendering
The pre- bid meeting is an opportunity for the purchaser to discover anything missing or unclear
in the procurement documents. It is a meeting between the buyer and all prospective sellers
prior to submittal of a bid or proposal. They are used to ensure that all prospective sellers have a
clear and common understanding of the procurement requirements, and that no bidders receive
preferential treatment. To be fair, purchasers should take great care to ensure that all prospective
sellers hear every question from any individual prospective seller and every answer from the
buyer. Typically, fairness is addressed by techniques such as collecting questions from bidders or
arranging field visits in advance of the bidder conference.
The organization may not necessarily use pre-proposal conferences in all tenders. In such cases
the bidders will be given chance to request in writing for any irregularities in the bidding
document or issues which need clarification. The organization has to give response in writing
and the response shall be distributed to all bidders at the same time. By way of clarification to
the questions raised by bidders or due to other necessity or requirement of change in the bidding
document, the organization will issue Amendments to the bidding document.
The purchaser shall allow enough time for the bidders to prepare their bids. The time allowed
shall depend on the assignment, but normally shall not be less than two weeks or more than
three months (for example, for assignments requiring establishment of a sophisticated
methodology, preparation of a multidisciplinary master plan). During this interval, the firms
may request clarifications about the information provided in the BD. The procurement unit shall
provide these clarifications in writing and copy them to all bidders on the pre-qualification list or
the list of bidders that purchased the BD. If necessary, the Procurement unit shall extend the
deadline for submission of Bids. No amendments to the technical or financial bid shall be
accepted after the deadline, although amended bids may be submitted before such deadline. A
committee of officials drawn by purchaser from the relevant departments (technical, finance, legal,
as appropriate), shall open all bids received by the deadline for the submission of proposals/bids
All bids received after the deadline shall be declared late and rejected and promptly returned
unopened. The committee shall read aloud the names of the bidders that submitted bid, Bid
price, Validity period of the bid, the bid security amount, bid security validity period, and any
other information deemed appropriate.
Except as otherwise provided in this manual in line with the public procurement proclamation
and directive, bidders, shall neither be requested nor permitted to alter their proposals in any
way after the deadline for the submission of bids. While evaluating bids, the technical evaluation
committee shall conduct the evaluation solely on the basis of the submitted bids, and shall not
ask bidders for clarifications, except for perfunctory queries.
The evaluation of the proposals for consultancy services involving technical and financial
proposals shall be carried out in two stages: first the quality (technical), and then the cost
(financial or commercial). Evaluators of technical proposals shall not have access to the financial
proposals until the technical evaluation is concluded. Financial proposals shall be opened only
thereafter. The evaluation shall be carried out in full conformity with the provisions of the RFP.
Given the need for high quality services, the quality of the evaluation of technical proposals is
paramount. The purchaser shall evaluate each technical proposal. Commonly an evaluation
committee consisting of at least 3 (three) experts and not more than 5(five) members including
qualified specialists in the sector of the assignment under consideration take part. Each member
of the committee shall not be in a conflict of interest situation as per the provisions outlined in
this manual, and certify to that effect before participating in the evaluation.
The technical evaluation shall take into account the criteria and sub criteria indicated below as
reflected in the RFP.
The technical evaluation committee shall evaluate each proposal on the basis of its
responsiveness to the requirements of the RFP. A proposal shall be considered as noncompliance
and shall be rejected at this stage if it fails to comply with important aspects described in the
RFP. Technical proposals containing any material financial information shall be declared
nonresponsive.
The members of the evaluation committee shall evaluate proposals in accordance with the
evaluation criteria specified in the RFP, independently of each other, and without any external
influence from any person or entity. A proposal shall be rejected if it fails to achieve the overall
minimum technical score specified in the RFP. At the end of the evaluation process, the technical
evaluation committee shall prepare a Technical Evaluation Report using standard form of
evaluation report or another report or another acceptable form. The report shall substantiate the
results of the evaluation and justify the total technical scores assigned to each proposal by
describing the relative strengths and weaknesses of the proposals. Large differences in the
individual scores given to a proposal for the same criterion or sub-criterion by different members
shall be addressed and a justification be provided in the technical evaluation report. All records
relating to the evaluation, such as individual score sheets shall be retained.
After the Technical Evaluation Report is completed, the purchaser shall inform consultants
whose proposals did not meet the minimum qualifying technical score or were considered
nonresponsive to the RFP and TOR that their financial proposals will be returned unopened after
the signature of the contract. In addition, the purchaser shall inform each of the above
consultants of their overall technical score as well as scores obtained for each criterion and sub-
criterion if any. The purchaser shall simultaneously notify the consultants that have secured the
minimum overall technical score of the date, time, and place set for opening the financial
proposals. The opening date shall be set allowing sufficient time for consultants to make
arrangements to attend the opening of the financial proposals. The financial proposals shall be
opened in the presence of representatives of the consultants who choose to attend (in person or
online). The name of the consultant, the technical scores, including the break-down by criterion,
and the offered total prices shall be read aloud (and posted online when electronic submission of
proposals is used) and recorded when the financial proposals are opened.
The purchaser shall then evaluate and compare the financial proposals in accordance with the
following procedures. Prices shall be converted to a single currency as stated in the RFP (for
international competitive bidding). The purchaser shall make this conversion by using the selling
(exchange) rates for those currencies quoted by an official source (such as the Commercial Bank)
or by an internationally circulated newspaper for similar transactions. The RFP shall specify the
source of the exchange rate to be used and the date of that exchange rate, provided that the date
shall not be earlier than four weeks prior to the deadline for submission of proposals (usually 28
days), nor later than the original date of expiration of the period of validity of the proposal. For a
time-based contract, any arithmetical errors shall be corrected, and prices shall be adjusted if
they fail to reflect all inputs that are included in the respective technical proposals. For a lump-
sum contract, the consultant is deemed to have included all prices in its financial proposal.
The offered total price shall include all consultants’ remuneration and other expenses such as
travel, translation, report printing, or secretarial expenses. The proposal with the lowest offered
total price may be given a financial score of 100 (one hundred) and other proposals given
financial scores that are inversely proportional to their prices. Alternatively, a directly
proportional or other methodology may be used in allocating the scores to the financial
proposals. The methodology to be used shall be described in the RFP.
The total score shall be obtained by weighting the quality and cost scores and adding them. The
weight for the “cost” shall be chosen, taking into account the complexity of the assignment and
the relative importance of quality. Except indicated differently, the weight for cost shall normally
be 20 (twenty) points out of a total score of 100 (one hundred). The proposed weightings for
quality and cost shall be specified in the RFP. The firm obtaining the highest total score shall be
invited for negotiations.
If Works are of complex nature, the purchaser is advised to carry out pre-qualification of bidders.
To obtain qualified Bidders, the purchaser may advertise an invitation for Pre-Qualification of
Bidders on the National Newspapers and/or Internationally accessible media. If there is a
requirement based on the ruling procurement procedure. The information on the Pre-
Qualification Document requested should enable the buyer to make decision or judgment on the
firm’s suitability.
In case of Consulting Services to obtain expressions of interest (EOIs), the purchaser shall
advertise a request for expressions of interest (REOI) for each contract for consulting firms on the
National Newspapers and/or Internationally accessible media. If there is a requirement based
on the ruling procurement procedure, a list of expected consulting assignments may need to be
included in the General Procurement Notice. The information on the EOI requested shall be the
minimum required to make a judgment on the firm’s suitability and not be so complex as to
discourage consultants from expressing interest. REOIs shall at a minimum include the following
information applicable to the assignment: required qualifications and experience of the firm, but
not individual experts’ bio data; short-listing criteria, required outputs and duration of the
assignment; and conflict of interest provisions. No less than 14 (fourteen) days from date of
posting on international or national media, shall be provided for responses, before preparation of
the short list. The late submission of a response to an REOI shall not be a cause for its rejection
unless the purchaser has already prepared a short list, based on received EOIs, that meets the
conditions set.
To initiate the process, invitation to bids will be made either through direct communication or
through open advertisement. An advertisement is placed in newspapers, magazines, internet,
etc. to attract sellers. Depending on the procurement rules and methods to be followed, the
advertisement could be posted through local and /or international media.
Direct/Restricted Invitation
Restricted Bidding
In case the Organization, based on the rules and procedures it is bind to, it may consider
restricted tendering method of procurement in line with Article 49.3 of The Public
Procurement Proclamation and Article 23 of the Public Procurement Directive, it may
solicit proposals from limited number of firms.
Single Source Procurement method, is the process by which the organization will directly
solicit bid from a single supplier/bidder. The Procedures and conditions for this
procurement method shall be in line with Article 51 and 52 of the Procurement
Proclamation and Article 25 of the Public Procurement Directive.
In case of procurement of Works, negotiations on price are not permitted except in direct award
contracts. Pre-contract award discussions on non-material technical issues might be conducted if
necessary.
Negotiations for consultancy services shall include discussions on the TOR, the methodology,
purchaser unit’s inputs, and special conditions of the contract. These discussions shall not
substantially alter the original scope of services under the TOR or the terms of the contract, the
quality of the final product, its price, and the relevance of the initial evaluation be affected. Major
reductions in work inputs should not be made solely to meet the estimated cost or available
budget. The final TOR and the agreed methodology shall be incorporated in the “Description of
Services” which shall form part of the contract.
The selected firm should not be allowed to substitute key experts, unless both parties agree that
undue delays in the selection process make such substitution unavoidable or that such changes
are critical to meet the objectives of the assignment. If this is not the case and if it is established
that key experts were included in the proposal without confirming their availability, the firm
may be disqualified and the process continued with the next ranked firm. The key experts
proposed for substitution shall have qualifications equal to or better than the key experts initially
proposed.
Financial negotiations shall include clarification of the consultants’ tax liability in the project
coordination unit/procurement unit’s country (if any) and how this tax liability has been or
would be reflected in the contract. Payments under lump-sum contracts are based on the
delivery of outputs (or products), hence the offered price shall include all costs (experts’ time,
overhead, travel, hotel, etc.). Consequently, if the selection method for a lump-sum contract
included cost as a factor in evaluation, the offered price shall not be negotiated.
In the case of time-based contracts, payment is based on inputs (experts’ time and reimbursable)
and the offered price shall include experts’ rates and an estimation of the amount of
reimbursable. When the selection method includes cost as a factor in evaluation, negotiations of
experts’ rates shall not take place, except in special circumstances, like for example, experts’ rates
offered are much higher than typically charged rates by consultants for similar contracts;
Consequently, the prohibition of negotiation does not preclude the right of the purchaser to ask
for clarifications, and, if the fees are very high, to ask for their change. Reimbursable are to be
paid on actual expenses incurred at cost upon presentation of receipts and therefore are not
subject to negotiations. However, if the purchaser wants to define ceilings for unit prices of
certain reimbursable (like travel or hotel rates), they should indicate the maximum levels of those
rates in the RFP or define a per diem in the RFP.
If the negotiations with the highest ranked consultant fail, purchaser shall inform the concerned
consultant in writing of all pending issues and disagreements, and provide them a final
opportunity to respond in writing. Contract negotiations shall not be terminated only for budget
considerations. If there is still disagreement, purchaser shall inform the consultant in writing of
its intention to terminate negotiations. Negotiations may then be terminated and the next ranked
consultant invited for negotiations. Once negotiations have commenced with the next ranked
firm, the purchaser shall not reopen the earlier negotiations. After negotiations are successfully
completed, the purchaser shall promptly notify other firms on the short list that they were
unsuccessful.
Notification of Award
A letter of award to be sent by the procuring entity /project manager to a successful bidder shall
not constitute a contract between the prospective successful bidder and the procuring entity. A
contract shall be deemed to have been concluded between the procuring entity and the
successful bidder only where a contract containing detailed provisions governing the execution
of the procurement is signed.
A letter of contract award to be sent to a successful bidder shall contain the following
information
Where the successful bidder cannot or is unwilling to sign a contract, the procuring entity
may either declare the bidder submitting the second most preferred bid the successful
bidder or invite such bidder to sign a contract or advertise the bid afresh by assessing the
benefit of the two options.
The procuring entity shall return to the bidders their bid security on the following
conditions:
o If the successful bidder has signed contract and furnished the required contract
security;
o If the bid validity period initially offered by a bidder not willing to extend such
period has expired or if a bidder is unsuccessful.
a) the purchaser conducting bid proceedings shall wait for seven (7) working days after disclosing
the result of the bid evaluation or after responding to a complaint, to give bidders time to present
complaint, if any, against the conduct of the bid proceeding or against the decision of the
purchaser on such complaint
b) a bidder aggrieved in connection with a procurement proceeding shall within five (5) working
days of when he became aware of or should have been aware of the reason giving rise to the
grievance, may submit his complaint to the head of the purchaser. A complaint submitted to the
Purchaser thereafter may not be entertained.
c) Unless the complaint is resolved by mutual agreement of the bidder that submitted it and the
purchaser conducting the procurement, the head of the Public Body shall give decision on the
complaint in writhing within ten working days from the date of submission of the complaint
Pursuant to Article 74/3 of the Proclamation.
d) The purchaser shall give to the complainant a copy of the decision within five (5) working days
from the date in which the decision was made
Confidentiality
Information relating to evaluation of bids and recommendations for award shall not be
disclosed to the consultants who submitted the proposals or to other persons not officially
concerned with the process, until the publication of the award of contract unless it is provided in
this Public Procurement Directive.
Competencies
for human resources as well as equipment. Resource calendars help organizations in their
resource planning. Organizations may also create shared resource calendars to manage a
resource pool. A resource pool makes it easier to administer people, or even equipment assigned
to tasks, in more than one project file. Using automation enables you to centralize resource
information, such as the resource name, calendar used, resource units, and cost rate tables.
Resource calendars are an important aspect of workforce planning.
Once a contract is in place the quantity and availability of contracted resources and those dates
on which each specific resource or resource group can be active or idle are documented.
iv.) Change requests
Change requests to the project management plan, its subsidiary plans, and other components are
processed for review and disposition through the Perform Integrated Change Control process.
v.) Project Management Plan updates
Elements of the project management plan that may be updated include:
Cost baseline,
Scope baseline,
Schedule baseline,
Communications management plan, and
Procurement management plan.
vi.) Project documents updates
Both the buyer and the seller will administer/control the procurement contract for similar
purposes. Each are required to ensure that both parties meet their contractual obligations and
that their own legal rights are protected. The legal nature of the contractual relationship makes it
imperative that the project management team is aware of the legal implications of actions taken
when controlling any procurement. On larger projects with multiple providers, a key aspect of
contract administration is managing interfaces among the various providers.
• Direct and Manage Project Work. Authorizing the work defined in the project manage
plan and approved changes to achieve the project’s objectives at the appropriate time.
• Control Quality. To inspect and verify the adequacy of the seller’s product.
• Perform Integrated Change Control. To assure that changes are properly approved and
that all those with a need to know are aware of such changes.
• Control risks. To ensure that risks are mitigated.
Control Procurement also has a financial management component that involves monitoring
payments to the seller. This ensures that payment terms defined within the contract are met and
that seller compensation is linked to seller progress, as defined in the contract. One of the
principal concerns when making payments to suppliers is that there is a close relationship of
payments made to the work accomplished.
The Control Procurement process reviews and documents how well a seller is performing or has
performed based on the contract and establishes corrective actions when needed. This
performance review may be used as a measure of the seller’s competency for performing similar
work on future projects. Similar evaluations are also carried out when it is necessary to confirm
that a seller is not meeting the seller’s contractual obligations and when the buyer contemplates
corrective actions. Control Procurements includes capturing the necessary details for managing
any early terminations of the contracted work (for cause, convenience, or default) in accordance
with the termination clause of the agreement. These details are used in the Close Procurement
process to terminate the agreement.
Agreements can be amended at any time prior to contract closure by mutual consent, in
accordance with the change control terms of the agreement. Such amendments are typically
captured in writing.
The Inputs, Mechanisms (Tools & Techniques & competencies), Controls / Constraints and
Outputs [IMCO] for control procurement (administer contract) process is shown in Figure 2.6
below.
Constraints
Procurement legislations
Procurement guidelines or directives
Organizational process assets
Enterprise environmental factors-
required delivery dates
Available skilled resources
Attitude of stakeholders
Inputs Outputs
Mechanisms
The project management plan describes how the procurement processes will be managed from
developing procurement documentation through contract closure.
iii.) Agreement
Agreements are understandings between parties, including understanding of the duties of each
party.
Approved change requests can include modifications to the terms and conditions of the contract,
including the procurement statement of work, pricing, and descriptions of the products, services,
or results to be provided. All procurement-related changes are formally documented in writing
and approved before being implemented through the Control Procurements process
Work performance data includes (1) the extent to which quality standards are being satisfied, (2)
the costs that have been incurred or committed, and (3) identification of the seller invoices that
have been paid. All data are collected as part of project execution.
In A contract change control system defines the process by which the procurement can be
modified. It includes the paperwork, tracking systems, change order/instruction/proposal
procedures, dispute resolution procedures, and approval levels necessary for authorizing
changes. The contract change control system is integrated with the integrated change control
system.
The key focus here is to measure the impact of change on all project limitations. Changes to any
part of the project may be requested during the course of the project especially during the project
executing and monitoring and control phase. It is not necessary to execute all changes. In the
Perform Integrated Change Control, changes can be accepted or rejected after evaluation of their
impact.
Since changes are inevitable, project manager should work to prevent the root causes of changes
whenever possible. Most cases indicate improper planning of the project results in change
requests. Although changes can happen, they are not encouraged and the handling of possible
changes must be planned, managed and controlled.
Changes can have two categories: the one that impact the project management plan, baselines,
policies and procedures, charter, contract, or statement of work and the one that does not impact
any of this.
Successful management of contract and subcontract changes can reduce costs, timely completion
of work and services, increase performance results, and improve business relations.
Reports required by the contract will assist the agency in monitoring the suppliers/contractor’s
general work effort, but cannot be relied upon to accurately measure contractor progress. The
procuring entity would usually appoint staff members or, preferably a team of qualified
individuals, to take the responsibility of administering the contract. It is the responsibility of the
Contract Administrator to perform the obligations and duties of the procuring entity specified in
the contract and to ensure the contractors and service providers implement the contract in
accordance with its terms and conditions. Nonetheless, the contractor or services provider has
the primary responsibility to ensure that the works or services meet the required standards and
to advise on the need for any changes as a result of constraints faced during contract
implementation.
The person designated in the contract performs the key role in managing the contract and
monitoring the contractor’s performance.
Both the receiver/project manager and the purchaser have roles in monitoring supplier
performance and communicating/ escalating issues to their internal management team.
Monitoring is needed to ensure that the supplier is meeting the terms and conditions of the
procurement documents. Monitoring will include, but not be limited to, items such as on time
delivery, responsiveness, completion of all requirements, and quality of supply or service
provided.
Monitoring the performance of the contractor is a key function of proper contract administration.
The purpose is to ensure that the contractor is performing all duties in accordance with the
contract and for the agency to be aware of and address any developing problems or issues.
Small or less complex contracts normally, require little, if any, monitoring. However, that does
not preclude the possibility of more detailed monitoring if deemed necessary by the agency.
Conversely, large contracts may need little monitoring if the items or services purchased are not
complex, and the agency is comfortable with the contractor’s performance and level of risk
associated with the contract.
• How will you know that the agency is receiving what is paid for?
• How will you know that the contractor is complying with the terms of the contract?
Review the statement of work and other contract terms, including contractor compliance
requirements. All of these requirements are deliverables that the contractor agreed to when the
contract was executed or the purchase order was issued. Design the monitoring program to
focus on items that are most important. Generally, this means to focus the monitoring on the
outcomes that result from the contract.
Consider the effect that the contract payment methodology has on what needs to be monitored.
For example, if payment is based on a firm fixed price (a specific amount of money for a unit of
service), it is not necessary to verify contractor’s expenses as they are not relevant to this type of
contract. Under a firm, fixed price contract, the agency should ensure that:
• The number of units billed is the same as the number of units received.
• The quantity and price agree with the contract amounts.
• The units meet or exceed the contract specifications.
– Full scope site visits are typically scheduled visits to the contractor’s /consultant’s place of
business. They are based on risk assessment and cover a broad range of contract compliance
and performance issues.
– Limited scope site visits typically focus on a particular problem. Examples of some typical
reasons for considering a limited scope site visit include, but are not limited to:
o Other contractors/consultants have experienced problems in a specific area and there
is an indication that this contractor/consultant might be experiencing the same
problem.
o Contractor/Consultant has provided a corrective action plan for a problem, but the
agency is not certain that the proposed solution will resolve the problem
More complex contracts and contracts that the agency perceives as having a higher degree of risk
may require both reviews and visits to the contractor’s/consultant’s facilities to ensure progress
is in accordance with the contract schedule. Site visits can be used to verify actual performance
against scheduled or reported performance. They can also ensure that the contractor/consultant
is dedicating sufficient resources and appropriate personnel to the contract. Site visits also
reinforce the importance of the contract to the contractor/consultant, as well as provide the
opportunity to enhance communication with the contractor/consultant.
To perform a site visit, the agency should develop a comprehensive and objective monitoring
checklist which:
– Focuses on the outcomes, but also includes compliance requirements. Monitoring criteria
should reference the applicable contract requirement.
– Assess contractor performance the same way. Are any errors considered minor or
inconsequential? If so, these must be outlined up front so that the contract is monitored
consistently. Clarify areas where monitors may exercise judgment
Desk Review
Typically, these are agency reviews of reports submitted by the contractor/consultant to the
entity. Entities should review the reports for the following;
Compare the report with what is known about the contractor’s/consultant’s operating
environment. Did adverse weather in the area recently increase the cost of construction supplies
or in the cause of a temporary reduction in services provided?
These are reviews of contractor/consultant invoices to determine if the rates and services are the
same as allowed by the contract. Determine if the supporting documents such as cost reports,
third party receipts for expenses, detailed client information, etc., adequately support the request
for payment. If the contractor/consultant consistently provides incorrect invoices and/or the
supporting document is insufficient to support the request, then additional monitoring such as
an on-site visit may be necessary.
Risk Assessment
Limited resources require the use of risk assessment because there is not sufficient time to
oversee all aspects of a contract. An effective risk assessment model will help focus monitoring
resources on contractors/consultants with the highest risk of noncompliance. First, identify risk
factors. Risk factors are indicators that assess the risk of the contract or project objectives not
being achieved. General risk factors may include:
Once the risk factors are identified, assign weights to each factor. Weights describe how
significant each factor is in identifying the contractors/consultants who should be monitored. In
case of administering a number of contractors/consultants, rating each contractor/consultant on
the risk elements will highly enhance the planning and execution of monitoring task.
It is important to note that the risk assessment is a dynamic process that should be updated
regularly to reflect the results of monitoring visits, reviews of payment vouchers, desk reviews,
etc. For example, if a contractor/consultant has fallen significantly behind schedule in delivering
Works/Services to the targeted population, the risk assessment should be updated to indicate
the elevated risk and this impacts how the contract is monitored in the future. Likewise, if a
Monitoring reviews, audits and investigations should be routinely carried out to:
The goal of follow up should be to bring the contractor/consultant back into compliance with the
contract requirements. Follow up is essential as the problem will not correct itself simply by
identifying it and including it in the monitoring report.
Monitoring results should also be used to improve the contract requirements for future contracts.
If there are unnecessary restrictions or insufficient restrictions, this is the time to make a note of
the recommended changes so future contracts can incorporate the changes.
Initially that action may involve contacting the supplier and asking them the reason
behind the failure. If the supplier provides a satisfactory response, the issue and the
response should be documented.
If the supplier either fails to respond, provides an inadequate response, or continues to
have performance problems, continue to document the performance issue and issue a
Cure letter/Notice of default/ Notice of unsatisfactory performance requesting a formal
response as to root cause, and proposed corrective actions, including timing. This letter
should be issued by the respective Contracting Officer.
If a supplier’s (contractor’s /consultant’s) poor performance rises to the level that it is necessary
to cancel their contract for cause:
A formal cancellation letter must be drafted by the agency Contracting Officer and
approved by the Office Head prior to issuance. The respective agency legal counsel and
claims advisor if any must approve termination and be copied on the letter.
The approved cancellation letter may be emailed (with a receipt confirmation requested)
or faxed to the supplier. The letter must also be mailed, delivery receipt required. Copies
of the confirmation documents must be retained as part of the purchasing record..
If several instances with this same supplier have occurred; or if any one event is significant
enough by itself, the Contracting Officer should give consideration to suspension or debarment
of the supplier.
Inspections and audits required by the buyer and supported by the seller, as specified in the
procurement contract, can be conducted during execution of the project to verify compliance in
the seller’s work processes or deliverables. If authorized by contract, some inspection and audit
teams can include buyer procurement personnel.
The inspection and verification, prior to acceptance, should ensure as a minimum that:
Work performance data and reports supplied by sellers are evaluated against the agreement
requirements. Work performance information from this evaluation is then reported as
appropriate. Performance reporting provides management with information about how
effectively the seller is achieving the contractual objectives.
Payments to the seller are typically processed by the accounts payable system of the buyer after
certification of satisfactory work by an authorized person on the project team. All payments
should be made and documented in strict accordance with the terms of the contract.
Contested changes and potential constructive changes are those requested changes where the
buyer and seller cannot reach an agreement on compensation for the change or cannot agree that
a change has occurred. These contested changes are variously called claims, disputes, or appeals.
Claims are documented, processed, monitored, and managed throughout the contract life cycle,
usually in accordance with the terms of the contract. If the parties themselves do not resolve a
claim, it may have to be handled in accordance with alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
typically following procedures established in the contract. Settlement of all claims and disputes
through negotiation is the preferred method. Refer section 11.3.4 for details for claims
management processes.
A records management system is used by the project manager to manage contract and
procurement documentation and records. It consists of a specific set of processes, related control
functions, and automation tools that are consolidated and combined as part of the project
management information system. The system contains a retrievable archive of contract
documents and correspondence.
Competencies
Change requests to the project management plan, its subsidiary plans, and other components,
such as the cost baseline, schedule baseline, and procurement management plan, may result
from the Control Procurements process. Change requests are processed for review and approval
through the Perform Integrated Change Control process.
Requested but unresolved changes can include direction provided by the buyer or actions taken
by the seller, which the other party considers a constructive change to the contract. Since any of
these constructive changes may be disputed by one party and can lead to a claim against the
other party, such changes are uniquely identified and documented by project correspondence.
Contract documentation. Contract documentation may include the contract with all
supporting schedules, requested unapproved contract changes, and approved change
requests.
The Elements of the organizational process assets that may be updated includes:
The instructions below provide the activities that shall be carried out for control/administer
procurement management:
The Close Procurement process also involves administrative activities such as finalizing open
claims, updating records to reflect final results, and archiving such information for future use.
Close Procurement addresses each contract applicable to the project or a project phase. In
multiphase projects, the term of a contract may only be applicable to a given phase of the project.
In these cases, the Close Procurement process closes the procurement(s) applicable to that phase
of the project. Unresolved claims may be subject to litigation after closure. The contract terms
and conditions can prescribe specific procedures for agreement closure. The Close Procurement
process supports the Close Project process group by ensuring contractual agreements are
completed or terminated.
Close Procurement process involves product verification (was the work completed correctly?)
and administrative closeout (updating and archiving of records).
Early termination of a contract is a special case of procurement closure that can result from a
mutual agreement by both parties, from the default of one party, or for convenience of the buyer
if provided for in the contract. The rights and responsibilities of the parties in the event of an
early termination are contained in the termination clause of the contract. Based upon those
procurement terms and conditions, the buyer may have the right to terminate the whole contract
or a portion of the contract, at any time, for cause or convenience. However, based upon those
contract terms and conditions, the buyer may have to compensate the seller for seller’s
preparations and for any completed and accepted work related to the terminated part of the
contract.
The Inputs, Mechanisms (Tools & Techniques & competencies), Controls / Constraints and
Outputs [IMCO] for close procurement process is depicted in Figure 2.8 below.
Constraints
Procurement legislations
Procurement guidelines or directives
Organization process assets
Enterprise environmental factors
required delivery dates
Available skilled resources
Attitude of stakeholders
Outputs
Inputs
Close CP Contract file
Formal acceptance and
Project management plan Procurement
update closure
Contract documentation Close files
Organizational process
assets updates
Mechanisms
The project management plan contains the procurement management plan, which provides the
details and guidelines for closing out procurements.
To close the contract, all contract documentation is collected, indexed, and filed. Information on
contract schedule, scope, quality, and cost performance along with all contract change
documentation, payment records, and inspection results are catalogued. This information can be
used for lessons learned information and as a basis for evaluating contractors for future
contracts.
A procurement audit is a structured review of the procurement process originating from the Plan
Procurement Management process through Control Procurements. The objective of a
procurement audit is to identify successes and failures that warrant recognition in the
preparation or administration of other procurement contracts on the project, or on other projects
within the performing organization.
In all procurement relationships, the final equitable settlement of all outstanding issues, claims,
and disputes by negotiation is a primary goal. Whenever settlement cannot be achieved through
direct negotiation, some form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) including mediation or
arbitration may be explored. When all fails, litigation in the courts is the least desirable option.
A records management system is used by the project manager to manage contract and
procurement documentation and records. Contract documents and correspondence are archived
through the records management system as part of the Close Procurement process.
iv.) Competencies
The buyer, usually through its authorized procurement administrator, provides the seller with
formal written notice that the contract has been completed. Requirements for formal
procurement closure are usually defined in the terms and conditions of the contract and are
included in the procurement management plan.
The instructions below provide the activities that shall be carried out for close procurement
management:
It is essential that the scope of the project and related professional inputs requirement,
milestones, deliverables, statement of works be determined before a request for consultant
services is processed (refer Plan Procurement process).
Relation between owners/clients and the consultants under contract can be very complex.
Consultants often act as ‘agent’ on behalf of the owner/client, exercising authorities and entering
into bidding contracts.
It shall be identified from the Conditions of Contract for Works and consultant contracts that the
consultant is engaged to perform consultant services and that the consultant shall NOT be
regarded as an employee NOR an agent of the owner/client in some circumstances.
An agent is “a person authorized by owner/client to act for, or in place of, the owner; one
entrusted with the contract and whose functions is to bring about, modify, affect, accept
performance of, or terminate contractual obligation between the owner, contractor and third
persons.”
In some instances, however, consultants may be perceived to be ‘agents’ of the owner/client, and
where their behaviours may be construed as such to be an ‘agent’ of through words or conduct.
The relationship of the owner/client and ‘agent’ can only be established with the consent
(expressed or implied) of the owner/client and the ‘agent’.
Contractors are not usually familiar with the consultant’s contract, and unless they receive notice
of specific limitations to the consultant’s authority or delegated power, it may be reasonable for
them to perceive the consultant as having the authority to do anything reasonably necessary to
carry out duties which they are expressly authorized to do so. This could lead to the consultant
being seen as ‘agent’ of the owner/client in some situations.
If the consultant was an ‘agent’, the consultant would be deemed to have the legal power to the
conditions of contract relationship with third parties (the contractor). In other words, should the
consultant instruct the contractor to do work not authorized by the owner/client, the latter could
be liable to pay that work.
In order to ensure that the consultant is NOT perceived as an agent or employee of the
owner/client, the Owner/Client should:
At the pre-planning meeting: explain and emphasize the Conditions of Contract at the
initial meeting with the consultant,
Make clear the exact nature of the consultant’s roles, responsibilities and authorities
Ensure all communication flow be made through the consultant
Where communication between the consultant and the contractor become contentious,
seek the assistance of Claims Expert to assist in resolving the situation
i.) General
Contract administration is the process that begins from when the contract is awarded to until
when the services is completed and accepted or the contract terminated; payment has been
made; and disputes have been completely resolved.
The contract administration of Engineering Services is a primary part of the procurement process
that assures the project owner/client gets a quality product for what it has agreed and assures
that the users/stakeholders are satisfied with the final product (engineering services:
design/supervision).
ii.) Purpose
iii.) Focus
Obtaining quality services that meet or exceed requirements (SOW) / terms of reference,
Schedule-complete project on time,
Budget-complete project within budget and
Closeout-must be problem free
iv.) Influences
v.) Process
Begin with post award orientation: either by conference / kick-off meeting, letter or some
other form of communication,
Establish good communication process: helps both parties (owner/client and consultant)
to achieve a clear and mutual understanding of the requirements;
the consultant is required to understand the roles and responsibilities of the owner/client
Project Manager who will administer the contract, and reduces future problems;
Pre-construction meeting (kick-off meeting) with applicable program and contracting
officials prior to the post award orientation conference so that there is a clear
understanding of their specific responsibilities and restrictions in administering the
contract;
Discuss authority of the project owner’s personnel who will administer the contract,
quality control and testing, the specific contract deliverable requirements, special contract
provisions, etc.;
Ensure there is an alternative dispute resolution technique in place – known as
"partnering" to help avoid future contract administration problems;
To ensure that the end users are satisfied with the services being obtained under the
contract, obtain input directly from the customers through the use of customer
satisfaction surveys
vi.) Monitoring
Develop a master schedule and a work breakdown structure (WBS) that incorporates
every important date or milestone in the contract,
List contract deliverables and their evaluation criteria in details, with checklist for the
team who perform the tasks,
Set a schedule and reminders for required reports, including the format and delivery
method,
Ensure all communications flow from the consultant is directed through the Project
Manager to the contractor including any contract interruption, site requests or request for
changes or information. Consultants provide recommendations to the Project Manager,
so that the Project Manager can make an informed decision, however the Project Manager
remains the ultimate decision maker,
Be familiar with contents of the RFP, contract, and review all change orders and
contemplate change order notices in detail,
Attend all site meetings and review minutes for accuracy. When unable to attend site
meetings, review the minutes and discuss with the consultant.
Exercise the right to override recommendations or decisions made by consultants and to
accept or reject work regardless of the consultant’s recommendation.
Deal with issues promptly (when they arise). If any issue is of a specialist/technical
nature, seek advice from third parties. If there is conflicting advice, consult with various
professional and technical expertise from the industry.
Reporting requirements (format, frequency, what information, how transmitted)
For each party involved in the contract, document change orders and contract
modifications that require rescheduling of any deliverables.
Ensure that expenses charged to the contract are allowable, allocable and reasonable.
Give room for competing priorities
Establish clear roles and responsibilities of procurement, program, and finance officials
with regard to review and approval of contractor invoices and payments.
Ensure consistent review and approval of payments for contracts prior to disbursement.
Arrange for sufficient guidance to Owner's Technical Representatives on how to conduct
payment or invoice reviews
Establish sufficient policies and procedures on payment or invoice submission and
approval.
Sufficient information on the payment or invoice for thorough review of claimed costs to
determine if they are allowable, allocable, and reasonable.
Avoid delays in processing payment or invoice.
Sufficient documentation, record keeping, and tracking of payment or invoice.
viii.) Claims
Claims in connection with engineering services contracts should be recognized timely and it
involves “timely” and “accurate” detection of the claim(s) in terms of the contract provisions and
requirements defined in the scope of services (terms of reference). The detection of the claims as
to the services comes from performance reviews, scope review, expenditure reviews, project
meetings, site visits etc.,
Notification of engineering service claim involves alerting the other party of a potential problem
in a manner that is non-adversarial. An initial letter of a claim notice to the other should be
concise, clear, simple, conciliatory, and cooperative. It should indicate the problem and alert the
other party of the potential increase in time or cost.
Engineering service providers expected to substantiate extension of time requests for events that
are considered to be owner’s/client’s risk events or beyond the control of both parties.
Engineering service providers /Consultants are responsible to provide detailed particular for the
reasons to request extension of time.
Owner/client must follow the approval process for extension of time for engineering service
contracts. The conditions of contract for client/ consultant services agreement should be strictly
adhered during processing of extension of time.
Closeout documentation.
The procurement methodology for Works (construction services) should be part of project
planning. It is particularly important that a bidding approach be established collectively by the
Project management and contracting teams early in a project’s development. Owners/clients or
procuring entity generally uses two distinct bidding approaches to solicit and evaluate offers
from bidders.
These are (1) Pre-qualification and then through an Invitation to Tender (ITT) and (2) Tenders.
Through an Invitation to Tender (ITT)
Pre-qualification can be used when there is a need to acquire complex or extended Works
(construction services). In Pre-qualification, owner/client is attempting to invite for Tender from
firms who are experienced. In this solicitation, owner/client is looking for expertise and quality
of construction services at the best possible price. It is therefore critical that the level of expertise
and quality of construction service required for each project first be determined, then clearly
communicated to proponents and, finally, properly evaluated by a knowledgeable and objective
owner/client selection team.
Tenders can be used when the scope of work to be delivered under the contract is fixed and
finite. Bidders are invited to submit their price for providing that Works (construction services).
The owner/client or procuring entity objective is to obtain the technical compliance and lowest
bid and lowest acceptance price for the work.
The most recommended method for Works procurement is acquiring using Tenders either
through public advertisement or source lists. The estimated cost of the construction work to be
tendered is the main consideration when determining whether to use public advertisement or a
source list.
Bid/Proposal class are used when there is a need to acquire complex or extended construction
services, usually through construction management or when only part of the required services,
as in Design-Build.
In bid calls, owner/client is looking for expertise and quality of services at the best possible
price. It is therefore critical that the level of expertise and quality of service required for each
project first be determined, then clearly communicated to proponents and, finally, properly
evaluated by a knowledgeable and objective owner selection team.
Open Tendering
Selective Tendering
Request for Quotation
Restricted Tendering / Limited Tendering
Direct Award
There are four primary methodologies currently employed or practiced in the Ethiopian
construction industry for procurement of Works (construction services).
The selection of the best or optimum methodology is a key consideration for the owner/client.
The solicitation of one methodology over another should be carefully analysed by all
stakeholders during the development of the risk management plan in order to determine the
inherent risks, advantages and disadvantages associated with each methodology.
The selection of a particular methodology for the delivery of Works (construction services) is
based on an analysis of those risks identified in the risk management plan that may impact the
priority of the project during the project’s planning and implementation stages.
Owner/client must follow informed selection of the optimum or best approach based upon a
review of:
a) The complexity of the construction project (warehouse = low-range level; custom office
building = middle -range level; a laboratory facility = high-range level).
b) Priority of objectives (cost of project vs. time of delivery vs. quality of product delivered).
c) Degree of control sought on the project by the owner / client (design, quality of material
selections, etc.).
Below Table 2.2 depicts the characteristics of project delivery methods / contract
types/construction methodologies that are widely used in Ethiopian construction industry.
Below construction methodologies comparison table provides the perceived advantages and
disadvantages of the methodologies practiced in the Ethiopian construction industry.
General
Contract administration is the process that begins from when the contract is awarded to until
when the construction service is completed and accepted or the contract terminated; payment
has been made; and disputes have been completely resolved.
Purpose
Focus
Obtaining quality product and services that meet or exceed contract specifications (SOW),
Schedule-complete project on time,
Budget-complete project within budget and
Closeout-must be problem free
Influences
Process
Begin with post award orientation: either by conference / kick-off meeting, letter or some
other form of communication,
Establish good communication process: helps both parties (project owner and contractor)
to achieve a clear and mutual understanding of the contract requirements; & the
contractor to understand the roles and responsibilities of the Project Manager who will
administer the contract, and reduces future problems;
Pre-construction meeting with applicable program and contracting officials prior to the
post award orientation conference so that there is a clear understanding of their specific
responsibilities and restrictions in administering the contract;
Discuss authority of the project owner’s personnel who will administer the contract,
quality control and testing, the specific contract deliverable requirements, special contract
provisions, etc.;
Ensure there is an alternative dispute resolution technique in place – known as
"partnering" to help avoid future contract administration problems;
To ensure that the end users are satisfied with the product or service being obtained
under the contract, obtain input directly from the customers through the use of customer
satisfaction surveys.
There is a need to ensure that construction briefing information and documentation being
provided to a construction contractor by the consultant/client at the initial pre-construction
meeting is recent, relevant and consistent, in order to safeguard the interests of the owner/client
and provide uniform direction to all project team members.
The pre-construction start-up meeting takes place following the award of a construction contract
and should not be confused with the tender review meeting (also called the pre-award meeting),
which takes place, as required, prior to the award of a contract. These tender review meetings
would be used to assess whether the contractor understands the technical requirements of the
project and/or identify any issues / requirements that are essential to the successful delivery of
the project.
The meeting should include the consultant, the client, the contractor and other third parties (as
appropriate).
2.6.2. Monitoring
Develop a master schedule and a work breakdown structure (WBS) that incorporates
every important date or milestone in the contract,
List contract deliverables and their evaluation criteria in details, with checklist for the
team who perform the tasks,
Set a schedule and reminders for required reports, including the format and delivery
method,
Make it clear to all contractors and other consultants, the exact nature of the parties to the
contract roles, responsibilities and authorities;
Ensure all communications flow from the consultant is directed through the Project
Manager to the contractor including any contract interruption, site requests or request for
changes or information. Consultants provide recommendations to the Project Manager,
so that the Project Manager can make an informed decision, however the Project Manager
remains the ultimate decision maker,
Attend all site meetings and review minutes for accuracy. When unable to attend site
meetings, review the minutes and discuss with the consultant.
Exercise the right to override recommendations or decisions made by consultant’s and to
accept or reject work regardless of the consultant’s recommendation.
Deal with issues promptly (when they arise). If any issue is of a specialist/technical
nature, seek advice from third parties. If there is conflicting advice, consult with various
professional and technical expertises from the industry.
Milestones: key dates, performance measures, deliverables;
Administrative requirements (compliance, licenses, calibration certificats, etc)
Communications (including regular meetings, discuss about progress, changes,
problems, performance, etc)
Risk assessment and review
Quality assurance
For each party involved in the contract, document change orders and contract
modifications that require rescheduling of any deliverables.
Ensure that expenses charged to the contract are allowable, allocable and reasonable.
Give room for competing priorities
Contract review (how will lesson learned be identified and communicated?)
Must have provisions in the contract to manage changes in estimated quantity in the
contract,
Check for the allowable increase in quantity in the contract (if any) or apply for change
request,
Unit prices remain the same except as may provided in the contract to adjust rates.
A change is any situation in which work, authorized by the client, differs from the work
described in the original contract. In construction contracts these are called ‘change orders or
variation’.
They are normally associated with specific Conditions of Contract clauses in the contract and
allow the consultant or client to order additional work, make changes, etc. The fewer the number
of changes the greater the chance to manage the project cost within budget, reduce delays and
avoid claims. A continuous flow of change can:
The administrative process required for the approval and processing of change orders begins
with the identification of the need for a change, followed by the contactor’s quotation for the
change, and the review, negotiation, approval and payment of the change. A review of the
impact of a change on the project schedules must be conducted during the negotiation process
and included as part of the total cost of the change, thereby decreasing the chance of delays on
the project.
Establish clear roles and responsibilities of procurement, program, and finance officials
with regard to review and approval of contractor invoices and interim payment
certificates.
Provide consistent review and approval of invoices and interim payment certificates
prior to disbursement,
Payment schedules (how often, completion of deliverables, milestones, monthly, etc);
total contract amount, payment arrangements, who confirms invoices/ interim payment
certificates are correct, who authorizes payments;
Prepare sufficient guidance to Owner's Technical Representatives on how to conduct
invoice/ interim payment certificates reviews
Assess reasonableness of direct costs when approving additional costs or new rates when
required under the contracts.
Establish sufficient policies and procedures on invoice/ interim payment certificates
submission and approval.
Provide sufficient information on the interim payment certificates for thorough review of
claimed costs to determine if they are allowable, allocable, and reasonable.
Contested changes and potential constructive changes are those requested changes where the
buyer and seller cannot reach an agreement on compensation for the change or cannot agree that
a change has occurred. These contested changes are variously called claims, disputes, or appeals.
Claims are documented, processed, monitored, and managed throughout the contract life cycle,
usually in accordance with the terms of the contract. If the parties themselves do not resolve a
claim, it may have to be handled in accordance with alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
typically following procedures established in the contract. Settlement of all claims and disputes
through negotiation is the preferred method.
i. Claim Identification
Recognition and identification of change,
Construction claim recognition and identification involves “timely” and “accurate”
detection of a construction claim. The detection comes from performance reviews,
expenditure reviews, project meetings, site visits etc.,
Notification of change,
Construction claim notification involves alerting the other party of a potential problem in
a manner that is non-adversarial. Time limit requirements are very crucial and critical.
An initial letter of a claim notice to the other should be concise, clear, simple, conciliatory,
and cooperative. It should indicate the problem and alert the other party of the
potential increase in time or cost. Time limit requirement are normally specified in the
contracts.
ii. Claim Quantification
Systematic and accurate documentation of change,
Records and documentation play a very important role in the settlement of contract
claims. Daily reports and records with sufficient details need to be given attention as
they are among the most important document on the projects.
Analysis of time and cost impacts of change,
Using the different techniques available the cost and time impact of the change will be
calculated in this process (refer Construction Project Claim Management Manual)
Pricing of change,
The purpose of this process is to give the other party in the contract a substantive
description and details of the extra costs incurred or to be incurred due to a contract
change. This detailed cost description is necessary for understanding, negotiating, and
justifying extra contract costs.
Negotiation of claim
A structured and proper negotiation preparation includes (1) ascertaining that all
information is current and complete, (2) minimizing the scope of negotiation beforehand
so that insignificant points should not precipitate a violent argument and disrupt
progress, (3) knowing one’s weakness and trying to utilize weak points by conceding
them in return from the other party, (4) foreseeing problems, and (5) anticipating the
opposition’s next move. If an agreement cannot be reached and any party believes his
position is correct, he should propose an alternative dispute resolution method. If
this fails, the choice remaining is to implement the disputes resolution mechanism
or take the matter to court.
Dispute resolution and settlement.
There are many options the employers and the contractors can select for settling any
dispute occurring in their project. Referring the matter to Dispute Review Expert/Board
(DRE/DRB) if such is the case in the contract is one way. If either party is dissatisfied
with the DRE/DRB decision, the case might be referred to arbitration after notice of
dissatisfaction is issued.
Clients usually adopt a generic quality assurance process for approval or rejection of extension of
time on construction contracts. Consultants are responsible to implement this process to ensure:
The consultant must follow the roles and responsibilities in the approval process for extension of
time on construction contracts. The request for extension of time can be made prior to, during, or
after the event has been determined that has caused delay or disruption that will prolong the
contract duration. The conditions of contract and consultant services contract must be followed
during processing of extension of time.
A procuring entity shall keep all records of procurement for at least ten years after the
resulting contract was entered into or, if no contract resulted, after the procurement
proceedings were terminated.
o The procurement Units of the procuring entities should have dedicated recording and
information management sections (registries) to store, retrieve and disseminate all
records and information relevant to procurements and disposals.
o The registry should be headed by Information and Documentation Officer who has
adequate education and experience on information and documentation management.
o The procurement registry should have a complete computer based database of the
name, description, date of creation, location, reference no. and other relevant details
of all the records and documentations.
o Procuring entities should implement a systematic information management system.
o The information Management System of should be supported by Information
Technology.
o The procuring entities should establish an Electronic Document Management System
(EDMS) which helps to store and retrieve all the procurement documentation.
o All the documents and correspondence including the original bids should be scanned
to the system as they come in.
The procurement unit should have a common network folder where reference materials
(including procurement laws, manuals, standard bidding documents, training materials,
reports, etc.) are shared among procurement staff.
This CPPM Manual shall be adjusted to confirm to specific requirements of projects in line with
their contractual obligations
The CPPM Manual may be amended for errata and similar circumstances as and when
recognized.
The correction/improvement of this CPPM Manual shall be initiated by Manuals Preparation
and Revision Standing Committee based on the feedbacks collected during the manual's three
years operation period and decision made by the ECPMI.
3.3. Manual Revision
This CPPM Manual shall be revised every three years unless otherwise required due to special
circumstances.
The revision of this CPPM Manual shall be initiated by Manuals Preparation and Revision
Standing Committee based on the feedbacks collected during the manual's three years operation
period and decision made by the ECPMI.
Bibliography
[1.] Design – Build Institute of America (2015), choosing a project delivery method, A Design –
Build Institute of America Publication
[2.] Project Management Institute (PMI) (2016). Construction Extension to the Project
Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) Guide. Newtown Square, PA, USA: Project
Management Institute (PMI)
[3.] Project Management Institute (PMI) (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of
Knowledge (PMBOK) (5th edition). Newtown Square, PA, USA: Project Management
Institute (PMI)
[4.] International Project Management Association (2015). Individual Competence Baseline for
Project, Program, and Portfolio Management. 4th version, International Project
Management Association.
[5.] Real Property Branch, Procurement Management Manual (2011)
[6.] www.ppa.gov.et for préparations of the Project pre-qualification document or BD for the
contract.