Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Always remember to write full work for what you do. This will help your grade in
case of incomplete or wrong answers. Also, no credit will be given for an answer, even if
correct, if you give no justification for it.
Write your final answers on the sheets provided. You may separate them as long as
you put your name on each of them. We will staple them when you hand them in. Ask
if you need extra sheets, they will be provided. Remember to put your name on each of
them and add them after the problem they refer to.
Name: Solutions
Problem 1
For a central-force motion the vector angular momentum (l) is conserved since
N = r × F(r) = 0 and N = l̇. This implies that the motion is planar, since the
vectors r and ṙ are constrained to always lye in a plane orthogonal to l, and l is
constant. It is then natural to choose planar polar coordinates (r and θ) to describe
the motion, and write the Lagrangian as,
1 1 k
L = T − V = m(ṙ2 + r2 θ̇2 ) + , (1)
2 β rβ
where we have derived the expression of V (r) = −k/β/rβ from F (r) = −∂V /∂r.
(1.b) Construct the effective potential Veff (r) for which the radial equation of motion
reads:
∂Veff (r)
mr̈ = − .
∂r
The equation of motion for θ expresses the conservation of the magnitude of the
angular momentum, i.e.
d
(mr2 θ̇) = 0 → mr2 θ̇ = l0 , (2)
dr
where l0 is a constant (of motion). On the other hand, the equation of motion for
r reads,
k (−β)
mr̈ − mrθ̇2 − =0, (3)
β rβ+1
or, using Eq. (2),
(1.c) Sketch Veff (r) for the case i) β < 0, ii) 0 < β < 2, and iii) β > 2. For what values
of β does a stable circular orbit exist? For what values of β are all orbits bounded?
One can see from the sketches in the figure that a stable circular orbit exists only
(d) β < 0 and 0 < β < 2, since the effective potential has a minimum for r = r ,
for 0
r = r0 + ⌘
where r0 defines the radius of the circular orbit. For β > 2 Veff (r) has a maximum
Put into the equation of r,
for r = r0 and the circular orbit is not stable. One also sees that only for β < 0 all
the orbits are bounded. k M2
mr̈ = + +1
r mr3
(1.d) For those values kof β which support
⌘ M 2the existence
⌘ of
k( a +
stable
1) 1 circular
3M 2 orbit, calculate
) m¨⌘= [1 ( + 1) ] + (1 3 ) = [ + ]⌘
the radius, r0 , rof
0
the circularr0 orbit
+1 mr0in terms
3
r0 of the (conserved)
r0 +1 r0 mrangular
4
0
momentum
(l0 ) and other constants. k( + 1) 3M 2
M 2
) m¨
⌘= [ + ]⌘ = [ (2 )]⌘
r0 +2 mr04 mr04
The radius of the 2 circular
1 stable orbit is obtained from the equation
where r0 = ( M
mk
) 2 . When the orbit is closed, the frequency of ⌘ should satisfy
l02
2
∂Veff (r) 1 !⌘ k l 1 l0 k
= − 3 + β β+1 = =0 → − + β−2 = 0 , (6)
∂r mr β !r✓ n r3 m r
from where
whichl, none
are integers. Since
can derive r0 as
M p M
!⌘ = 2 , !✓ = ✓˙ = , 1
l02 l02
2−β
k mr02 β−2 mk mr 2
0
= → r0 = → r0 = . (7)
so m r0β−2 p l02 mk
l
2 =
n
which is any rational number.
(1.e) Let r = r0 + η and derive the equation of motion for radial deviations, assuming η
small. Under what conditions will the perturbed orbit be closed?
l02 k
mη̈ = 3
− . (8)
m(r0 + η) (r0 + η)β+1
l02
η k η
mη̈ = 1−3 − β+1 1 − (β + 1) + O(η 2 ) , (9)
mr03 r0 r0 r 0
and finally, by observing that the first parenthesis vanishes due to the condition on
Veff that defines r0 , one gets,
η̈ + ωr2 η = 0 , (11)
with
l02 p l0
ωr2 = 2 4
(2 − β) → ω r = 2−β 2 , (12)
m r0 mr0
which shows how the radial displacement undergoes harmonic oscillations of fre-
quency ωr . When the orbit is closed the frequency of radial oscillations has to be
commensurate with the angular frequency (ωθ = θ̇), i.e. the ratio of the two has to
be a rational number, or,
ωr m
= ↔ nωr = mωθ , (13)
ωθ n
where m and n are integers.
Name:Solutions
Problem 2
The central force acting in this problem is of the form studied in Problem 1 with
β = 4. Therefore, we can use the general treatment of Problem 1 without having to
justify all the steps again. Notice however that in this problem the potential is missing
a prefactor β1 and therefore you have to trace that factor of 14 through your results for
Problem 1 in order not to do mistakes.
In particular, since β > 2, we know from the sketches in part 1.c) that the effective
potential has a maximum that we can calculate to be at
1
4km 2
r0 = , (14)
l02
and the maximum value of the effective potential is,
Problem 3
η1 = a1 eiω1 t , η2 = a2 eiω2 t
1 1
x1 = a11 η1 + a21 η2 = √ eω1 t + √ eω2 t ,
2 2
1 1
x2 = a11 η1 + a21 η2 = √ eω1 t − √ eω2 t .
2 2
The displacements of the two oscillators will be given by (real part only),
1
x1 = √ [cos(ω1 t) + cos(ω2 t)] ,
2
1
x2 = √ [cos(ω1 t) − cos(ω2 t)] .
2
If we choose initial conditions for which only η1 is active (x1 (0) = x2 (0), ẋ1 (0) =
ẋ2 (0)), then x1 (t) = x2 (t), i.e. the two oscillators oscillate is phase with requency
ω1 ) (symmetric mode). Vicevera, if we choose initial conditions for which only η2
is active (x1 (0) = −x2 (0), ẋ1 (0) = −ẋ2 (0)), then x1 (t) = −x2 (t), i.e. the two
oscillators oscillate with opposite phase and frequency ω2 ) (antisymmetric mode).
(3.c) Assume α ω02 (weak coupling): show that the two oscillators oscillate with the
same frequency (ωf = ω0 ) and their amplitudes vary harmonically with frequency
ωb = α/(2ω0 ) and opposite phase (i.e. when one of the amplitudes is minimal the
other is maximal). This is the well-known phenomenon of beats.