CÁLCULO DE MONOBLOQUES

Profesor: Ing. Daniel E. Weber

J.T.P.: Ing. Sebastián Romero

Cimentaciones U.T.N. – Facultad Regional Santa Fe – 2009

E-Mail: cimentacionesutn@yahoo.com.ar
 Análisis del momento reactivo lateral MS:
Método de Sulzberger Volumen de Tensiones

M y ⋅ tg(α )

H
dy MS
Cy ⋅ b σy
α MS σ máx.
R
2 α
⋅t
3 y y=
t y
t y t
3
1 2
⋅t G
3 Ct Ct Ct ⋅ b  y
σ y = C t ⋅ 1 −  ⋅ y ⋅ tg(α )
F  t
Mb  y
C y = C t ⋅ 1 − 
 t y = t → σy = 0 → Cy = 0
a Limos, Arenas y
Arcillas no Variación Lineal del y = 0 → σy = 0
consolidadas Coeficiente de Balasto t
b y= → σ y = σmáx.
G 2
PLANTA
 Análisis del momento reactivo lateral MS:
Método de Sulzberger

dMS = (C y ⋅ y ⋅ tg(α ) ⋅ b ⋅ dy ) ⋅ y =
= C y ⋅ b ⋅ dy ⋅ y 2 ⋅ tg(α ) =
 y
= C t ⋅ 1 −  ⋅ b ⋅ dy ⋅ y 2 ⋅ tg(α )
 t
y =t
 y 2
MS = ∫ dMS = C t ⋅ b ⋅ tg(α ) ⋅ ∫ 1 −  ⋅ y ⋅ dy =
Y =0 
t
 y3 t 1 y 4 t  b ⋅ t3
= C t ⋅ b ⋅ tg(α ) − ⋅ = ⋅ C t ⋅ tg(α )
 3 0 t 4 0 12
b ⋅ t3
MS = ⋅ C t ⋅ tg(α ) Momento de inercia del diagrama de
carga respecto del eje de giro del fondo
12
 Análisis del momento reactivo lateral MS:
Método de Sulzberger

Cuando H consume la resistencia de fricción de fondo, el eje de giro se

traslada desde el fondo, hasta y = t/3.
En este momento lo que no soporta la fricción de fondo lo toma el
diagrama de reacción lateral.
t b ⋅ t3
⋅ C t ⋅ tg(α )
t
F = µ ⋅ G = R ⇒ MS = R ⋅ = µ ⋅ G ⋅ =
2 2 12

6⋅ µ ⋅G Este valor de a1 se analiza respecto de la

tg(α1 ) =
b ⋅ Ct ⋅ t 2 deformación límite tg a1 = 0,01

b ⋅ t3
MS = ⋅ C t ⋅ tg(α )
36
 Análisis del momento reactivo lateral MS:
Método de Sulzberger

→ tg(α1 ) > tg(α ) = 0,01

b ⋅ t3
Eje de Giro en el fondo MS = ⋅ C t ⋅ tg(α ) tg a=0,01
12

→ tg(α1 ) < tg(α ) = 0,01

b ⋅ t3
Eje de Giro en y = t/3 MS = ⋅ C t ⋅ tg(α ) tg a=0,01
36

Eje de Giro en el fondo Mexterno = H ⋅ (h + t )

 2 
Eje de Giro en y = t/3 Mexterno = H ⋅  h + ⋅ t 
 3 
Análisis del momento reactivo de fondo Mb:
Método de Sulzberger

→ λ0 > λ'

a a a  (λ + λ') + 2 ⋅ (λ0 − λ' )

S= −C = − ⋅ 0 =
2 2 3  (λ0 + λ' ) + (λ0 − λ') 
a a  3 ⋅ λ0 − λ'  a  λ' 
= − ⋅   = − a ⋅  0,5 −  =
2 3  2 ⋅ λ0  2  6 ⋅ λ0 
a2
⋅ tg(α )
a ⋅ λ' 2 a 3 ⋅ b ⋅ Cb ⋅ tg(α )
= = =
6 ⋅ λ0 6⋅G 12 ⋅ G
a ⋅ b ⋅ Cb
a 3 ⋅ b ⋅ Cb ⋅ tg(α )
→ Mb = G ⋅ S =
12
Análisis del momento reactivo de fondo Mb:
Método de Sulzberger

→ λ0 = λ'
2⋅G
a ⋅ tg(α2 ) = 2 ⋅ λ0 =
a ⋅ b ⋅ Cb
2⋅G
→ tg(α2 ) =
a 2 ⋅ b ⋅ Cb

→ λ0 < λ'
a x
Mb = G ⋅ S' = G ⋅  −  =
2 3
a 1 2⋅G 

= G⋅ − ⋅ 
 2 3 b ⋅ Cb ⋅ tg(α ) 


a G 
→ Mb = G ⋅  − 0,47 ⋅ 
2 b ⋅ Cb ⋅ tg(α ) 
 Análisis del momento reactivo lateral Mb:
Método de Sulzberger

Gadh Colabora en la reducción de la excentricidad

que produce el tiro horizontal de los conductores.:
x = t ⋅ tg(β )

G: Área Base Mayor Pirámide Truncada

g: Área Base Menor Pirámide Truncada

Volumen Pirámide Truncada:

t
3
(
⋅ G + g+ G⋅g )
Peso suelo adherente Gadh.:
t 
Gadh. = γ S ⋅  ⋅ [a ⋅ b + (a + 2 ⋅ t ⋅ tgβ ) ⋅ (b + 2 ⋅ t ⋅ tgβ )] + g ⋅ G  − t ⋅ g
3 
b= 3º a 5º en compresión
gs= considerar valor mínimo

Si hay sumergencia: γ S = 1,00 t / m3 γ H = 1,20 t / m3 Densidad Hormigón Sumergido

 Método de Sulzberger

Momento de Fondo
tgα 2 = Mb =

2⋅G b ⋅ a3
> 0,01 ⋅ Cb ⋅ tgα
a ⋅ b ⋅ Cb
2 12

2⋅G a G 
< 0,01 G ⋅  − 0,47 ⋅ 
2 b ⋅ Cb ⋅ tgα 
a 2 ⋅ b ⋅ Cb  

Momento de Empotramiento Cb : Cte.

tgα1 = MS = Ct : Variación lineal de 0 a Ct

G : Peso Total de Fundación,
6⋅µ⋅G b⋅t 3
incluye Gadh.
> 0,01 ⋅ C t ⋅ tgα
b ⋅ t ⋅ Ct
2
12 Eje de giro en el fondo: Mexterno= H (h+t)

Eje de giro en 2/3 t: Mexterno= H (h+2/3 t)

6⋅µ⋅G b ⋅ t3
< 0,01 ⋅ C t ⋅ tgα
b ⋅ t 2 ⋅ Ct 36
 AMPLIACION E.T. LUJAN PROV. DE SAN LUIS
COEFICIENTES DE BALASTO Y TENSIONES
ADMISIBLES A COMPRESION
PROFUNDIDAD 1,50m a 2,00m

0,25m

0,50m 2
σ adm = 0,25 Kg/cm 0,66m
2
3 σ adm = 0,30 Kg/cm
0,5 Kg/cm
2
1,50m σ adm Puntual= 0,33 Kg/cm 0,7 Kg/cm
3
2
σ adm Puntual = 0,40 Kg/cm
2,00m

3
1,5 Kg/cm
3
2 1,80 Kg/cm
σ adm = 0,70 Kg/cm
3
2 2,00 Kg/cm
σ adm Puntual= 0,93 Kg/cm σ adm = 0,80 Kg/cm
2
3
2 2,4 Kg/cm
σ adm Puntual = 1,1 0 Kg/cm
 AMPLIACION E.T. LUJAN PROV. DE SAN LUIS
COEFICIENTES DE BALASTO Y TENSIONES
ADMISIBLES A COMPRESION
PROFUNDIDAD 2,50m a 3,00m

0,25m

0,83m 2
σ adm = 0,33Kg/cm 1,00m
2
σ adm = 0,50 Kg/cm
3
0,83 Kg/cm 2
2,50m σ adm Puntual= 0,40 Kg/cm 3
1,00 Kg/cm 2
σ adm Puntual = 0,66 Kg/cm
3,00m

3
2,5 Kg/cm
2
σ adm = 1,00 Kg/cm 3,00 Kg/cm
3

2
σ adm Puntual= 1,33 Kg/cm 3,00 Kg/cm
3
2
σ adm = 1,5 Kg/cm
3
2 3,6 Kg/cm
σ adm Puntual = 1,99 Kg/cm
 MOMENTO REACTIVO DE BASE M b [tm] MOMENTO REACTIVO DE EMPOTRAMIENTO M S [tm]

tg α 2 = 2∗∗ GT / (a2∗ b∗∗ cb) tg α 1 = 6∗∗ µ∗ GT / (b∗∗ t2∗ ct)

tg α 2 = 0.00572 tg α 1 = 0.00107

tg α 2 > 0,01 M b =(b∗∗ a3∗ cb∗ tagα

α ) / 12 tg α 1 > 0,01 M s =(b∗∗ t3∗ ct∗ tagα
α ) / 12
Mb = No corresponde Ms = No corresponde

tg α 2 < 0,01 M b=GT∗ [ (0,5∗∗ a)-0,47∗∗ (GT/( b∗∗ cb∗ tagα

α ) ) ] tg α 1 < 0,01 M s =(b∗
0,5 3
∗ t ∗ ct∗ tagα
α ) / 36
M b = 1.399 M s = 9.77
FUNDACION INTERRUPTORES a [m]= 0.90 N [ton]= 1.350
N b [m]= 0.90 Q [ton]= 0.95
Mf Q t [m]= 2.50 Mf [tm]= 4.40
s
s [m]= 0.25 GT [ton]= 6.25
L
β L [m]= 1.00 Mf pto giro[tm]= 5.983
2t/3
γ horm D [m]= 0.35 M s [tm] = 9.766
t 3
γs cb [t/m ]= 3000 M b [tm] = 1.399
GT
ct [t/m3]= 2500 Ms+Mb = 11.165
Ct
µ µ= 0.40 Ms/Mb = 6.98
Cb
β [G sex.]= 0
do
GIRO=( Mserv/(Ms+Mb) ) ∗ 0,01 = 0.005359
3
a γ s [t/m ]= 1.60 Fs m in = 1.50
γ horm [t/m ]= 2.20
3
Fs real = 1.87
tag β = 0.00000 σh t/3 [Kg/cm2]= 3.72
b D a+(2t∗∗ tag β ) = 0.900 σh a t [Kg/cm2]= 11.16
∗ tag β ) = 0.900
b+(2t∗ σv a t [Kg/cm2]= 11.52
3
Ghorm [ton]= 4.90 Volumen de excavacion [m ]= 2.025
3
Gsuelo [ton]= 0.00 Volumen de Hormigon [m ] = 2.131
 N= 0.15 ton Solicitaciones finales

(
W = B ∗ L ∗ H + s f ∗ 2.4 = 3.686 )
M= 1.10 tm
( + W ) [ton] = 3.836
η = K = 0.80
( )
H

Q= 0.30 ton K V M +Q∗ H + s f = 1.82

3
x max Suelo Kh = 1500 t/m sf = 0.40 m Valores Auxiliares
α 3
H 
4 ∗η ∗   = 50
p1  L 

6 ∗η ∗ H 2
E1 = 37.5
W H = 2.00 m L3
2H/3 6 ∗η ∗ H 2
e = 0.735
L + 4 ∗η ∗ H 3
3
R
α pm in 3
N pm ax Suelo B ∗ L = 0.034
+ arcilloso 12
W CL
B ∗ H 3 1.707
4 ∗η ∗ =
12
3
suelo Kv = 1875 t/m
L
e ≤ = 0.13
6
L= 0.80 m Cáculos

e=
[ (
M + Q∗ H + s f )] ∗ 1
= 0.009
+W  H 
3

1+ 4∗η∗  
B= 0.80 m   L 
 
6 ∗η ∗ H 2
E1 = 3
* ( + W ) ∗ e = 1.338
L

[
R = M +Q∗ H + s f ∗( )] 6 ∗η ∗ H 2
−Q = 1.038
L 3 + 4 ∗η ∗ H 3
 L + 4 ∗η ∗ H

tgα =
[ (
M + Q∗ H + s f )] = 0.00056
 B ∗ L 3   B ∗ H 3 
∗
Kv    +  4 ∗ η ∗ 
  
 12   12 
p1 =
[ (
η ∗ M +Q∗ H + s f ∗H )] = 1.673
= H ∗ tgα =  B∗L   
 +  4 ∗η ∗ B ∗ H 
x 0.001 3 3
max 
 12   12 
  

( + W ) ∗ 1 +  6 ∗ e  = ( + W ) ∗ 1 −  6 ∗ e  =
p max =    p min =  
L 
6.413 5.576
B∗ L   B∗L  L 
 

( L
)
Verif = p max + p min ∗ ∗ B =3.8364
2